546Assembly Proceedings, May 15 June 8, 1751
The Petition of Joseph Cheney and Anne his Wife,
referred from the Upper House to the Consideration of this House, was here read and rejected. The Petition of the Vestry, and sundry of the principal Inhabi tants and Freeholders, of Durham Parish in Charles County, re ferred from the Upper House to the Consideration of this House, was read and granted.
The Petition of some of the Inhabitants of Bladensburgh in Prince Georges County pray ing leave to bring in a Bill to prevent Swine running at large in the said Town; and the Petition of Joseph Cheney and Ann his Wife, of Prince Georges County Praying a Reward may be given for the Dis covery of Medicines to cure the Flux, Referred to the Consideration of the Lower house of Assembly and sent by Richard Lee Esq.
May 20
a Petition of Joseph Cheney and Anne his Wife, praying a Bounty to make public a Cure for the Bloody Flux; with several Testimon ials of Cure performed, annexed to the said Petition. Which were severally Indorsed, “Referred by the Upper House of Assembly to the Consideration of the Lower House.”
Provincial Court Proceedings, 1674. 329
Daniel Jenifer John Cheyney and Jane his wife administratrix Liber M M agt of the goods and Chattells rights and Creditts John Cheyney & ux of Henry Rough her late husband deceased were Sumoned to answer unto Daniel Jenifer in a plea that they render unto him 4000 l of tob which from him they unjustly deteine. And whereupon the said Daniel by Robert Carvile his Attorny Saith that whereas the said Henry by the name of Henry Rough of Calvert County in the Province of Maryland Chirurgeon upon the 29th day of August in the 39th yeare of the Dominion of Caecilius & Annoq Doth: 1670 by his certaine writeing Obligatory Sealed with the Seale of him the Said Henry and here in Court produced p. 246 whose date is the day and yeare abovesaid did confesse and acknowl edge himselfe to Owe and Stand indebted unto the said Daniel the full and just Sume of foure thousand pounds of good Sound mer chantable tobacco & caske to be paid to the said Daniel in Some convenient place or places in Calvert County before or upon the tenth day of November which should be in the yeare of Our Lord 1671 To the which payment well and truly to be made he the said Henry did bind himselfe his heirs and executors firmly by those presents Yet notwithstanding the said Henry in his Life tyme nor the said Jane Since the death of the Said Henry to whom admcon of all and Singular the goods and Chattels rights & Creditts that were his the said Henryes at the tyme of his death were by the Honble Philip Cal vert Esq Cheife judge for probate of Wills and granting of adminis trations within the said Province in due forme of Law cothitted whilst the Said Jane was Sole nor the said John Cheney and Jane his wife Since their intermarriage have Satisffied and paid the said Sume of 4000li of tobacco to him the Said Daniel according to the said writeing Obligatory though often thereunto requested
But the Said John Cheyney and Jane his wife have hitherto denyed and refused to pay the same & the same Still to pay doe deny and refuse to the damage of the said Daniel 6ooo I tobacco & thereupon he bringeth his suite &c. And the Said John and Jane by George Parker their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when &c and pray liberty of Speakeing hereunto untill the next Provinciall Court. and it is granted unto them the same day is given to the Said Daniel Now here at this day to witt the 16th day of October in the 43th yeare of the Dominion of Caecilius &c came the said Daniel by Robert Carvile his Attorny and Offered himselfe against the Said John and Jane but the said John and Jane came not but made de fault Therefore it is considered by the Court here that the said Daniel recover against the said John Cheney and Jane his wife admrx of the Said Henry Rough of the estate of the Said Henry aswell the said Summe of foure thousand pounds of tobacco the debt aforesaid as also the Summe of five hundred Sixty Seaven pounds of tobacco for his costs and charges in this behalfe laid Out.
