Search billions of records on Ancestry.com
   
THE ABOVE IS AN ADVERTISEMENT.

Strickland DNA Project Results

The Strickland DNA project results are found in the tables below. The results have first been divided between Northern and Southern Stricklands based upon the earliest known location in the United States of the earliest known ancestor. The results have then been grouped generally, but not always strictly, by DNA results and ancestry as reported by the participants and their sponsors. Note that the Strickland modal haplotype as shown in light blue is shared by participants of both the Northern Stricklands and the Southern Stricklands - descendants of both Matthew Strickland of Isle of Wight County, Virginia, and Thwaite Strickland of Connecticut and also others who have not traced their lines back to the 1600s.

For additional information about the Strickland DNA project, see the Main Strickland DNA page. Direct links to the ancestral charts of the participants are not currently provided on this page, but the ancestral charts may be viewed by going directly to the ancestral charts page and selecting the earliest ancestor by name in the list or by using "Find" (control-F) and search for the participant number.

Strickland DNA Project History

The Strickland DNA project was established in late 2000 by Ron Strickland with most participants in the first phase of DNA testing recruited by 31 January 2001. The DNA testing for the first phase of the Strickland DNA project was performed by The Center for Molecular Genealogy at Brigham Young University (BYU) and was established as project SC#41 at BYU by May 2001. Phase I participants are identified in the chart below as participant numbers 1-47 (no number 36). Phase 1 included several participants with paper trails back to Matthew Strickland of Isle of Wight County, Virginia, with the goal of determining Matthew Strickland's DNA haplotype (pattern of DNA results).

The second phase of testing, which is ongoing, is being performed by Relative Genetics and Family Tree DNA (FTDNA). Phase 2 participants at Relative Genetics have participant numbers greater than 2906 in the chart below. Participants that had testing performed by Family Tree DNA have kit ID numbers preceded by the letter "F" or if they were tested by FTDNA through National Geographic's Genographic Project their kit numbers are preceded by an "N". Test results have also been extracted from the Sorensen Molecular Genealogy Foundation (SMGF) website (http://www.smgf.org/). These are labeled as "SMGF" in the Participant Number field, and include links to the test results. The pedigrees submitted to SMGF can be viewed by clicking on the pedigree icon on the SMGF results page. Some Strickland DNA participants have also submitted their results to the YSearch database (http://www.ysearch.org/). YSearch ID numbers (consisting of both letters and numerals) and links to the ysearch submitter pages have been included below when known. A few participants from Phase 1 have been retested during Phase 2 and both participant numbers will be listed below.

To Join or Upgrade DNA markers

Relative Genetics offers 26 and 43 marker Y-DNA tests and also offers a 26 to 43 marker upgrade test for previous Relative Genetics participants. To participate in the Strickland DNA project or to upgrade to 43 markers at Relative Genetics, contact the Strickland DNA Phase 2 project coordinator.

Family Tree DNA offers 12, 25, 37 and 67 DNA marker tests. To participate in the Strickland DNA project through Family Tree DNA, submit a join request here.

SMGF offers FREE DNA testing for inclusion in their database, although DNA results are not reported directly to the participant nor are they guaranteed to appear in the database. DNA testing via SMGF is an inexpensive way to participate in the Strickland DNA project or to upgrade the number of markers tested for those already in the Strickland DNA project. For more information, see SMGF's Why Participate page. If participating in the SMGF DNA testing, please inform the Strickland DNA project for inclusion on the Strickland DNA project webpages.

Project Results

Currently, results for 109 Strickland DNA participants are available.

