|
Awards

Navigating
the DNA Pages
Frequently
Asked Questions
Our
Participants
Our
Matches
About
the
Markers
The
MacLeod
Project
MacLeod
Project
Haplotype
Ancestral
Haplotypes
Current
Conclusions
About
this site
Walking
with
Ghosts
- Home
Background
Frequently
Asked
Questions
My
Blog
I've
been
published....sort
of
Primary
Research
MacLeod/McLeod
MacLeod
DNA
Project
McLeod
Reunion
Information
South
Carolina
Grave
Index
Secondary
Research
Wilke
of Germany/N.Y.
Jessup
of England
Checker/Tskeris
of Greece/N.Y.
Abnett
of England
Hudson
of South
Carolina
Ives
of South
Carolina
|
Our
FTDNA
MacLeod
Surname
Project
Matches
Overview
of
the
Project
/
MacLeod
Project
Haplotype
/
Ancestral
Haplotypes
/Understanding
the
Markers
/
Our
Family
Results
/
Current
Conclusions
NEW
PAGES
:
Full
Result
Table
/
Sub
Group
B
Results
Table
/
Branching
Table
/
LCF
Rates
Table
/
Frequently
Asked
Questions
/
Mutation
Rates
TMRCA
Calculations
The
TMRCA
calculator,
while
it
has
the
ability
to
calculate
using
the
various
mutation
rates
on
each
marker,
works
only
with
that
information
and
not
the
documentation
available
to
the
participant
and
the
project
leader.
The
documentation
and
Ancestral
Modal
Haplotypes
of
family
groups
within
the
project
can
allow
us
to
predict
when
a
mutation
(in
what
generation)
occurred
and
adjust
our
perspective
on
a
match
accordingly
-
the
TMRCA
does
not
have
that
ability.
In
other
words,
where
a
mutation
is
known
to
have
occurred
SINCE
the
last
common
ancestor,
it
can
be
ignored
in
determining
relationship.
(i.e.
my
father
and
our
first
cousin
-
see
below)
but
the
TMRCA
calculator
does
not
have
an
"ignore"
capability
and
so
calculates
percentages
based
on
what
is
a
lack
of
genealogical
information.
It
is
important
to
remember
this
when
looking
at
the
percentages
below.....they
are
probably
higher
in
most
cases
and
in
some
cases,
perhaps
even
much
higher.
To
illustrate
this
point,
take
a
look
at
my
father,
Donald
Ross
McLeod
Jr.
and
his
first
cousin,
Purdy
Belvin
McLeod
Jr.
We
have
first
hand
knowlege
and
documentation
on
a
total
of
6
generations.
Their
MRCA
is
2
generations
distant
-
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
576=18
|
95%
TMRCA
|
|
Purdy
|
DYS
576=18
|
To
Modal
cr.
1759
To
Donald
cr.
1759
|
| |
|
|
|
Donald
|
DYS
576=17
|
To
Modal
cr.
1709
To
Purdy
cr.
1759
|
Donald
and
Purdy
shared
a
grandfather
who
was
born
in
1847...the
TMRCA,
without
documentation,
is
off
by
88
years
when
it
predicts
a
95%
probability
to
the
TMRCA
of
the
two
men.
The
TMRCA
calculator
gives
only
a
47.31%
chance
of
a
common
ancestor
in
2-4
generations
-
read
-
a
common
ancestor
will
be
found
within
4
generations
47.31%
of
the
time
and
will
not
be
found
in
those
generations
52.69%
of
the
time.
To
again
illustrate
this
discrepancy,
and
the
importance
of
testing
members
of
your
family
in
order
to
refine
your
matches,
below
is
the
TMRCA
information
for
our
cousin
James
Leroy
McLeod
Jr.
who
shared
an
ancestor
with
Donald
and
Purdy
6
generations
distant:
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
390=25
|
DYS
439=12
|
DYS
389
|
95%
TMRCA
|
|
Purdy
|
DYS
390=25
|
DYS
439=12 |
13/29 |
To
Modal
cr.
1759
To
James
cr.
1634
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
James
|
DYS
390=24
|
DYS
439=11 |
12/28 |
To
Modal
cr.
1584
To
Purdy
cr.
1634
|
James,
Purdy
and
Donald's
MRCA
was
born
1783
(6
generations
back)
-
149
years
after
the
TMRCA
95%
probality
year.
The
TMRCA
calcualtor
give
only
a
16.13%
chance
of
a
common
ancestor
in
4-6
generations.
In
some
cases
the
TMRCA
will
be
closer
in
time
then
is
predicted
due
to
convergence
on
some
markers
-
in
order
to
fully
understand
these
matches
and
the
many
paternal
lines
found
within
the
related
MacLeods,
each
participant
should
encourage
cousins
to
test
with
them.
Ancestral
Haplotypes
/
Understanding
the
Markers
HINT
-
if
you
are
one
of
our
matches;
use
your
browser's
FIND
tool
(IE
Browser
+
Edit
+
Find
on
this
page
+
enter
your
kit
number)
Note
-
other
kits
refers
to
the
number
of
kits
that
have
the
same
allele
as
the
kit
referenced
Note:
YUtility
gives
one
date
in
table
but
a
date
spread
in
another
row
-
I
have
included
the
date
spread
but
the
date
in
bold
is
the
first
date
given
by
YUtility
-
where
the
date
given
is
within
the
date
range
-
it
is
added
and
enclosed
in
parenthesis)
Kit
150587
-
-
Very
Tightly
Related
-
Gen
Distance
0
@
37
markers
-
A
descendant
of
Alexander
MacLeod
born
1834
at
Breakitch,
Skye
-
confirmed
as
the
"farmer's
groom"
of
Donald
MacLeod
of
Arnisdale
(ex
Glenelg,
ex
Kingsburgh)
at
the
farm
of
Coulmore
(Ross
and
Cromarty)
as
evidenced
by
the
1861
census
-
Alexander
married
Margaret
Fraser,
a
cook
at
Coulmore
Farm
on
15
Dec
1864
at
Beauly
(R
&
C).
They
then
emigrated
to
New
Zealand
in
1865.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
150587
|
13/29
+
10
|
To
us:
99%
=
1739
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534
-1759
|
|
Other
kits
|
9
kits
|
~
|
Note:
I
have
used
99%
with
this
kit
because
it
reached
95%
by
1835
-
we
know
that
we
did
not
share
an
ancestor
before
the
birth
of
our
EKA
Angus
cr.
1745
in
Scotland-
therefore
the
99%
TMRCA
is
the
earliest
opportunity
for
a
common
ancestor.
FTDNA
states:
Distance
0
-
Very
Tightly
Related
Your
perfect
match
means
you
share
a
common
male
ancestor
with
a
person
who
shares
your
surname
(or
variant).
Your
relatedness
is
extremely
close
with
the
common
ancestor
predicted,
50%
of
the
time,
in
3
generations
or
less
and
with
a
90%
probability
within
5
generations.
Very
few
people
achieve
this
close
level
of
a
match.
All
confidence
levels
are
well
within
the
time
frame
that
surnames
were
adopted
in
Western
Europe.
Kit
N9281
-
Tightly
Related
-
Gen
Distance
1
@
37
markers
-
EKA
was
William
MacLeod
born
about
1775
who
resided
on
the
Isle
of
Lewis
in
the
district
of
Bak
(Vatisker)
at
the
birth
of
his
son
Norman
in
1801.
