| |
Even
as the literary circles of which he was a part began to break
up, either through the death or removal to parts distant of
the parties concerned or actual disintegration of the purposes
that had brought them together (societies among friends were
frowned upon by Nicholas I’s policemen), Evgeny began to involve
himself in various publishing schemes, such as the Moscow
Telegraph and Delvig’s Literary Gazette. He made new friends
and in them found havens in which to shelter his fractured
world-view (despite the continued tendency of some of those
friends to characterize Evgeny as "the Marquis"
and his orderly, classical verses "unromantic").39
Moscow
did provide Evgeny the opportunity to mix with the Romanticist
writers, critics and philosophers known as the "Lyubomudry"
the "Wisdom Lovers" whose inspiration was the "art
comes from Nature" beliefs of Friedrich von Schelling.
Perhaps most famous for a single aphorism, "Architecture
is frozen music," Schelling believed that God exists
in Nature, and that without Nature, there is no God. In a
version of pantheism, Schelling saw the entire universe suffused
with godliness, in which anybody at one with Nature is perforce
at one with God.40
This
system of belief struck a familiar chord for Boratynski, who
for all his rational, "French" mindset possessed
the necessary love of nature and passivity of personality
to welcome a philosophy that seemed based on unification of
art with the infinite. If architecture was frozen music, a
tree was a poem writing itself upon earth’s page, a poet a
seed planted in the mind of God. This was a metaphoric world
in which Boratynski was fully at home.
Evgeny
was not completely won over by Schelling’s philosophy, or
what Russian enthusiasts made of it, but it consoled him in
his increasing sensation of being separated from his fellow
man, more and more out of step with them while more and more
in tune with nature’s music. The verse he published during
this period (exclusive of his verse tales, The Ball
and The Gipsy Girl), showed great stylistic maturity,
an atmosphere Prince Mirsky describes as "dryer and clearer"
than could be found in any other Russian poet’s work of the
period. To get the gist of this atmosphere, Mirsky refers
the English reader to Alexander Pope. Boratynski’s is "poetry
of thought", adds Mirsky, stating that he was perhaps
the one 19th century poet who went farthest using pure thought
as his material.41
Compression and concentration of ideas increased the chances
that Evgeny’s verses would be difficult to understand, particularly
in an age when such tentative Impressionism was only just
beginning to stir in art. What Boratynski himself admitted
he liked most about Schelling’s thought was not so much the
philosophy itself, as he wrote Pushkin in 1826, but the poetry
of it.42
Like many true lovers of mathematics, Evgeny could see the
beauty of form, the rhythmic life behind cold numbers. Schelling’s
philosophy went far toward validating thoughts and feelings
Evgeny had pondered most of his life. Unfortunately, Nicholas
I’s paranoia posed too great a strain and the "Wisdom-Lovers"
broke up.
The
one strong personality from this period left for Evgeny was
Ivan Kireevsky, whose periodical, "The European",
founded in 1832, palpated the edge of the Slavophilism soon
to blanket Russia by stressing the inborn spiritualism believed
to exist in the Russian nation and contrasting it with the
burgeoning industrialism and rationalism of western Europe.
It was a rejection of materialism and a belief in the inborn
gifts of every man, serf or master, which would become ingrained
in several future Boratynskis. Always attracted to charismatic
people, Evgeny was drawn to the six years’ younger Kireevsky
as to a soul-mate: here was someone with whom he could share
all his thoughts and feelings, without reserve, someone he
could trust and trust did not come easily to the analytical
Boratynski.
During
the next ten years, Evgeny worked for the Moscow Herald, and
for its replacement, the Moscow Observer Nicholas I had shut
down the first journal after a few issues. Kireevsky’s "European"
lasted barely longer than the Herald, being closed by the
government soon after its first appearance. Distracted by
these censor-foiled publications, and unable to stay in one
place for very long, Evgeny was now in Moscow, at the house
he purchased in Bol’shaya Spiridonievskaya Street, now at
Mara, and spending more and more time on estates of the Engelgardt
family.