1) Strickland Modal Haplotype
Results from the first phase of testing indicated that 40 of the 46 participants tested represented one major Strickland line. This group included 21 participants who had paper trails to Matthew Strickland of Isle of Wight County, Virginia. From these 40 participants, the initial "Strickland Modal Haplotype 1" of the 28 markers tested by BYU was determined. The modal haplotype consists of the most common values for each of the tested Y-DNA markers. Participants with 3 or less mutations or differences from the modal haplotype of 28 markers were deemed related and shared a common paternal ancestor. Results for six participants did not fit the criteria to match the Strickland Modal Haplotype and also none of these six participants matched each other. These six participants (numbers 6, 10, 28, 29, 30 and 39) were categorized as singlettes and represent other Strickland lines.
2) Thwaite Strickland - Matthew Strickland DNA connection
Three participants with paper trails to Thwaite Strickland (born about 1622) of Dedham, Massachusetts and Glastonbury, Hartford Co., Connecticut have participated in the DNA project. Two of these participants, one a descendant of Thwaite's son John and one a descendant of Thwaite's son Joseph, matched the Strickland Modal Haplotype associated with Matthew Strickland of Isle of Wight Co., Virginia, with a 26/26 match of the markers tested for the participants. The perfect 26/26 match of the tested Y-DNA markers suggests that both Matthew Strickland of Isle of Wight Co., Virginia, and Thwaite Strickland of Massachusetts and Connecticut share a common ancestor. The third Thwaite Strickland participant did not match the other two Thwaite Strickland participants, nor any other current participants in the project. A third "Northern" Strickland participant, a descendant of Noah Strickland (born about 1807) of New York also matched the two Thwaite Strickland participants and the Strickland Modal Haplotype on 26/26 Y-DNA markers. None of these three "Northern Strickland" participants who match the Strickland Modal Haplotype have upgraded the number of markers tested to see if the DNA match holds with additional markers tested.
3) Multiple Strickland/lin Origins
As Y-DNA testing of Strickland/lin participants has continued, it has become apparent that there are several other Strickland/lin lines in the United States that are not related to Matthew Strickland or Thwaite Strickland through the paternal line. These other Strickland/lin lines have roots in both the northern and the southern United States and indicate multiple origins of the Strickland/lin surname. A few of these other lines are lines in which a non-paternity event was known to have occurred even before the DNA testing was done.
4) Samuel Strickland Haplotype
Four participants who are descendants of two sons of Samuel Strickland (d. abt. 1784 Johnston Co., NC) and his wife Mary have been tested. All four participants have a mutation or change to 29 repeats at DYS 449 from the Strickland modal value of 30 repeats. Three participants (#5, 12, 18) are brothers and are descendants of Samuel's son Daniel Davis Strickland (d.1806 Johnston Co., NC) and the fourth participant (#5441) is a descendant of Samuel's son Benjamin (d. 1821 Johnston Co., NC).
The DNA change at DYS 449 to 29 repeats appears to be ancestral at least to Samuel Strickland (d.abt 1784). It is expected that all descendants of Samuel Strickland (d.1784) will have 29 repeats at DYS 449, unless an additional mutation (backwards or forwards) occurred at that location in a generation between Samuel Strickland (d.1784) and the descendant. Currently this result cannot be assumed for earlier generations of this line without further DNA testing of descendants through different sons of the earlier generations.
This is the first big breakthrough of the Strickland DNA project in associating a particular DNA result with a particular line of descent from Matthew Strickland of Isle of Wight County, Virginia. This breakthrough came about through the willingness of participant #5441 to upgrade the number of DNA markers tested to include DYS 449 to determine whether a descendant of Samuel's son Benjamin shared the mutation found earlier in the line of Samuel's son Daniel Davis Strickland.
At the same time, participant #4096 whose line ends with Levi Shivers Strickland (b. 1832 Wake Co., NC) also upgraded the number of DNA markers tested to include DYS 449. It is suspected that Levi Shivers Strickland was a descendant of Daniel Davis Strickland and his wife Nancy Shivers, although solid documentation is lacking for the generations between Levi Shivers Strickland and Daniel Davis Strickland, son of Samuel Strickland (d.1784) . The results of these two marker upgrades not only helped determine the ancestral haplotype of Samuel Strickland (d. 1784), but also supplied evidence that participant #4096 was most closely related to the Samuel Strickland (d.1784) line of Stricklands than to all of the other current Strickland DNA participants. Until further participants test and it can be determined whether or not the 29 result at DYS 449 occurred at the birth of Samuel Strickland (d.1784) or with an earlier generation, it cannot be conclusively stated that participant #4096 is a descendant of Samuel Strickland (d. 1784) by the DNA results alone, although the DNA results in combination with other evidence and documentation found through traditional genealogical methods suggest that participant #4096 is likely a descendant of Samuel Strickland (d.1784).
5) DNA testing for a "Null 439" result
The Null 439 phenomenom occurs when FTDNA's proprietary primer for testing DYS 439 cannot obtain any results for DYS 439, although the primers used by other companies such as Relative Genetics and SMGF do obtain results for DYS 439. When participants who have the Null 439 result at FTDNA are tested at Relative Genetics, marker DYS 439 has 12 repeats. "The working hypothesis [of the Null 439 phenomenom] is that FTDNA is unable to find the marker due to a recent single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the flanking area of the marker. If this interpretation is correct, the null 439s represent a recent subclade of Haplogroup R1b. Estimates of the age of this subclade range from 1500 to 2500 years." (Fox DNA Project, select "News" tab, accessed 4 Mar 2006). The DNA testing company EthnoAncestry has identified the SNP associated with the Null 439 phenomenom. The SNP is labelled S26 and is also called the Little SNP after Leo Little (a Strickland descendant) who has been instrumental in its discovery.
The Strickland DNA project was approached by the Fox DNA project in 2005 for testing for the Null 439 result at FTDNA. The Strickland Modal Haplotype was a close match to the Fox haplotype that had tested positive for the Null 439 phenomenom and the Strickland Modal Haplotype also had the requisite 12 repeats at DYS 439 when tested by Relative Genetics. A possible familial connection was also proposed between the Fox family and the Strickland family and if the Strickland family also had the Null 439 result, then the Null 439 result would suggest that the Fox family with the Null 439 result and the Strickland family did indeed share a common ancient ancestor. The line of William Fox (1497-1559) of Stewkley Manor in Buckinghamshire has been traced by one Fox researcher back to the Norman Invader Robert de Vaux born about 1010. A possible common connection between the Fox or De Vaux family and the Strickland family was proposed to have occurred between Robert De Vaux and his reputed descendant Walter Fitzadam de Strickland, born about 1237, the supposed son of Adam de Vaux who is believed to have changed his name to Adam de Strickland.
Strickland participant #21, a participant with a paper trail to Matthew Strickland of Isle of Wight Co., Virginia, and with no mutations or differences from the Strickland Modal Haplotype, was selected to represent the Matthew Strickland and Thwaite Strickland lines in the Y-DNA test for the Null 439 phenomenom. It was determined that the major Strickland family represented by the Strickland Modal Haplotype 1 was NOT part of the Null-439 group as FTDNA was able to produce a result of 12 repeats at DYS 439. We can conclude that the Strickland family represented by the Strickland Modal Haplotype is not related to the Fox family that has the Null 439 result. It can also be concluded that BOTH the Null 439 Fox family and the Strickland family can NOT descend from Robert De Vaux.

