Search billions of records on Ancestry.com
   

The Aaron Stark Family Chronicles

Volume 4: Descendants of Jonathan Stark & Sarah Lacock; The Kentucky Stark Families

Part 2: From Connecticut to Kentucky

Chapter 4: Jonathan Stark & His Sons; Their Journey From Connecticut to Kentucky

By Clovis LaFleur, February 2008

 [Home] [Table of Contents] Preface ] Chapter 1 ] Chapter 2 ] Chapter 3 ] [ Chapter 4 ] Chapter 5 ] Chapter 6 ] Chapter 7 ] Chapter 8 ] Daniel Stark ] Moses Stark ] Walter O. Shriner Letters ]

Chapter 4 Attachment: Jonathan Stark Family Timeline ]

Last Update: June 26, 2008 Webmaster: Clovis LaFleur <clafleur1@austin.rr.com> Click HERE to see Copyright & Disclaimer.

Back ] Next ]

Introduction

Born to William and Experience (Lamb) Stark on December 12, 1712 in New London County, Connecticut was a son, Jonathan Stark destined to be the progenitor of the Kentucky descendants of Aaron Stark [1608-185].[1] He was the great-grandson of Aaron and grandson of William Stark (Senior). Over a period of 100 years, Jonathan and his descendants would migrate from Connecticut; to New Jersey; to Northern Virginia, then western Pennsylvania; eventually arriving in Kentucky in 1785. The journey began with Jonathan, his relatives, and some of his neighbors, leaving Connecticut in search of a place where they could worship as they pleased. Their journey ended in Kentucky, near present day Louisville. Their descendants would later move north of the Ohio River into southern Indiana; a place where their religious beliefs were not only tolerated but all men could live freely as neighbors and friends and as a bonus, own excellent farm land free of the encumbrances of the territorial bickering they found as they moved from New Jersey to Kentucky.

Connecticut

At the age of one, Jonathan’s father received as a gift from William Stark (Senior), a sizable amount of property in Groton.[2] However, four months later, Jonathan’s father exchanged this property with his father-in-law, Isaac Lamb, for a smaller plot of land.[3,4] Jonathan’s Grandfather Stark was most displeased with his son for keeping property in the family was important to these early colonials.

March 3, 1715/16, William (Senior) again conveyed property to his son as a gift inserting a clause which prevented William (Junior) from selling the property during his natural life. The clause allowed William (Junior) to improve the property during his natural life, but upon his death, the property would then pass to Jonathan, age three at the time this deed was signed into the record. At a very young age, Jonathan was essentially a land owner; or at least would become a land owner when his father died. The clause stated:[5]

"...that I ye abovesd William Stark for ye good will and kinder affection I bear to my son William Stark Junr and my Grandchild Jonathan Stark both of Groton in ye County of New London aforesd have fully freely and absolutely given granted aliened ensealled and confirmed unto William Stark Jun aforesd a certain tract of land during his naturall life and then to my grandchild Jonathan Stark aforesd and his heirs..."

Jonathan’s grandfather was a Baptist at a time when Connecticut was ruled by a Theocracy; it’s leaders opposed to religious beliefs that were contrary to the scriptures as interpreted by the Congregational Church. Within this Baptist movement in Connecticut arose a small, radical group, known as the Rogerenes; followers of John Rogers. The Rogerenes believed there was no basis in fact in the scriptures that required the day of worship to be the first day of the week Sunday. Instead, they believed that man had decreed Sunday as the day of worship not God. Because the Rogerenes refused to worship on Sunday and chose to work on the Sabbath, the Rogerenes were severely persecuted.

These early Stark family members, although Baptist, were divided on this issue and just before 1720, Jonathan’s parents, his Lamb relatives, and several Stark Cousins who were sons of Aaron Stark (Junior), probably became followers of John Rogers. One of their neighbors, John Culver, became the leader of the Rogerenes when John Rogers died in 1721. For a period, the group attempted to continue living in New London County, some even moving to Colchester after 1721 to form a Rogerene community. But the persecution continued. By 1730, the Rogerenes had decided to move to New Jersey a Colony that was more religiously tolerant than Connecticut. Jonathan’s parents continued to live in New London County, Connecticut, but most likely before 1736, William (Jr.) died for Jonathan sold the property which would have come into his possession upon the death of his father.[6] Jonathan’s Mother, Experience, then married John Larkin in 1738.[7]

New Jersey

Western New Jersey in 1795

This map has many of the features and townships which are in the region of interest as they approximately appeared in 1760, their boundaries altered as new townships and counties were formed. [Note the mileage scale in upper left corner.]

 

The Rogerenes left New London County in 1732, bound for New Jersey where they settled on the east slope of Schooley's Mountain – where they were known as the "Colverites" by local residents. Three years later, this religious sect removed to Monmouth County, living their for 11 years before returning to live on the summit and western slope of Schooley's Mountain.[8]

Jonathan chose to follow his relatives to New Jersey where he first appears in the New Jersey records in 1734 as an a witness to a deed transaction for Mary Insley of Woodbridge, Middlesex County, New Jersey.[9] This is where he would meet his future wife, Sarah Lacock, whom he would marry between 1734 and 1738.[10]

Jonathan’s father was deceased before May 5, 1836; for this was the date that Jonathan sold the property he received upon the death of his father – to his cousin, Aaron Fish.[6] Jonathan had been living in New Jersey at least two to three years by this time. He did not move with the Rogerenes from Schooley’s Mountain, but remained in the area, eventually building a grist mill. He later lived in that region of northwest New Jersey that is present day Hardwick Township.

Hardwick was incorporated on January 22, 1750, which included the present day townships of Frelinghuysen and Allamuchy in Warren County and Hackettstown and Green in Sussex County. On March 6, 1750, Jonathan advertised he had property for sell or lease with – grist-mills in Bethlehem, adjoining land of Mr. Allen to be sold or let by Jonathan Stark in Bethlehem.[11] By 1750, about 600 residents lived in the region around Hardwick and they began to petition for their own County due to the hardship of traveling all the way to Morristown for court business. On June 8, 1753, the colonial legislature created Sussex County from part of Morris County.

