Mary's ancestry has not been found to my knowledge.
It is likely they were married in England before coming to America. However,
it is also possible Mary and James married after coming, especially if
James came as an apprentice to John Brown as is speculated.
A search of families surrounding the Phips' home
site near Woolwich may yield Mary's ancestry as it was common for neighbors
and families to migrate in groups. Search
the families of Hayward, Hammond, Cole and Brown to start with.
MARY was born in England2, and
died Aft. February 19, 1703/04 in Maine3. She married
(1) JAMES PHIPPS Bef. 1636 in Bristol, England4, son of WILLIAM
PHIPPS and ELIZABETH. She married (2) JOHN
WHITE5 Bef. 1661 in Kennebec township, Maine6,
son of NICHOLAS WHITE and DEBORAH FORD. 5 - 8 more children
by 2nd marriage? On October 04, 1679, she and husband White deeded
Jeremisquam Neck, Maine to Sir William Phipps7
Sir Wm. Phipps' legatee, Mary, claimed the tract--"Cherysequamy
Neck (sp)"--"as by deed from John White and Mary, his wife, formerly the
wife of James Phipps of Kennebeck deceased; dated Oct. 4, 1679." [Me. H.
and G. Reg. VIII, 202.]
She married (3) HOWARD - wish I knew who he was!
On February 19, 1703/04, her daughter in law Mary
Sargent (Mary Spencer Hull Phipps Sargent) willed her 10# annuity8
Reverend Cotton Mather
began the tale of Mary and James Phips' family of 26 children when he wrote
Pietas in Patrium: Life of His Excellency Sir William Phips, Knt. in 1697.
The tale perpetuates to this day. Although there were large families known
of in New England during those years, it is highly unlikely that one woman
produced 26 children in one marriage, and then another 5-8 children in
a second marriage!
Especially given the fact that of the supposed
26 children of James and Mary, only 6 children have ever been named.
Also consider that if James Phips was born between 1606-1612, and married
at the age of 22 (an average marriageable age for a man in that day), the
marriage of James and Mary would have taken place between 1628 and 1634.
James was dead by 1654, leaving 20-26 years in which he could have fathered
the 26 children! Unless there were several multiple births it is
clearly impossible given the time factor alone.
I would like to submit that it could have been
possible for Mary to have parented 26 children - but not 26 biological
children. It is possible that of her 3 marriages there were 26 natural
and step children, making her 'mother' to all.
A WORK IN PROGRESS!
If you have comments or suggestions, e-mail me at walkers@vaix.net