Notes

The markers labelled in red have been observed to have faster than average mutation rates. Markers with faster mutation rates can be helpful in splitting lineages into branches within the family tree. Markers labelled in blue have slower mutation rates. The haplogroup R1b mutation rates for several markers can be viewed on the Gene Diversity page of the Null 439 project.

Marker numbers DYS449, DYS458, and DYS459 were not CEPH calibrated during Phase 1 of testing but have since been converted. Beginning 25 June 2004, Relative Genetics has calibrated DYS 461 according to the standard set forth by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). All results below for DYS 461 from BYU, Relative Genetics and SMGF are reported in accordance with the NIST standard. Results for DYS 461 from FTDNA have been converted to the format used by Relative Genetics.

For more information about haplogroups, see Dennis Garvey's Y-Chromosome Haplogroups webpage. For a discussion of Haplogroup R1b, the most Y common haplogroup in Europe, see Dennis Garvey's Y Haplogroup R1b webpage.

The haplogroups listed below are predicted haplogroups and have not been confirmed by SNP testing. Unless otherwise specified, the haplogroups have been predicted using the Y-Haplogroup Predictor created by Whit Athley. The Y-Haplogroup Predictor is found at https://home.comcast.net/~hapest5/index.html.




Strickland Modal Haplotype 1

DYS GGAAT YCAII YGATA
3
8
5
a		 3
8
5
b		 3
8
8
 3
8
9
i		 3
8
9
i
i		 3
9
0		 3
9
1
 3
9
2		 3
9
3		 3
9
4
/
1
9		 4
2
6		 4
3
7		 4
3
8		 4
3
9		 4
4
1		 4
4
2		 4
4
4		 4
4
5		 4
4
6		 4
4
7		 4
4
8		 4
4
9		 4
5
2		 4
5
4		 4
5
5		 4
5
6		 4
5
8		 4
5
9
a		 4
5
9
b		 4
6
0		 4
6
1		 4
6
2		 4
6
3		 4
6
4
a		 4
6
4
b		 4
6
4
c		 4
6
4
d		 5
7
0		 5
7
6		 6
0
7		 1
B
0
7		 A B A
1
0		 C
4
/
6
3
5		 H
4		 C
D
Y
a		 C
D
Y
b		 Haplo
Modal 1 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 19 30 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 16 15 15 10 19 23 12 23 12 35 38 R1b


Northern Strickland Results

Northern Strickland results matching the Strickland Modal Haplotype 1

Donor# DYS GGAAT YCAII YGATA
3
8
5
a		 3
8
5
b		 3
8
8
 3
8
9
i		 3
8
9
i
i		 3
9
0		 3
9
1
 3
9
2		 3
9
3		 3
9
4
/
1
9		 4
2
6		 4
3
7		 4
3
8		 4
3
9		 4
4
1		 4
4
2		 4
4
4		 4
4
5		 4
4
6		 4
4
7		 4
4
8		 4
4
9		 4
5
2		 4
5
4		 4
5
5		 4
5
6		 4
5
8		 4
5
9
a		 4
5
9
b		 4
6
0		 4
6
1		 4
6
2		 4
6
3		 4
6
4
a		 4
6
4
b		 4
6
4
c		 4
6
4
d		 5
7
0		 5
7
6		 6
0
7		 1
B
0
7		 A B A
1
0		 C
4
/
6
3
5		 H
4		 C
D
Y
a		 C
D
Y
b		 Haplo
Early Lineage or Earliest Ancestor
Modal 1 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 19 30 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 16 15 15 10 19 23 12 23 12 35 38 R1b Strickland Modal Haplotype
4210 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NY Noah (1807) to MI
4054 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Thwaite (c1622) to CT - John
15441 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Thwaite (c1622) to CT - Joseph