One
of these, Muranovo, became his and Nastenka’s own on the death
of her father in 1836. Originally the property of Nastenka’s
mother, Muranovo was a small property, in the south-eastern
corner of which stood a single story house. There Nastenka’s
father, General Engelgardt, dictated his memoirs of the reigns
of Catherine the Great, Paul I and Alexander I (not published
until 1859), starting a chain of "literary occupancy"
that would persist at Muranovo until 1918.43
Evgeny
replaced the original small dwelling with a two-story, rectangular
structure, sitting atop a gentle slope surrounded by his beloved
trees. It was here, in the solitude of the estate’s forests
and fields, that Evgeny grew both closer to nature and more
pessimistic in his appraisal of the affairs of men. (Considering
how seriously threatened Muranovo’s pond and forests are today
by Moscow’s creeping suburban sprawl, Evgeny would probably
come to the same conclusions about mankind were he alive now.)
He even wrote to Prince Viazemsky that "the time of subjective
poetry has passed." As if echoing this privately held
belief, when Evgeny’s second collection of poetry was published
in 1835 it had no success with either public or critics. He
contributed nothing to the Observer after that year, and watched
its slow demise, beginning with increased surveillance by
the censors in 1836, and the journal’s takeover by Bakunin
and Belinsky in 1838. Like so many others, it disappeared
soon after.
Changes
were occurring between Evgeny and Kireevsky, who was turning
more zealously toward Slavophile beliefs which Evgeny could
not share. In 1831, his old friend from Petersburg, Anton
von Delvig, died (his widow later married Evgeny’s brother
Sergei, of Mara, with whom it was rumored she had already
been carrying on an affaire). And in 1837, Alexander
Pushkin got himself killed in a duel in St. Petersburg with
a talentless dandy, Baron Georges d’Anthès de Heckeren,
whom the poet had rightly suspected of having designs on his
beautiful but immature wife, Natalia.
Pushkin
had certainly lost more friends than gained them during his
sad last years, married to the maddeningly impecunious Natalia,
writing under Nicholas I’s heavy thumb, accepting and attempting
to carry out court gentleman duties humiliating for an artist
of his stature but necessary for Natalia to gain access to
the imperial soirées. Yet one would have hoped that
Boratynski would have kept in touch with his old friend and
literary champion. For killing Russia’s greatest poet, handsome
Heckeren was deported from Russia, where he was wined and
dined as a quasi-celebrity, ending up as the founder of the
Paris Gas Company. According to a letter reproduced in part
in Henri Troyat’s Pushkin biography, Evgeny tried to visit
his friend Heckeren while the latter was under arrest, but
was prevented by the guard.44
|
|
In
the last decade of his own life, Evgeny seems to become a living
personification of German Romantic painter Caspar David Friedrich’s
famed picture of a solitary man facing down nature, "Wanderer
Above a Sea of Fog" [1818].
A
Russian critic, writing in 1907, described Boratynski as having
less to do with Byron than with Hamlet 45,
and if any Russian poet ever struggled over whether to be
or not to be, it was Boratynski. A long way from his days
of posing as the "Finnish exile", his was now a
spirit virtually shattered by its enduring inability to find
in the greater world a niche to call his own, a place to stand
and be heard. Rumors went the rounds that, holed up at Muranovo,
Evgeny fell to drowning his sorrows in alcohol.
Indeed,
as modern Boratynski biographer L. I. Ginzburg shrewdly points
out, the Russian Schellingites were not by definition bothered
by the divide between poet and society. But this division
proved spiritually destructive for Boratynski, coloring his
last published verses with a sense of alienation of man and
nature, apocalyptic prophecies of the death of art, and perhaps
subconscious fears that the way of life which had bred him
and most of his fellow poets of the 1820’s secluded, classical,
ruminative estate life was coming to an end.
We
can fairly say that while art has managed to hold up under
some severe demagogic tortures during the past century, two
thirds of Evgeny’s prediction came true. The long eighteenth
century longer in Russia than elsewhere was over. In the wake
of its demise came Alexander II’s laudable but badly planned
freeing of the serfs in 1861, which did as much bad as good
for both former serfs and landowners. The estates, which had
been small but effective cells of culture all their own, the
nurturers of nearly every important creative talent of which
Russia could boast for two hundred years, were losing their
raison d’être. As they faded, there was nothing
with which to replace them. As Evgeny’s old friend Kireevsky
wrote in an essay called "The Nineteenth Century",
popular consensus was that the age of poetry was gone "pragmatic
enterprises" now took precedence, along with a cold,
prosaic emphasis on purely industrial progress.46
Where
was the soul in all of this? One sees the results in a writer
like Nikolai Gogol (who, significantly enough, thought Boratynski
a morbid moper).47
A petty nobleman bred on a small estate, who upon moving to
Petersburg tried his hand at several different "trades"
acting, bureaucracy, teaching Gogol found his true métier
in satirical writings that catalogue the wounds of his soul,
and men’s wounding actions upon all souls.
