Marker Mutation Analysis
(This page
updated October 22, 2009)
DNA Participants, Please Note: This DNA Project Website is maintained
on a voluntary basis. If you see an error or omission in any of
your information on this or any other web page, please don't hesitate to contact
Patrick Childress at londonwildcat@earthlink.net
and request an update! We rely on your eyes to catch our mistakes...
When we examine the Y-DNA results, we speak in
terms of "repetitions" which are the numerical values assigned to each of the
12-, 25-, 37- or 67-marker positions. These "repetitions" range from a low of about
"8" to a high of about "38" for each marker,
or alleles. Once we've managed to group individuals together in a common
"Clan" based on the similarity of marker values (repetitions)
on each of the alleles, the mathematical value of each marker is immaterial.
For example, we just know that Clan 1 is comprised of eight individuals whose values are
identical on each of the 34 of 37 marker values (alleles). Thus, we can effectively discard all those marker values in each Clan where all the
members have identical results and
concentrate only on the markers where there are mutations from the baseline for
the Clan. (The baseline is that repetition number which is associated
with the greatest number of participants for each marker.)
The purpose of the following table is to draw the reader's attention to those
mutations from each Clan baseline for each participant. By carefully
examining each participant's mutations, particularly where there are matching
mutations with other participants, we can begin to draw fairly accurate
conclusions concerning the Barron family tree and its various branches. Any
of the 12-, 25-, 37- or 67-markers not shown in the following table indicates that all participants within
that Clan had identical mathematical values for that marker.
Click
here for a complete spreadsheet of all marker values for all participants
(wait a moment for the data to load to the page).
What do these "Clans" mean? Every individual in each Clan is, by definition, a cousin to every other individual in their
Clan. Perhaps the relationship is "third cousin, 10 times removed," but each is a
cousin to the others by virtue of having a "recent" common ancestor
(say, within the last 800 years or so). Remember, in order for
an individual to be assigned to any Clan, their 25-marker DNA test results
must demonstrate at least a 25% probability of
having a Common Ancestor within the past 24 generations with any other
individual in a Clan. Click
here to review each Clan Lineage.
(Red marker numbers below indicate a
"fast mutating" marker...average mutations occur only once every 6,000
years or so; these fast mutating markers can change more quickly. Click on
the Haplogroup designation below to go to a definition page describing that
Haplogroup's origin.)
Note: Anyone wishing to remove
their name from the following chart should immediately contact the Group
Administrator!
CLAN 1
Y-DNA MARKER ANALYSIS OF MUTATIONS ONLY
(Click here
to Review DNA Evidence as it relates to our April 5, 2009 conclusions for Clan
1)
Haplogroup R1b1b2 |
| The markers shown to the right are
ONLY those which
have at least one mutation in the entire Clan from the baseline value. |
3
9
3 |
3
8
5
b |
4
3
9 |
5
7
6 |
5
7
0 |
C
D
Y
a |
OBSERVATIONS:
The following notes pertain to the existence of individual marker
mutations when compared to the baseline of the MRCA. Mutations
that exist in only one case are highlighted in yellow
while those carried by more than one participant are highlighted in green.
These mutations are more important as they can lead to the identity of
more recent family lines. |
|
(top
number to right is alleles location)
CLAN 1 - baseline
---»
|
1
13 |
6
14 |
9
13 |
32
17 |
33
17 |
34
37 |
The bold marker values to the left are those
most likely carried by the M.R.C.A. (baseline)
|
17723
37
marker
|
Donald
Ray Barron - TX |
12 |
14 |
13 |
17 |
17 |
37 |
Donald Ray of Texas and John Calvin are known to
be third cousins, so Donald's mutation marker on 393 has occurred
within the past 3 generations. |
22581
67 marker |
Donald
Ray Barron - MS
|
13 |
14 |
12 |
17 |
17 |
35 |
The identical mutations on the 439
marker (fast mutating) indicates that Donald and Arlin possibly are
more closely related than the others in this Clan. The relationship
calculator suggests that the probability of a common ancestor within the
past 8 generations is about 85%. |
36543
37 marker |
Arlin
Dale Barron |
13 |
14 |
12 |
17 |
17 |
37 |
Arlin Dale's Haplogroup is designated R1b1 by
FTDNA through detailed "SNP" testing. |
71558
67 marker |
Andrew
Dale Barron |
13 |
14 |
12 |
17 |
17 |
37 |
Andrew, as expected, has the same exact mutation
pattern as that of his father, Arlin Dale Barron. |
42075
37 marker
|
Davy Lee Barron |
13 |
14 |
13 |
17 |
17 |
37 |
Jimmie Edward Barnes, Davy Lee Barron, and John Calvin
Barron match perfectly on 37 of 37
markers, indicating an 97% probability of a common ancestor within the past 8 generations.
