Design
and layout
Access
to the site was obtained in December 1949 and the first meeting of the
founder members of the staff was held in one of the first floor bedrooms
of the house. At that time the estate looked rather untidy to say the least.
Only one half of the house had been occupied by Mr Perkins, the previous
owner, who had build a wall through the middle of the house, from north
to south, and is said at one stage to have tried to sell half of the house
as semi-detached "with share of large grounds". The other side of the house
was in an incredibly sorry mess, broken windows, doors hanging off and
inches of dirt, dust and cobwebs everywhere. Some features of the house
suggested some unusual characteristics in former owners. The windows of
the principal bedroom and bathroom on the first floor were protected by
iron gates similar to those on an old fashioned lift, while the W.C. in
the bathroom was on a raised platform in the window and commanded an extensive
view of the south lawn. The grounds had obviously been a showpiece at one
time, but had not been tended for years. The remains of three hard tennis
courts could just be seen to the north of The Grove house. North
west
of The Grove was an old coach house & stables which was in ruins, this
was immediately roped off and labeled 'DANGEROUS'. All of the roads were
gravel, not tarmac. At that time squatters were likely to take possession
of any unoccupied house and George Mulvey, who was to be responsible for
physical security ( and ultimately live in a flat at the gate house, later
to become offices for the Personnel Department, at later still in the 1990's the Social Club
Bar. ) undertook to guard the house against squatters over Christmas.
By this time those who were to run the new laboratory had learned for the first time that it was to be an Agency of the Ministry of Supply controlled like those that had applied to shadow factories during the second world war. An immediate consequence was a requirement for a "brochure" setting out everything that would be required from buildings, laboratory equipment and machine tools to knives, forks and spoons for the canteen. Each item had to be approved before it could be purchased and the Ministry insisted on supplying some items, such as cars, from Government stocks. Fortunately the civil servant principally concerned, Walter Abson, was extremely intelligent and understanding and the preparation and gradual approval of the brochure, though laborious, went smoothly except for the part which dealt with buildings. Here the Architects Branch of the Ministry had to give its approval to plans, tenders and carrying out of the work.
Robert Clayton was principally responsible for the site layout and personally designed the layout of the individual buildings, using a centimeter graph paper at a scale of one division to a foot. The layout of the site and the design of the buildings were governed by a number of factors and went through a number of stages, An attempt was made to minimize intrusion on the locality and to have a layout with open spaces and lawns, consistent with the Green Belt environment. Two single story laboratory blocks, one on the north and one on the south of the house, were proposed: a two and eventually three story laboratory block was to go on the site of the derelict coach house in the north west corner. A north-lit workshop block with adjoining two story drawing office was proposed to go along a sunken rose garden in the south west corner. The house was to be used for conference rooms, library, management and administration. Supplies were to be located in the boiler house and sub-station alongside the house, connected by a tunnel to the other buildings. A stores building was to be built close to the main gate for minimum entry by suppliers vehicles and a canteen in a loop in the security fence so that it could be inside during working hours and outside for social events in the evenings and weekends. One factor affecting the layout was a tulip tree in the middle of the south lawn said to be rare and important. It was duly protected, but not much later died from natural causes and was ceremonially replaced with a fir tree, the plaque when they planted the new tree is still in place today.
The
original proposal of the Ministry was that as many buildings as possible
should be "Ministry of Works Huts" because they had them in stock and there
was also a requirement to use as little steel as possible. The GEC constructional
engineer, then located at the Wembley estate alongside the Wembley laboratories,
designed the new buildings to Robert Clayton's plans, in brick, glass and
concrete which mostly used no steel and were no more expensive than the
Ministry of Works Huts. This was accepted by the Ministry and a pleasant
appearance for the site was ensured.
A
letter dated 7th December 1949 estimated the provisional building
work to cost £248,103.
![]() |
![]() |
|
| The Grove House being prepared c1950. | The Grove House being prepared c1950. | |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Building North Block Laboratory c1950 | Building North Block Laboratory c1950 | |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Building North Block Laboratory c1950 | Building North Block Laboratory c1950 | |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Building South Block Laboratory c1950 | Building South Block Laboratory c1950 | |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Building South Block Laboratory c1950 | Building South Block Laboratory c1950; | |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Building South Block Laboratory c1950 | Building South Block Laboratory c1950 | |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Building South Block Laboratory c1950 | Building South Block Laboratory c1950 | |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Building 5, Workshops, Design Office and Surgury c1950 | Building 5, Workshops, Design Office and Surgury c1950 | |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Building 5, Workshops, Design Office and Surgury c1950 | North East Annexe and Temporary Buildings c1950 |