184 Assembly Proceedings, 1694-1728.
Liber LL, 4
Acts
seven hundred and eight for the Consideration of twenty five pounds
Sterling granted and sold unto Stephen Wright of the same County
and province Planter and to his heirs and Assignes forever the
moyety or half parte of a Tract or parcell of land Called Timber
neck Lying in Ann arundell County on the South Side of South River
on the West side of a Creek Called Jaccobs Creek Beginning at a
marked red oake standing upon a point and running for breadth West
South west up the Creek one hundred and Sixty perches to a marked
Oak by a Marish side being a bounded tree of Richard Beards on the
west by Beards line drawn west and by north two hundred perches
to a marked pock hiccory and by a line drawn north and by East
from the said Pock hiccory fifty perches to a marked red oake in the
line of Richard Chenys land and by Chenys line East south East
twenty five perches to a marked white oake bounded on the North by
p. 124
a line drawn North north East from the said Oak one hundred
perches to a marked Pock hiccory and from the said Pock hiccory
north East and by North to a marked Oake by a Branch in the line
of the land laid out for Murreen Duvall and William Young on the
East by the said Land on the south by Jacobs Creek Containing and
laid out for two hundred acres more or less being formerly granted
to Richard Uggins and John Wheeler that is to say that moyety or
halfe parte of the said Tract of land Called Timber neck formerly
Occupied by the said John Wheeler and late in the Tenure or Occu-
pation of William Bateman of Ann arundell County late deced as
by the same Deed duly Executed and acknowledged and now remain-
ing upon the land Records of Ann Arundell County in the Book
marked P L page four hundred and Eighty two reference being
thereto had may more at Large appear And whereas the said
Stephen Wright by his Deed of Bargaine and Sale bearing date the
Sixteenth day of May Anno Domini Seventeen hundred and Eleven
for the Consideration of Thirty five pounds Sterling granted and
sold the said moyety or halfe part of the Tract of land aforesaid unto
Samuell Chambers of the same County and Province Gentleman and
to his heirs and Assignes forever as by the Deed thereof duly Execu-
ted and acknowledged and now remaining upon the same land records
and in the same Book aforementioned page four hundred and Eighty
five reference being thereto Likewise had may more fully appeare. But
forasmuch as the said Stephen Wright Omitted to get his aforemen-
tioned Deed from Matthew Beard Recorded in time so that by the Act
of Assembly of this province for Quieting possessions Enrolling Con-
veyances and secureing the Estates of purchasers no Estate in the said
land was past thereby and for that the said Matthew Beard and
Stephen Wright are Both since deceased And for that the said
Samuel Chambers on finding the said first mentioned Deed not
recorded Omitted Recording the said Deed from Wright to himself
well knowing the Recording the said Deed would avail him nothing
unless he Could procure a Confirmation of the aforementioned first.
