Re: FW: Fwd: important internet/email news

[adyer1@juno.com (J & A Dyer)]

Terry, 

Would you please explain what you mean when you use the words "liberal
shant" ?
JADyer

On Fri, 16 Jan 1998 15:11:17 -0500 "Dan E. Harrison"
<DEHarris@Bellsouth.net> writes:
>Once again, friends, I have already heard the emotional, hateful
>arguments. Where are the facts? Don't keep sending me notes of emotion
>about somebody taking away our cheap ride. Send me some facts I can
>digest. I can be as selfish as the next person, but I try not to be so
>obvious about it. I am really concerned about the liberal slant some 
>of
>these arguments are taking. I don't really care if you can use the
>Innernet around the clock for penneys! I want to make sue thatthe 
>right
>thing is going to be done and right now all I am hearing is junk. Does
>anybody really know and care what is going on? Where are you?
>
>-gene Harrison-
>Fayetteville, Ga 
>Terry G. Peden wrote:
>> 
>> This e-mail came into me today and it has concerned me very much.  
>If this really happens it will directly effect all of us.  Let's make 
>sure that it dosen't happen anyway.  Let the FCC know how you feel.  I 
>am.
>> 
>> A concerned Family Genealogist who relies on Internet e-mail,
>> 
>> Terry G. Peden
>> Dalton, GA
>> http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Ranch/1088/page5.html
>> 
>> Paternal:
>> PEDEN/STINNETT/RIDLEY/GRAY/COX/BINGHAM/BOHANNON/MAYES/BOYD/BARNETT/
>> KILLIAN/CHASE/BALL/POWELL/WIDDOWS/CARDWELL/MONTEITH/BELL/GILES/ 
>JOHNSON/JUSTUS/THOMASON/SHOTWELL/OGLE/MARTIN/WHITE/FEAGANS/LONG/
>> DEBORD/HUDSPETH/McDILL/LESLIE/MILLS/HAMILTON/
>> 
>> Maternal:
>> BROWN/COLLINS/WESTMORELAND/JOHNSON/PARKER/GOSSAGE/CALLAHAN/
>> WALLACE/JACKSON/TUCKER/WHITE/HARRISON/CARRELL/HELTON/SILVEY/WEBER/
>> SMITH/McKINNEY/ALLISON/BELL/HARDIN/CATE-CATES/OGLESBY/WOMACK/BERRY/ 
>BLALOCK/
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:   Eugene Finley [SMTP:ecfinley@alltel.net]
>> Sent:   Friday, January 16, 1998 10:13 AM
>> 
>> Subject:        FW: Fwd: important internet/email news
>> 
>> ----------
>> From:   Louise A. Flood[SMTP:pwrchair@ocsonline.com]
>> Sent:   Thursday, January 15, 1998 12:03 PM
>> To:     Alleman, Boyd; Batchelor, Marcia; Birdsall, Eva; Darren 
>Williams; Derenda, Sue; Devereaux, Betty; Finley, Eugene; Mast, 
>Marissa J.; Paries, Calvin
>> Subject:        Fw: Fwd: important internet/email news
>> 
>> Forwarded by Louise A. Flood <pwrchair@ocsonline.com>
>> 
>> Just a quick but important message concerning E-Mail.  This is to 
>inform you of a very important matter currently under review by the 
>FCC.
>> Your local telephone company has filed a proposal with the FCC to 
>impose
>> per minute charges for your internet service.  They contend that 
>your
>> usage has, or will,  hinder the operation of the telephone network.
>> E-Mail, in my opinion will diminish dramatically if users were 
>required
>> to pay additional per minute charges.  The FCC has created a E-Mail 
>box
>> for your comments, responses must be received by February 13, 1998. 
>Send
>> your comments to "isp@fcc.gov" tell them what you think. Every phone
>> company is in on this one, and they are trying to sneak it in just 
>under
>> the wire for litigation.  Let everyone you know hear this one.  Get 
>E_Mail
>> addresses to everyone you can think of.
>> Forward this to your E_Mail friends and ask them to write to the FCC 
>at the
>> above address.
>> We all must write and send to everyone we know to write also.  We 
>don't want or need extra charges for email.
>> ___________________________________________________
>> >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>> 
>> >from Jeff Litster:
>> 
>> I feel that we pay the phone companies plenty, and I think this is 
>just a
>> ploy so that the phone companies will not have to upgrade our unfit, 
>worn
>> down phone lines.  I also think that they feel threatened that we're 
>not
>> making phone calls anymore because of e-mail, which in my opinion, 
>is a
>> crock.  Let's get out comments to the FCC so that this stupidity is
>> stopped!  Who knows too, maybe this is a break that I-Link can use 
>since
>> they're trying to get that $20/month voice phone plan (long 
>distance) going
>> on anyway... =)
>
>