
John Shakespeare
The 'King's Bitmaker'
|
Our information on this John Shakespeare comes from
Charlotte Stopes 'Shakespeare's Family'
Chapter XIV London Shakespeares
(p 146-9). Here she describes her confusion on finding what later turned
out to be two different but contemporary John Shakespeares in the capital.
It is interesting to follow her lines of deduction as she traces the two
distinct John Shakespeares (the other one being John Shakespeare 'of St
Martin's in the Fields'). The 'King's Bitmaker' was an extremely wealthy man, whose son and namesake succeeded him as a bitmaker, but, strangely, his widow, Mary, named their daughter Ellen, the wife of John Milburne, as her heir in her will. It is here, perhaps interesting to note that Mary's maiden name was Gotheridge, and that Stopes lists a number of her family who may provide clues for further research: she had a sister Anne, whose married name was Brewer, and an un-named brother, who had a daughter Sarah (Gotheridge) whose married name was Richardson. What Was A Bitmaker? In it's simplest explanation a bit was the metal part of a horse's bridle. However, given the huge prices quoted by Stopes for examples of John's work, this here seems too simplistic - not only must there have been considerable leatherwork involved (and here we have connections with, for example, the Poet's father ( a glover) and John Shakespeare, the Stratford 'Shoemaker - workers in leather, and both, for their time, quite wealthy men), but there was probably ornamentation in precious metals or jewels. Who Was John? Stopes suggested that this John was the son of Thomas Shakespeare, of Snitterfield, an idea that Sir Edmund Chambers dismisses as 'guesswork.' However, this idea should not be put aside so lightly: there were very few John Shakespeares alive at this point in history, and as has already been shown, a number of them were 'leatherworkwers.' What is intriguing - and this is what probably drew Stopes to the idea - is that Thomas Shakespeare of Snitterfield had a brother Anthony, and among the children of the bitmaker is another Anthony, only the third of this name known to history, and extremely rare among the few dozen Shakespeares known to be alive, or have lived at this time. The only other occurrence of this name is the Anthony Shakespeare of Wroxall, now thought to be the ancestor of the Snitterfield Shakespeare's. The Bitmaker's Family John Shakespeare, the 'King's Bitmaker,' married Mary Gotheridg at St Clements Danes, 3 Feb 1604/5 - she was described as 'of The Strand.' John was later buried at the same church, on the 27th January 1633. They had the following children:
The eldest son, also John Shakespeare, and his wife Margaret (nee Edwards) also left descendants:
Here then we have a probable reason for the widow, Mary (nee Gotheridge) making her daughter her heir: the children of her only other surviving child, John, were probably all dead, with the possible exception of the Mary Shakespeare who married Thomas Allon. So here we have yet another Shakespeare line which comes, like a number of others, to a dead end, having no male descendants, but it is still interesting to speculate as to the origins of 'The King's Bitmaker.' |
|
Notes
|
|
See Also: |