Jonathan and his family were now Baptist, known to have belonged to the Bethlehem Baptist Church in 1754 and later, were among fourteen members who formed a Baptist Church in Knollton, Sussex County.[12] His father-in-law, Joseph Lacock, and other associated families were also members of these Churches. After August 27, 1760 and before October 8, 1760, Jonathan’s father-in-law, Joseph Lacock, died in Hardwick, Sussex County. His Will was witnessed by James Stark and named Sarah (Lacock) Stark as his daughter. Her brothers, Joseph, Nathan, and William (the administrator of his father’s estate) were also named in the Will.[13]

The Stark and Lacock families lived relatively quietly in Hardwick until Jonathan died in late December of 1764, his estate probated on January 3, 1765. Sarah (Lacock) Stark and James Stark were named administrators of the estate and Sarah’s brother, Joseph Lacock (Junior), was named fellow bondsman.[14] Sarah was now a widow with a number of underage children living at home. James Stark, her oldest, was probably about 26 years of age or older. The other children ranged in age from about 10 to 23. The names of the known children were James, Jonathan [the younger], Daniel, Joseph, Christopher, William, Sarah, and John.

Sussex County, situated in northwest New Jersey, was well off the beaten path in those days. The Kittatinny Mountains cut across its entire northwestern region, creating highlands which were heavily-wooded. Rising upward from the Kittatinny Valley in the eastern part of the county, these rock covered hills made farming a difficult occupation, especially in Hardwick Township.

At the beginning and throughout the French & Indian War, residents in Sussex County were subjected to especially violent attacks from the Delaware Indians who had declared independence from the Iroquois. Faced with unspeakable violence, many residents of Hardwick fled to more civilized locations. This continued throughout the war until peace was restored in 1763. Before and at the conclusion of the war, there was a boundary dispute between New York and New Jersey which was the source of further violence in the region until resolved in 1769. By 1764, the Lacock and Stark families had begun to look elsewhere for a place that was more settled and with better farm land to support their families. The first to begin that search was William Lacock.

Virginia

William Lacock, one of the executors of his father's Will in 1760, was a resident of Loudoun County, Virginia by 1764 and purchased property from Lord Fairfax in 1765.[15,16] At that time, this region of Virginia was rumored to offer excellent opportunities for farming and growing tobacco – the cash crop of the period. The reasons for moving from New Jersey could have been due to the rocky conditions and poor soil in Hardwick Township; the threat of Indian attacks; the boundary dispute with New York; or a division or disagreement within the Baptist Church. For any or all of these reasons, the Lacock and Stark families, united through the marriage of Sarah Lacock to Jonathan Stark, prepared to join William Lacock in Virginia.

Original of the 1768 Cameron Parish Tithable 

Compiled by James Hamilton with the blocked area magnified above revealing the names of Joseph Starke, William Starke, and James Starke. Cameron Parish was within the jurisdiction of Loudoun County, Virginia. The next line under James Starke has the name William Laycock, which was in the next microfilm frame of the Hamilton list.

In 1767, Daniel Stark was living near his Uncle William Lacock in a region of Loudon County bounded by Vestal's Gap, Blue Ridge, and Catacton Creek. By this time, Daniel was married to Elizabeth ( believed my many to be Elizabeth Wells). It’s quite probable his mother, Sarah (Lacock) Stark, sister, Sarah Stark, and youngest brother, John Stark, were all living together.[17,18] In the same year, James, Joseph, and William were living near Nathan Lacock. William was reported as a tithable of James, indicating William was probably between 16 and 21 years of age. Joseph was over 21 for he was not reported as a tithable of James. They were living in a region of Loudon County bounded by William's Gap; to Vestal's Gap; to the junction of Vestal's Gap; to the Blue Ridge; and then to Kittocton Mountain.[17] All three were bachelors, probably working as laborers on their Uncle Nathan Lacock’s farm.

Soon after his father died, Jonathan Stark [the younger] married Margaret Ball May 15, 1765 – in Morris County, New Jersey – and remained in New Jersey with his Uncle Joseph Lacock. Christopher also remained in New Jersey until 1768, probably living with Jonathan [the younger] or with his Uncle Joseph.

Christopher Stark joined his brothers in Loudoun County in 1768.[17] Of the five related men with the surname Stark found living in Loudoun County in 1768, only James Stark appears on the tithable list for 1769. Also missing from the tithable list for 1769 was a gentleman named William Wood, who was living near Daniel Stark in 1767 and 1768. William Wood married Daniel’s sister, Sarah, February 14, 1769.[19]

Soon after Sarah Stark was married, her husband moved his new bride to the settlement at Redstone Fort, located near the region that became present day Washington County, Pennsylvania. But soon after their arrival, Indian trouble disrupted further settlement and William brought his pregnant bride back to Loudoun County where their first born, Elizabeth Wood, was born in December of 1769.[20] Sarah's older brother, James, may have still been a resident of Loudoun County at that time, as were her Uncles, William and Nathan Lacock. This was probably a safer place for Sarah to give birth. Is it possible Daniel, Christopher, Joseph, and William moved to Redstone Fort in 1769 with William Wood? If the named brothers and William Wood did move to Redstone Fort in 1769, what was the attraction?

November 5, 1768, the treaty of Fort Stanwix was made with the Indians which opened up the lands west of the Allegheny and Ohio Rivers for settlement. April 3, 1769, the land office opened in Philadelphia and on the first day twenty orders of survey were issued for land in present day Washington County, then a part of Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. Within one month there were 3200 applications for warrants, mostly made by the Scotch-Irish living in eastern Pennsylvania.

The 1770 tithable list discloses Christopher Stark, Joseph Stark, and William Wood were once again in Loudoun County. They may have been at Redstone in 1769 and returned to Loudoun County when the Indians problems erupted in the region. However, after 1768, no record of Daniel Stark can be found in Loudoun County nor can records for James Stark be found after 1769. Nor was William Stark found in the Loudoun County records after 1768 and he then disappears altogether from the records – suggesting he may have died as a result of the Indiana hostilities or some other calamity. In 1770, Nathan Lacock, William Lacock, and Joseph Lacock appear on the Loudoun County tithable list; the first known record suggesting Joseph Lacock had removed from New Jersey to Loudoun County by 1770.

The Loudoun County Court minutes record Joseph Lacock, William Lacock, and Nathan Lacock were still in Loudoun County in 1771 and as late as December 10, 1771. After 1771, the surnames of interest begin to disappear from the Loudoun County records. The last record found for James Stark was dated September 13, 1769 in the Loudoun County Court minutes. In addition to Joseph Stark being reported on the tithable list, he last appears in the Loudoun County Court minutes March 14, 1770.[21] By 1771 or 1772, the Stark men are no longer present in the Loudoun County public records – suggesting the brothers had moved elsewhere. Where could the families have been after early 1772?

