|
Genealogy of the Jackson and Associated Families |
Generation 3
Grandchildren of Ralph Jackson and Leah Williams
Children of William/Williams Jackson and Sarah (Mary) Burton
4. John Jackson
|
John Jackson was born in Dale Parish, Henrico County,
Virginia, and died in Nottoway County, Virginia. John (1718/1723 –
1787/1788) can be traced through Amelia County, Virginia records for
a period of 49 years from 1739 through 1788. Although his birth date
and place are not known, at least from primary source records, the
date of his death can be fairly accurately pegged as occurring
sometime between 14 August 1787 and 28 February 1788. He wrote his
will on the earlier date, and it was presented in court after his
death on the latter date, which brackets his death as occurring
sometime during the intervening time period. There is a peculiar bit
of information about his son Abner that may suggest that John’s
death took place during the earlier part of this time period. In
August of 1787 it was noted in Charlotte County records that Abner
Jackson had abandoned his property in that county and had left the
area (to parts unknown) without paying taxes. This was, presumably,
the same Charlotte County land bequeathed to Abner from his father
in his August 1787 will. If Abner left the area without bothering to
sell the land he had inherited from his father, and Charlotte County
officials noticed his absence in 1787, then it certainly makes sense
that John must have passed away sometime in 1787.1,2,3,4,5,25 |
|
John Jackson was probably born in either Chesterfield or Henrico County, Virginia. Amelia County tithable lists extend back to 1736, but John does not appear in them until 1739, which means either he just moved to the area, or he had just reached taxable age (16) when he first appeared. In the latter case, it is more likely that he would have appeared in his father’s household as a minor rather than in his own household. A reasonable upper end member on his date of birth date, thus, can be ascertained by assuming John was 16 years old in 1739. This yields a birth date of 1723. More likely, he was at least 21 in 1739, which places a lower limit of 1718 for his birth date. This analysis brackets the date of John Jackson’s birth as probably occurring sometime between 1718 and 1723. Consequently, his age at the time he died (based on a late 1787 date of death) must have been somewhere between 64 and 69.59
|
|
At an unknown date and place he married a woman named Sarah (? - ?), whose last name has been lost to history. While the date and place of the wedding have not been documented, it, surely, must have taken place in Virginia, probably Amelia County where John lived. Very little personal information, other than her name, the fact that she existed and was married to John Jackson, is available for Sarah.
|
|
As noted above, John Jackson passed away in late 1787 or early 1788 in Amelia County, Virginia. According to John’s will, Sarah was to live on the farm for the rest of her days or until she remarried. Since she only appears as the head of household in the tax records once (in 1788) after her husband’s death, it is presumed either that she, too, passed away, or that she remarried sometime after 1788. The burial site for both John and Sarah is unknown. A best guess is that they were buried on the family farm or in a local cemetery. If Sarah remarried, it seems more likely that she would have been buried near her second husband. |
Timeline of John Jackson and Sarah ? (Unknown Last Name)
|
~1718 - 17231,2,3,4,5,25 |
Birth of John Jackson in Dale Parish, Henrico County, Virginia |
|
26 Nov. 173838 |
Colonial Wills of Henrico County, Virginia Part Two 1737 - 1781, page
1095 |
|
173951 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
174051 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
174151 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
1741 |
Earliest Estimated Date for Birth of John Jackson Jr. |
|
174151 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
174251 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
1743 |
Earliest Date for Birth of Arthur Jackson |
|
174451 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
174651 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
1746 |
Latest Date for Birth of John Jackson Jr. and Arthur Jackson |
|
174851 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
174951 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
175051 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
1750 |
Approximate Birth Date of Daniel Jackson |
|
10 June 175151 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
175251 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
3 Jan. 175259 |
Amelia County, Virginia Deed Books Volumes 3 - 4, 1747 - 1754, Deed Book 4, page 287 This indenture made the third day of January in the year of our lord one
thousand seven hundred and fifty two between John Jackson of the county
of Amelia of the one part and Alexander Roberts of the same county of
the other part |
|
29 Jan. 175259 |
Amelia County, Virginia Deed Books Volumes 3 - 4, 1747 - 1754, Deed Book 4, page 306 This Indenture made this the twenty ninth day of January in the year of
our lord Christ One thousand Seven hundred and fifty two Between Joseph
Motley of the county of Amelia of the One part and John Jackson of said
county of Amelia of the other part |
|
175251 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
22 Nov. 175359 |
Amelia County, Virginia
Deed Books Volumes 3 - 4, 1747 - 1754, Deed Book 5, page 102 |
|
175351 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
23 Feb. 175425 |
The Jacksons of Lower Virginia, Evelyn Duke Brandenburger,
Chesterfield
County, Virginia Will Book 1, page 208 |
|
175451 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
1754 |
Earliest Potential Birth Date for Abner Jackson |
|
175551 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
175651 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
1756 |
Earliest Possible Birth Date for William Jackson |
|
1758 |
Earliest Possible Birth Date for Henry Jackson |
|
14 May 176151 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
1761 |
Latest Possible Birth
Date for Abner Jackson, William Jackson and |