Northern Strickland results in haplogroup R1b but not matching the Strickland Modal Haplotype 1 (>3 mutations)

Donor# DYS GGAAT YCAII YGATA
3
8
5
a		 3
8
5
b		 3
8
8
 3
8
9
i		 3
8
9
i
i		 3
9
0		 3
9
1
 3
9
2		 3
9
3		 3
9
4
/
1
9		 4
2
6		 4
3
7		 4
3
8		 4
3
9		 4
4
1		 4
4
2		 4
4
4		 4
4
5		 4
4
6		 4
4
7		 4
4
8		 4
4
9		 4
5
2		 4
5
4		 4
5
5		 4
5
6		 4
5
8		 4
5
9
a		 4
5
9
b		 4
6
0		 4
6
1		 4
6
2		 4
6
3		 4
6
4
a		 4
6
4
b		 4
6
4
c		 4
6
4
d		 5
7
0		 5
7
6		 6
0
7		 1
B
0
7		 A B A
1
0		 C
4
/
6
3
5		 H
4		 C
D
Y
a		 C
D
Y
b		 Haplo
Early Lineage or Earliest Ancestor
Modal 1 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 19 30 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 16 15 15 10 19 23 12 23 12 35 38 R1b Strickland Modal Haplotype
R1b Modal 11 14 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 12 25 19 29
30		 11 11 16 17 9 10 11 15 15 17 17 17 18 15 19 23 12 38 R1b R1b Super Western Atlantic Modal Haplotype (SWAMH)****
10 11 15 12 12 29 24 11 13 13 15 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 16 9 9 11 12 11 10 19 23 12 24 12 R1b NY Edward (1784)
4209 12 15 12 14 31 24 10 13 14 14 12 15 12 13 24 11 11 11 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Thwaite (c1622) to CT - Joseph-Edward (1701)
2906 17306 SMGF 11 14 12 14 30 24 11 13 13 14 12 14 12 12 13 13 13 12 13 25 18 29 11 11 11 16 18 9 10 10 11 11 20 15 15 17 18 10 19 23 13 23 11 R1b Peter (1646) to CT
81058 11 14 12 14 30 24 10 13 13 14 12 14 12 12 13 13 13 12 13 25 18 29 11 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 11 11 20 15 15 18 18 10 19 23 13 23 11 R1b Nova Scotia - Christopher (d.bef 1788)
****See Whit Athey's STR Allele Frequencies for Haplogroup R1b, Basis for the "Super Western Atlantic Modal Haplotype", http://worldfamilies.net/Super%20Western%20Atlantic%20Modal%20Haplotype.htm, viewed 12 February 2006. For DYS 449, the frequency in the DYS 449 sample of 1376 haplotypes for 29 repeats was 39% and for 30 repeats was 31%. Because of differing methods between labs of reporting results for YGATA-H4, the SWAMH result for YGATA-H4 was incremented by one for consistency with the Relative Genetics reporting method. Whit Athey's anaylsis of SWAMH only used markers available from FamilyTreeDNA. Markers tested by Relative Genetics and showing no value for the SWAMH were not included in Whit Athey's analysis.

Northern Strickland results in Haplogroup I1b1a (old I1b2)

Donor# DYS GGAAT YCAII YGATA
3
8
5
a		 3
8
5
b		 3
8
8
 3
8
9
i		 3
8
9
i
i		 3
9
0		 3
9
1
 3
9
2		 3
9
3		 3
9
4
/
1
9		 4
2
6		 4
3
7		 4
3
8		 4
3
9		 4
4
1		 4
4
2		 4
4
4		 4
4
5		 4
4
6		 4
4
7		 4
4
8		 4
4
9		 4
5
2		 4
5
4		 4
5
5		 4
5
6		 4
5
8		 4
5
9
a		 4
5
9
b		 4
6
0		 4
6
1		 4
6
2		 4
6
3		 4
6
4
a		 4
6
4
b		 4
6
4
c		 4
6
4
d		 5
7
0		 5
7
6		 6
0
7		 1
B
0
7		 A B A
1
0		 C
4
/
6
3
5		 H
4		 C
D
Y
a		 C
D
Y
b		 Haplo
Early Lineage or Earliest Ancestor
39–6202 12 12 13 13 28 23 10 11 13 17 11 15 10 11 25 11 11 10 11 12 10 10 21 14 22 12 I1b1a** OH Paul (c1813) Joseph (#6206 & #5252 are cousins.)
5252 12 12 13 13 28 23 10 11 13 17 11 15 10 11 16 13 13 11 13 25 21 30 10 11 11 14 16 8 10 10 11 12 20 11 14 15 - 10 11 21 14 22 12 I1b1a** OH Paul (c1813) Joseph (#6206 & #5252 are cousins.)
**"I1b1a, (old) I1b2, is very easy to spot if its very unusual YCAIIa,b = 11,21 is included in the examined haplotype. This subclade of I1b1, M26+, represents a very large fraction of the males of Sardinia, an island in the Mediterranean Sea west of Italy, and it is a sizeable contributor to the population in regions of the Iberian peninsula, but only a small amount is found in more northerly Europe. It’s unusual modal 12,12 at DYS385a,b helps to identify it with short haplotypes, but with extended haplotypes all varieties of I1b1 are readily distinguished from each other. I1b1a seems to divide into multiple varieties, and DYS19 = 17 seems to be more common in Mediterranean regions than in Northern Europe." (Ken Nordtvedt, "Population Varieties within Y-Haplogroup I and their Extended Modal Haplotypes," http://www.northwestanalysis.net/, accessed 10 April 2006.)