This
kit
missed
a
perfect
37
marker
match
by
one;
the
miss
was
at
marker
464d
which
is
a
rapidly
moving
marker.
William
MacLeod
was
seven
generations
back
from
the
Kit
owner,
the
kit
owner
was
himself
born
in
Scotland.
The
only
mutation
in
37
markers
is
at
a
fast
marker
-
testing
of
cousins
of
this
kit
could
define
in
which
generation
the
mutation
took
place..
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
464
14,15,15,16
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
14,15,15,16
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
N9281
|
13/29
+
10
|
14,15,15,17
|
To
us:
95%
=
1739
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
464d=unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1709)
|
|
Other
kits
|
9
kits
|
0
kits
|
~
|
Distance:
1
-
Tightly
Related
36/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
one
'point'
at
only
one
marker--a
36/37
match.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25
or
25/25
on
a
previous
Y-DNA
test
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb.
Very
few
people
achieve
this
close
level
of
a
match.
Your
mismatch
is
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Note:
FTDNA
expects
a
miss
at
464
to
be
a
second
miss
-
it
is
not
included
in
their
statement
until
35/37
match
information.
It
is
therefore
unusual
for
a
single
miss
to
be
at
464.
Kit
36748
-
Tightly
Related
-
Gen
Distance
2
@
67
markers
-
a
descendant
of
a
Norman
MacLeod
born
about
1745
in
Colbost,
nr
Dunvegan
on
the
Isle
of
Skye.
He
and/or
his
son
Murdo
(kit
owner
descended
through
this
line)
were
reportedly
hereditary
galley
makers
for
Chief
-
Norman
The_Red_Man
MACLEOD
(XXII
Chief).
The
family
was
apparently
removed
from
their
life
rent/tenancy
in
Colbost
in
1841
as
part
of
the
Clearances
which
was
testified
to
at
the
Napier
Convention
in
1883
by
a
grandson
of
Norman,
also
a
Norman
(Tormod
Dall)
who
was
born
in
1801
-
some
descendants
remain
in
Scotland
today
including
Kit
36748.
Tormod
Dall
had
brothers,
two
of
whom
immigrated
to
Australia
(Allan
and
Alexander)
and
Donald
who
immigrated
to
America
and
became
the
author
of
several
Gaelic
songs.
The
family
are
supposed
to
be
of
the
Raasay
Branch
and
of
Clann
Alaisdhair
Ruaidh,
the
same
branch
of
which
was
the
poetess
Mairi
Ni'n
Alastair
Ruaidh
-
that
branch
which
was
descended
from
William
the
fifth
chief
of
Dunvegan
('The
Cleric').
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
60
-
DYS
446=15
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
60
-
DYS
446=15
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
36748
|
13/29
+
11
|
60
-
DYS
446=16
|
To
us:
95%
=
1739
|
|
Other
kits
|
14
|
1
-
27950
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
stable
|
~
|
FTDNA
states:
Distance:
1-2
-
Tightly
Related
65-66/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
one
or
two
'points'
at
only
one
marker.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
36/37
or
37/37
on
a
previous
Y-DNA
test.
Very
few
people
achieve
this
close
level
of
a
match.
All
confidence
levels
are
well
within
the
time
frame
that
surnames
were
adopted
in
Western
Europe.
Kit:
47096
-
Tightly
Related
-
Gen
Distance
2
@
67
markers
-
A
descendant
of
Roderick
MacLeod
who
was
born
about
1770
and
was
a
crofter
at
Seilbost,
on
the
Isle
of
Harris,
near
coastal
Scarista.
The
crofts
location
was
stated
on
his
son's
death
certificate
-
the
son
William
was
born
cr.
1810.
Although
William
MacLeod
left
Harris
to
move
to
first
Rhum
and
then
Sleat
where
he
died
1895.
William
possibly
had
a
brother
John
(
wife
Catherine
Campbell
)
who
went
to
the
Red
River
Settlement
in
Canada
in
the
1860’s
with
his
family
including
children
Roderick,
Alex,
Malcolm,
Kirsty,
Effie
and
William.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
449=31
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
449=31
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
47096
|
14/30
+
10
|
DYS
449=30
|
To
us:
95%
=
1739
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
very
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1634)
|
|
Other
kits
|
7
|
2
|
~
|
FTDNA
states:
Distance:
1-2
-
Tightly
Related
65-66/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
one
or
two
'points'
at
only
one
marker.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
36/37
or
37/37
on
a
previous
Y-DNA
test.
Very
few
people
achieve
this
close
level
of
a
match.
All
confidence
levels
are
well
within
the
time
frame
that
surnames
were
adopted
in
Western
Europe.
Kit:
86240
-
Tightly
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
2
@
67
-
a
descendant
of
an
unnamed
immigrant
said
to
be
from
the
Isle
of
Skye.
Immigration
took
place
into
Mississippi
just
prior
to
the
Civil
War.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
447=26
|
DYS
449=31
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
447
=
26
|
DYS
449=31
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
86240
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
447
=
25
|
DYS
449=32
|
To
us:
95%
=
1739
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
unstable
|
very
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1634)
|
|
Other
kits
|
9
kits
|
4
kits
|
5
kits
|
~
|
FTDNA
states:
Distance:
1-2
-
Tightly
Related
65-66/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
one
or
two
'points'
at
only
one
marker.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
36/37
or
37/37
on
a
previous
Y-DNA
test.
Very
few
people
achieve
this
close
level
of
a
match.
All
confidence
levels
are
well
within
the
time
frame
that
surnames
were
adopted
in
Western
Europe.
Kits
32956,
24712
-
Related
-
2
documented
descendants
of
Angus
(or
John)
MacLeod
b.
about
1775
and
Mary
McKinnon
who
immigrated
aboard
the
Duke
of
Kent
in
1802
to
North
Carolina
-
the
two
men
descend
from
two
sons
of
Angus
(
or
John)
and
Mary.
They
are
believed
to
have
sailed
with
a
group
of
MacLeods
that
included
Murdoch
the
Sailor
(of
Milliveig).
The
two
kits
are
third
cousins
however,
like
our
own
cousin
James
Leroy
McLeod
Jr.
(Jimmy),
one
of
them
is
found
to
have
a
higher
than
usual
number
of
mutations
in
his
DNA
signature
-
therefore,
I
have
used
Deduced
Ancestral
Modal
of
the
kits
to
determine
TMRCA
at
the
67
marker
level
with
the
YUtility
Tool.
Note
-
The
second
kit
is
trying
to
find
a
third
participant
from
their
family
in
order
to
further
define
their
Ancestral
Modal
and
determine
when
the
age
of
the
mutations
in
this
family.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
391=11
|
DYS
439=12
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
391=11
|
DYS
439
=
12
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
32956/24712
|
13/29
+
11
|
IGNORED
|
DYS
439
=
13
|
To
us:
95%
=1709
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
stable
|
stable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
Other
kits
|
14
kits
|
0
kits
|
3
kits
-30097/96
|
~
|
Double
Mutation
(per
FTDNA)
from
the
Sub
Group
B
Related
Modal
-
each
paternal
line
experienced
a
mutation
at
DYS
391
however
each
line
went
in
a
different
direction
-
this
mutation
can
be
ignored
since
it
happened
since
the
two
cousins
last
shared
an
ancestor.
