Search billions of records on Ancestry.com
   
 
Discussion of Y DNA tests 12 April 2003
The DNA molecule is like a ladder which has been twisted. The rungs are formed of pairs of "bases" composed of combinations of adenine (A), thymine (T), cytosine (C), and guanine (G), eg GATA.

Short Tandem Repeat (STR) are short sequences of DNA that are repeated numerous times in a head to tail manner. The sequence of "gatagatagatagata" would represent 4 repeats of the sequence "gata", or 4 rungs of the ladder which are the same. The numbers given for the results of our tests are thus like so many rungs of the ladder at each marker position.

These numbers of repeats are constant from generation to generation but, at each marker position, do change randomly by reducing or increasing  by one, about once every 500 generations on average. Taking a generation as 25 years a change or mutation would occur about every 12,500 years. If you look at 25 markers you would expect to find 1 mutation every 20 generations, 500years.

If a man has 2 sons, he could have 10 generations of descendants in 250 years on those 2 branches. Looking at the last 2 on each branch they are 20 generations apart, ie both are 10 back to the common ancestor. When we test their DNA we can expect their numbers to be all the same except at one marker which is different by 1. However because of the random nature (plus or minus) and timing we wouldn't be surprised if they were the same or different by 1 or 2.

Our Results of Y DNA Tests (red figures indicate mismatches with Joes results)
    Marker    Tim    Joe    Fred
1    393        13    13        14
2    390        23    24      23
3    19          14    14        14
4    391        11    11        11
5    385a      11    11        11
6    385b     14    11       13
7    426        12    12        11
8    388        12    12        12
9    439        11    11        10
10  389/1     13    13        14
11  392        13    13        14
12  389/2    28    30        30
13  458                16        17
14  459a                9         9
15  459b              10         9
16  455                11        11
17  454                11        12
18  447                25        25
19  437                15        14
20  448                19        19
21  449                31        29
22  464a              17        15
23  464b              17        15
24  464c              18        15
25  464d              18        15

Total differences from Joe: Tim = 3 mismatches with a total difference of 6 mutations from 12 markers. 
Fred = 16 mismatches and a total difference of 24 mutations from 25 markers
Its quite obvious we are not close genetically, well beyond the time range during which the paternal hereditary surname system has been used.

Haplogroup.
Atlantic Modal Haplotype (AMH):  the descriptive term used by Dr James F. Wilson to characterize the most common haplotype in parts of Europe. Joe is spot on in this group, typical of western Europe. Tim is only 1 mutation off.
Fred is way off the AMH.
Marker AMH Tim  Joe   Fred
19       14     14     14      14
388     12     12     12      12
390     24     23     24      23
391     11     11     11      11
392     13     13     13      14
393     13     13     13      14

Red figures show the mutations from the AMH. It is obvious that Freds haplotype is quite unlike the AMH. It is more typical of Northern Europe and has been found commonly in northern Russia and the Saami people (Lapland), some in Finland Sweden Norway. Could it have come from a Viking? FTDNA say it looks like he is in Group N but it would require more testing to confirm.

European Y STR Database
This database contains  results from 12,802 Y DNA tests on Caucasian people from all over Europe. It allows inspection of geographical origins of other peoples with the same test results at 9 common markers, namely 393, 390, 19, 391, 385a, 385b, 389i, 392, and 389ii. This permits the formation of "haplogroups".
http://ystr.charite.de/index_kl.html
Tim's results showed 37 matches in the database. For a list of match locations and a map see:
http://ystr.charite.de/map/big_map.html?ranint=94197
The numbered red dots show locations of people with the same figures as Tim for the markers named above.
Joe's results had 4 matches in the database.
http://ystr.charite.de/map/big_map.html?ranint=62124
Fred had 24 matches, including 11 in Finland, 5 in Estonia and 3 in Sweden.
http://ystr.charite.de/map/big_map.html?ranint=26646
This database will mean more in years to come, as more results are posted to it.

Where to from here?
We all need tests from other volunteers for further comparison. Known second, third or fourth cousins would be ideal to establish the haplotypes for each line. At the moment we are waiting on Rons results (from Melbourne, OZ)  to confirm a common ancestor with Fred. If they are the same we will have established one Wiltshire Vines haplotype back to the mid 1700s. There will be others where adoptions and false paternity in the records has occurred.
Fred Vines 12th April 2003

Arthur & Frank Vine UK Tests 20th April 03

The results of Arthur and Frank Vine's tests surprised us all. Not only did they match each other, proving a family line divergence in early 1800s, but unexpectedly matched with Fred. This means that they all have a common ancestor in the Grittenham Wiltshire family of Vines. At the moment this family is confirmed as descendants of Benjamin Vines and Elizabeth Smith who married at Nailsworth Gloucestershire, near Stroud, on 26 Sep 1717. Benjamin was born 18 Apr 1689; his parents are believed to have been John Vines, possibly 1667?-c1715?, and wife Christian. 
Arthur and Franks line come from either a brother of Benjamin or from one of Benjamins sons, John 1720, Charles 1722, Peter 1724 or William 1729. Freds line is well established as from Edward 1725, the other son of Benjamin.
Further detective work on the birth, death and marriage records are required to determine the exact genealogy of Arthur and Franks lines. If Rons results, due in about a week, also match we will declare it as a prominent haplotype of the Wiltshire Vines.

The name Vines and Vine is often interchanged. Indeed my milkman usually refers to me as Mr Vine! However I still believe that there is a major Vine line in southern England genetically distinct from the Wilts./Glos. Vines.
The family of Benjamin and Elizabeth has only recently been uncovered from a study of their 1760s wills

Haplogroup
 Haplogroups are a classification of test results according to the origins of the test participants. These have been determined from long-isolated populations and/or statistical geographic concentrations. My results (Fred) were accompanied by a note from FTDNA that they appeared to be in Haplogroup N. I will take the further test to confirm this; it is  performed at slower mutating markers than used for the standard Y DNA test and can thus detect older relationships. Group N is common in northern Europe and Asia and reflects ancient and pre-historic population movements. 
Fred Vines 19 April 2003

Ron Vines of Melbourne, 12 Marker Results 30th April 2003

Only the results from the first 12 markers have been received, apparently the tests on the rest are being repeated.
So far Rons test indicates a common ancestor with Fred and Arthur & Frank Vine. The latter pairs common Wiltshire ancestor lived in the late 1700s and may be from the family of Benjamin and Elizabeth Vines of Grittenham or from one of the sons of John and Christian. No mutations have so far been seen for these 4 participants. See the interim tree of Grittenham Vines.
Fred Vines 30 Apr 03

Ron Vines

Rons results are now complete showing a perfect 25/25 match with Fred and Arthur and Frank Vine. The search is on to trace the most recent common ancestor in North Wiltshire to these four.
 
 

Back