Having
long before declined to polish up his pessimism with satire,
Evgeny Boratynski chose to retreat to his own ground, turning
his face against even poetry to shore up nature by planting
trees on his estate. (Some of these still exist at Muranovo.)
Yet even this he recorded in a poem, "On the Plantation
of a Forest", written a year before his death, and in
his poems, "The Last Death" and "The Last Poet".
In the latter, Boratynski seems to paint a self-portrait:
A lone poet stands on an ocean cliff, the laughter of an uncomprehending
world ringing in his ears. Like Sappho, the poet who leapt
to her death in the sea, Boratynski’s poet seems to ponder
the inevitability of suicide for a poetic soul lost in a purely
utilitarian world.
Yet
it is "The Last Death" which makes the greatest
impact on our modern sensibilities, dealing as it does with
a modern problem: Man’s thoughtless exploitation of nature,
his ruination of its sacredness. In three separate visions
the poet sees the world first as a glowing garden, populated
by happy beings who had calmed the oceans with "artificial
islands" and conquered the heavens with "invented
wings" (both of which sound curiously like the ocean
liners and jet planes of the distant future). The poet gazes
upon a world where seasons are summoned at will, where man
gets exactly what he wants from nature. In a second vision,
mankind has become sated, lazy, and fruitless with the abundance
it forced from nature, careless of replacing what it has taken.
The third vision is like a scene from Revelations. Here the
poet witnesses the disintegration of "the last families"
of the world, decayed like crumbling temples on the frontiers,
sees the ruined cities and shepherdless, starving cattle wandering
in search of food. What can follow this but the silent Götterdämmerung
of an earth which has cleansed itself of godless humankind,
reverting to its old, wild splendors?
As
if sensing that the past was slipping away fast, in 1840 Boratynski
began to travel back in time, making his first return to Petersburg
in fifteen years. The old Petersburgian magic enthralled him
as he visited old friends Zhukovsky, Prince Viazemsky (who
was to live on and die, forgotten and embittered, in the 1870’s),
his brother-in-law Nikolai Putyata as well as meeting the
darkly Romantic Lermontov for the first time. Evgeny went
back to Moscow intent on moving to St. Petersburg in the near
future. He also prepared for his long-awaited "pilgrimage"
to Europe, where, as he wrote his mother, he wanted to see
Schelling’s Munich, "the Athens of Germany". He
was farther than ever from the Slavophilism that was infiltrating
the art and politics of Russia.
Evgeny’s
last collection of verse was, hauntingly enough, titled "Twilight".
On its publication in 1842, "Twilight", when greeted
with any reaction at all, was described as a "ghost"
appearing among the astonished living, who were puzzled as
to what it could want from its descendants.48
By
this time, Boratynski had made up his mind: First the European
pilgrimage, then the move from Moscow to St. Petersburg.
In
that most European of Russian cities, poised on the edge of
an empire transforming itself as a temple of retrogressive
Slavdom, did Evgeny expect his melancholy voice to be heard
with more understanding? Would the Neva, reflecting back the
architectural confetti of Baroque palaces and the endless
silver plains of the sky, have helped him decide whether to
be or not to be, a suffering Hamlet forever on the periphery
of life, or simply persuaded him to leave his tortures behind
for the serenity of finally belonging?
Evgeny,
Nastenka, and their elder children left for France in September
of 1843, and by November were in Paris. The poet’s dream of
pilgrimage seemed to be coming true. While in the city of
bourgeois King Louis-Philippe and elegant courtesan Marie
Dupleissis,
|
|
(La
dame aux caméllias), Evgeny met a constellation
of famed French writers, including Prosper Merimée
(already one of many admirers of the future Empress Eugénie),
Charles Nodier, and Alphonse de Lamartine.