192 Assembly Proceedings, 1694-1728.
Liber LL, 4
Acts
of the other parte Witnesseth that the said William Lunn for and
in Consideration of the Sume of thirty pounds Sterling mony to him
in hand already paid by the said Thomas Larkin the receipt whereof
he the said William Lunn doth hereby acknowledge and himselfe
therewith to be fully Contented and paid hath Given Granted Aliened
bargained sold Enfeoffed and Confirmed and by these prsents doth
Give Grant alien bargain Sell Enffeoffe and Confirme unto the said
Thomas Larkin his heirs and Assignes forever All that parcell of
land which he the said William Lunn had made over to him by Benja-
min Williams John Cheny and Mary his wife as by their Deed of
Conveyance may appeare It being part of a tract of Land Called
Waterford Lying in Ann Arundell County aforesaid and Beginning
at a bounded Beech tree standing on the side of a Bank on the South
Side of green branch at the mouth of the said Branch upon Patuxent
River Side and runing from thence East and by South one hundred
perches to a bounded Red oake thence South East one hundred
and Sixty perches to bounded white oake thence west and by North
Eighty perches to another bounded beech on the river side thence
binding with the River to the first bounded tree Containing one
hundred acres of land more or less togeather with all Rights pfitts
benefitts and previledges thereunto belonging unto him the said
p. 195
Thomas Larkin his heirs and Assignes forever and to and for the
only proper use and behoofe of him the said Thomas Larkin his heirs
and Assignes forever more and the said William Lunn Doth for
himselfe his heirs Executors and Admrs Covenant promise grant
and agree to and with the said Thomas Larkin his heirs and As-
signes that he the said William Lunn his heirs Exrs and Admrs shall
and will from time to time and at all times hereafter acquitt Ex-
onerate and Discharge or otherwise Save and keep harmless as well
the said Thomas Larkin his heirs and Assignes as also the one hun-
dred acres of land and prmises with all other the appurtenances before
mentioned hereby bargained and sold or Intended to be hereby Con-
veyed as aforesaid with all and Singular the prmises with their
appurtenances and Every part and parcell thereof Clear and free of &
from all Bargaines Sales Joyntures Dowers and all other Incum-
brances whatsoever had made or done at any Time before the En-
sealeing and Delivery of these prsents by him the said William Lunn
or any other pson or psons whatsoever and alsoe the said William
Lunn his heirs and Assignes and Every of them shall & will from
time to time when thereunto required make do acknowledge Suffer
& Execute or cause to be made done Acknowledged suffered and
Executed all and every such Further act & acts thing & things assure-
ance & Assureances in the Law whatsoever as by the said Thomas
Larkin his heirs and Assignes or his or their Councill Learned in the
Law shall be reasonably Devised advised or required for the Further
and better Assureance and Sure makeing of all and Singular the
said land and pmises before mentioned unto him the sd Thomas
Acts. 193
Larkin his heirs and Assignes forever and that the said Thomas
Larkin his heirs and Assignes shall and may forever peaceably and
Quietly have hold use Occupy possess and Enjoy all the said one hun-
dred acres of Land and premises without any let suit Trouble or dis-
turbance of any pson or psons whatsoever and Also that he the said
William Lunn his heirs and Assignes shall and will at all times here-
after warrant and defend the said Land and prmises unto him the said
Thomas Larkin his heirs and Assignes forever against all persons
whatsoever In Wittness whereof the party first to these presents
hath put his hand and Seale the day and year first above Written
William Lunn [Seale] On the Back of which Indenture was Endorst
as followes Viz. Signed Sealed and Delivered in the prsence of us.
Acts of 15734,
ch. 13
p. 22
An Act to Enable John Cheney and Mary his wife to Sell in ffee
Simple three hundred Acres Part of a Tract of Land Called Water-
ford notwithstanding the Same is Specially Intailed on the heirs
of the body of the said Mary by Benjamin Williams of Ann
Arundell County.