Southern Strickland Results

Southern Strickland results with 3 or fewer mutations from the Strickland Modal Haplotype 1

Donor# DYS GGAAT YCAII YGATA
3
8
5
a		 3
8
5
b		 3
8
8
 3
8
9
i		 3
8
9
i
i		 3
9
0		 3
9
1
 3
9
2		 3
9
3		 3
9
4
/
1
9		 4
2
6		 4
3
7		 4
3
8		 4
3
9		 4
4
1		 4
4
2		 4
4
4		 4
4
5		 4
4
6		 4
4
7		 4
4
8		 4
4
9		 4
5
2		 4
5
4		 4
5
5		 4
5
6		 4
5
8		 4
5
9
a		 4
5
9
b		 4
6
0		 4
6
1		 4
6
2		 4
6
3		 4
6
4
a		 4
6
4
b		 4
6
4
c		 4
6
4
d		 5
7
0		 5
7
6		 6
0
7		 1
B
0
7		 A B A
1
0		 C
4
/
6
3
5		 H
4		 C
D
Y
a		 C
D
Y
b		 Haplo
Early Lineage or Earliest Ancestor
Modal 1 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 19 30 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 16 15 15 10 19 23 12 23 12 35 38 R1b Strickland Modal Haplotype
05* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 29 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Samuel-Samuel-Daniel D. (Donors #5,12,18 are brothers)
12* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 29 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Samuel-Samuel-Daniel D. (Donors#5,12,18 are brothers
18* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 29 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Samuel-Samuel-Daniel D. (Donors#5,12,18 are brothers)
4096
ETZRZ		 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 19 29 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Levi Shivers (1832) to TX - possibly descendant of Daniel D.
5441 11 16 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 22 29 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Samuel-Samuel-Benjamin(c1754)
14* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-William-William-William(1721 NC)
20* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-William-William-Aaron-Lewis-Lewis(1801 GA)
11822 12 15 12 13 29 24 12 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-William-William-Aaron-Lewis-Jacob(1800 NC) to GA
47 11 15 12 13 29 24 12 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b VA/NC David(1735) Robert to GA, MS, LA
3 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 14 12 12 25 32 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b VA/NC David(1735) Solomon to GA, LA
19* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 32 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Jacob-Jacob-Wilson(1783 NC) to GA
11 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 32 11 18 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b GA Andrew J.(1818) - son of ?Simon(c1780 NC)
4307 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b GA Andrew J.(1818) - son of ?Simon(c1780 NC)
42* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Sampson-Obediah(1763)-Brinkley
04* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 18 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Sampson-Obediah(1763)-Abel-Samuel-Thomas(1858 AL)
24* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Sampson-Obediah(1763)-Abel-Samuel-James(1868)
33* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Sampson-Obediah(1763)-Abel-Samuel-William(1870 AL)
38* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Sampson-Obediah(1763)-Abel-John R.(1849)
45* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Sampson-Abel(1764)
34*– 6142 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 13 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Joseph (1699)- David
01* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 13 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Jacob-Solomon-Ezekiel-Ephraim-Zachary(1852 GA)
13* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 13 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Jacob-Solomon-Ezekiel-Ephraim-Julius(1837 GA)
F61213
8MBCQ 		11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 11 25 19 30 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 15 15 17 17 16 15 15 19 23 12 35 38 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Jacob-Solomon-Ezekiel-Elisha-Ancel-Sicero(1848 AL)
35* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Jacob-Solomon-Ezekiel-Elisha-Ancel-Tolbert(1859 AL)
08* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 8 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Jacob-Solomon-Hardy(1776 NC) to GA
40* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Jacob-Jacob-Isaac(1770 NC) to GA
21* F40501 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 11 25 19 30 11 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 15 15 17 17 16 15 15 10 19 23 12 23 12 35 38 R1b1 Mathew-Mathew-Jacob-Jacob-Hardy(1775 NC) to GA
4258 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Jacob-Jacob-Henry-Isaac(1808 GA)
25* 11 15 12 13 29 24 10 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Jacob-Jacob-Henry-Clement(1805 GA)
16* 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Jacob-Mark-Gideon-Wilson(1832)
69214 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 19 31 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Jacob-Mark-Gideon-Mathew(1836)
41-20583 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 19 31 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Reuben (1794)