Pennsylvania & Lord Dunmore’s War

 

Colonial Roads

=== Main Roads                    ----- Secondary Roads or Trails

Colonial Roads that may have been used by families migrating from Loudoun County, Virginia to Redstone and beyond. Two ways of travel could have been used. Being close to the Potomac River, they could have traveled by water to Fort Cumberland and then by land on the secondary roads from Fort Cumberland to Redstone. The second method could have been by land traveling up from Loudoun County to Fredericktown and west to Fort Cumberland on the Main Road and then to Redstone on the secondary road. From Loudoun County, the distance to Fort Cumberland was about 75 miles and to Redstone from Fort Cumberland about 60 miles.

 

As mentioned above, April 3, 1769, the Pennsylvania Proprietary Land Office opened. Over the next two years, pioneers moved in large numbers into the regions that were west of the  Monongahela River and south of Pittsburgh. On March 9, 1771, Bedford County was formed from the western part of Cumberland County and included this region. At this time, Pitt Township and Springhill Township were created, the latter taking in the region south of present day Washington, Pennsylvania. The 1772 tax-rolls for Springhill Township, Bedford County, reveal 308 landholders, 89 tenants, and 58 single freemen, most from Virginia and Maryland. In late 1773 and early 1774, Virginia attempted to establish court jurisdiction over this part of Southwest Pennsylvania.

Lord Dunmore, Governor of the Colony of Virginia, visited Fort Pitt in late 1773 where he met Dr. John Connolly. Dunmore appointed Connolly "Captain and Commandant of the Militia of Pittsburgh." On January 1, 1774, the unsettled boundary between Pennsylvania and Virginia became hotly contested when Connolly posted a proclamation on the walls of Fort Pitt to announce his appointment and Lord Dunmore's intention to claim the region for Virginia. Within this proclamation, Connolly ordered those men in the region dependant on the fort for protection to assemble the militia on January 25.

Places & Events: Dunmore's War April to July

  1. April 30- Massacre of Logan's Relatives at Bakers Cabin.

  2. May 8- William Crawford leaves Stewart's Crossing for Fort Pitt with 100 men.

  3. May to early June - William Crawford at Fort Pitt assembling men for move to Wheeling.

  4. Mid June - William Crawford arrives at Wheeling with between 200 and 300 men and works with Ebenezer Zane and John Caldwell to build a fort later named Fort Fincastle in Lord Dunmore's honor.

  5. July - Angus McDonald arrives from Frederick County, Virginia with between 400 and 500. Assists in completion of Fort.

  6. July 26 - Angus McDonald leaves Wheeling with 400 men arriving at Fish Creek 24 miles down river from Wheeling. Begins march overland from Fish Creek to Shawnee Villages on the Muskingum River.

However, within several months, trouble with the Indians in the region erupted when several relatives of Mingo Chief Logan were murdered at Baker's cabin on April 30, 1774. This was the beginning of a six month conflict between the settlers and Native American tribes that became known as Dunmore's War. James Stark, Daniel Stark, Christopher Stark, and William Wood participated in Dunmore's War for there is documented evidence they were paid at Fort Pitt in October of 1775 for militia service in the companies of Captain Joseph Mitchell and Lieutenant David Enoch.[22]

At the beginning of hostilities, their place of residence is not known with certainty. They may have been living near Pigeon Creek, at that time within Springhill Township created by Pennsylvania in March of 1771. William Wood was reported as owning land on a tributary of Pigeon Creek in a 1780 Virginia Survey suggesting this may have been one possible residence of some or all of the brothers before May of 1774.[23] This property was located about five miles west of the Monongahela River and half-way between Redstone and Pittsburgh.

Records from Dunmore's War report Daniel Stark and Christopher Stark served in Colonel William Crawford's Frederick County, Virginia Regiment under Captain Joseph Mitchell, their company commander. Two others serving in Captain Mitchell's Company were Lieutenant Nathaniel Fox and Sergeant Zophar Ball. The length of service of Captain Mitchell, for which he was paid 79 pounds and 10 shillings, was 159 days.[22]

Assuming hostilities ended before the end of October 1774, Mitchell's pay period probably ended about November 1, 1774, implying his pay period began about May 20, 1774. Therefore, the Stark brothers probably served in Colonel William Crawford's Regiment between May 20, 1774 and November 1, 1774.

Historians report William Crawford departed from his home at Stewart’s Crossing with 100 men May 8th his destination Fort Pitt where other men of the surrounding area militia were to assemble. By the time Crawford was ready to leave Fort Pitt for Wheeling he had a command of between two hundred and three hundred men, many apparently living on both sides of the Monongahela River and as far east as Laurel Hills. It’s possible some of these men traveled over the mountains from Frederick County, meeting at Steward's Crossing before proceeding on to Fort Pitt with Crawford. Joseph Mitchell could have been one of these men. Because Pigeon Creek was in close proximity to Stewart's Crossing, the Stark brothers may have been among those who assembled at Steward's Crossing. Once the men had assembled at Fort Pitt, they surely were organized into companies, not all of the men in each company necessarily from the same region but assigned to regional Captains.

Historical accounts reveal the region between the Monongahela and Ohio Rivers had been mostly evacuated of settlers and their families by late May of 1774. Allowing Daniel and Christopher time to move their families to safety on the east side of the Monongahela River between April 30 and May 20, they probably had time to travel to Fort Pitt to participate in the militia assembly or could have been assigned to Mitchell's Company May 8th at Steward's Crossing. If they served in William Crawford's Regiment, then they most likely participated in much of the activity attributed to his regiment during Dunmore's War.

During there months of service, Daniel and Christopher participated in the construction of Fort Fincastle and may have been participants in Angus McDonald’s expedition that was ambushed August 2nd near the Muskingum River Lieutenant Nathaniel Fox of Mitchell’s command wounded in this skirmish. Alternately, rather than serving with McDonald, they could have been among 200 hundred to 300 men ordered to remain with William Crawford at Fort Fincastle.