Whereas Benjamin Williams of Ann Arundell County by his
Deed Indented bearing Date the Sixth Day of August One Thou-
sand Seven hundred and twenty two Did in Consideration of Love
Good Will and Affection Convey and Make over unto his Son in Law
John Cheney and Mary his wife and to the heirs of the said Mary's
Body begotten by the said John A Certain Parcell of Land Originally
granted the first day of May Sixteen hundred and Seventy Six unto
Acts.- 355
William Jones for Eight hundred Acres by the name of Waterford
And whereas it is Represented Unto this Assembly by the said
Benjamin Williams John and Mary Cheney afd that thro a great
Charge of Children Great Sickness and Other Misfortunes the said
John and Mary are much Impoverished And no means whereby they
Can hope to be relieved but by the Sale of Part of the Said Eight
hundred Acres which none will buy because the Same is Intailed
Except the said John is Enabled by Law to Sell in ffee Notwith-
standing the Intail afd And whereas this Present Generall Assembly
have taken the Premises into Consideration And have thought it
reasonable to Enable the said John to Sell and Dispose of in ffee
Simple three hundred Acres of the afd Tract notwithstanding the
Deed of Intaile afd
Be it Therefore Enacted by the Right Honrble the Lord Propry
by and with the Advice and Consent of his Lordships Governour
and the Upper and Lower Houses of Assembly and the Authority
of the Same that he the said John Cheney and Mary his wife shall
be Enabled and are hereby Enabled to Make Sale in fee by Deed
or Deeds Indented after the usual and lawfull Manner of Conveying
Land to Any Person or Persons whatsoever a Quantity of the said
Tract not Exceeding three hundred Acres. And be it further
Enacted by the Authority afd that Such Person or Persons as shall
buy by Deed or Deeds Indented as afd shall have as good Estate in
ffee Simple by Vertue of such Sale as if the said John and Mary
were Seized in ffee Simple to them and their heirs for Ever Notwith-
standing the Deed of Intail afd or Any Clause or Article therein
Contained Provided that this Act or Any thing therein Contained
shall not be Construed to make a better Estate to the said John
& Mary or to Any Purchaser or Purchasers Deriveing Under them
by Vertue of this Act than the said Benjamin Williams had at and
before the Enseeling & Delivery of the Deed of Intaile afd Saving
to his most Sacred Majesty his heirs and Successors and to the Right
Honrble the Lord Propry his heirs & Successors and all Bodies
Politick and Corporate and all Others not mentioned in this Act
their Severall and respective Rights.
320 Assembly Proceedings, Sept. 28 Dec. 16, 1757. L. H. J.
His Excellency communicated to Mr. Speaker the following Mes sage, viz.t Gentlemen of the Lower House of Assembly, I have perused the several Papers that were Presented to me, p. 142 together with your first Address of the 5th Instant, viz.t A Copy of the Affirmation of Benjamin Richardson, and Copies of the Depo sitions of Daniel Meconekin, Edward Seares, Thomas Hill, David Macklefish, William Hall, Ephraim Howard, Ezekiel Cheney, and Jeremiah Cheney: The Complaint of the Two First I find against Two Soldiers or Soldier-like Men, called Smith and Lake, for beating and endeavouring to carry off by Violence one Griffith, who they pretended to have Enlisted about Eight Months ago, and for threat ening and abusing the said Richardson and Meconekin.
By these Liber C Gentlemens own Account it appears, I think, that upon Smith's refus ing to go with them before a Justice of the Peace, and presenting a Gun at Mr. Richardson, he the said Richardson took it away from him, that a Scuffle ensued, but that in the End they released or rescued Griffith, and then went and informed some Magistrate or other of what they had done; what became of Lake and Smith they know not, but have heard that Smith was a Waiter on one Mr. McCarty, an Officer, and who Mr. MCCarty is, or where he is to be met with, they do not say; and I cannot learn, neither can I guess, what you would have me do in this Affair.