22 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 31 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b GA William M.(1811) to AR
9 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 31 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b GA Henry (1818)
5256 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 19 31 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b GA Irvin (1780)
4206 26364 11 15 12 13 30 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 19 31 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Frederick (1741) Zachariah
7428 11 15 12 13 30 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Frederick (1741) Burrell
4261* 11 15 12 13 30 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 11 R1b Mathew-Mathew-Sampson-Sampson(c1757)
14483 11 15 12 13 30 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Jesse W. (1789)
16205 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 22 12 23 12 R1b NC Jesse W. (1789)
15 11 15 12 13 29 24 10 13 13 14 12 14 12 12 25 31 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC/GA James Rayford (1794)
SMGF #2 11 15 12 13 29 24 10 13 13 14 12 12 12 13 25 19 30 11 17 10 12 22 19 23 12 R1b MO Henry Lee (1857 St. Claire Co., MO) - Irl Hicks (1890 Medicine Lodge, KS)
4356 11 15 12 13 29 24 10 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b TN Stephen (1786) Benjamin
4478 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b TN Stephen (1786) Luke
9850 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b TN Stephen (1786) Thomas
Donor# DYS GGAAT YCAII YGATA
3
8
5
a		 3
8
5
b		 3
8
8
 3
8
9
i		 3
8
9
i
i		 3
9
0		 3
9
1
 3
9
2		 3
9
3		 3
9
4
/
1
9		 4
2
6		 4
3
7		 4
3
8		 4
3
9		 4
4
1		 4
4
2		 4
4
4		 4
4
5		 4
4
6		 4
4
7		 4
4
8		 4
4
9		 4
5
2		 4
5
4		 4
5
5		 4
5
6		 4
5
8		 4
5
9
a		 4
5
9
b		 4
6
0		 4
6
1		 4
6
2		 4
6
3		 4
6
4
a		 4
6
4
b		 4
6
4
c		 4
6
4
d		 5
7
0		 5
7
6		 6
0
7		 1
B
0
7		 A B A
1
0		 C
4
/
6
3
5		 H
4		 C
D
Y
a		 C
D
Y
b		 Haplo
Early Lineage or Earliest Ancestor
Modal 1 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 19 30 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 16 15 15 10 19 23 12 23 12 35 38 R1b Strickland Modal Haplotype
4099 11 14 12 13 30 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b WV/MD? -George E (1855) to IL
32 11 14 12 13 29 23 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 13 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Henry S.(1792) Charles to GA
8464 11 14 12 13 29 23 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 13 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Henry S.(1792) Lewis to GA
44 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC William (c1728) - line goes to SC
14765 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 19 30 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Matthew (c1732) md. Mary Perry
23 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Absolom (1750) Nathan
46 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Philip (1756)
38261 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 19 30 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Stephen (1764)
3817 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Isaac (c1790)
17 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Gadi (1778) to GA
F79618
K5HPW		 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 12 R1b NC Jacob(1780) to SC
31 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Bolin (1814)
37 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC Kerney W. (1826) to TX
15691 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC James K (1837)
26 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC/SC Levi (c1812)
SMGF 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 19 30 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b GA Levi J. (c1844 m. Margaret) -Owen Levi (c1875 GA m. Martha)
2 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC/SC Eli H.(1794) to AL
4263 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b NC/KY Isham Stricklin (c1804) to IL
4097 11 15 12 14 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b TN John W. Stricklin (c1844)
4264 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b GA Lodrick(1814) - son of ?Julius(c1765 NC)
7 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b GA Thomas (1765)
13289 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b SC Ervin/Erwin (1798)
14135 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b AL James (c1840)
15738 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b TN Francis (1820)
4213 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b SC Alexander (1800) Llewellyn - to GA
27 11 15 12 13 29 25 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 13 23 12 R1b SC Alexander (1800) John - to GA
43 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 16 12 15 12 12 25 30 11 17 9 10 10 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b LA William (c1842) to TX
7977 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 12 11 10 19 21 12 23 12 R1b KY Abijah (1800) to MS
*Participant numbers followed by (*) indicate participants who have traced their lines to Matthew Strickland of Isle of Wight county, Virginia.