FTDna
states:
Distance:
5-6
-
Related
61-62/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
five
or
six
'points'.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
slightly
tighter
than
being
11/12,
23/25,
or
33/37,
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
closely
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25,
36/37
or
37/37
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d,
or
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
third
panel
of
markers.
Your
common
ancestor
is
not
very
recent,
but
your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Kit
36109
-
Related
-
Gen.
Distance
2
@
37
markers
-
a
descendant
of
John
C.
MacLeod
who
immigrated
from
Scotland
to
Prince
Edward
Island
cr.
1825
"give
or
take
a
couple
of
years".
Preliminary
research
on
PEI
indicates
departure
may
have
been
from
the
Isle
of
Raasay.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
576
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
576
=
18
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
36109
|
13/29
+
11
|
DYS
576
=
17
|
To
us:
95%
=
1709
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
volatile
|
To
modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
Other
kits
|
14
kits
|
6
kits
|
~
|
Distance:
2
-
Related
35/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
two
'points'
--a
35/37
match.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25
or
25/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
DYS
439
or
DYS
385
A,
385
B,389-1
and
389-2,
from
our
first
panel
of
12
markers,
or
from
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
Your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe
Kit:
63320
-
Related
-
Gen.
Distance
3
@
37
markers
-
a
gentleman
for
whom
no
information
is
known:
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
63320
|
15/31
+
9
|
To
us:
95%
=
1709
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
To
modal
=
1534-1759(1709)
|
|
Other
kits
|
1
kits
|
~
|
Distance:
3
-
Related
34/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
three
'points'
--a
34/37
match.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
slightly
tighter
then
being
11/12
or
23/25
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25
or
25/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
Your
mismatch
will
most
often
be
found
within
DYS
439
or
DYS
385
A,
385
B,389-1
and
389-2
from
our
first
panel
of
12
markers,
or
within
the
second
panel:
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
Your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Kit
49409
-
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
2
@
37
markers
-
a
gentleman
of
whom
nothing
is
known
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
CDYa=37
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
CDYa=37
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
49409
|
14/30
+
10
|
DYS
CDYa=36
|
To
us:
95%
1709
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1634)
|
|
Other
kits
|
7
|
6
|
~
|
FTDNA
states:
Distance:
2
-
Related
35/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
two
'points'
--a
35/37
match.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25
or
25/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
DYS
439
or
DYS
385
A,
385
B,
389-1
and
389-2,
from
our
first
panel
of
12
markers,
or
from
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
Your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Kit
135999-
Related
-
Gen.
Distance
2
@
37
markers
-
EKA
Norman
MacLeod
b.
24
March
1802
on
the
Isle
of
Harris
-
He,
his
wife,
Catherine
Morrison
and
8
children
immigrated
to
North
America
in
1852
aboard
the
"Sea
Nymph"
out
of
Glasgow-
1851
Scottish
census
living
on
the
Isle
of
Harris
in
a
village
called
Lecklie.
Perfect
37/37
to
Kit
77417
whose
EKA
was
born
on
the
Isle
of
Harris
-
see
next
kit.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
135999
|
14/30
+
11
|
To
us:
95%
=
1659
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
Other
kits
|
16
kits
|
~
|
FTDNA
states:35/37:
Related
-
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
two
'points'
--a
35/37
match.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25
or
25/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
DYS
439
or
DYS
385
A,
385
B,389-1
and
389-2,
from
our
first
panel
of
12
markers,
or
from
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
Your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Kit
77417
-
Tightly
Related
-
Gen.
Distance
2
@
67
markers
-
a
descendant
of
William
MacLeod
born
on
the
Isle
of
Harris
cr.
1770.
His
son
Neil
born
on
Harris
cr
1795
immigrated
to
Cape
Breton
around
1838.
FTDNA
states:
Distance:
1-2
-
Tightly
Related
65-66/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
one
or
two
'points'
at
only
one
marker.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
36/37
or
37/37
on
a
previous
Y-DNA
test.
Very
few
people
achieve
this
close
level
of
a
match.
All
confidence
levels
are
well
within
the
time
frame
that
surnames
were
adopted
in
Western
Europe.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
77417
|
14/30
+
11
|
To
us:
95%
1659
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
Other
kits
|
16
kits
|
~
|
FTDNA
states:
Distance:
1-2
-
Tightly
Related
65-66/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
one
or
two
'points'
at
only
one
marker.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
36/37
or
37/37
on
a
previous
Y-DNA
test.
Very
few
people
achieve
this
close
level
of
a
match.
All
confidence
levels
are
well
within
the
time
frame
that
surnames
were
adopted
in
Western
Europe.
kit
89216
-
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
4
@
67
Markers
-
EKA
-
John
McLeod
Prince
Edward
Island
Canada
1885
37/37
to
Kit
144662
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
570=17
|
DYS#449=31
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
570
=
17
|
DYS
449=31
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
89216
|
13/29
+
11
|
DYS
570
=
16
|
DYS
449=33
|
To
us:
95%
=
1659
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
unstable
|
very
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1709)
|
|
Other
kits
|
14
kits
|
1
kit
|
2
kit
|
~
|
FTDna
states:
Distance:
3-4
-
Related
63-64/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
three
or
four
'points.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25,
36/37
or
37/37
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d,
or
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
third
panel
of
markers.
Your
common
ancestor
is
probably
not
extremely
recent,
but
your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Kit
144662
-
Probably
Related-
Gen
distance
of
4
@
67
-
37/37
to
Kit
89216
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
570=17
|
DYS#449=31
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
570
=
17
|
DYS
449=31
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
144662
|
13/29
+
11
|
DYS
570
=
16
|
DYS
449=33
|
To
us:
95%
=
1659
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
unstable
|
very
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1709)
|
|
Other
kits
|
14
kits
|
1
kit
|
2
kit
|
~
|
FTDna
states:
Distance:
3-4
-
Related
63-64/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
three
or
four
'points.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25,
36/37
or
37/37
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d,
or
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
third
panel
of
markers.
Your
common
ancestor
is
probably
not
extremely
recent,
but
your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
kit
40190
-
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
3
@
67
-
a
descendant
of
a
Norman
MacLeod
b.
cr.
1844
on
Prince
Edward
Island.
It
is
believed
that
his
parents
were
the
immigrants
and
speculated
but
not
proven
that
his
family
may
have
been
part
of
the
Selkirk
Settlers
from
Skye
to
PEI
(cr.
1803)
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
576=18
|
DYS#CDYa=37
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
576
=
18
|
DYS
CDYa=37
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
40190
|
13/29
+
11
|
DYS
576
=
17
|
DYS
CDYa=36
|
To
us:
95%
=
1634
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
volatile
|
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1709)
|
|
Other
kits
|
14
kits
|
6
kits
|
6
kits
|
~
|
FTDna
states:
Distance:
3-4
-
Related
63-64/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
three
or
four
'points.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25,
36/37
or
37/37
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d,
or
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
third
panel
of
markers.