The Two Soldier-like Men may, for aught I know, have been much to blame; but if the Complainants were really of that Opinion, I wonder they did not, when they found themselves able, carry the supposed Offenders before a Magistrate, who would, no doubt, have punished them according to their Deserts; but if, on the contrary, Smith and Lake should return again to this Province, and make it appear that Griffith was fairly Enlisted, I am apt to think, that Mr. Richardson and the Deponent will not find it any easy Matter to justify their Conduct. By the Depositions of Macclefish, Seares, Hill, Mr. William Hall, and Mr. Ephraim Howard, one Thomas Beall, a young Fellow of p. 143 Prince-George's County (who was impowered by me to Enlist Men for his Majesty's Service, in Consequence of several Acts of As sembly lately made in this Province) is accused of having pretended to Enlist the said Seares, Hill, and Macclefish, of treating them afterwards as Deserters, of compelling Seares to pay £10 for a Dis charge, which he could not give, and of endeavouring to oblige the other Two to purchase their Discharges likewise: Mr. Beall is not present to hear what is alledged against him; and tho' his Transac tions, as in the Depositions stated, have not the best Appearance, yet I don't think it would be right to condemn him unheard; he is no Officer that I know of, neither is he in the least dependent on me; and if the Complainants can prove that he has acted illegally, I hope they may redress themselves without applying to any Branch of the Legislature; but if it should, on farther Enquiry, appear that they were duly Enlisted, you will not, I am persuaded, take it amiss if they are apprehended and delivered up to one of his Majesty's Officers
. ‘With regard to the Complaint of Ezekiel and Jeremiah Cheney, whose articled and indented Servants are said to have run away from them, and to have Enlisted into our Provincial Forces, I can only say, that if the Case is as they represent it, and they have a Right to Satisfaction for their Servants, the Law will give them Relief, if they will be pleased to take the proper Steps to obtain it: And upon the Whole, I cannot help saying, that if these are all the Complaints that your Constituents have any Reason to make against Recruiting
Parties, I am persuaded that no People on the Continent have suffered so little from them as his Majesty's good Subjects, the Inhabitants of this Province.
What was the Opinion of your Committee upon the several Facts that are mentioned in the Depositions and Affirmations, whereof you sent me Copies, or whether we shall agree thereupon, I know not, as their Report was not delivered, notwithstanding it is said in your Address that it was thereunto annexed.
7th December, 1757. Hor.° Sharpe.
Journal of the State Council, 1784-1789. 33
bound for his said Sons Appearance) the whole of his Land and
other property with full power to sell and dispose of the same in case
they sustained any Damage by becoming Securities for his Son's
appearance, That at the Court to which he was to appear for trial,
being called did not attend, and to give a further Opportunity the
Court respited the Recognizance of the said Jeremiah Cheney and
William Cheney to the succeeding Court held in March last, and the
said Obediah Noland being again called, did not appear, whereupon
the Recognizance aforesaid became forfeited, and will be shortly
levied, which, will not only ruin the said William Noland and his
Family (which are very old and infirm) but very materially distress
and injure the Securities aforesaid, and several Inhabitants of the
State of Virginia, some of whom are Magistrates of that State,
certifying that the said William Noland is an Aged Man in very
low Circumstances, and has since their knowledge of him (near
[p 39] twenty years) supported the Character of an Honest
Industrious, Inoffensive person, and that the facts stated in his Peti-
tion are true, which are also corroborated by the Certificate of five
of the Justices of Washington County, and who recommend the
said William Noland as an Object worthy the interposition of Gov-
ernment. This Board are therefore of Opinion, and do order and
direct that the Recognizances aforesaid be remitted to the said
Jeremiah Cheney and William Cheney.
Chas. Wallace
John Davidson
Samuel T. Wright
The Council adjourned 'till tomorrow morning 11 o'clock.
*******************************
320 Assembly Proceedings, Sept. 28 Dec. 16, 1757
With regard to the Complaint of Ezekiel and Jeremiah Cheney, whose articled and indented Servants are said to have run away from them, and to have Enlisted into our Provincial Forces, I can only say, that if the Case is as they represent it, and they have a Right to Satisfaction for their Servants, the Law will give them Relief, if they will be pleased to take the proper Steps to obtain it: And upon the Whole, I cannot help saying, that if these are all the Complaints that your Constituents have any Reason to make against Recruiting Parties, I am persuaded that no People on the Continent have suffered so little from them as his Majesty's good Subjects, the Inhabitants of this Province. What was the Opinion of your Committee upon the several Facts that are mentioned in the Depositions and Affirmations, whereof you sent me Copies, or whether we shall agree thereupon, I know not, as their Report was not delivered, notwithstanding it is said in your Address that it was thereunto annexed.
7th December, 1757.