Later Events During Dunmore's War 

  1. August 2 - McDonald ambushed by Shawnee. Nathaniel Fox Wounded.

  2. Late August - McDonald back at Redstone awaiting arrival of Lord Dunmore.

  3. Early September - William Crawford back at Fort Pitt awaiting arrival of Lord Dunmore.

  4. Mid September - William Crawford and 500 men move cattle and supplies from Fort Pitt to Wheeling.

  5. September 30 - Dunmore and Crawford arrive at Wheeling. Crawford continues to Hocking River.

  6. October 9 - Crawford & Dunmore at mouth of Hocking River where Stockade was completed for the cattle.

  7. October 10 - Battle of Point Pleasant occurs.

  8. Later in October - Dunmore arrives at Camp Charlotte where Cornstalk and Chiefs meet to discuss ending the war.

  9. Towards end of October - Crawford sent up the Scioto to destroy Mingo Village.

  10. November 14, 1774 - Crawford writes a letter to George Washington from his home at Steward's Crossing.

 

Captain Mitchell's Company probably participated in concert with William Crawford's Regiment after September 30, 1774 and would have participated in a skirmish with the Mingo's late in October, the last hostile act in Dunmore‘s War.. At the conclusion of the War in late October, Crawford's regiment was relieved or disbanded for William Crawford wrote a letter November 14, 1774 to George Washington from Stewart's Crossing reporting those events in which Crawford participated.[24] However, did the Stark brothers complete their tour at that time and return to their families?

The records of payment for Dunmore's War reveal John Connolly was still in Command of the West Augusta County Battalion. After Lord Dunmore's return to Redstone November 17 and from there to Williamsburg, Connolly resumed command of the forces remaining in the District of West Augusta. Although a treaty had been signed and honored by the Shawnee, there were other Indian tribes which did not want to honor the agreement. Therefore, as a safety precaution, one would have to presume companies of men would have been garrisoned at forts on the Ohio River as a first line of defense in the event these tribes chose to renew their raids.

Within Connolly's command was Lieutenant David Enoch. The length of service of Lieutenant Enoch, for which he was paid 79 pounds and 10 shillings, was 132 days.[22] Serving in Enoch's Company was Sergeant Zophar Ball, a Sergeant who had served in Joseph Mitchell's Company. From the military records, there were a number of men who appeared on the rosters of both Joseph Mitchell’s company and David Enoch’s company. Among these men were Daniel Stark and Christopher. James Stark was not on the roster of Mitchell’s company but was reported on the roster of Enoch’s company.

The brothers participation in Dunmore's War suggests they were living between the Monongahela and Ohio Rivers at the time of the massacre of Chief Logan's relatives at Baker's Cabin. A compelling reason for believing they lived in the region was their service under Lieutenant David Enoch. The Enoch family has been documented as having lived at the time of Dunmore’s War on Ten Mile Creek – located southeast of present day Washington, Pennsylvania. Historical accounts report they had build a blockhouse only two miles from the Monongahela River on that same creek. One could easily speculate David Enoch's men lived near the blockhouse, providing protection in that region against Indian attacks, and that these same men had served earlier in Joseph Mitchell's Command. If this were true, then the men in Enoch's command could have been living near the blockhouse. This would be only one of several possibilities, for they could have also garrisoned any of the several forts built along the Ohio River.

Their service in Mitchell's Company would seem to imply they came from Frederick County, Virginia, the regional name given to their Regiment commanded by William Crawford. However, the historical account clearly reveals Crawford was a Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania official on April 30, but then appointed a Major in the Virginia militia after April 30. Therefore, it would seem reasonable to expect men under his command were not all residents of Frederick County. Many were probably members of the local militias that assembled at Stewart's Crossing, Pittsburgh, and Wheeling.

What is known for sure is James Stark, Daniel Stark, Christopher Stark, and William Wood were paid at Fort Pitt for their service in Dunmore's War, which suggests they were living near Pittsburgh by October of 1775; and their participation in Dunmore's War further suggest they could have been living over the mountains in the boundary disputed region before April 30, 1774.

By 1775, all of the Stark brother’s were married accept for the youngest, John Stark. James probably married his spouse, Hannah, sometime between 1767 and 1769, this marriage probably occurring in Loudoun County, Virginia.[26] Daniel Stark had married Elizabeth around 1767; Christopher Stark married Martha Vineyard probably no later than 1772;27 and Joseph Stark most likely married his spouse, Hannah, about 1775. John Stark, the youngest, did not marry Elizabeth Eddy until sometime between 1780 and 1782 for the couples first child, Benjamin, was not born until 1783 near the conclusion of the Revolutionary War.[28]

Pennsylvania & The Revolutionary War

Early in May of 1775, communication arrived form the east reporting that on April 19th a detachment of Royal troops under the command of General Gage at Boston, Massachusetts, had fired on provincial troops at Lexington. These were the opening shots of the Revolution. The boundary dispute between Virginia and Pennsylvania was temporarily set aside, but there were still hostile feelings on both sides of the argument for Augusta County, Virginia, and Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania, had separate meetings on May 16th to discuss these developments.

Inhabitants living west of Laurel Hill and claiming allegiance to Augusta County met at Pittsburgh. The term "west of Laurel Hill" suggests the West District of Augusta claimed jurisdiction over the region on both sides of the Monongahela River as far east as Laurel Hill. Several familiar names chosen as members of a committee for the District of Augusta were William Crawford, Henry Enoch, and James Ennis, whom we will learn later was a neighbor of William Wood near Pigeon Creek. The appointed committee had the

"full power to meet at such times as they shall judge necessary, and in case of any emergency to call the committee of this district together, and shall be vested with the same power and authority as the other standing committee and committees of correspondence are in the other counties within this colony."

Colony in this instance meant Virginia, not Pennsylvania.

Pennsylvania had been founded as a Quaker pacifist colony, and as such, Pennsylvania did not have a military organization. This was probably one of the reasons Virginia was able to establish control of Pittsburgh and the surrounding region during the boundary disputes. Therefore, early in 1775, certain localities organized volunteer companies called "military associations." On June 30, 1775, the Pennsylvania Provisional Assembly gave official recognition to the Military Associations and grouped their companies into battalions.

The Stark brothers were probably not members of the Continental Line detachments originating from Pennsylvania or Virginia during these early years of the conflict. Author Boyd Crumrine summarized these years as follows: [25]

"Other than the military organizations which have already been mentioned, viz. the Eight Pennsylvania Regiment, the company which joined Miles' Rifles, the Seventh and Thirteenth Virginia Battalions, and the detachment of Westmoreland militia, no other troops were raised in the Monongahela country for regular service in the Revolutionary armies, though many were afterwards raised for the various Indiana campaigns and expeditions. From that time forward to the close of the war the able-bodied men west of the Monongahela were kept constantly on guard, if not on actual duty, against Indian incursions and massacre along the frontier; and it could not be expected that they would leave their families and homes defenseless to serve in the armies operating hundreds of miles away across the mountains."

This assessment would most likely apply to the Stark brothers who were living west of the Monongahela River. Much of their active duty in the early years of the conflict probably consisted of garrison duty in small companies of about 50 men or less, probably manning forts and blockhouses. The companies participating in this garrison duty were probably rotated on a regular schedule.

