![]() |
|
Awards Navigating the DNA Pages Frequently Asked Questions Our Participants Our Matches About the Markers The MacLeod Project MacLeod Project Haplotype Ancestral Haplotypes Current Conclusions About this site Walking with Ghosts - Home Background Frequently Asked Questions My Blog I've been published....sort of Primary Research MacLeod/McLeod MacLeod DNA Project McLeod Reunion Information South Carolina Grave Index
Secondary
Research
Wilke of Germany/N.Y. Jessup of England Checker/Tskeris of Greece/N.Y. Abnett of England Hudson of South Carolina Ives of South Carolina
|
MacLeod
Surname
Study This is the first page in the DNA portion of this site: 1.Clan MacLeod Project Overview / 2. Clan MacLeod Project Modal Haplotype (Hypothetical) / 3. Ancestral Modal Haplotypes / 4. Understanding the Markers and Mutation Rates / 5. Our Participants Results / 6. A Closer Look at our matches / 7. Current Conclusions NEW
PAGES
:
Full
Result
Table
/
Sub
Group
B
Results
Table
/
Branching
Table
/
LCF
Rates
Table
/
Frequently
Asked
Questions
/
Mutation
Rates
The Project:
Clan
MacLeod
Surname
Project
-
consists
of
all
152
participants
regardless
of
Haplogroup
(May
29
2009) At the higher levels of testing (37 and 67) these kits have distances (mutations) of 10 to 25 from the R1b Clan MacLeod Project Haplotype. These kits share few if any of the markers that are unique to the Related MacLeods found in Sub Group B (unique as it relates to the R1b Haplogroup Alleles at those markers and to the degree that they are found in each of the related kits - see above table). This sub group A consists of descendants of those who were associated by tradition with the Clan and took on the surname when that became the societal norm. For those who do not match the Founding Group R1b or who do not match the Founding Group Haplotype at higher levels of testing, one of the following events likely took place:
For
an
excellent
explanation
of
various
haplogroups
within
a
clan
structure
see
the
To date, the five known documented descendants carry the 14/30 at DYS 389 and four out of five carry an "11" at DYS 459b - should there be more documented descendants in the project whose identities are not known, perhaps one or more of them will have the 13/29 at DYS 389 which would clarify whether we are looking at two significant branching's ocurring cr. 1649 -1705 or at a "meandering" allele combination. A CADET project was underway at one time but the results of that have not been made public - it is unknown if these Cadet kits were included in OUR current project. TMRCA
predictions
by
FTDNA
and
YUtility
both
state
that
the
two
haplotypes
-
*13/29
&
10
or
11*
or
*14/30
&
10
or
11*
-
have
a
95%
probability
of
sharing
an
ancestor
cr.
1649
-
1705
-
evidence
now
is
that
the
13/29
and
14/30
combination
"meanders"
its
way
through
the
related
paternal
lines.
R1b Subclades
February 15 2009 - An Overview of the Study The Clan MacLeod Society is participating in the relatively new science of utilizing DNA testing for genealogical purposes. There are basically three steps to the process for MacLeod men (and those of other surnames) who are participating:
However, this is a relatively new aspect of DNA studies and the scientists and project leaders are learning as we have more and more men participate just how mutations and other factors influence the results in studies that are concerned with more recent events then the migration patterns of early man. About the MacLeod YDNA Surname Study There are actually several different projects that have been done, or which are currently ongoing. In the original project, tests were to determine if the earliest participants, all men who bear the surname, were descended from one common ancestor as our Clan history suggests. Five hundred kits were originally sent out to volunteers and about 80% of those kits were returned and/or usable. This first testing project was to determine what is best described as the "deep ancestry" of our Clan - in this initial testing participants were found to belong in several different haplogroups making it clear that not all who bear the surname MacLeod (or any of its variant spellings) were descended from one common ancestor. The results shows that of the kits returned, 32% had a common haplogroup that is consistent with an ancestry out of the Isle of Man which itself is consistent with our Clan History and the remainder were of a different haplogroup and had assumed the surname MacLeod at some point since cr 1200. The study also determined that within the common Haplogroup, a haplotype was emerging. The results of this study were reported in the Clan MacLeod Magazine in April 2004. Key: Row
One
-
Locus
or
marker
number
Note:
UL
referred
to
the
R1b
group
as
"Founding
Group"
which
equals
FTDna
R1b The first column shows the University of London terminology and clarifies the standard and FTDNA terminology. This was found on the FTDNA MacLeod Project RESULTS page but was difficult to read as it was not in TABLE format. (I have added the R1b Modal row for comparison and clarification; it was not included on the results page.)