*******************************
An Inquisition Indented taken at
m.r Nicholas Gassoway's house in the County of Ann Arundell
the 12.th day of November in the year of the Dominion of Caecilius &Ca Annoq Dñi 1674 before us Robert Burle & Tho.s Besson by Virtue of a Cothission in the nature of a writt of mandamus to us directed & to the Said Inqui sition Annexed to Enquire what Lands & Tenements James Stringer late of Ann Arundell County deced dyed Seized of within the Said Co.ty of Ann Arundell & whether Mary Williams wife of Lodowick Williams & Daughter of the Said James Stringer be his next heir & whether the Same were Surveyed in the life time of the Sd James Stringer & the quantity of the Same & whether the Same may or ought of Right to descend to the Said heir or whether the Same are not Escheated & who are the present possessors of the S.d Land & by what Title by the Oaths of Doct.r William Jones, W.m Ramsey, Rob.t Love, John Howard, Cornelius Howard, James Saunders, Rich.d Cheney John ifoster, ifardinando Battee, Richard Tydings, Thomas Watkins John Grassum duly Sworn w.ch Said Jurors upon their Oaths do Say as followeth viz.t I It is our Judgm.t that James Stringer dyed Seized of the Land now in dispute as the manner was then to hold Land as ap pears by the Inventory taken off the Record of the County & the Evidences 2 It is our Judgm.t that mary Williams the wife of Lodowick (fol. 144) Williams is the only heir of James Stringer there being no other Ever known or apparent 3 Evidence makes appear that the Lands held by James Stringer to Say the Land in dispute was not Surveyed till after the Death of the Said Stringer the q.ty being one hund.d & fifty acres 4 It is our Judgm.t that mary Williams is the Right heir to the sd one hund.d & fifty acres of Land after the manner of holding of Lands in those days within this province w.ch was by Caveats Entered Liber C D upon Record in ye office 5 It is our Judgm.t that this land in dispute is not Escheat it being Orphans Land 6 The prsent possesso.r of the sd Land is Nathan.” Heathcoate Guardian to ye Orphans of John Brewer of this Co.tY deced by virtue of an assignm.t Granted to Jn.° Brewer By Jn.° Collier upon the Back of a pattent Granted unto y.e Jn.° Collier after y.e Decease of the S.d Jn.° Stringer In Testimony whereof as well the S.d Com.rs as the Juro.rs af.d to this present Inquisition have Interchangeably Set their hands & Seal y.e day & year abovemenconed Robert Burle sealed Thomas Besson sealed William Jones sealed John ffoster sealed his his W.m Ramsey sealed fferdin.do Batten . . . . sealed mark mark his his Rob.t RF Love sealed Ric R Tydings sealed mark mark John Howard sealed Thomas R Watkinssealed Cor.s Howard sealed marke James Saunderssealed John Gressnon sealed his Rich.d Cheny sealed mark
*********************************
1703/02/24
Survey of Cheneys Delight for Charles Cheney, Prince George's Co. extract No restrictions MSA SC 103-1-2
1783 Montgomery County Maryland
Ann Cheney. MO Lower Newfoundland, Rock Creek, and North West Hundred, p. 3. MSA S 1161-8-2 1/4/5/51
Charles Cheney. MO Lower Newfoundland, Rock Creek, and North West Hundred, p. 3. MSA S 1161-8-2 1/4/5/51
Charles Cheney. Hard Struggle, 52 1/2 acres. MO Lower Newfoundland, Rock Creek, and North West Hundred, p. 17. MSA S 1161-8-2 1/4/5/51
Charles Cheney. Hard Struggle, 50 3/4 acres. MO Lower Newfoundland, Rock Creek, and North West Hundred, p. 17. MSA S 1161-8-2 1/4/5/51
Charles Cheney. Jacksons Improvement, 192 acres. MO Lower Newfoundland, Rock Creek, and North West Hundred, p. 18. MSA S 1161-8-2 1/4/5/51
Eleanor Cheney. MO Lower Newfoundland, Rock Creek, and North West Hundred, p. 3. MSA S
1783 Somerset County
Andrew F.. Cheney. Haywards Purchase, pt, 5 acres. SO Monokin p. 21
Andrew F.. Cheney. Nutters Purchase, pt, 8 1/2 acres. SO Monokin p. 21
Andrew F.. Cheney. Friendship, 172 acres. SO Monokin p. 21
Andrew F.. Cheney. Nutters Purchase, pt, 71 1/2 acres. SO Monokin p. 21
Andrew F.. Cheney. Beckford, 2 Lots. SO Princess Anne p. 31
CHENEY, ANDREW FRANCIS (SO) to GENERAL ASSEMBLY.