The Pennsylvania Archives report James Stark, Daniel Stark, Christopher Stark, and Joseph Stark served in the “Rangers of the Frontier,” being paid for active service between 1777 and 1783. They served with Captain Abner Howell, Francis Vineyard, John Vineyard, and Thomas Vineyard.[29]

Their brother, Jonathan Stark [the younger], continued to live in New Jersey. He enlisted for one year on January 8, 1777, serving as a Corporal in Captain Wade's Company, 4th Regiment of the New Jersey Continental Line and deserted in October of 1777 before his enlistment had expired.[30] On June 10, 1782, Jonathan was reported to be a member of Captain Cravens Company of the 5th Battalion of the Washington County Militia. This is the first record suggesting Jonathan [the younger] had moved from New Jersey and joined his brothers in Pennsylvania.[31]

Captain Abner Howell's Company may have participated in Colonel Brodhead's expedition up the Muskingum River from April 19, 1781, to May 22, 1781. On page 219 of the "Pennsylvania Archives," 6th Series, Volume 2, is the beginning of a list entitled "Roll of the Militia of Washington County - Officer list with dates of when service was performed." Howell's militia company was on active duty from April 8, 1781, to May 10, 1781. The company was again active from May 13, 1781 to June 13, 1781. These periods of active duty, which appear to be continuous accept for two days between May 10th and May 13th, coincide with the time window of Brodhead's expedition up the Muskingum River.[32]

In 1779, Colonel Daniel Brodhead replaced General Lachlin McIntosh as Commander of the Western Department. His orders provided him with discretionary powers to order out the militia of the western counties through their county lieutenants. Early in 1780, between forty and fifty men, women, and children were killed or captured in the regions west of the Monongahela River. Colonel Brodhead attempted to organize troops for an expedition to carry the attack to the Indians. Brodhead ordered Colonel Joseph Beelor [county Lieutenant for then Yohogania County, Virginia] to draft men who lived in the region between the Monongahela and Ohio Rivers. However, Brodhead had problems procuring provisions and the draft of men was stopped May 20, 1780 and the expedition was abandoned.

Most of these problems throughout 1780 were the result of the boundary dispute between Pennsylvania and Virginia – there being uncertainty as to which state had jurisdiction over the region. When the Delaware Indians became hostile late in 1780, Brodhead was finally able to muster the men and supplies to launch an expedition in the spring of 1781. According to Crumrine "Being unable to obtain any troops by draft from the militia of Westmoreland, he (Brodhead) called for volunteers, and the call was responded to, principally by men from the territory of the newly-erected (though not organized) county of Washington."

Three hundred men answered the call, of which about half were volunteers. They mustered at Wheeling (Fort Henry) and began a march to the Muskingum River, arriving at a place near present day Coshocton, Ohio on April 19, 1781. After attacking and destroying several Delaware villages, Brodhead returned to Fort Pitt, arriving before or about May 22, 1781.

Howell's company was again on active duty from July 25th to August 25th of 1781; and again active from August 27th to October 1st of 1781. Accept for one day between August 25th and August 27th, these periods of active duty appear to be continuous and fall within the time window of two planned excursions into the Indian country. The first was conducted by General George Clarke and the second, planned during approximately the same time frame, was ordered by Colonel Brodhead. August 4th, General Clarke's main body of troops and supplies gathered at Fort Henry (Wheeling) after considerable difficulty due to the boundary dispute. The campaign was supported primarily by Virginia, but conflicts of command and jurisdiction had delayed the campaign by about three months. During the same time frame, Colonel Brodhead was collecting a force – this activity competing with Clarke’s efforts to raise men and supplies.

General Clarke's objectives were to attack the Indian towns on the Sandusky River and capture or destroy Detroit. From the start, the expedition was plagued with desertions and further hindered by a failed rendezvous with a trailing Westmoreland County detachment under the command of Colonel Lochry. By the end of August, General Clarke abandoned the enterprise at the Falls on the Ohio (present day Louisville, Kentucky). The men of his command then had to made there way back to their homes, encountering many perils and hardships along the way, the journey for some taking two months.

As early as August 23rd, Colonel Brodhead mentioned a proposed enterprise in a letter to the president of the Council "An Expedition against the Sanduskies is in Contemplation, and I wish to promote it, but what can be done with naked and starved men, unless the Country will afford a generous supply, you will easily Determine." Colonel Gibson, commander of the Seventh Virginia Regiment, was to lead the expedition and was ordered to rendezvous at Fort McIntosh on September 5, 1781. A considerable number of volunteers were recruited, including many of the leading citizens of Washington County. But, as on previous occasions, procuring supplies was encountered. On September 24th, Brigadier General William Irvine relieved Colonel Brodhead as commander of Fort Pitt and the enterprise was abandoned on the General's orders.

Abner Howell's Company probably was not a part of General Clarke's command and most likely the active duty reported from July 25th to October 1st was related to Colonel Brodhead's aborted attempt to send a force down the Ohio River. Some of the Stark brothers may have been active in other expeditions, but without records of confirmation, their participation cannot be ascertained with certainty.

Residents of Washington County, Pennsylvania

September 27, 1785, a deed description was filed which reported Reverend William Wood had 349 acres on Sugar Camp Run near Pigeon Creek which bordered the land of James Innis. This property was adjacent to the property of James Stark, his property bordered by the land of Noah Williams.33 This land was within the bounds of Fallowfield Township on this date. The 1783 Washington County Tax list reports James Stark owned 140 acres in Fallowfield Township and on this same Fallowfield Township list were Daniel Stark and Jonathan Stark, neither owning land.[34] If this property owned by James was the same land described in the property description, then his land shared a border with the property of William Woods, the same 349 acres surveyed June 8, 1780 and presented in a survey map produced for the Virginia Settlement (certified by Colonel William Crawford, County Surveyor for Yohogania County).[35]

1780 Virginia Survey Map Showing William Wood Property

Source: History of Washington County, Pennsylvania: with biographical sketches of many of its pioneers and prominent men. Edited by Boyd Crumrine. Illustrated. Philadelphia: L.H. Everts and Co., 1882. Page 192 & 193, Illustration.

This survey map records Sugar Camp Run as a border of the Wood property to the west and south while Innis Run bordered the property to the west. To the north and northwest, the 349 acres was bordered by the property of James Innis. From the description given, the property of James Stark was apparently adjacent to Sugar Camp Run and the property of Noah Williams.