|
176251 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
176351 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
176451 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
1764 |
Earliest Birth Date for Curtis Jackson |
|
176551 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
176651 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
1766 |
Latest Birth Date for Curtis Jackson |
|
176751 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
176851 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
21 Apr 176858 |
Amelia County, Virginia, Deed Books 9 – 11, Deed Book 9, page 343 This Indenture made this the twenty first day of April in the year of
our lord Christ One thousand Seven hundred and sixty eight between John
Jackson of the county of Amelia of the One part and Williams Jackson of
said county of the other part |
|
24 Nov. 176858 |
Amelia County, Virginia,
Deed Books 9 – 11, Deed Book 10, page 96 |
|
176951 |
Amelia County, Virginia Tithables
1736 – 1771 |
|
1772 |
Earliest Birth Date for Isaiah Jackson |
|
177852 |
Amelia County, Virginia
Tithables 1778 – 1782 |
|
177952 |
Amelia County, Virginia
Tithables 1778 – 1782 |
|
178252 |
Amelia County, Virginia
Tithables 1778 – 1782 |
|
178353 |
Amelia County, Virginia
Personal Property Tax Lists 1782 - 1813 |
|
1787 |
Latest Birth Date for Isaiah Jackson |
|
14 Aug. 178749 |
Amelia County Virginia,
Will Book 4, page 94 |
|
28 Feb. 178849 |
Amelia County Virginia,
Will Book 4, page 116 |
|
25 Apr 178853 |
Amelia County, Virginia
Personal Property Tax Lists 1782 - 1813 |
|
25 Sept. 178849 |
Amelia County Virginia,
Will Book 4, page 116 |
Analysis of the Timeline
|
John and Sarah Jackson, along with most of the children in their household, can be traced for a period of nearly 50 years through colonial Virginia land, will and tax records. Analysis of this data reveals much information about the family structure, where they lived and some general information on their lifestyle.
|
|
A birth order of John and Sarah’s male children, as well as an
approximation of their birth dates, can be derived from tax records
of pre-Revolutionary, colonial Virginia. A 1705 Virginia law taxed
all males 16 years of age and over, so, in a continuous series of
tax records, the first appearance of a male in his father’s
household would closely approximate the year in which he turned 16,
thus allowing a fairly accurate calculation of his birth date.
Successive appearance of males in the father’s household in
succeeding years would, thus,define the birth order of other sons.
Unfortunately, for various reasons, the tax data for Southside
Virginia counties comprises a discontinuous series of records.
Individual tax lists were lost and courthouse fires destroyed
records, especially during times of war, so Virginia county tax
lists are characterized by numerous gaps. Despite these
deficiencies, much family information can be gleaned from these
records.59 |
|
Table ? shows tax data for the John and Sarah Jackson household in Amelia County, Virginia from 1739 through 1788, and perhaps one of the more striking features of this graphic are the gaps in data, which are shown in gray. The data is fairly continuous through the 1740’s and mid 1750’s, characterized only by scattered one-year data gaps. A five year gap then occurs from 1757 through 1761, and is followed by eight years of continuous records. Then, from 1770 through 1777, there is another gap, followed by alternating periods of missing data and full data coverage until 1788. All totaled, there are 23 tax years of missing data and 27 years of preserved data, so there is, actually, a great deal of tithable and property tax data available, containing a sufficient amount of information to allow the structure of this Jackson family to be reconstructed.
|
|
John Jr. and Arthur are the first to appear as males over 16 in their parent’s household in 1762, and since the first major record gap (1757 – 1761) occurs immediately prior to their first appearance, they must have turned 16 sometime during that time. This brackets their birth dates as occurring sometime between 1741 and 1746. Since John left his parent’s household much earlier than Arthur, it is here interpreted that he is the oldest son. While the order in which they left home may not necessarily reflect birth order, John Jr is, clearly, named after his father, possibly supporting the notion that he was the first born son. Of particular note is the fact that the first year that John Jr. appears in his own household, his father is identified in the tax records as John Sr. This was most likely an identifier used by the county clerks or the tax list owner to differentiate between two individuals having the same given and surnames within a tax district. Arthur remained in his parent’s household until 1765, and appears on his own the next year, which could mean that he got married and moved out sometime during that year. Daniel makes his first appearance in 1766, so he must be next in the birth order with a birth date that calculates to 1750. The second large “data hole” starts in 1770, and by the end of this eight year gap, three more males have come of taxable age: William, Abner and Henry. Both William and Abner are living either in their own household (William), in the household of another individual (Abner), or in their parent’s household (Henry), which means they turned 16, and possibly 21 sometime during the preceding gap in the records. Their birth dates, thus, can be bracketed as occurring sometime between 1754 and 1761. Finally, in 1782, Curtis makes his first appearance in the tax records of his father’s household, but this is immediately after a two year gap in the records. He must have turned 16 during the hiatus, so his birth, thus, can be bracketed as occurring sometime between 1764 and 1766. In 1788, after John Sr had passed away, Sarah is listed as the head of household, which includes one male under the age of 16. John’s 1788 will identifies a son named Isaiah, and since he never appears in previous tax records, it can be assumed that Isaiah must have been the youngest son. Since he was 16 or younger in 1788, calculation of his birth date indicates that Isaiah was born in 1772 or afterwards.