Your
common
ancestor
is
probably
not
extremely
recent,
but
your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Kit
121470-
see
above
kit
Gen
Distance
of
4
@
67
Gen
distance
of
1
to
kit
40190
-
TMRCA
for
them
is
1759
-
therefore,
1634
is
the
more
accurate
TMRCA
to
us.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
576=18
|
DYS#CDYa=37
|
CDYb=37
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
576
=
18
|
DYS
CDYa=37
|
CDYb=37
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
121470
|
13/29
+
11
|
DYS
576
=
17
|
DYS
CDYa=36
|
CDYb=38
|
To
us:
95%
=
1584
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
volatile
|
unstable
|
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1634)
|
|
Other
kits
|
14
kits
|
6
kits
|
6
kits
|
6
kits
|
~
|
Distance:
4
-
Probably
Related
33/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
four
'points'
--a
33/37
match.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
about
the
same
as
being
11/12
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
23/25
or
24/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
If
several
or
many
generations
have
passed
it
is
likely
that
these
two
lines
are
related
through
other
family
members.
That
would
require
that
each
line
had
passed
a
mutation
and
one
person
would
have
experienced
at
least
2
mutations.
The
only
way
to
confirm
is
to
test
additional
family
lines
and
find
where
the
mutations
took
place.
Only
by
testing
additional
family
members
can
you
find
the
person
in
between
each
of
you...this
'in
betweener'
becomes
essential
for
you
to
find,
and
without
him
the
possibility
of
a
match
exists,
but
further
evidence
must
be
pursued.
If
you
test
additional
individuals
you
will
most
likely
find
that
their
DNA
falls
in-between
the
persons
who
are
4
apart
demonstrating
relatedness
within
this
family
cluster
or
haplotype.
kit
27859
-
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
3
@
37
markers-One
of
the
kits
involved
in
the
Sandhills,
North
Carolina
DNA
Study
-
a
decendant
of
an
Alexander
MacLeod
b.
cr
1747
in
Scotland
married
to
Nancy
Ann
McDonald
-
the
couple
immigrated
from
reportedly
the
Isle
of
Skye
to
Moore
County
North
Carolina
cr
1783
with
2
sons
and
3
daughters
-
a
3rd
son
was
born
in
North
Carolina
about
1783.
The
descendants
remain
in
North
Carolina
today.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
447=26
|
DYS
576
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
447
=
26
|
DYS
576
=
18
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
27859
|
13/29
+
11
|
DYS
447
=
25
|
DYS
576
=
17
|
To
us:
95%
=
1634
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
unstable
|
volatile
|
To
modal
=
1534-1759(1709)
|
|
Other
kits
|
14
kits
|
4
kits
|
6
kits
|
~
|
Distance:
3
-
Related
34/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
three
'points'
--a
34/37
match.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
slightly
tighter
then
being
11/12
or
23/25
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25
or
25/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
Your
mismatch
will
most
often
be
found
within
DYS
439
or
DYS
385
A,
385
B,389-1
and
389-2
from
our
first
panel
of
12
markers,
or
within
the
second
panel:
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
Your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
kit:
50745
-
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
3
@
37
markers-a
descendant
of
John
MacLeod,
b.
1771,
North
Uist,
Scotland
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
576
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
576
=
18
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
50745
|
14/31
+
10
|
DYS
576
=
19
|
To
us:
95%
=
1634
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
volatile
|
To
modal
=
1534-1759(1584)
|
|
Other
kits
|
0
kits
|
9
kits
|
~
|
Note:
Comparing
this
to
a
14/30
&
11
combination
TMRCA
=
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1684)
i.e.
his
TMRCA
to
77417
would
be
1709
-
-
additionally,
testing
of
cousins
may
clarify
the
age
of
these
mutations
allowing
them
to
be
ignored
completely.
Distance:
3
-
Related
34/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
three
'points'
--a
34/37
match.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
slightly
tighter
then
being
11/12
or
23/25
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25
or
25/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
Your
mismatch
will
most
often
be
found
within
DYS
439
or
DYS
385
A,
385
B,389-1
and
389-2
from
our
first
panel
of
12
markers,
or
within
the
second
panel:
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
Your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
kit
34079
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
3
@
37
markers-A
gentleman
for
whom
no
information
is
known.
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
576=18
|
CDYb=37
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
576
=
18
|
CDYb=37
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
34079
|
13/29
+
11
|
DYS
576
=
17
|
CDYb=38
|
To
us:
95%
=
1634
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
volatile
|
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1709)
|
|
Other
kits
|
14
kits
|
6
kits
|
6
kits
|
~
|
Distance:
3
-
Related
34/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
three
'points'
--a
34/37
match.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
slightly
tighter
then
being
11/12
or
23/25
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25
or
25/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
Your
mismatch
will
most
often
be
found
within
DYS
439
or
DYS
385
A,
385
B,389-1
and
389-2
from
our
first
panel
of
12
markers,
or
within
the
second
panel:
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
Your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
kit
25196
-
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
3
@
37
markers-This
gentleman
descends
from
Alexander
I
of
Liosale
in
the
district
of
Minginish,
who
was
the
son
of
Norman
IV
of
Waternish,
the
only
survivor
of
the
family
of
John
The
Fair
Hair
of
the
MacLeods
of
Harris
and
Dunvegan.
He
shares
an
earlier
ancestor
in
Iain
Borb
with
kit
30097
of
Group
One.
Immigration
to
the
United
States
took
place
about
1770
into
North
Carolina
with
a
later
migration
into
Marlborough
County
South
Carolina.
John
MacLeod
and
his
wife
Jane
Hunter
had
four
sons,
one
born
in
the
United
States.
Another
kit
claims
a
descent
from
Alexander
of
Liosale
through
his
son
Donald
of
Drynoch.
See
Current
Conclusions
for
more.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
576
|
DYS
464
14,15,15,16
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
576
=
18
|
14,15,15,16
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
25196
|
14/30
+
10
|
DYS
576
=
19
|
15,15,15,16
|
To
us:
95%
=
1634
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
volatile
|
464c=Very
stable
|
To
modal
=
1284-1509(1584)
|
|
Other
kits
|
7
kits
|
10
kits
|
3
kits
|
~
|
Distance:
3
-
Related
34/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
three
'points'
--a
34/37
match.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
slightly
tighter
then
being
11/12
or
23/25
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25
or
25/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
Your
mismatch
will
most
often
be
found
within
DYS
439
or
DYS
385
A,
385
B,
389-1
and
389-2
from
our
first
panel
of
12
markers,
or
within
the
second
panel:
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
Your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Kit
30097
-
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
4
@
67
-
This
gentleman
descends
from
the
representative
branch
of
the
MacLeods
of
Talisker,
his
brother
currently
holds
the
representation.
He
is
a
documented
descendant
of
Leod
through
the
Harris
branch
of
MacLeod.
Unique
Mutation
Event
at
marker
67
-
This
mutation
most
likely
took
placed
SINCE
this
kit
last
shared
an
ancestor
with
any
other
kit
in
the
project
-
testing
of
cousins
would
confirm
this.