Southern Strickland results in haplogroup R1b but not matching the Strickland Modal Haplotype 1 (>3 mutations)

Donor# DYS GGAAT YCAII YGATA
3
8
5
a		 3
8
5
b		 3
8
8
 3
8
9
i		 3
8
9
i
i		 3
9
0		 3
9
1
 3
9
2		 3
9
3		 3
9
4
/
1
9		 4
2
6		 4
3
7		 4
3
8		 4
3
9		 4
4
1		 4
4
2		 4
4
4		 4
4
5		 4
4
6		 4
4
7		 4
4
8		 4
4
9		 4
5
2		 4
5
4		 4
5
5		 4
5
6		 4
5
8		 4
5
9
a		 4
5
9
b		 4
6
0		 4
6
1		 4
6
2		 4
6
3		 4
6
4
a		 4
6
4
b		 4
6
4
c		 4
6
4
d		 5
7
0		 5
7
6		 6
0
7		 1
B
0
7		 A B A
1
0		 C
4
/
6
3
5		 H
4		 C
D
Y
a		 C
D
Y
b		 Haplo
Early Lineage or Earliest Ancestor
Modal 1 11 15 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 11 12 12 13 25 19 30 12 11 11 16 17 9 10 10 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 16 15 15 10 19 23 12 23 12 35 38 R1b Strickland Modal Haplotype
R1b Modal 11 14 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 12 25 19 29
30		 11 11 16 17 9 10 11 15 15 17 17 17 18 15 19 23 12 38 R1b R1b Super Western Atlantic Modal Haplotype (SWAMH)****
4208 12 15 12 13 29 24 10 12 13 14 13 15 12 12 25 11 11 10 13 11 10 19 23 13 23 11 R1b
11996 11 15 12 13 29 25 11 13 13 15 12 15 12 11 25 11 11 11 12 11 10 19 23 13 24 12 R1b Private
15737 11 16 12 13 28 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 11 26 11 11 11 12 11 10 19 23 13 24 12 R1b
29 11 14 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 11 27 30 11 16 9 10 11 12 11 10 19 23 14 23 13 R1b TN John Stricklin (1785) Thomas
3995 11 14 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 11 27 11 11 11 12 11 10 19 23 14 23 13 R1b TN John Stricklin (1785) William (Donors #3995 & 3996 are brothers.)
3996 11 14 12 13 29 24 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 11 27 11 11 11 12 11 10 19 23 14 23 13 R1b TN John Stricklin (1785) William (Donors #3995 & 3996 are brothers.)
23065 11 14 12 13 28 23 12 13 13 15 12 14 13 12 13 12 12 12 14 25 19 29 11 11 11 17 17 9 10 11 12 11 22 15 15 17 17 10 19 23 13 23 12 R1b
17684 11 14 12 13 29 23 11 13 13 15 12 15 12 12 26 11 11 11 12 11 10 19 23 13 23 11 R1b
4053 11 14 12 13 29 23 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 24 11 11 11 12 11 10 19 24 14 23 12 R1b VA-Joseph Stricklin (c1740) Abiel -William D. - line to MO
4256 11 14 12 13 29 23 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 24 11 11 11 12 11 10 19 24 14 23 12 R1b VA-Joseph Stricklin (c1740) Abiel -Thomas - line to MO
70421 11 14 12 13 29 23 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 12 13 12 14 24 19 29 11 11 11 16 17 9 10 11 12 11 22 15 16 17 18 10 19 24 14 23 12 R1b VA-Joseph Stricklin (c1745) Samuel Clayton - to IL
4262 11 14 12 13 29 25 10 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 24 11 11 11 12 11 10 19 23 12 23 12 R1b MD/VA- John Strickling (c1765) - line goes to OH
QCWBN 11 14 12 13 29 25 10 13 13 14 12 12 R1b Strickling
15702 11 14 12 14 30 22 10 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 11 12 11 10 19 23 13 23 12 R1b
15943 11 13 12 13 29 26 10 14 13 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 11 12 11 10 19 23 13 23 12 R1b SC Sion (1776)
7748 11 13 12 13 29 23 10 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 24 11 11 11 12 11 11 19 23 13 23 12 R1b TN Wm H. Stricklin (1843) Walter
6
4257
20605
4R8YR		 11 13 12 13 29 23 11 13 13 14 12 15 12 12 13 12 12 12 13 24 19 29 11 11 11 17 16 9 10 11 12 11 22 15 15 16 17 11 19 23 13 23 12 R1b TN Wm H. Stricklin (1843) Wm to OK
4368
PD3Z4		 11 13 12 12 28 23 11 13 12 14 12 15 12 12 25 11 11 11 12 11 10 19 24 13 23 12 R1b AL John A.(1860) mother is Elvy Strickland(1829)
****See Whit Athey's STR Allele Frequencies for Haplogroup R1b, Basis for the "Super Western Atlantic Modal Haplotype", http://worldfamilies.net/Super%20Western%20Atlantic%20Modal%20Haplotype.htm, viewed 12 February 2006. For DYS 449, the frequency in the DYS 449 sample of 1376 haplotypes for 29 repeats was 39% and for 30 repeats was 31%. Because of differing methods between labs of reporting results for YGATA-H4, the SWAMH result for YGATA-H4 was incremented by one for consistency with the Relative Genetics reporting method. Whit Athey's anaylsis of SWAMH only used markers available from FamilyTreeDNA. Markers tested by Relative Genetics and showing no value for the SWAMH were not included in Whit Athey's analysis.