|
26741
25 marker
|
Bob Ashton Barron |
13 |
14 |
13 |
17 |
17 |
37 |
Bob Ashton Barron, Jimmie Edward Barnes, Davy Lee
Barron, and John Calvin Barron match perfectly on 25 of 25 markers, indicating an
85% probability of a common ancestor within the
past 8 generations. |
15255
37
marker
|
John Calvin Barron |
13 |
14 |
13 |
17 |
17 |
37 |
Jimmie Edward Barnes, Davy Lee Barron, and John Calvin
Barron match perfectly on 37 of 37
markers, indicating an 97% probability of a common ancestor within the
past 8 generations. |
96897
37
marker
|
Jimmie Edward
Barnes |
13 |
14 |
13 |
17 |
17 |
37 |
Jimmie Edward Barnes, Davy Lee Barron, and John Calvin
Barron match perfectly on 37 of 37
markers, indicating an 97% probability of a common ancestor within the
past 8 generations. |
108981
37
marker
|
Dennis
Halm Barron |
13 |
12 |
13 |
18 |
17 |
37 |
- |
140650
37
marker
|
Walter
Thomas Barron, Jr. |
13 |
14 |
13 |
17 |
17 |
37 |
- |
144009
37
marker
|
Robert
Jonathan Barron |
13 |
14 |
13 |
17 |
18 |
36 |
- |
147966
25
marker
|
Michael
Leroy Barron
|
13 |
14 |
13 |
17 |
17 |
37 |
- |
CLAN 2
Y-DNA MARKER ANALYSIS OF MUTATIONS ONLY
(Click here
to Review DNA Evidence as it relates to our conclusions for Clan
2)
Haplogroup R1b1b2 |
| The markers shown to the right are
ONLY those which
have at least one mutation in the entire Clan from the baseline value. |
4
3
9 |
4
6
4
a |
4
6
4
b |
4
6
4
b |
G
A
T
A
H
4 |
Y
C
A
I
I
b |
5
7
6 |
C
D
Y
b |
5
3
7 |
6
4
1 |
5
2
0 |
5
6
5 |
OBSERVATIONS:
The following notes pertain to the existence of individual marker
mutations when compared to the baseline of the MRCA. Mutations
that exist in only one case are highlighted in yellow
while those carried by more than one participant are highlighted in green.
These mutations are more important as they can lead to the identity of
more recent family lines. |
|
(top number to right is alleles
location)
CLAN 2 - baseline
---» |
9
12 |
22
15 |
23
15 |
24
17 |
27
12 |
29
24 |
32
19 |
35
37 |
43
10 |
44
10 |
59
20 |
67
12 |
The bold marker values to the left are those most likely
carried by the M.R.C.A. (baseline)
|
15219
67 marker |
Bill W. Barron |
12 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
12 |
23 |
19 |
37 |
11 |
10 |
20 |
12 |
- |
18169
67 marker |
Oran
M. Barron, Jr. |
12 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
12 |
24 |
19 |
37 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
12 |
Oran, Michael David (kit
#50436) and Keith (kit #43129) are known not to have a common
ancestor within the past 6 generations and they match perfectly on all 67 markers,
indicating a 98% probability of a common ancestor in the last 7 generations. |
50436
67 marker |
Michael
David Barron |
12 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
12 |
24 |
19 |
37 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
12 |
See Observation Note for Oran M. Barron, Jr. (kit
#18169) |
35175
67 marker |
Brent
Cody Barron
(contact is son, Brent Cody Barron II |
12 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
12 |
24 |
19 |
37 |
10 |
11 |
20 |
12 |
- |
15314
37 marker |
Joseph
Russell Barron |
12 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
12 |
27 |
19 |
37 |
- |
- |
- |
|
While unusual, multiple step mutations can occur in a
short time span, as evidenced by a +3 step mutation for Joseph
Russell Barron (15314) and and Justin Smith Barron (117230)
and Chip Barron's -5 step mutation on the YCAIIb marker. Joe and
Justin have a close relationship to Chip (4th cousins, once removed) and
all descended from William Barron, Sr.'s son, William Jr.