It
is not known whether Evgeny’s path crossed that of the Marquis
de Custine, whose Russia in 1839, a scathing critique
of Nicholas I’s empire that sounds more like a journey through
the Russia of Joseph Stalin in 1939, was published in Paris
this year. Astolphe and Evgeny would have had much to share
on that score.
|
Evgeny Boratynski's gravestone

Courtesy
of the Ilyin family archive
|
These
years leading up to the 1848 revolution were artistically
full of promise: Wordsworth was England’s Poet Laureate, Tennyson
had published his "Morte d’Arthur", Mendelssohn’s
shimmering music to "A Midsummer Night’s Dream"
was first performed (in Potsdam), and Wagner’s stormy operatic
love story, "Der fliegende Holländer", went
on the boards of Dresden’s fairytale opera house. The world’s
first nightclub, called "le Bal des Anglais", was
opened in Paris, in which city Karl Marx was to meet Friedrich
Engels the next year. (Setting off another kind of can-can
in time to come.) Turner’s paintings were opening the door
to Impressionism, and the telegraph was on its way to becoming
a functional tool of communication. Of more importance to
Boratynski, however, was his success with the Russian émigrés
he met in Paris a fact which, taking the poet’s sense of alienation
at home into account, should not surprise us.
The
Boratynskis spent the winter of 1843-44 in Paris. When spring
came, they headed south. They boarded ship in Marseilles for
Naples, with plans to visit Rome and Florence and then to
return to Russia by fall. Already swept up in the excitement
of travel, before the ship was far from land Evgeny took up
pen and paper. The uncharacteristically serene poem he wrote
rejoices in the waves beating against the vessel’s sides,
the shrill captain’s whistle, the seagulls flapping about
in the open ocean, the exclamatory rippling of the sails.
To Evgeny, just to see the Marseilles seamen hoist the anchor
seemed a sign of hopefulness.
Two
images, the ocean in this poem, long dreamed of since childhood,
and his Italian tutor, Borghese, in his very last poem, occupied
Evgeny’s mind during a journey that begins to take on the
joyfulness of a soul certain it is going to heaven. In "To
the Italian Tutor", Boratynski seems to look back over
his own life: Listening enraptured to Borghese’s stories of
Italy and Napoleon; mourning General Boratynski’s death and
return to the solace of Mara; and now the seductive sleepy
beauty of Naples in the poet’s own eyes, drowsing in eternal
sunset light. It saddens Evgeny that Borghese died not in
all this golden warmth of his homeland but in the icy solitudes
of Russia.
Was
this a premonition? Poetry had become for Evgeny a sort of
sylvan retreat, a refuge into which he might escape an increasingly
noisy world. His estate at Muranovo, with its quiet woods
and controlled but natural harmony, came to symbolize a more
tangible retreat, safe from Russia’s changing political and
artistic scene, a place where both classless poet and aristocratic
"Marquis" could contemplate and immortalize what
made life, and art, worthwhile.
The
joy of seeing the volcano-crowned city at last was attenuated
by a serious illness (of unknown nature) which at first posed
a grave threat to Nastenka. Thanks to poor sanitation and
frequent summer epidemics, the constitutions of foreign visitors
frequently fell prey to Neapolitan sicknesses, and this or
something picked up in France or on board ship may account
for Nastenka’s trouble.
The
crisis was obviously surmountable, since Nastenka lived on
until 1860. Though it is believed (and is plausible) that
Evgeny worried himself sick over his wife’s condition, his
own health cannot have been in optimum condition, because
only a few weeks after arriving in Naples the poet died suddenly
at Villa Reale, possibly of a heart attack, on June 29, 1844.
The
cradle of Evgeny’s boyhood dreams, Naples may have been denied
Borghese in death, but it was to prove the poet’s doorway
between his world and that of his beloved tutor: The old saying
"See Naples, then die" taken literally. Evgeny’s
death there becomes even more haunting when it is recalled
that the old Greek name for Naples was "Parthenope"
after the siren who, when she found she was unable to charm
the worldly Odysseus, threw herself into the sea. In this
setting, the figure of the misunderstood bard, standing on
a sea cliff contemplating suicide in Evgeny’s "The Last
Poet", seems all too apposite in a man who felt increasingly
alone in a world hardened against the charms, and the inspiration,
of poetry.
Unlike
the appearance of his last book of verse, not even Evgeny’s
ghost seemed to bother the critics of Moscow and St. Petersburg
now few seemed to care. A year later (1845), his body was
brought back to Russia, and buried in that final resting place
of so many of Russia’s immortals, Petersburg’s St. Alexander
Nevsky Cemetery. There, at the very top of the memory-haunted
Nevsky Prospekt, a marble memorial was raised above Evgeny’s
grave, its marble front carved with a bas-relief profile portrait
of the poet, his name picked out in gold below.
Boratynski
had bridged the divide between flesh and spirit, to become,
using the words of his near contemporary and brother-in-sentiment,
Percy Bysshe Shelley, ...a poet hidden In the light of thought.
|
|