The 1783 Washington County, Pennsylvania tax list records the names of all of the Stark brothers and their Lacock, Vineyard, and Wood relatives. The list suggests Jonathan [the younger], Daniel, and Christopher Stark did not own property – but were living in Fallowfield Township – most likely near or with William Wood and their brother James Stark. The list reported Joseph Stark owned 240 acres in Amwell Township and living near or with Joseph was John Stark; owning no property at that time.[36] Although the location of the Joseph Stark property in Amwell Township is not known with certainty, they could have been living near the Lacock families. The 1783 tax list provides the best documented evidence of the place of residence in 1783 of the Stark brothers and suggests their probable place of residence prior to that year.

Virginia had approved William Wood’s claim to his property June 8, 1780, before the boundary dispute had been settled. Pennsylvania claims of land ownership in Washington County came from warrants issued by Pennsylvania from 1769 thru 1776. Conflicting with these claims were certificates issued by the Virginia authorities in 1779 and 1780 to persons, who, thinking they were in Virginia, had made bona fide settlements (a corn crop or one year's residence) before January 1, 1778. William Wood's property was one of many surveys conducted by Yohogania County, Virginia related to these certificates of ownership.[37]

The land office of western Pennsylvania closed December 2, 1776 and did not reopen until July 1, 1784. At that time, Pennsylvania began issuing warrants for two types of applications; those made through regular Pennsylvania channels; and those made by virtue of the Virginia certificates. By 1785, most persons with a property grievance were satisfied they now owned property in Washington County by virtue of new warrants being issued. However, one must presume not all of the property claims were settled to the satisfaction of the land owners, which was probably the case for William Wood. Five months after the land office opened, William Wood departed from Washington County, bound for Kentucky – at that time under the jurisdiction of Virginia. Wood departed from Washington County in December of 1784 with a number of his neighbors who lived near Pigeon Creek and had received certificates of ownership from Virginia.

One can only speculate, but this sudden move must have become necessary because the State of Pennsylvania did not validate all of the Virginia certificates of ownership. Although one could argue the above deed description recorded in September of 1785 belonged to William Wood, before a new Pennsylvania Warrant could be issued to a potential new owner, the original Virginia survey may have been used as a documented description of the property. This theory would seem to be supported, for there are no land records in Washington County reporting William Wood, James Stark, or Joseph Stark actually sold their property recorded on the 1783 tax list.

If many of the Virginia certificates were nullified, then it would seem probable this was also true for James and Joseph Stark. The area which later became the state of Kentucky in 1792 was within the jurisdiction of Virginia in 1785 and the families probably moved to that region to purchase land grants they had lost in Pennsylvania as a result of the boundary dispute settlement. The Stark brothers would soon follow William Wood to Kentucky; while the Lacock and Vineyard families would remain in Pennsylvania.

[Top of Page]

Sources & Footnotes

  1. Ancestry.com. Connecticut Town Birth Records, pre-1870 (Barbour Collection) [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network, Inc., 2006. Original data: White, Lorraine Cook, ed. The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records. Vol. 1-55. Baltimore, MD, USA: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1994-2002. Page 212. Citation Under Stark Starke: Jonathan, s. William and Experience, b. Dec. 12, 1712. Vol.1, page112.

  2. Groton, New London County, Connecticut; First Book of Records 1705-1723. Book 1, page 225. Citation: "William Stark Sener of Grotton … yeoman … for love good will and affection which I have and do bear towards my well beloved son William Stark Juner of the town and county aforesaid yeoman … a certain tract of land being in the town of Groton which I purchased of John Plasto … north east corner tree it being a Chestnut tree marked on four sides with WS and VW standing by a brook then running by the brook till it comes to the main brook near east then running up the main brook till it comes to a maple tree standing in the brook marked on four sides then running near east to a black oak tree by the side of the hill marked on four sides with WL on it then running by the Indian path near north to the first mentioned bounds … 21 Dec 1713 …Signed: William Starke. Wit: Valentine Wightman, Isaac Lamb. Ack and Recd 26 May 1714."

  3. Ibid. Pages 234-235. Citation: "William Stark of Groton yeoman … I the sayd William Stark Juner for 150L paid by Isaac Lamb of Groton … 500A adjacent to the land of Valentine Whitman … Ephraim Collvers land … Indian path … the sayd Isaac Lamb his heirs and assigns to his and their own sole and proper use benefit and behoof from hence forth for ever and the sayd William Stark … 1 Apr 1714 …Signed: William Stark. Wit: John C Cooke his mark. Huttson X Springer his mark. William Stark Juner the subscriber personally appeared and ack the above written instrument to be his free act and deed before me 2 Apr 1714. Nehemiah Smith Justice. Recd 2 Apr. 1714."

  4. Ibid. Pages 232-233. Citation: "Isaac Lamb of Groton for 170L payd by William Stark Juner of Groton … 50A … near Mistick River bounded with Majher Winthrop's land and on the north with land layed out to ----- Springer and towards the west with a brook commonly called Colvers brook and …. The South with land in the possession of sd Craig … Major Winthrops land fifty and two Rods together with all such buildings and … timber fruit trees above and under woods ways rights libertys …1 April 1714. Signed: Isaac Lamb. Wit: John C Cooke his mark. Huttson Springer his X mark. Ack and recd 2 Apr 1714."

  5. Ibid. Pages 341-342.

  6. Groton, New London County, CT Deed Records, Book 4, page 26. Citation: Jonathan Starke of Groton for 64L paid by Aaron Fish of Groton a certain tract of land … adj Thomas Parke now Daniel Denisons … the Darke swamp near the bridge … adj Edward Cashby, Daniel Denison to the Brook Side to a Maple tree … with the House and buildings thereon … 16A … Dated 5 May 1736 … Recd 5 May 1736 … Signed Jonathan Stark … wit Chrisr. Avery, Samuel Lester

  7. The Stonington Congregational Church Records show Experience Stark married John Larkin December 13, 1738. It is believed by some researchers this Experience Stark was the widow of William Stark, Jr. No records have been found of children born to this couple. The Stonington Barbour Collection shows the marriage of John Larkin to Elizabeth Roos; Oct 30, 1720; Vol. 2, page 73. The Stonington Congregational Church Records report that on Oct. 9, 1737,"Elizabeth Roos being very ill at her house, was baptized by Mr. Rosseter." This indicates she may have died in that year and then John Larkin married the widow of William Stark (Jr.), Experience (Lamb) Stark. Sources: 1)Stonington Congregational Church Records, 2) William Harrison Larkin, Jr., Chronicle of the Larkin Family of the Town of Westerlie and Colony of Rhode Island in New England. Number 3 (Arlington, MA, 1935) retyped by Richard Fessenden Larkin, 1995.