How does all of this pertain to those of us who are descended from Angus and Nancy McCutchen MacLeod? The Haplotype of the Clan MacLeod Project can be determined by defining the "center" of the project; this is done by taking the most common allele/value at each marker tested - this allele/value becomes the Modal for that marker. Once the "center" is defined, in most Surname Project's each participant's results are compared to the haplotype and a distance from it is assigned. FTDNA has set "allowable" distances which indicate the degree of relatedness of each kit to each other kit. Our family results are a 12/12 match at the 12 marker level of testing to the haplotype; a 25/25 match at the 25 marker level of testing to the haplotype and a 66/67 to the MacLeod Haplotype as it presently stands. (There is some "fuzziness" beginning to appear at 37 markers in which two multicopy markers appear equally likely to be the modal which will be discussed on the following pages). As more men participate in the project the haplotype will continue to be defined. Among our closest matches are two main branches of Leod's family tree as well as 3 sub - branches of the tree which certainly indicates that we share a recent common ancestor with those lines (within 600 years or cr. 1408 - 1700). As to where we actually "fit" into the Family Tree of Leod, that is something of which we may never truly know the truth. If one takes a good look at the documented lines of MacLeods who descend either through MacLeod of Harris or MacLeod of Lewis it is obvious that although many times the names of a specific man's children are known, nothing but the name is known for one or more of the male children. These are sometimes referred to as "lost lines". Documenting our place in the tree will be almost impossible to do based upon the scarcity of records. However, for more recent genealogy i.e. 1690 - the present, the DNA testing has revealed avenues of research that should be investigated....such as a close match with a MacLeod Family of Colbost, Isle of Skye Scotland and another MacLeod Family of Virginia. There is also indication of close relationship with several MacLeod Family's of North Carolina. What exactly does DNA PROVE? I have spent a great deal of time researching and have come across several web pages where it is stated "DNA is passed UNALTERED from father to son and will prove relationship ...." or similar wording. Unfortunately, this is not exactly the case in genealogical DNA testing which uses "junk" DNA..... Mutations do occur between a father and son and we have this in our family results from our participation in this project - it is also found in the family of the founder of FTDNA who misses his father and brother by a one step mutation. Additionally, DNA testing has its limits - it cannot tell you how you are related just that you are related ...i.e. ..my 6 times great grandfather may be the same man as your 5 times great grandfather...that man is our "in-betweener" and can help us determine the age of any mutations that exist between our two haplotypes but without the documentation each of us has we cannot determine the "how" of the relationship. Basically the DNA testing does two things:
DNA testing is a companion to Genealogical Research ....it cannot and should not be considered in any way a replacement for good old fashioned record searching! This is the first page in the DNA portion of this site: 1. Clan MacLeod Project Overview / 2. Clan MacLeod Project Modal Haplotype (Hypothetical) / 3. Ancestral Modal Haplotypes / 4. Understanding the Markers and Mutation Rates / 5. Our Participants Results / 6. A Closer Look at our matches / 7. Current Conclusions NEW PAGES : Full Result Table / Sub Group B Results Table / Branching Table / LCF Rates Table / Frequently Asked Questions / Mutation Rates |
Sideline Research Arrants of South Carolina Barnes of South Carolina Blyther of South Carolina Boykin of South Carolina Coombs of Maine Davis of South Carolina Dennis of South Carolina Freeman of South Carolina Holland of South Carolina Huggins of South Carolina Hurst of South Carolina Jones of South Carolina Josey/Jossey of South Carolina Medhurst of England Meyers of South Carolina Moseley of South Carolina Rodgers of South Carolina Ross of South Carolina Yates/Yeates of South Carolina Online
Research Sites
Sumter South Carolina Genealogy Kershaw South Carolina Genealogy County Kent England Genealogy Family Tree DNA |
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~formyfamily/index.htm
!Source: Lori McLeod Wilke copyright © 2000-2009 All Rights Reserved