|
71454
67 marker |
Thomas
W. "Chip" Barron |
12 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
12 |
19 |
19 |
38 |
11 |
10 |
20 |
12 |
- |
74525
67 marker |
Kenneth Derald Barron |
12 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
11 |
24 |
19 |
37 |
10 |
10 |
21 |
12 |
- |
15701
25 marker |
Joe Lynn Barron |
12 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
|
103783
67 marker
|
Jerry
Wayne Barron |
13 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
12 |
24 |
18 |
37 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
12 |
The ancestors of Jerry Wayne Barron, Richard Larry
Barron and John Lee Barron migrated to Chambers/Tallapoosa Counties, AL
in the 1830's. Jerry descends from Robert Barron, Larry and John
from Thomas Barron. Robert and Thomas were brothers
whose father may have been Thomas Barron of York/Union Counties, SC. All
three participants experienced a mutation from baseline on
fast-mutating marker 439 - the only three participants in this clan with
that mutation. Jerry and Larry have one-step mutations, John has a
two-step mutation.
|
102182
37
marker |
Richard
Larry Barron
(contact is Glenda Lowe, sponsor) |
13 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
12 |
24 |
19 |
37 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
117230
37
marker
|
Justin
Smith Barron
|
12 |
14 |
15 |
17 |
12 |
27 |
19 |
37 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Justin and Joseph Russell Barron (15314) are
descendents of William Barron, Jr.'s son, Smith Barron. The 3-step positive mutation of 27
on the YCAIIb marker has to have occurred in the Y-DNA of Smith Barron
since another descendent of William Barron,
Jr., Chip Barron (71454) through son James, shows a 5-step negative
mutation of 19. |
121466
67
marker
|
Michael
James Barron |
12 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
11 |
24 |
19 |
37 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
11 |
Michael James and Kenneth Derald Barron share the same
unique, single step mutation of marker GATAH4. Derald likely
descends from William Barron of Pendleton, SC and later Cass County, GA,
a near relative (possibly a nephew) of Michael James Barron's ancestor,
Alexander Barron. Both William and Alexander settled in Pendleton
County, SC in the late 1700's. |
43129
67
marker
|
Dr.
Keith Reeves Barron
|
12 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
12 |
24 |
19 |
37 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
12 |
- |
142211
37
marker
|
Harold
Brooks Barron
|
12 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
12 |
24 |
19 |
37 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
157008
37
marker
|
John
Lee Barron
|
14 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
12 |
24 |
19 |
37 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
158267
37
marker
|
Daniel
Raymond Barnes, Jr.
(contact is Julie Barnes Weston, daughter)
|
12 |
15 |
15 |
17 |
12 |
24 |
19 |
37 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Daniel Barnes matches perfectly the Clan 2 baseline
on 37 markers. This is rather remarkable since the MRCA
between his line and the other four participants who also match the
baseline on 37 markers probably lived in the 1600's. Family
tradition indicates that the likely ancestral line of the other four
matching participants (Oran Barron, Michael David Barron, Brent
Cody Barron and Keith Reeves Barron) left Scotland for Ireland in
the mid-1600's. Their immigrant ancestor(s) arrived in America from
Ireland in the mid 1700's. Daniel Barnes' immigrant ancestor came
directly from Scotland in the late 1800's. Somewhere between the
1600's and 1800's, Daniel's family came to be known as Barnes rather
than Barron |
CLAN 3
Y-DNA MARKER ANALYSIS OF MUTATIONS ONLY
(Click here
to Review DNA Evidence as it relates to our conclusions for Clan
3)
R1b1b2a1b5b |
| The markers shown to the right are
ONLY those which
have at least one mutation in the entire clan from the baseline value. |
3
8
5
b |
4
3
9 |
3
8
9
|
2 |
4
3
7 |
4
4
8 |
4
6
0 |
5
7
6 |
C
D
Y
a |
C
D
Y
b |
4
4
2 |
5
3
7 |
OBSERVATIONS:
The following notes pertain to the existence of individual marker
mutations when compared to the baseline of the MRCA. Mutations
that exist in only one case are highlighted in yellow
while those carried by more than one participant are highlighted in green.
