|
|
Page
95
The
Years Before the Republic of Texas
In the 1830 census, John and Sarah (Stark) Lewis were
living next door to William Herrin and his first spouse who had given
birth to James Herrin in 1826. As will be revealed later, James Herrin
married Nancy Jane Lewis who was the first
daughter and child of John and Sarah Mariah. On page 191 of the 1830
Ouachita Parish Census, head of the house on
line 10 was Martin B. Lewis, on line 12 was John Lewis, and on line 13
was William Herrin indicating they were neighbors.[1]
After William Herrin’s first wife died, he married Prudence Jane
Stark, the sister of Sarah Mariah Stark.
Samuel S. Lewis was also recorded in the 1830 Ouachita
Parish Census which was enumerated on November 25, 1830.[2]
It is believed Samuel may have already obtained land in Mexican Texas
earlier. Mrs. Charles
Martin published the following in the Kirbyville Banner in 1971 “In
his (Col. Samuel S. Lewis) certificate of character,
he states that he came to Texas in March 1832, but that his servants had
been in the province since January 1830.
This was probably to prepare fields and buildings for the arrival of the
family. The Lewis Plantation was on Indian Creek
between the communities of Bevilport and Peachtree, but his post office
address was Zavalla in Angelina County. The
other part of his grant was east of Cow Creek and south of the Biloxi
community.”[3]
From the above and other sources, the Lewis family most
likely arrived in Texas between the 1st and 5th of March in the
year 1832. The Mexican certificate of character made by Samuel Lewis
stated his servants and other property had been
in Texas since January of 1830 and he and his wife had two children
still living at home. The certificate of character
was dated in January of 1833 and signed by the local Alcalde, William
McFarland.[4] Also moving to Texas at
this time were Samuel’s sons, Martin Lewis and John Taylor Lewis.
However, as the family was preparing to move to Texas,
the Mexican Government declared an end to the flow of immigrants
from the United States into Texas. General Manuel de Mier y Terán had
left Mexico City with an expedition
in November of 1827 charged with surveying and marking the northeastern
border of Mexico which had been established
in the 1819 treaty between the United States and Spain. However, his
covert mission was to assess the situation
in Texas relative to the size, strength, and attitudes of the settler
colonies; evaluate the condition and prospects of
the Indians; study the extent and value of the natural resources; and
recommend measures to keep Texas as a Mexican providence.[5]
After traveling across Texas to Nacogdoches, Terán
reported what he had observed and speculated what it meant to Mexico.
He wrote, “As one travels from Béxar to this town, Mexican influence
diminishes, so much so that it becomes clear
that in this town that influence is almost nonexistent. But where could
such influence come from? Not from the population,
because the ratio of the Mexican population is precisely the contrary
the Mexicans of this town consist of what
people everywhere call the abject class, the poorest and most ignorant.
The poor Mexicans neither have the resources
to create schools, nor is there anyone to think about improving their
institutions and their abject condition.”[6]
This was but one of many observations made by Terán and
illustrate his concern the Americans, as you moved closer to the
Louisiana border, were much better at colonization of regions of Texas
than the Mexicans and he feared Texas would ultimately
become part of the United States. Therefore, how could Texas be defended
against the invasion of the Americans?
Terán first recommended the Mexican army’s presence in Texas must be
increased. “On the frontier there are
intrigues,” Terán wrote; and the way to prevent intrigues from
becoming rebellions was to have troops at the ready. Second,
he recommended immigration of North Americans be suspended but
recommended those American colonies already
present, like Stephen F. Austin’s at San Felipe, be left alone an
allowed to prosper.[7]
The most important measure recommended by Terán was
reserved for east Texas from west of the Sabine River to the Gulf
of Mexico and east of the Trinity River. Terán believed Texas should be
truly Mexican and without this measure, the
other recommendations would only be temporary solutions delaying the
inevitable settlement of Texas by Americans.
Therefore, Terán declared; “The land of Texas, or at least its
eastern part where its principle rivers begin to be
navigable, should be reserved for Mexican settlers.” He further
recommended the government transplant five thousand
Mexicans along the Trinity River to form a barrier to further
encroachment of Americans into Texas.[8] As will be
seen, this recommendation would have adverse affects on the Lewis Clan
who would settle in this region.
________
|
1) |
Census
Year 1830 State Louisiana Parish Ouachita Page No 16 Reel no
M19-44 Division Western District Sheet No 191 Enumerated by
Haywood T. Alford on November 25th, 1830 Reference Source Used
Blue Roses Publishing images Transcribed by Karen Mabry Rice and
Proofread by Shawn Martin for USGenWeb, http//www.rootsweb.com/~census. |
| 2) |
Ibid;
Western District Sheet No 184. |
| 3) |
Martin,
Mrs. Charles; “Early Settlers of Jasper County; The First
To Arrive.“ Kirbyville Banner, Kirbyville, Texas 75956,
Wednesday 17, 1971. |
| 4) |
Benthall,
Lillian Light, “Colonel Samuel S. Lewis, Early Texan
Founder of Orleans, Indiana“, June 13, 1966. |
| 5) |
Brands,
H. W., “Lone Star Nation; How a Ragged Army of Volunteers
Won the Battle For Texas Independence - And Changed America.”