Ignoring
this
UME
TMRCA
to
Modal
=
1709
-
To
us:
=
1634
-
testing
of
known
3rd
cousins
of
this
kit
could
confirm
the
age
of
this
UME.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
439=12
|
DYS
565=12
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
439
=
12
|
DYS
565=12
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
30097
|
14/30
+
11
|
DYS
439
=
13
|
DYS
565=11
|
To
us:
95%
=
1609
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
stable
|
stable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1634)
|
|
Other
kits
|
16
kits
|
3
kits
|
0
kits
|
~
|
FTDna
states:
Distance:
3-4
-
Related
63-64/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
three
or
four
'points.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25,
36/37
or
37/37
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d,
or
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
third
panel
of
markers.
Your
common
ancestor
is
probably
not
extremely
recent,
but
your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Kit
37392
-
Probably
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
4
@
37
markers
-
This
gentleman
is
a
member
of
the
family
of
the
Branch
of
Lewis
MacLeods
who
currently
hold
the
representation
of
Raasay
and
Lewis.
Therefore,
his
earliest
shared
ancestor
would
be
LEOD
cr.
1280
or
his
son
(according
to
Clan
History,
the
Harris
and
Lewis
Branch
each
descend
from
one
of
two
grandsons
of
Leod
-
the
two
branches
would
have
formed
cr.
1340.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
385a
|
DYS
464
14,15,15,16
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
385a=11
|
14,15,15,16
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
37392
|
14/30
+
11
|
DYS
385a=12
|
14,15,15,15
|
To
us:
95%
=
1584
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
stable
|
464d=Very
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
Other
kits
|
16
kits
|
|
1
kits
|
~
|
Distance:
4
-
Probably
Related
33/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
four
'points'
--a
33/37
match.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
about
the
same
as
being
11/12
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
23/25
or
24/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
If
several
or
many
generations
have
passed
it
is
likely
that
these
two
lines
are
related
through
other
family
members.
That
would
require
that
each
line
had
passed
a
mutation
and
one
person
would
have
experienced
at
least
2
mutations.
The
only
way
to
confirm
is
to
test
additional
family
lines
and
find
where
the
mutations
took
place.
Only
by
testing
additional
family
members
can
you
find
the
person
in
between
each
of
you...this
'in
betweener'
becomes
essential
for
you
to
find,
and
without
him
the
possibility
of
a
match
exists,
but
further
evidence
must
be
pursued.
If
you
test
additional
individuals
you
will
most
likely
find
that
their
DNA
falls
in-between
the
persons
who
are
4
apart
demonstrating
relatedness
within
this
family
cluster
or
haplotype.
Kit
99508
-
Related
-
Gen
Distance
4
@
67
-
this
kit
belongs
to
a
man
who
believed
he
was
a
MacLeod
although
an
ancestor
was
adopted
into
a
family
of
another
name.
This
belief,
based
upon
oral
history
and
backed
by
census
records
in
Scotland
was
confirmed
by
his
matching
with
other
MacLeods
in
this
project.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
464
14,15,15,16
|
GATH4=11
|
DYS
576=18
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
14,15,15,16
|
GATH4=11
|
DYS
576=18
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
99508
|
13/29
+
11
|
14,15,16,16
|
GATH4=10
|
DYS
576=19
|
To
us
95%
=
1584
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
464c=Very
stable
|
stable
|
volatile
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1634) |
|
Other
kits
|
14
kits
|
1
kits
|
2
kits
|
10
kits
|
~
|
FTDna
states:
Distance:
3-4
-
Related
63-64/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
three
or
four
'points.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25,
36/37
or
37/37
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d,
or
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
third
panel
of
markers.
Your
common
ancestor
is
probably
not
extremely
recent,
but
your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Kit
77670
-
Probably
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
4
@
37
-
a
Descendant
of
John
McLeod
h/o
Nancy
Campbell
b.
cr.
1787
in
Skinidin,
Skye,
Scotland
farmed
in
Moore
County
by
1812
-
possibly
the
son
of
a
Daniel
-
this
kit
is
a
37
perfect
match
to
Kit
38247
and
a
37
distance
of
1
to
kits
148833
and
127808
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
464
14,15,15,16
|
DYS#449=31
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
14,15,15,16
|
DYS
449=31
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
77670
|
14/30
+
11
|
14,14,15,15
|
DYS
449=32
|
To
us:
95%
=
1584
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
464c=Very
stable
|
very
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1634)
|
|
Other
kits
|
16
kits
|
3
kits
|
5
kits
|
~
|
Distance:
4
-
Probably
Related
33/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
four
'points'
--a
33/37
match.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
about
the
same
as
being
11/12
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
23/25
or
24/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
If
several
or
many
generations
have
passed
it
is
likely
that
these
two
lines
are
related
through
other
family
members.
That
would
require
that
each
line
had
passed
a
mutation
and
one
person
would
have
experienced
at
least
2
mutations.
The
only
way
to
confirm
is
to
test
additional
family
lines
and
find
where
the
mutations
took
place.
Only
by
testing
additional
family
members
can
you
find
the
person
in
between
each
of
you...this
'in
betweener'
becomes
essential
for
you
to
find,
and
without
him
the
possibility
of
a
match
exists,
but
further
evidence
must
be
pursued.
If
you
test
additional
individuals
you
will
most
likely
find
that
their
DNA
falls
in-between
the
persons
who
are
4
apart
demonstrating
relatedness
within
this
family
cluster
or
haplotype.
Kit
38247
-
Related
-
Gen
Distance
4
@
67-
The
earliest
MacLeod
ancestor
for
this
kit
was
a
Daniel
McLeod
born
cr
1770
who
immigrated
from
Scotland
to
Carthage
Moore
County
North
Carolina
either
with
his
parents
or
alone.
This
kit
is
a
37/37
match
to
another
kit
(77670)
in
the
project
also
of
North
Carolina
-
very
few
people
achieve
this
level
of
a
match
-
even
Donald
and
Purdy
who
are
documented
first
cousins
did
not
receive
this
close
of
a
match.
Two
additional
kits
(127808/148833
-
NC)
share
a
66/67
match
with
kit
38247
-
(missing
separate
markers)
also
a
rare
match
-
these
three
kits
are
tightly
related
to
each
other.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
464
14,15,15,16
|
DYS#449=31
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
14,15,15,16
|
DYS
449=31
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
38247
|
14/30
+
11
|
14,14,15,15
|
DYS
449=32
|
To
us:
95%
=
1584
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
464c=Very
stable
|
very
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1634)
|
|
Other
kits
|
16
kits
|
3
kits
|
5
kits
|
~
|
FTDna
states:
Distance:
3-4
-
Related
63-64/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
three
or
four
'points.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25,
36/37
or
37/37
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d,
or
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
third
panel
of
markers.
Your
common
ancestor
is
probably
not
extremely
recent,
but
your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Kit
63702
-
Related
-
-
Gen
Distance
4
@
67
-
a
gentleman
for
whom
no
information
is
known:
See
kit
below:
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
391=11
|
DYS
447
=26
|
GATH4=11
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
391=11
|
DYS
447
=26
|
GATH4=11
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
63702
|
14/30
+
10
|
DYS
391=10
|
DYS
447
=25
|
GATH4=12
|
To
us:
95%
=1584
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
stable
|
unstable
|
stable
|
To
Modal
=
1284-1509 |
|
Other
kits
|
7
kits
|
5
kits
|
4
kits
|
1
kits
|
~
|
FTDna
states:
Distance:
3-4
-
Related
63-64/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
three
or
four
'points.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25,
36/37
or
37/37
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d,
or
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
third
panel
of
markers.