Dates: 1777, Apr
Petition for a hearing or trial for his alledged disloyalty.
MSA S991-10-560 MdHR 4617-20 Location: 1/6/5/11
1777, Mar. 28.
CHENEY, ANDREW FRANCIS to GOV.
Request for release on bail.
MSA S 989-2986, MdHR 4584-59 1 /6 /4 /16.
1781, Sep. 28.
CHENEY, ANDREW FRANCIS (AN) to GOV.
Petition to relieve the poor prison conditions of his son, Frances T. Cheney.
MSA S 989-4141, MdHR 4596-34 1 /6 /4 /28.
CHANCERY COURT (Chancery Papers)
1785/08/24
774: Richard Cheney and Samuel Cheney vs. Samuel
Snowden, John Snowden, Mary Snowden, Henry
Snowden, and Thomas Snowden. PG. Petition to
release mortgage on slaves Sarah, Lettica, Jack,
Nole, Harvy, Cook, Margaret, and Hannah.
Accession No: 17,898-774. MSA S512-803 1/35/5/
CHANCERY COURT (Chancery Papers)
1773/06/21
1046: John Chaplin and Greenbury Cheney vs. Rignal
Prather. PG. Injunction against execution of
judgment on Addition.
Accession No: 17,898-1046. MSA S512-1124 1/36/1/
CHANCERY COURT (Chancery Papers)
1797/12/23
1129: John Cheney. AA. Appointment of trustee for
William Benson.
Accession No: 17,898-1129. MSA S512-1202 1/36/1/
CHANCERY COURT (Chancery Papers)
1797/03/18
1143: Richard Coe vs. John Compton, Elizabeth
Compton, Maria Jacobs, John Jacobs, Thomas Jacobs,
Corbin Jacobs, and Mary Ann Jacobs. PG. Estate of
Benjamin Jacobs - Wades Adventure.
Accession No: 17,898-1143. MSA S512-1213 1/36/1/
CHANCERY COURT (Chancery Papers)
1801/02/14
780: Benjamin Cheney, Abraham Cheney, Ruth
Proctor, Henry Hardesty, John Hardesty, Delby
Russell, Joseph Russell, Ann Shekels, and John
Shekels vs. Rebecca Cheney, Wilhelmina Taylor, and
Samuel Taylor. AA. Estate of Benjamin Cheney -
Benjamins Choice, Benjamins Content. Recorded
(Chancery Record) 54, p. 266.
Accession No: 17,898-780. MSA S512-809 1/35/5/
CHANCERY COURT (Chancery Papers)
1805/06/10
840: Jeremiah Cheney vs. Samuel Ringgold, Tench
Ringgold, Frisby Tilghman, and Ann Tilghmen. WA.
Injunction against execution of judgment on
Cheneys Delight, Long Looked for Come at Last,
Number of Two.
Accession No: 17,898-840-1/2. MSA S512-874 1/36/1/
CHANCERY COURT (Chancery Papers)
1808/02/26
4110: Francois F. Perier, Luke Tiernan, Thomas
Cheney, and Nicholas Brewer vs. Daniel Decaindry.
AA. Mortgage foreclosure on Resurvey of Courtenays
First Addition, slaves Kitty, Harry, and Venus.
