Search billions of records on Ancestry.com
   


                                                           
   
     
      D Y S #   C  
    O  
    3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 U  
    9 9 9 9 8 8 2 8 3 8 9 8 5 5 5 5 5 4 3 4 4 6 6 6 6 N  
    3 0 4 1 5 5 6 8 9 9 2 9 8 9 9 5 4 7 7 8 9 4 4 4 4 T  
  VINES Haplo-       R  
  Name group   19   a b   1   2   a b   a b c d Y  
  Wilts1  
  Fred N 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30 17 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 29 14 14 14 14 OZ  
  Ron N 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30 17 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 29 14 14 14 14 OZ  
  Paul N 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30 17 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 30 14 14 14 14 OZ  
  Arthur * N 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30 17 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 29 14 14 14 14 UK  
  Francis * N 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30 17 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 29 14 14 14 14 UK  
  Sam M. # N 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30 17 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 29 14 14 14 14 US  
  Ont1 R1b 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 0 13 13 29 16 9 9 11 11 24 15 19 30 15 16 16 17 US  
  Good documentation in Wilts1 family lineage but 17/25 mismatches. One of this male line's forbears adopted into Vines  
  name since 1757, the marriage of Charles and Mary. Further tests required to determine the identity.  
  Sam M. has Wilts1 genetics. Surname change due to unrecorded adoption, both families lived in same area.  
     
  Vines/ L.  
  Joe R1b 13 24 14 11 11 11 12 12 11 13 13 30 16 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 31 16 16 17 17 US    
  Edward R1b 13 24 14 11 11 11 12 12 11 13 13 30 16 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 30 16 16 17 17 US  
  Roger L.# R1b 13 24 14 11 11 11 12 12 11 13 13 30 16 9 10 11 11 25 14 19 30 16 16 17 17 US  
  Ancestor of Joe and Edward died about 1780. His widow remarried to a Vines with name change for children.  
  Ancestor of Roger L. retained family name, but genetic relationship of all three is shown by Y chromosome DNA.  
 
  Unmatched  
  Leics1  
  Tony R1b 13 25 14 11 11 13 12 12 12 13 14 29 16 9 10 11 11 25 15 18 31 15 16 16 17 UK  
  Ga1  
  Bill R1b 14 24 14 11 10 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 17 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 16 17 US  
  Va1  
  Derek 14 22 15 10 16 17 11 13 12 12 12 30 17 9 9 11 11 25 15 21 29 13 14 15 17 US  
  La1  
  Tim R1b 13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 13 13 28 US  
   
  Note: All surnames are Vines except the two marked * which are Vine, and those marked #   
   
  Mismatches  
  Families Wilts1 Vines-L. Leics1 Ga1 Va1 La1  
  25 markers Vines-L. 17  
  " Leics1 15 9  
  " Ga1 14 10 9  
  " Va1 16 19 18 15  
  12 markers La1 7 3 5 5 12  
  25 markers Ont1 17 7 8 8 19 3  
   
  As a general rule to indicate relationship, mismatches should not be more than 2 in the 25 marker tests.  
  Any mismatches at all in the 12 marker test indicates a need to extend testing to 25 markers.  
  The 12 marker test is an excellent way to disprove a continuous male line relationship in the last 1000 years.  
  These test results have defined 2 Vines or Vine families in UK and 5 families in Nth America