These mutations are more important as they can lead to the identity of
more recent family lines. |
|
(top number to right is alleles
location)
CLAN 3 - baseline
---» |
6
13 |
9
12 |
12
29 |
19
15 |
20
18 |
26
11 |
32
18 |
34
35 |
35
40 |
36
12 |
43
10 |
The bold marker values to the left are those most likely
carried by the M.R.C.A. (baseline) |
15394
67
marker |
Charles
Chester Barron |
12 |
12 |
29 |
15 |
18 |
11 |
18 |
35 |
40 |
12 |
8 |
Charles Chester and John S. share a proven
ancestor six generations ago; thus
Charles' two mutations have occurred within the past 5 generations. |
15654
25 marker |
William
Paul Barron, Jr. |
13 |
12 |
29 |
14 |
19 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
William and the rest of this clan share a common
ancestor seven generations ago, thus William's mutations have occurred
since that ancestor lived. |
15363
67
marker
|
John S. Barron |
13 |
12 |
29 |
15 |
18 |
11 |
18 |
35 |
40 |
12 |
10 |
John S. and Bobby Barron share a common ancestor
six generations ago and no mutations have occurred during the ensuing
period of time. |
72957
25 marker
|
Bobby
Barron |
13 |
12 |
29 |
15 |
18 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(see note above) |
70588
67
marker |
Daniel
Barron
c/o Beth Hillis |
13 |
12 |
29 |
15 |
18 |
11 |
18 |
35 |
40 |
12 |
10 |
Daniel and
John S. Barron (kit #15363) both have
taken the 67-marker test. The fact that they have a perfect match
substantiates the proposed relationship between the two individuals, per
the chart shown on the Conclusion
Page. |
87442
25 marker |
Robert
Michael Barron |
13 |
12 |
28 |
15 |
18 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
98422
67 marker |
Jack
Leslie Barron |
13 |
11 |
29 |
15 |
18 |
12 |
17 |
35 |
39 |
13 |
10 |
In theory, the FTDNA "Relationship
Calculator" (based on the number of mutations) estimates
that there is a 27% chance that a common ancestor between John S.
(kit #15363) and Jack Leslie Barron lived within the last 8
generations. Family lineage and documentation suggests that this
common ancestor lived within the past six generations. (See the
Conclusion Page). |
90162
67 marker |
Charles
Henson Barron |
13 |
12 |
29 |
15 |
18 |
12 |
18 |
34 |
40 |
12 |
10 |
The fact that only Charles Henson and Jack
Leslie Barron both have a mutation at the marker CDYa marker (a slow
mutating marker), gives rise to the thought that they may have a common ancestor whose DNA marker mutated since the common
ancestor for all these participants. However, the fact that there
are five additional mutations between these participants seemingly
contradicts this possibility. Additional research is required. |
|
CLAN 4
Y-DNA MARKER ANALYSIS OF MUTATIONS ONLY
Haplogroup R1b1b2 |
| The markers shown to the right are
ONLY those which
have at least one mutation in the entire clan from the baseline value. |
4
3
9 |
5
7
6 |
C
D
Y
b |
OBSERVATIONS:
The following notes pertain to the existence of individual marker
mutations when compared to the baseline of the MRCA. Mutations
that exist in only one case are highlighted in yellow
while those carried by more than one participant are highlighted in green.
These mutations are more important as they can lead to the identity of
more recent family lines. |
|
(top
number to right is alleles location)
CLAN 4 - baseline
---» |
9
12 |
32
18 |
35
39 |
The bold marker value to the left is that most likely
carried by the M.R.C.A. (baseline) |
80423
37
marker |
Terry
Samuel Barron |
12 |
17 |
39 |
(see note below) |
93331
25
marker |
Mike
Stone
(birth name: Ralph E. Barron)
(correspondent: Gloria Maranda) |
11 |
- |
- |
The FTDNA "Relationship Calculator"
(based on the number of mutations) estimates that there is a 27%
probability that a common ancestor lived within the past 4 generations
and a 58% probability that he existed within the past 8 generations. |
155261
37
marker
|
Robert
Lee Barron |
12 |
18 |
38 |
- |
ANY MEMBER NOT SHOWN IN ANY OF THE ABOVE CHARTS
CURRENTLY IS UNASSIGNED TO A CLAN.
CONTACTS FOR QUESTIONS?
Patrick
Childress, website author & Barron DNA Project Co-Administrator; Barron Project Co-Administrators John
Barron and/or Vicki Kruschwitz
|