Recorded (Chancery Record) 87, p. 151.
Accession No: 17,898-4110-1/2. MSA S512-4234 1/36
CHANCERY COURT (Chancery Papers)
1805/06/10
840: Jeremiah Cheney vs. Samuel Ringgold, Tench
Ringgold, Frisby Tilghman, and Ann Tilghmen. WA.
Injunction against execution of judgment on
Cheneys Delight, Long Looked for Come at Last,
Number of Two.
Accession No: 17,898-840-1/2. MSA S512-874 1/36/1/
Marriage record of Elizabeth Cheney dau of Richard to William Ijams
·
James (Ijams), m. by 8 Nov 1722, Eliza, admx of William Robison (MDAD 5:478).·
Plummer; 9 Feb 1777; Jemima Welch ("Marriage Register of Rev. David Love," discovered by Peter Wilson Coldham in the Public Record Office, London (PRO: AO 13/61(II)/ 420ff.).·
Thomas; 26 Sep 1771; Mary Ijams ("Marriage Register of Rev. David Love," discovered by Peter Wilson Coldham in the Public Record Office, London (PRO: AO 13/61(II)/ 420ff.).·
William, m. by 1 March 1674, Elizabeth, dau. of Richard Cheney of AA Co. (AALR IH#1:50).·
William; 6 March 1770; Anne Williams ("Marriage Register of Rev. David Love," discovered by Peter Wilson Coldham in the Public Record Office, London (PRO: AO 13/61(II)/ 420ff.).Marriage record of Anne Cheney to John Jacobs
JACOBS
·
Henry, m. by 25 March 1742, Anne, dau. of William Edwards, Dec (QALR RTB:404).·
John, m. by 1 March 1674, Anne, dau. of Richard Cheney of AA Co. (AALR IH#1:45).·
John; 25 March 1776; Mary Davis ("Marriage Register of Rev. David Love," discovered by Peter Wilson Coldham in the Public Record Office, London (PRO: AO 13/61(II)/ 420ff.).·
Samuel; 19 Jan 1769; Mary Davis ("Marriage Register of Rev. David Love," discovered by Peter Wilson Coldham in the Public Record Office, London (PRO: AO 13/61(II)/420ff.).
Cheney
, Thomas, planter,24th Aug., 1737;
May Prov' Court 1730 as Jurymen 45 whereof is De
ducted 34
[folio 7]3804
To Mr John Dorsey Junr for 3 Do at Do 45 with Do 34
To Mr Robert Shipley for 3 Do at Do 45 with Do 34
To Mr John Hammond son of Charles for 3 Do at Do 45
with Do 34
To Mr Henry Hall for 2 Do at Do 30 with Do23
To Mr Abraham Woodward for 3 Do at Do 45 with Do 34
To Mr Richard Williams for 3 Do at Do 45 with Do 34
To Mr Thomas Clark for 3 Do at Do 45 with Do 34
To Mr Walter Phelps for 3 Do at Do 45 with Do 34
To Mr John Cheney for 3 Do at Do 45 with Do 34
To Mr John Jacobs for 3 Do at Do 45 with Do 34 p. 264
To Mr Caleb Dorsey for 3 Do at Do 45 with Do 34
To Mr Thomas Lusby for 2 Do at Do 30 with Do 23
To Mr Charles Griffith for one Do at Do 15 with Do 12
To Mr Henry Ridgley for one Do at Do 15 with Do 12
To Mr Thomas Jobson for 2 Do at Do 30 with Do 23
To Mr Thomas Baldwin for Do at Do 45 with Do 34
To Mr William Whitehead for Do at Do 15 with Do 12
To William Lock Esqr as one of the Justices of the Assize for
the Western Shore for riding Aprill 1730 Assizes 5000
Whereof 1/4 is deducted 3750
To Coll. Smith as one of Do for Do 5000 with Do 3750
[folio 8] 8013