Search billions of records on Ancestry.com
   
site logo
You are here: Home/People List/A3-4 Thomas Park

pixel.gif pixel.gif pixel.gif pixel.gif
File Name: A3-4-tp Return to: Ancestor's Pedigree


Family Group Record
People List
Relationship Chart


A3-4 THOMAS PARK (MALE)

pixel.gif pixel.gif
Born:
At:
Informant:
Certificate:
Source:

Baptised:
At:
Certificate:
Source:

Married:
To:
At:
Whilst living at:
Occupation:
Witnesses:
Certificate:
Source:

Widowed:
At:
Source:

Divorced:
At:
Source:

Remarried:
To:
At:
Whilst living at:
Occupation:
Witnesses:
Certificate:
Source:

Occupation:
As at:
Whilst living at:
Source:

Occupation:
As at:
Whilst living at:
Source:

Occupation:
As at:
Whilst living at:
Source:

Died:
At:
Cause:
Occupation:
Informant:
Certificate:
Source:

Buried:
At:
Source:

Father:
Mother:
Brothers:
Sisters:
Sons:
Daughters:
10 Oct 1870
Bright Street, Carlisle, Cumberland (No number given)
"X The mark of" Sarah Ross/Park, Mother, Bright Street, Carlisle, Cumberland
Filed #B192
Birth Certificate; General Records Office: Dec Qtr 1870; Vol: 10b; Page: 449; District: Carlisle; County: Cumberland
































Scholar Age 10
3 April 1881
Cummersdale Rural Sanitary District, Cumberland (No details given)
1881 Census On-line at www.familysearch.org PRO Ref: RG11; Piece: 5163; Folio: 18; Page: 3

Engraver's Apprentice at Calico Printer's Possibly Married Age 21 *
5 April 1891
9, (sic) Dalston Street, Carlisle, Cumberland **
S & N CD of 1891 Census PRO Ref: RG12; Piece: 4289; Folio: 107a; Page: 31; Thumbnail: 215


















Alexander Park 2nd
Sarah Ross/Park
William Park; Alexander Park 1st
Catherine Park; Elizabeth Park/Gilbertson; Frances Park

COMMENTS

* The Census entry is difficult to read but could indicate that Thomas was married.

** The enumerator of this part of the 1891 census omitted one house in Dalston Street, thought to be number 7, which was subsequently added on a later page as number 9. The Marriage Certificate of Alexander's sister Elizabeth Park/Gilbertson quite distinctly gives her address as 7, Dalston Street. The presumption is that the Census enumerator confused the number of the house which had been omitted from the original survey and inserted later. Substantiation should come from other events in the family.

© All Rights Reserved