|
|
In his will, John Jackson lists all of his children in the following order: John Jackson, Arthur Jackson, Daniel Jackson, Abner Jackson, William Jackson, Henry Jackson, Isaiah Jackson and Curtis Jackson. While there may never have been an attempt to list his children in birth order, except for the last two children, this sequence is supported by the tax records, and is here considered to be birth order for this family. Birth dates and/or ranges for all of John and Sarah’s known children, thus, can be defined as follows, from oldest to youngest: John Jr. (1741 - 1746), Arthur (1743 - 1746), Daniel (1750), Abner (1754 – 1761), William (1756 – 1761), Henry (1758 – 1761), Curtis (1764 – 1766) and Isaiah (1772 –1787). Unfortunately, the tax data gives no indication of the presence of daughters, but no daughters are mentioned in John’s will, so it is here presumed that John and Sarah either had no daughters or had none that survived beyond infancy.
|
|
A key method for reliably tracing John Jackson through what are essentially minimally descriptive personal property tax records is through the identification and location of his property. During this time period of John Jackson’s lifetime covered by these records (1739 – 1788) there were several types of taxable property expressed in the tax data, the most prominent being land, slaves and livestock. The county government assigned tax collection to individuals who were responsible for specific, geographically-defined regions, and, in the early records, these regions were bounded by the drainage basins of the principal streams in the area. From 1739 through about 1753, the tax districts consisted of three areas: the area between the Flat Creek drainage and the Appomattox River, the drainage basin containing Flat Creek and Deep Creek and the drainage basin beyond Deep Creek. The Flat/Deep Creek district was often further subdivided by the drainage basin of Nibbs Creek. (See Figure ?) Taxpayers that appeared in the same tax district year after year, quite clearly, owned property within that particular district. Early tax records identified all taxable slaves by name, thus allowing individual slaves and slave owners to be traced from year to year. Consequently, slave ownership, especially when corroborated by will data, is quite useful in confirming an identification. Finally, while livestock and other personal property does not relay much, if any, family information, it does shed much light on the nature of the lives of these pioneers. The tithable and tax data can be used to generally locate John and Sarah’s farm in Amelia County. The early tax records refer to the location of their land as being between Deep and Flat Creeks and, beginning around 1753, within Nottoway Parish. From about 1753 onward, the county was, apparently, subdivided into Raleigh and Nottoway Parish, with Nottoway Parish being split off to become Nottoway County in 1789. (source) Based on this data, it can be seen (Figure 1?) that John and Sarah lived in the Flat Creek drainage basin in the part of Amelia County that was later split off to become Nottoway County.
|
|
John Jackson can also be definitively traced through Amelia County records based upon his record of slave ownership and the geographic location of his property within the county (Table 1?). In his 1787 will he named nine slaves (Abner, Nancy, Jack, Amey, Jude, Tawney, Milly, Sally and Sampson), most, of whom (Amey, Jude, Tawney, Molly and Sampson), were also itemized in his subsequent estate inventory. Two of these slaves were African women, Amey and Jude, who can be used to positively identify John from 1778 through 1783. Amey appears, along with another African female named Peg, from 1762 through at least 1768, and from 1751 through at least 1756, Peg is listed as John and Sarah’s only slave. Except for gaps in the record, the record of slave ownership, alone, can be used to successfully identify John Jackson in the Amelia County tax records back in time to 1751. While he owned no slaves prior to 1751, there is only one John Jackson in Amelia County records from 1739 through 1750, and he is located in the Flat Creek/Deep Creek tax district. Furthermore, except for the later years when they owned several male slaves, John and Sarah owned only one or two female slaves for most of the time period, and female slaves were, most likely, not field hands. This Jackson family had a house full of boys to help with the farm work, so these African women, no doubt, were used to assist in household chores and in raising the boys. When the boys had mostly left the household and John and Sarah were elderly, it appears that male slaves were purchased, and were most likely put to work in the fields.