  8. Theodore F. Wolfe, The History of Morris County (Lewis Publishing Company, 1914), Chapter 18, “The Rogerenes First Whites in Roxbury Township.” Citation: "The sect (Rogerenes) had been founded in New London in 1674, by John Rogers, who passed most of his subsequent life in prison, and, as persecutions by the church authorities began almost immediately, it is not improbable that this New Jersey community may have made their exodus by the beginning of the eighteenth century. Why they chose this comparatively rough tract of land for their settlement in preference to the more level and more easily cleared and cultivated lands of the plain bordering the nearby Alamatong (the Indian name for the Black River) will never be known."

  9. Carol S. Stark, Starks and Lacocks of Sussex County New Jersey, Loudoun County, Virginia, & Washington County, Pennsylvania (Gresham, Oregon, 1997).

  10. These would appear to be the probable years that Jonathan Stark married Sarah Lacock/Laycock based on probable year of birth of their oldest son, James, born in or before 1739 – the latest year of birth for James. On August 27, 1760, James was a witness to the will of Joseph Lacock. If he had to be twenty-one to be a witness, then 1739 would be the latest year in which he could have been born.

  11. Stark, Starks and Lacocks of Sussex County [Author’s note: According to the research of Carol S. Stark, this was Bethlehem Township, Hunterdon County, New Jersey and was not in Bethlehem Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. A letter from the Bucks County Genealogical Society to Carol S. Stark dated February 18, 1990, and signed by Roberta Daymon reported, "Terry McNealy put the Stark reference in his book (Index to Bucks County, Reference in Pennsylvania Gazette) because the river that feeds into the Delaware River was referred to as the "Little Delaware". Bethlehem City is about 10-15 miles from the real Delaware River, then in Bucks County, Pennsylvania. Jonathan’s advertisement states his property was one mile from the river in Bethlehem.]

  12. Ibid. Also see: Morgan Edwards, Edward's Materials Towards a History of the Baptists (Heritage Papers; Danielsville, Georgia, 1984), Volume 1, page 118. Citation: "That about the year 1754 that Jonathan Start & his wife Sarah were members of the Bethlehem [in Hunterdon County] Baptist Church, which was the name of the township where it existed. In 1763, fourteen persons formed a church at Knollton [Sussex County]. Three of these people were Joseph Lacock and Jonathan Start and his wife Sarah. There was no Start family in Sussex Co., associated with Joseph Laycock. This was Jonathan & Sarah Stark. The Knollton land was a gift from the Rev. Henry Crossley. Henry was a witness to the will of Joseph Laycock who died in 1760. Another witness to this will was James Stark."

  13. Calendar of New Jersey Wills, 1670-1760. Also see Ancestry.com. [database online]: Original data New Jersey Historical Society. Calendar of New Jersey Wills, Administrations, etc. Newark, New Jersey, New Jersey Historical Society, 1901. Ancestry.com Database Record: Name: Joseph Lacock ; Date 27 August 1760; Location: Hardwick Township, Sussex County; Wife: [not named]; Children: John, Nathan, Joseph, Sarah, Elizabeth, Henry and William; Executors: sons Joseph and William Lacock; Witnesses: Edward Pigot, Jeames Stark, Henry Crosley; Proved: Oct. 8, 1760 -- Libra (Book) 10, page 465; Year 1760; Inventory: £124.9.3, by Henry Crosley and Ephraim Darby.

  14. Sussex County, New Jersey Wills and Administrations, Libra (Book) 12, page 232; Year 1765. Abstract: “…the administration of the estate of Jonathan Stark of Hardwick, Sussex County, wheelwright, in testate. Adm'rs Sarah Stark (widow) and James Stark. Fellow bondsman Joseph Lacock, all of the same place. 3 Jan. 1765, Inventory, £121.4.10, made by John Laforge and Samson Dildine.”

  15. Raymond Martin Bell & Irene Putnum Lignian, The Lacock Family of Washington County, Pennsylvania (Washington, Pennsylvania, 1986).

  16. Source 1: Marty Hiatt & Craig Roberts Scott, Loudoun County, Virginia Tithables, 1758-1786 (3 Volumes,1995). Volume 1. Source 2: Jean Jorgenson, Loudoun County, Virginia, 1765 Tithables and Voter List (1983). [This is a hand typed and bound, non-published work. Contributor Pauline Stark Moore.][ Author's comment: This source reported William Lacock had 2 tithables, naming himself and Moses ?Hayton/Hutton? whose age was between 16 and 21.]

  17. Mary Kathryn Harris & Mary Iva Jean Jorgensen, James Stark of Stafford County, Virginia And His Descendants (Copyright 1985, Privately Printed Fort Worth). Volume 1, pages 1269-1271. [Author’s Comment: The Genealogy of Christopher Stark has often been confused with that of Christopher Stark (Jr.) [1728-1786] – a nephew of William Stark (Jr.). He was actually the son of Christopher Stark (Sr.) who married Joanna Walworth. For more, see the article by the Author entitled Who Was Who Named Christopher Stark in the Appendix.]

  18. Author's Comment: Many researchers of this family believe Daniel's wife was Elizabeth Wells. That her given name was Elizabeth is not disputed. There were families with the surname Wells recorded living in Loudoun County, Virginia and Washington County, Pennsylvania at the same time Daniel and Elizabeth were present, but research to date has not been able to confirm their relationship to Daniel's wife.

  19. Debbie Nordyke <dnordyke@houston.rr.com> (Wood Family Researcher and Contributor). According to this source, the marriage date of William Wood and Sarah Stark was recorded in a "Wood Family Bible." Deborah reported there were three different sources with conflicting dates 1. 1767- Maryland or NJ [Lyman C. Draper Manuscript notes, Series 8BB.]; 2. September 1768 - [1892 Marshall research, DAR 406237]; 3. February 14, 1769- [Bible, date only]. [Author's Comment: I have determined the Bible record most likely to be correct based on the above discussion, as did the contributor of this information and that the place of marriage was Loudoun County, the place of residence of William Wood and Daniel Stark in 1768.]