Southern Strickland results not in Haplogroup R1b

Donor# DYS GGAAT YCAII YGATA
3
8
5
a		 3
8
5
b		 3
8
8
 3
8
9
i		 3
8
9
i
i		 3
9
0		 3
9
1
 3
9
2		 3
9
3		 3
9
4
/
1
9		 4
2
6		 4
3
7		 4
3
8		 4
3
9		 4
4
1		 4
4
2		 4
4
4		 4
4
5		 4
4
6		 4
4
7		 4
4
8		 4
4
9		 4
5
2		 4
5
4		 4
5
5		 4
5
6		 4
5
8		 4
5
9
a		 4
5
9
b		 4
6
0		 4
6
1		 4
6
2		 4
6
3		 4
6
4
a		 4
6
4
b		 4
6
4
c		 4
6
4
d		 5
7
0		 5
7
6		 6
0
7		 1
B
0
7		 A B A
1
0		 C
4
/
6
3
5		 H
4		 C
D
Y
a		 C
D
Y
b		 Haplo
Early Lineage or Earliest Ancestor
4357 13 15 14 12 29 23 10 11 13 14 11 16 10 12 23 11 8 10 12 13 11 19 21 13 22 11 I1a*** GA William (1850) to AL
28 12 13 14 12 29 22 10 11 13 14 11 16 10 12 23 30 11 14 8 9 10 12 12 11 19 21 12 23 11 I1a*** Neil (1798)
4098 13 21 12 12 30 23 10 14 13 13 12 15 12 12 27 12 11 10 12 12 11 19 22 12 22 12 Q***** SC Ezekiel (1810) Marcus-Henry T. to AL
7796 13 21 12 12 30 23 10 14 13 13 12 15 12 12 27 12 11 10 12 12 11 19 22 12 22 12 Q***** SC Ezekiel (1810) Marcus-William to AL
18773
7HQ2U		 17 17 12 13 30 23 10 14 13 13 12 14 11 13 12 25 21 31 10 11 15 14 9 9 11 11 12 13 13 13 19 20 17 16 11 19 23 13 22 12 34 40 Q SC William Riley Stricklin (1802) to AL
12299 16 19 12 14 31 21 9 11 15 17 11 14 11 12 27 11 11 11 13 12 11 19 21 11 21 11 E3a AL Jesse A.(1863) son of Elizabeth Strickland(1834)
30 13 17 15 12 28 24 10 11 12 15 11 16 9 12 28 29 11 16 8 9 11 10 11 11 19 20 12 22 11 J2 NC Wiley(1825)
58091
X9MYC 		13 17 15 13 29 23 10 11 12 15 11 15 9 11 11 11 13 12 12 24 21 30 10 11 11 15 14 9 9 10 12 11 20 13 14 15 16 11 21 21 14 21 12 J2 NC William (1794)-Asa-William Riley(1858)
***See Ken Nordtvedt's Population Varieties within Y-Haplogroup I and their Extended Modal Haplotypes, http://www.northwestanalysis.net/
*****Ezekiel Strickland's haplogroup is predicted to be Haplogroup E3b by Relative Genetics. Whit Athey's Haplogroup predictor indicates these haplotypes are in haplogroup Q with a high "fit" score of 74 while E3b has a low "fit" score of only 23 using 25 markers.

English Strickland Results

Donor# DYS GGAAT YCAII YGATA
3
8
5
a		 3
8
5
b		 3
8
8
 3
8
9
i		 3
8
9
i
i		 3
9
0		 3
9
1
 3
9
2		 3
9
3		 3
9
4
/
1
9		 4
2
6		 4
3
7		 4
3
8		 4
3
9		 4
4
1		 4
4
2		 4
4
4		 4
4
5		 4
4
6		 4
4
7		 4
4
8		 4
4
9		 4
5
2		 4
5
4		 4
5
5		 4
5
6		 4
5
8		 4
5
9
a		 4
5
9
b		 4
6
0		 4
6
1		 4
6
2		 4
6
3		 4
6
4
a		 4
6
4
b		 4
6
4
c		 4
6
4
d		 5
7
0		 5
7
6		 6
0
7		 1
B
0
7		 A B A
1
0		 C
4
/
6
3
5		 H
4		 C
D
Y
a		 C
D
Y
b		 Haplo
Early Lineage or Earliest Ancestor
13294 12 16 13 12 29 23 11 11 13 16 11 15 10 11 25 11 11 10 11 12 11 21 21 11 21 11 I1b


Copyright and Disclaimer

Copyright ©2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 Strickland DNA Project. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any form is prohibited. The information contained in the ancestral charts was provided by the participants, and the Strickland DNA Research Group, Relative Genetics, Family Tree DNA and BYU assume no responsibility for accuracy. The data contained herein is intended for genealogical interest and should be used only for that purpose.


This page last modified on: June 17, 2007.
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~rchris/strickland/dnachart.html

Main Strickland DNA Project Home | Ancestral Charts



THE BELOW IS AN ADVERTISEMENT.