Your
common
ancestor
is
probably
not
extremely
recent,
but
your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Kits:
27949,
27950
-
Related
-
-
Gen
Distance
4
@
67
-
2
documented
descendants
of
Norman
MacLeod
of
Scotland
who
entered
the
United
States
through
Virginia
cr.
1783-1790
and
migrated
to
Gallia
County
Ohio
by
1810.
This
kit
shares
a
family
legend
similar
to
our
own.....immigration
date
and
place
fits
that
of
our
legend.
A
25
marker
perfect
match
to
Dad
and
Purdy
-
the
upgraded
kit
experience
two
mutations
in
the
26-37
level
and
two
mutations
in
the
38
-
67
level
-
one
of
the
misses
in
this
last
group
matches
a
miss
by
36748.
This
kit
also
experienced
a
Unique
Mutation
Event
at
this
final
level.
Testing
of
the
second
kit
and
perhaps
another
cousin
could
shed
light
on
the
age
of
these
mutations.
Unique
Mutation
Event
-
DYS
444
-
This
mutation
most
likely
took
placed
SINCE
this
kit
last
shared
an
ancestor
with
any
other
kit
in
the
project
-
testing
of
cousins
would
confirm
this.
Ignoring
this
UME
=
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1584)
-
To
us:
=1534-1759(1634)
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
CDYb=37
|
DYS
442=12
|
DYS
444=12
|
DYS
446=15
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
CDYb=37
|
DYS
442=12
|
DYS
444=12
|
DYS
446
=15
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
27949/50
|
13/29
+
10
|
CDYb=38
|
DYS
442=11
|
DYS
444=13
|
DYS
446=
16
|
To
us:
95%
=1584
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
unstable
|
very
stable
|
stable
|
stable
|
To
Modal
=1284-1509(1509)
|
|
Other
kits
|
9
kits
|
6
kits
|
1
kits
|
0
|
1
-
36748
|
~
|
FTDna
states:
Distance:
3-4
-
Related
63-64/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
three
or
four
'points.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25,
36/37
or
37/37
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d,
or
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
third
panel
of
markers.
Your
common
ancestor
is
probably
not
extremely
recent,
but
your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
These
two
were
a
perfect
25
marker
match
with
Purdy
and
Donald.
Few
people
achieve
this
level
of
closeness.
However,
when
one
of
these
kits
upgraded
to
the
67
marker
level
of
testing
4
markers
were
missed
between
marker
26
and
67
resulting
in
the
low
percentages
shown
above,
including
a
Unique
Mutation
Event
at
DYS
444
-
should
the
cousin
upgrade
from
25
-
67
markers,
the
age
of
these
mutations
could
be
deetermined
-
should
the
cousin
match
the
modal
alleles
of
the
project,
then
the
mutation(s)
could
be
ignored
when
determining
TMRCA
Kit
50516
-
Related
-
-
Gen
Distance
4
@
67
-EKA
Malcolm
MacLeod,
b.c.
1746,
Glashvin,
Isle
of
Skye
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
447=26
|
CDYa=37
|
DYS
534=16
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
447=26
|
CDYa=37
|
DYS
534=16
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
50516
|
13/29
+
11
|
DYS
447=25
|
CDYa=36
|
DYS
534=15
|
To
us:
95%
=1584
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
unstable
|
unstable
|
stable
|
To
Modal
=1534-1759(1634) |
|
Other
kits
|
14
kits
|
4
kits
|
5
kits
|
1-137480
|
~
|
FTDna
states:
Distance:
3-4
-
Related
63-64/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
three
or
four
'points.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25,
36/37
or
37/37
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d,
or
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
third
panel
of
markers.
Your
common
ancestor
is
probably
not
extremely
recent,
but
your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
137480
-
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
5
@
67
-
Unique
Mutation
Event
-
at
YCAIIb
-
note
how
this
drops
his
TMRCA
from
the
1584
of
kit
50516
-
however,
they
are
a
distance
of
1
to
each
other
-
TMRCA
for
them
=
1634
-
therefore,
it
is
most
likely
that
TMRCA
from
us
to
this
kit
is
1584
just
as
it
is
with
kit
50516.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
447=26
|
YCAIIb
|
CDYa=37
|
DYS
534=16
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
447=26
|
YCAIIb=23
|
CDYa=37
|
DYS
534=16
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
137480
|
13/29
+
11
|
DYS
447=25
|
YCAIIb=25
|
CDYa=36
|
DYS
534=15
|
To
us:
95%
=1584
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
unstable
|
stable
|
unstable
|
stable
|
To
Modal
=1284-1509(1434)
|
|
Other
kits
|
14
kits
|
4
kits
|
0
|
5
kits
|
1-137480
|
UME
-
see
above
|
Kit
81878
-
Probably
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
3
@
37
-
a
descendant
of
Donald
MacLeod
born
cr.
1730
on
the
Isle
of
Harris.
Norman
MacLeod,
a
descendant
of
Donald,
b.
cr.
1889
in
Kilmarnock,
Scotland
immigrated
to
Montreal
Canada
bef.
1912
:
See
above
kit
-
63702
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
391=11
|
GATH4=11
|
DYS
570
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
391=11
|
GATH4=11
|
DYS
570
=
17
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
81878
|
14/30
+
10
|
DYS
391=10
|
GATH4=12
|
DYS
570
=
18
|
To
us:
95%
=
1584
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
stable
|
stable
|
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1284-1509
|
|
Other
kits
|
7
kits
|
5
kits
|
1
kits
|
0
kit
|
~
|
Distance:
4
-
Probably
Related
33/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
four
'points'
--a
33/37
match.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
about
the
same
as
being
11/12
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
23/25
or
24/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
If
several
or
many
generations
have
passed
it
is
likely
that
these
two
lines
are
related
through
other
family
members.
That
would
require
that
each
line
had
passed
a
mutation
and
one
person
would
have
experienced
at
least
2
mutations.
The
only
way
to
confirm
is
to
test
additional
family
lines
and
find
where
the
mutations
took
place.
Only
by
testing
additional
family
members
can
you
find
the
person
in
between
each
of
you...this
'in
betweener'
becomes
essential
for
you
to
find,
and
without
him
the
possibility
of
a
match
exists,
but
further
evidence
must
be
pursued.
If
you
test
additional
individuals
you
will
most
likely
find
that
their
DNA
falls
in-between
the
persons
who
are
4
apart
demonstrating
relatedness
within
this
family
cluster
or
haplotype.
Kit
99027
-
Probably
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
4
@
37
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
385b
|
DYS
576
|
DYS
570
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
385b=14
|
DYS
576
=
18
|
DYS
570
=
17
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
99027
|
14/30
+
11
|
DYS
385b=15
|
DYS
576
=
19
|
DYS
570
=
16
|
To
us:
95%
=
1584
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
very
stable
|
volatile
|
unstable
|
To
modal
=
1534-1759(1634)
|
|
Other
kits
|
16
kits
|
0
|
10
kits
|
1
kit
|
~
|
Distance:
4
-
Probably
Related
33/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
four
'points'
--a
33/37
match.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
about
the
same
as
being
11/12
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
23/25
or
24/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
If
several
or
many
generations
have
passed
it
is
likely
that
these
two
lines
are
related
through
other
family
members.