|
|
Further information on the composition and structure of John and Sarah’s family, as well as insights into their lifestyle can be discerned from John’s 1788 will and his estate inventory. Table 2? shows the items from this inventory classified into eight categories. The categories themselves, as well as an analysis of the items placed in the categories yield interesting insights into the life and times of what appear to be typical residents of Amelia County, Virginia in the late 18th century. Two crops were itemized, so it can be seen that these Jacksons raised, at the very least, corn and tobacco. The tobacco, most likely, was a cash crop for export to England, while the corn was probably used for subsistence living with the excess possibly being available for local barter or sale. A grindstone in the inventory must have been for grinding corn or wheat to flour, which would have been used to make bread, among other food items. The basic farm implements, hoes and shovels, clearly serve to further underscore the agricultural root of their existence. The agrarian nature of their life is further defined by the livestock they owned – cattle, horses, sheep and bees. Since they were beekeepers, they obviously produced honey which could be used in the home as well as for local trading. The oxen yoke and the butter pot indicate that the cattle were used both as a food source and as draft animals. The horses, no doubt, were used mostly for personal transporation or for hauling material, or both, as evidenced by the saddle and the cart. The spinning wheel, spindles, cotton cards and loom indicate that this Jackson family probably made yarn from the wool of their sheep, and wove it into cloth with the loom for barter, sale, as well, most likely, to produce their own clothes. The candles and chamber pot indicate the primitive level of their pioneer existence without the modern day luxuries of electricity and indoor plumbing. Very few items of furniture were identified - some bedroom furniture, an armchair and a table are all that are listed, which may indicate the sparse furnishings of a yeoman farmer’s home. With the exception of the looking glass (or mirror) all of the furniture in this list could easily have been hand made. In fact, the saws, drills, chisels and wedges all show that John was a very active wood worker. Not only was wood the main fuel for heating and cooking in this preindustrial society, but it was also an easily obtainable and available construction material. Two guns were itemized in addition to a sword and a bayonet, all of which seems to suggest the need to be able to defend oneself against dangerous enemies – the sword, in particular, suggests some formal military experience. The rawhide and tanned leather indicate that every part of a butchered animal had some useful application, not to mention that leather items were probably made in the home. Kitchen items were of particular importance, since they made everyday life in such a harsh environment much more tolerable. All in all, an analysis of the estate inventory paints a picture of a self sufficient, rural, pioneer farming family that probably spent the bulk of their time raising crops, tending livestock, not to mention hand crafting wood and leather items. They probably grew and processed much of their own food, bartered for necessities they could not produce themselves by trading specialty items they could produce, like honey and homespun cloth, and, with the heavy concentration of wood and wool working tools, as well as the leather items, they, undoubtedly, met many of their basic functional needs by handcrafting needed items on their own. They also had the assistance of several female slaves to assist, not only in handling many of these chores, but also in raising a houseful of boys. These Africans also required food, shelter and clothing. (The froe and the drawing knife – for making shingles.) |
Table 2?
Categorization of Items from Estate Inventory
|
Tools wedges froe cross cut saw hand saw whip saw jointer auger drawing knife chisels compasses flat irons scissors grindstone hatchet pales tubs barrels hooks hoes shovels |
Animals horses cattle sheep bees |
Animal Gear saddle brush bridles meal bag shoe tool ox yokes cart |
Crops corn tobacco |
|
Household Items wheels spindles cotton cards loom beds & furniture armchair table candlestick looking glass butter pot books chamber pot |
Kitchen Items pots hooks dishes spoons bowls cups & saucers tumblers tea pot knives & forks bottles basin pitcher funnel jug |
Slaves Amey Jude Tawney Molly Tab Sampson |
Miscellaneous Items guns sword bayonet rawhide tanned leather |
|
While most, if not all, of the Jacksons living in Amelia, Chesterfield and surrounding Southside Virginia counties during this time period were, undoubtedly, related in some way, further research is needed to accurately define these relationships. (Southside Virginia is that part of Virginia that lies between the James River and the North Carolina border). SOURCE There is an intriguing hint, however, of a possible family relationship between John Jackson and a Francis Jackson of Amelia County through the Hamblin family that also requires additional research. John’s son, Abner Jackson, unaccountably appeared in the tax records in 1778 and 1779 in the household of a Steven Hamblin in Amelia County. Francis Jackson, whose Amelia County will was written in 1792, left property to a Kitty Hamblin and Sarah Hamblin, although he did not define his relationship to either woman. There exists the possibility that Steven Hamblin is related to Kitty and Sarah Hamblin, and, as noted, to francis Jackson, either by blodd or through marriage. Steven Hambllin could be a relative from Abner’s mother’s side, or, for that matter from his father’s side by marriage to a sister or cousin of John Jackson.
|
![]()
|
Maps |
![]()
Last Revised: 10 Oct 2006