Saturday, December 31, 2011
Reconstructed Lawsuit 2011 Webpage
Containing Just The Lawsuit Documents
For The Latter Part of 2011
Documents entered in the PACER system beginning August 5th, 2011 thru end of year:
Document 1093 - COFC OPINION AND ORDER (Aug 5, 2011)
Document 1094 - COFC JUDGMENT (Aug 5, 2011)
Document 1095 - COFC LETTER TO SOI SALAZAR (Aug 9, 2011)
Document 1096 - COFC LETTER TO ERICK KAARDAL (Aug 15, 2011)
Document 1097 - COFC ORDER CORRECTING DOCUMENT 1093 (Aug 18, 2011
Document 1098 - COFC CORRECTED JUDGMENT TO DOCUMENT 1094 (Aug 22, 2011)
Document 1099 - Plaintiff-intervenors' Joint Motion for ext of time (Aug 25, 2011)
Document 1100 - Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of doc 1093 (Sep 2, 2011)
Document 1101 - COFC ORDER acknowleging the filing of doc 1100(Sep 9, 2011)
Document 1102 - Defendant's Response to doc 1099 (Sep 9, 2011)
Document 1103 - COFC ORDER denying doc 1099 motion (Sep 14, 2011)
Document 1104 - Plaintiff's Response to doc 1100 motion
Document 1105 - Plaintiff-Intervenors' Response to doc 1100 motion
Document 1106 - Amicus Curiae statement
Document 1106-1 - Exhibit A
Document 1106-2 - Exhibit B
Document 1106-3 - Exhibit C
Document 1106-4 - Exhibit D
Document 1106-5 - Exhibit E
Document 1106-6 - Exhibit F
Document 1106-7 - Exhibit G
Document 1106-8 - Exhibit H
Document 1106-9 - Exhibit I
Document 1106-10 - Exhibit J
Document 1106-11 - Exhibit K
Document 1106-12 - Exhibit L was sealed by the court - see ahead to Document 1108
Document 1107 - Senior Case Manager letter
Document 1108 - Defendants motion to seal Exhibit L
Document 1109 - COFC ORDER sealing Exhibit L
Document 1110 - COFC ORDER denying doc 1100 motion
Document 1111 - Redacted Exhibit L refiled by COFC
Document 1112 - Notice of appearance
Notice of Appeal by defendant USA (Document 1113)
Notice of Appeal by Group B Intervening Plaintiffs (Document 1114)
were filed December 27th but not entered in the PACER system as of December 31, 2011.
Saturday, August 6, 2011
Notes by Erick G. Kaardal
The Court has issued its order. It is linked in the right-hand column.
To summarize the critical parts of the opinion, the Court:
(1) denied the motions to amend to add claims for amounts greater than $554,514 total;
(2) entered final judgment on the one claim for $554,514 total;
(3) ordered the Department of the Interior to determine by August 6, 2012, who the lineal descendants were entitled to share in the $554,514 final judgment; and
(4) awarded costs to Plaintiffs.
In light of the 2009 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit opinion and the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court denial of the petition for writ of certiorari, this may be the end, or at least the virtual end, of the litigation.
Thank you for your patience. Obviously, I was hoping for a more favorable result for the plaintiffs.
As I receive directions from the Department of the Interior as to payment, if any, I will post them here on this website.
NOTE: This is the most recent word from the Mohrman & Kaardal website.
© 1995 - 2015