That
would
require
that
each
line
had
passed
a
mutation
and
one
person
would
have
experienced
at
least
2
mutations.
The
only
way
to
confirm
is
to
test
additional
family
lines
and
find
where
the
mutations
took
place.
Only
by
testing
additional
family
members
can
you
find
the
person
in
between
each
of
you...this
'in
betweener'
becomes
essential
for
you
to
find,
and
without
him
the
possibility
of
a
match
exists,
but
further
evidence
must
be
pursued.
If
you
test
additional
individuals
you
will
most
likely
find
that
their
DNA
falls
in-between
the
persons
who
are
4
apart
demonstrating
relatedness
within
this
family
cluster
or
haplotype.
115676
-
Probably
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
4
@
37
-
Peter
MacLeod
1800's
Scottish
Cape
Breton
Pioneer
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
576
|
DYS
570
|
DYS
442=12
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
576
=
18
|
DYS
570
=
17
|
DYS
442=12
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
115676
|
14/30
+
11
|
DYS
576
=
19
|
DYS
570
=
16
|
DYS
442=11
|
To
us:
95%
=
1584
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
volatile
|
unstable
|
very
stable
|
To
modal
=
1534-1759(1634)
|
|
Other
kits
|
16
kits
|
1
kits
|
10
kits
|
1
kits
|
~
|
Distance:
4
-
Probably
Related
33/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
four
'points'
--a
33/37
match.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
about
the
same
as
being
11/12
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
23/25
or
24/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
If
several
or
many
generations
have
passed
it
is
likely
that
these
two
lines
are
related
through
other
family
members.
That
would
require
that
each
line
had
passed
a
mutation
and
one
person
would
have
experienced
at
least
2
mutations.
The
only
way
to
confirm
is
to
test
additional
family
lines
and
find
where
the
mutations
took
place.
Only
by
testing
additional
family
members
can
you
find
the
person
in
between
each
of
you...this
'in
betweener'
becomes
essential
for
you
to
find,
and
without
him
the
possibility
of
a
match
exists,
but
further
evidence
must
be
pursued.
If
you
test
additional
individuals
you
will
most
likely
find
that
their
DNA
falls
in-between
the
persons
who
are
4
apart
demonstrating
relatedness
within
this
family
cluster
or
haplotype.
Kit:
37219
-
Probably
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
2
@
37
markers-This
gentleman
is
believed
to
have
descended
from
Alexander
of
Liosale
in
the
district
of
Minginish,
who
was
the
son
of
Norman
IV
of
Waternish,
the
only
survivor
of
the
family
of
John
The
Fair
Hair
of
the
MacLeods
of
Harris
and
Dunvegan.
An
interview
with
the
widow
of
his
immigrant
ancestor
tells
a
story
that
fits
within
this
line
of
descent
as
does
documentation.
He
shares
the
line
of
descent
with
kit
25196
(Liosale,
a
documented
descendant
of
Leod).
He
also
therefore
shares
an
earlier
ancestor
in
Iain
Borb
with
kit
30097
.
Another
kit
claims
a
descent
from
Alexander
of
Liosale
through
his
son
Donald
of
Drynoch.
See
Current
Conclusions
for
more.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
385b
|
DYS
576
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
385b=14
|
DYS
576
=
18
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
37219
|
14/30
+
11
|
DYS
385b=15
|
DYS
576
=
19
|
To
us:
95%
=
1509
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
very
stable
|
volatile
|
To
modal
=
1534-1759(1584)
|
|
Other
kits
|
16
kits
|
0
|
10
kits
|
~
|
Distance:
4
-
Probably
Related
33/37
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
four
'points'
--a
33/37
match.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
about
the
same
as
being
11/12
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
23/25
or
24/25
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
If
you
matched
exactly
on
previous
tests
you
probably
have
a
mismatch
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
newest
panel
of
markers.
If
several
or
many
generations
have
passed
it
is
likely
that
these
two
lines
are
related
through
other
family
members.
That
would
require
that
each
line
had
passed
a
mutation
and
one
person
would
have
experienced
at
least
2
mutations.
The
only
way
to
confirm
is
to
test
additional
family
lines
and
find
where
the
mutations
took
place.
Only
by
testing
additional
family
members
can
you
find
the
person
in
between
each
of
you...this
'in
betweener'
becomes
essential
for
you
to
find,
and
without
him
the
possibility
of
a
match
exists,
but
further
evidence
must
be
pursued.
If
you
test
additional
individuals
you
will
most
likely
find
that
their
DNA
falls
in-between
the
persons
who
are
4
apart
demonstrating
relatedness
within
this
family
cluster
or
haplotype.
kit
66014
-
Related
-
Gen
Distance
4
@
67
-
a
descendant
of
John
MacLeod
who
was
born
about
1770
and
who
immigrated
from
Scotland
to
Cape
Breton,
Nova
Scotia
-
it
is
reported
that
he
sailed
from
Stornoway
on
the
Isle
of
Lewis.This
kit
has
an
unusual
mutation
at
Marker
2/DYS
#390
of
a
"24"
-
a
convergence
with
our
James
Leroy
McLeod
JR.
(Jimmy)
-
it
is
very
likely
that
this
mutation
occurred
within
the
last
several
generations.
If
this
can
be
proven
by
the
testing
of
cousins
to
this
kit,
this
mutation
can
be
ignored
in
comparing
it
to
ours
and
to
the
Sub
Gourp
B
Modal.
This
kit
also
experienced
a
Unique
Mutation
Event
at
DYS
460.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
390=25
|
DYS
460
=11
|
CDYa=37
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
390=25
|
DYS
460
=11
|
CDYa=37
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
66014
|
13/29
+
11
|
DYS
390=24
|
DYS
460
=10
|
CDYa=36
|
To
us:
95%
=1509
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
stable
|
very
stable
|
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1584)
|
|
Other
kits
|
14
kits
|
1
kits
|
0
|
5
kits
|
~
|
Unique
Mutation
Event
DYS
460
=
10
This
mutation
most
likely
took
placed
SINCE
this
kit
last
shared
an
ancestor
with
any
other
kit
in
the
project
-
testing
of
cousins
would
confirm
this.
Ignoring
this
UME
=
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1634)
-
To
us:
=1534-1759(1584)
FTDna
states:
Distance:
3-4
-
Related
63-64/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
only
three
or
four
'points.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25,
36/37
or
37/37
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d,
or
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
third
panel
of
markers.
Your
common
ancestor
is
probably
not
extremely
recent,
but
your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Kit
127808
-
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
5
@
67
-
an
immigrant
from
Scotland
in
the
early-mid
1800's
-
this
family
has
oral
legend
that
includes
Colbost,
Isle
of
Skye
-
same
area
of
origin
as
kit
36748
which
is
our
closest
match.
This
kit
is
a
gen
distance
of
1
@
67
markers
match
to
38247/
gen
distance
of
1
@
37
to
77670)
and
a
gen
distance
of
2
@
67
to
148833
-
These
kits
share
significant
markers
that
indicate
they
are
a
branch
which
last
shared
a
ancestor
with
each
other
cr.