  20. Ibid. Source of Move to Redstone. Wood Family Bible source of birth of Elizabeth.

  21. Harris & Jorgensen, James Stark of Stafford County. Volume 1, page 1271.

  22. Warren Skidmore with Donna Kaminsky, Lord Dunmore's Little War of 1774 His Captains and Their Men Who Opened Up Kentucky & the West to American Settlement (published by Heritage Books, Inc., Westminster, Maryland, 2002). Pages 42, 53-54, 66-67.

  23. Boyd Crumrine, Editor, History of Washington County, Pennsylvania with biographical sketches of many of its pioneers and prominent men. Illustrated (Philadelphia L.H. Everts and Co., 1882). Page 192 & 193, Illustration. Shows location and boundary of the property of William Wood.

  24. Ibid. Pages 72 & 73.

  25. Ibid. Page 85.

  26. Author's Comment: Many researchers believe Hannah Stark, named as the mother of Margaret Stark in a 1794 Shelby County, Kentucky Marriage Bond, was the daughter of Abner Howell. However, Abner Howell was born in 1744. Because the oldest child of James and Hannah was not born until 1770, Abner would not have been old enough to have a daughter of marrying age before 1770. There has been speculation Hannah was Ann Howell, daughter of Hugh Howell and his spouse Margaret. They were the parents of Abner Howell. I don't believe the data is sufficient to state with confidence James Stark married Ann Howell or anyone with the surname Howell. The data only suggests the possibility which cannot be confirmed but cannot completely be dismissed. Until this matter can be resolved, I can only state that some researchers believe the surname of James Stark's wife was Howell which needs confirmation before it can be stated as fact. Thus far, the data has not suggested other possible surnames for the spouse of James Stark.

  27. Author's Comment: The marriage could have occurred between the years 1772-1774, depending on the date of birth of their first child, James.

  28. Raymond Martin Bell & Irene Putnum Lignian, The Lacock Family of Washington County. Page 10. Comment: Elizabeth Eddy, the fifth child of John Eddy, was reported to have married “---Stark.” Research suggest John Stark and his spouse named a daughter Edith Eddy Stark. This suggest Edith’s mother may have been Elizabeth Eddy.

  29. Pennsylvania Archives, 3rd Series, Volume 23. Page 214. Comment: Has a list of "Rangers of the Frontier" who were paid for active service between the years 1777 to 1783. On page 214 will be found George Sharp and Francis Vinyard. On page 215 will be found Christopher Stark, Captain Abner Howell, Daniel Stark, John Vinyard, and Thomas Vineyard. On page 216 will be found Captain Abner Howell, Daniel Starks, James Vinyard, Captain Abner Howell (appearing twice on this page), John Vinyard, Thomas Vinyard, Daniel Starks (appearing twice on this page), and James Vinyard (appearing twice on this page). On page 217 will be found James Stark, Captain Abner Howell, and James Stark (appearing twice on this page). Therefore, men from the Stark, Howell, and Vineyard families appear to have served between 1777 and 1783, although the precise times of service is not known from this publication.

  30. Harris & Jorgensen, James Stark of Stafford County. Volume 1, page 1348

  31. Pennsylvania Archives, 6th Series, Volume 2. Pages 118,119,186,244,251. Comment: Additional entries for these surnames. Page 118 begins the Class Roll of Captain Abner Howell's Company. On page 119, Daniel Stark was listed as 2nd Sergeant; Francis Venin (probably Vineyard) and Christopher were on the 1st Class Roll; on the 2nd Class Roll was John Venard (probably Vineyard); on the 4th Class Roll was Elisha Lacock. On page 120, William Venerd (probably Vineyard) was on the 5th Class Roll; on the 7th Class Roll was John Stark and Joseph Stark; and on the 8th Class Roll was James Veneard (probably Vineyard) and Isaac Lacock. On page 186, dated June 10, 1782, will be found "Johnathan" Starks listed under "A Return of the 6th, 7th & 8th Classes of Captain Cravens Company of the 5th Battalion of Washington County Militia." On page 244 is a list of Washington County, Pennsylvania militia serving from 1782 to 1785, battalion names not stated. In Captain Abner Howell's company were Thomas Venard (probably Vineyard), Daniel Stark and James Stark. On page 251, Christopher Starks is listed on the roster of Captain George Sharp's Company. Combined, these military records suggest the Stark brothers may have been members of the Rangers and Militia from 1777 to 1785 and most likely both volumes of the Pennsylvania Archives are reporting the same active duty up to 1783.

  32. Ibid. Page 219. Comment: Beginning of a list entitled, "Roll of the Militia of Washington County - Officer list with dates of when service was performed." Comment: Howell's militia company was on active duty from April 8, 1781, to May 10, 1781. The company was again active from May 13, 1781 to June 13, 1781. These periods of active duty, which appear to be continuous accept for two days between May 10th and May 13th, are within the time window of Brodhead's expedition up the Muskingum River.

  33. Raymond Martin Bell, Early Records of Washington Co., Pennsylvania. Part 8: Yohogania Grants in Pennsylvania. Quote "Sep 27; William Woods, 349a, Sugar Camp run, near Pigeon creek. James Innes, 637a, Sugar Camp run adj James Stark, Noah Williams."

  34. Raymond M. Bell and Katherine K. Zinsser, The 1783 Tax Lists and the 1790 Federal Census for Washington County, Pennsylvania (Bowie, Md, Heritage Books, 1988). Pages 16&48.

  35. Boyd Crumrine, Editor, History of Washington County, Pennsylvania. Page 192 & 193, Illustration.

  36. Raymond Martin Bell, Washington County, Pennsylvania Tax Records 1783. Paper by this title stamped R. M. Bell, 1506 1st Ave. N. Apt. 3, Coralville, IA, 52241-1125. Comment: See Appendix Article entitled, “The 1783 Washington County, Pennsylvania Tax List.”

  37. Raymond M. Bell, The Pennsylvania-Virginia Boundary Controversy (Published July 1997). Web Site: http//www.savory.org/chartiers/raybell/1997-boundry.html.

[Top of Page]

Copyright

Other than that work created by other acknowledged contributors or sources, the articles presented were authored and edited by Clovis LaFleur and the genealogical data presented in this publication was derived and compiled by  Pauline Stark Moore; Copyright © 2003. All rights are reserved. The use of any material on these pages by others will be discouraged if the named contributors, sources, or Clovis LaFleur & Pauline Stark Moore have not been acknowledged.

Disclaimer

This publication and the data presented is the work of Clovis LaFleur & Pauline Stark Moore. However, some of the content presented has been derived from the research and publicly available information of others and may not have been verified. You are responsible for the validation of all data and sources reported and should not presume the material presented is correct or complete.

 

[Return to Top]