1709.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
464
14,15,15,16
|
DYS#449=31
|
CDYb=37
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
14,15,15,16
|
DYS
449=31
|
CDYb=37
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
127808
|
14/30
+
11
|
14,14,15,15
|
DYS
449=32
|
CDYb=38
|
To
us:
95%
=1509
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
464c=Very
stable
|
very
unstable
|
unstable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1584)
|
|
Other
kits
|
16
kits
|
3
kits
|
5
kits
|
6
kits
|
~
|
This
kit
is
a
distance
of
1
from
kit
38247
missing
only
the
unstable
CDYb
from
that
kit
-
38247
To
us:
=
1584
-
that
year
is
most
likely
the
more
accurate
predition.
FTDna
states:
Distance:
5-6
-
Related
61-62/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
five
or
six
'points'.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
slightly
tighter
than
being
11/12,
23/25,
or
33/37,
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
closely
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25,
36/37
or
37/37
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d,
or
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
third
panel
of
markers.
Your
common
ancestor
is
not
very
recent,
but
your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Kit
148833
-
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
5
@
67
-
a
descendant
of
George
Washington
McLeod
(1820-1895),
son
of
Norman
per
a
Family
Bible
-
this
Norman
is
believed
to
have
had
children
born
on
Edisto
Island
SC
prior
to
moving
to
Darlington,
SC.
Norman
is
said
by
some
to
be
the
brother
of
Daniel
MacLeod,
h/o
Jane
Raspberry
Evans
of
Kershaw
District
-
who
is
said
to
the
son
of
Norman
(the
Immigrant)
and
Jeannette
Morrison.
This
kit
is
a
distance
of
1
at
67
markers
to
Kit
38247
and
a
distance
of
2
at
67
to
kit
127808
-
(just
above).
These
kits
share
significant
markers
that
indicate
they
are
a
branch
which
last
shared
a
ancestor
with
each
other
cr.
1709
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
464
14,15,15,16
|
DYS#449=31
|
DYS
439
=
12
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
14,15,15,16
|
DYS
449=31
|
DYS
439=12
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
148833
|
14/30
+
11
|
14,14,15,15
|
DYS
449=32
|
DYS
439=11
|
To
us:
95%
=1509
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
464c=Very
stable
|
very
unstable
|
stable
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759(1584)
|
|
Other
kits
|
16
kits
|
3
kits
|
5
kits
|
1
kits=
James
|
~
|
This
kit
is
a
distance
of
1
from
kit
38247
missing
only
DYS
439
from
that
kit
-
38247
To
us:
=
1584
-
that
year
is
most
likely
the
more
accurate
predition.
FTDna
states:
Distance:
5-6
-
Related
61-62/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
five
or
six
'points'.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
slightly
tighter
than
being
11/12,
23/25,
or
33/37,
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
closely
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
It's
most
likely
that
you
matched
24/25,
36/37
or
37/37
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests
and
your
mismatch
will
be
found
within
the
second
panel
at
DYS
#'s
458,
459
a,
459b,
449,
or
within
464
a-d,
or
at
DYS
576,
570,
CDYa
or
CDYb
in
our
third
panel
of
markers.
Your
common
ancestor
is
not
very
recent,
but
your
mismatch
is
likely
within
the
range
of
most
well
established
surname
lineages
in
Western
Europe.
Kit
106635
-
Probably
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
6
@
67
markersa
gentleman
for
whom
no
information
is
known:
Unique
Mutation
Event
at
395S1b=15
This
mutation
most
likely
took
place
SINCE
this
kit
last
shared
an
ancestor
with
any
other
kit
in
the
project
-
testing
of
cousins
would
confirm
this.
Ignoring
this
UME
results
in
TMRCA
-
to
Modal
=
1534-1709(1584)
/
To
us:
=1509
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
19=14
|
CDYb=37
|
DYS
456=16
|
395S1B=16
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
19=14
|
CDYb=37
|
DYS
456
=
16
|
395S1B=16
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
106635
|
14/30
+
11
|
DYS
19=15
|
CDYb=38
|
DYS
456
=
15
|
395S1=15
|
To
us:
95%
=
1434
|
|
Marker
Rating
|
389
=very
unstable
-
459b=
very
unstable
|
unstable
|
unstable
|
very
stable
|
stable
|
To
modal
=
1284-1509(1509)
|
|
Other
kits
|
16
kits
|
1
|
6
kits
|
1
kit
|
0
|
~
|
FTDna
states:
Distance:
7
-
Probably
Related
60/67
You
share
the
same
surname
(or
a
variant)
with
another
male
and
you
mismatch
by
seven
'points'.
Because
of
the
volatility
within
some
of
the
markers
this
is
about
the
same
as
being
11/12
and
it's
most
likely
that
you
matched
23/25
or
24/25
or
33-34/37
on
previous
Y-DNA
tests.
If
several
or
many
generations
have
passed
it
is
likely
that
these
two
lines
are
related
through
other
family
members.
The
only
way
to
confirm
is
to
test
additional
family
lines
and
find
where
the
mutations
took
place.
Only
by
testing
additional
family
members
can
you
find
the
person
in
between
each
of
you...this
'in
betweener'
becomes
essential
for
you
to
find,
and
without
him
the
possibility
of
a
match
exists,
but
further
evidence
must
be
pursued.
If
you
test
additional
individuals
you
will
most
likely
find
that
their
DNA
falls
in-between
the
persons
who
are
7
apart
demonstrating
relatedness
within
this
family
cluster
or
haplotype.
Kit
62311
-
Probably
Related
-
Gen
Distance
of
7
@
67
markersa
descendant
of
Norman
MacLeod
whose
ancestry
is
,
son
of
Roderick,
(RODERICK
RUAIRIDH
OG),
son
of
JOHN
(Ian
'Breac'
Macleod)
,
son
of
John
(John
Iain
Mor
MACLEOD),
son
of
Roderick
(Sir
Rory
Mor)
-
This
genealogy
was
written
into
a
Family
Bible
cr.
1829
but
has
not
been
proven
with
documentation.
If
this
is
true,
then
this
man
shares
an
ancestry
with
Kit
#30097.
They
are
a
distance
of
5
@
37
and
7
@
67
yet
the
mismatches
during
the
first
37
markers
are
all
on
fast
moving
markers
and
one
of
the
two
mismatches
in
the
final
panel
is
also
at
a
fast
marker-
testing
of
cousins
of
both
families
would
define
the
Ancestral
Haplotype
and
explain
those
mutations.
If
those
mutations
can
be
proven
to
have
occurred
since
their
branches
would
have
split
(or
since
1605),
their
relationship
would
have
great
credence
and
perhaps
prove
the
genealogy
written
in
the
Family
Bible.
| TMRCA
2nd
and
4th
rows
-
To
modal
=
YUtility
95%
prediction
that
the
kits
ancestor
matched
the
modal
exactly
|
|
Sub
Group
B
|
DYS
389
13/29
DYS
459=11
|
DYS
607
|
DYS
576
|
DYS
570
|
DYS
406S1
|
TMRCA
|
|
My
Family
|
13/29
+
10
|
DYS
607=15
|
DYS
576
=
18
|
DYS
570
=
17
|
DYS
406S1=10
|
To
Modal
=
1534-1759
|
|
62311
|
14/30
+
11
|
DYS
607=16
|
DYS
576
=
20
|
DYS
570
=
16
|
DYS
406S1=11
|
To
us:
95%
=
1359
|
| |