Published by Doubleday, March 2004, First Edition; Pages 142
&143. |
| 6) |
Ibid,
page 148; H. W. Brands. Source: Pages 97 & 98; “Texas
by Terán The Diary Kept by General Manuel de Mier y Terán on
His 1828 Inspection of Texas.” Edited by Jack
Jackson. Austin University of Texas Press, 2000. |
| 7) |
Ibid,
pages 151 & 152; H. W. Brands Source Pages 38 & 39 of
the Teran Diary. |
| 8) |
Ibid;
Source: “Texas by Terán The Diary Kept by General Manuel
de Mier y Terán on His 1828 Inspection of Texas.” Edited
by Jack Jackson. Austin University of Texas Press, 2000, pages
38 & 39. |
|
|
Page
96
In the Spring of 1830, Mexican foreign Minister Lucas
Alamán introduced a bill to the Mexican Congress which became
known as the “April 6 Law.” This bill authorized the construction
and manning of military posts in Texas, encouraged
colonization by Mexican nationals, prohibited further immigration to
Texas from the United States, suspended
empresario contracts not already completed, and banned the introduction
of additional slaves, slavery having already
been banned by the Mexican Constitution of 1824. William Bennett Travis
came in early 1831 to Anahuac, Texas
from Claiborne, Alabama, establishing a law practice in that community.
Travis was to be appointed the American
Council in Anahuac on the recommendation of Stephen F. Austin but before
Congress could act on this recommendation,
Anahuac became the focal point of immigrant discontent because of the
April 6, 1830 Law. Stephen F.
Austin’s colony on the Brazos had been granted exemption from custom
duties for seven years and under the new law, Mexican
authorities insisted on payment after the exemption ran out, which
applied to all of the colonies. The colonist and
merchants responded by smuggling their goods into Anahuac and the
Mexican authorities resorted to seizures of ships
and their cargos.[9]
The smuggling was a direct challenge to Mexican
Authority and the government appointed Colonel Juan (John) Bradburn,
a Virginian by birth, as Commander of the garrison at Anahuac. The
American colonist were annoyed by Bradburn’s
allegiance to Mexico and, because he was a intemperate, belligerent man,
completely lacking in the powers of
persuasion, animosity between the Commander and Colonist grew in
intensity.[9] The original Mexican Constitution of
1824 specifically made slavery illegal in Mexico but the authorities
allowed immigrants from the United States to bring
their slaves if each slave signed long term documents of indenture. The
slaves readily signed the documents having no
idea the laws were different in Mexico. Bradburn took the ban on slavery
seriously and attempted to enforce the Mexican
Constitution and when Travis made application to Bradburn to recover two
runaway slaves, Bradburn rejected the
application, stating the runways were not contraband, but free men under
Mexican Law and that the two men had joined
the Mexican Army and requested Mexican citizenship.[9]
Taking advantage of Bradburn’s unpopularity with the
colonist, Travis spread a rumor that Louisiana vigilantes were coming
to Anahuac to recover the slaves causing Bradburn to prepare the
garrison for an assault, only to discover there was
no threat at all. Because Travis had laughed so hard telling the story
to others, making Bradburn the laughing stock of
Anahuac, Bradburn had Travis arrested and thrown in the guardhouse.
Travis became an instant celebrity among the American
population, who despised Bradburn anyway, and when Patrick Jack was
arrested for attempting to raise a militia
against Bradburn, the colony became restless. Fearing the Anahuac
residents would attempt to free his prisoners, Bradburn
moved them from a ordinary guardhouse to a empty brick kiln.[9]
Other arrest were made which infuriated the colonists
even more and word of the plight of those arrested in Anahuac spread
northward to San Felipe and Nacogdoches. Thirty armed men were raised
from Brazoria and as they rode toward Anahuac,
their number grew to more than 100 men. As they were riding towards
Anahuac, this band of settlers came upon
soldiers sent out by Bradburn who were taken hostage. On arriving in
Anahuac, a prisoner exchange was discussed and
the Mexican soldiers were released. However, Bradburn reneged on
releasing Travis and Jack and instead sent soldiers
into Anahuac who shot up the town in the American sector. A group of
settlers traveling from Brazoria with a cannon,
engaged some Mexican soldiers, the skirmish resulting in several
fatalities among the Mexican troops.[9]
The fatalities alarmed the Commander of the garrison at
Nacogdoches who hurried south to Anahuac to prevent the rebellion
from becoming a full fledged revolution. Because the Mexican army’s
presence at that time was not of sufficient
strength to put down an uprising in East Texas, the Nacogdoches
Commander convinced Bradburn to release Travis
and Jack to the Mexican Civil Courts and persuaded Bradburn to
relinquish his command to a replacement.[10] Travis
was released two months later and declared in a publication, “Americans
know their rights and will assert and protect
them. The Americans have gained everything which they claimed. There is
every prospect that this happy state of
things will have a long and prosperous duration.”[10]
Stephen F. Austin and James Bowie attempted to calm the
American colonist after the Anahuac Rebellion but during the
summer of 1832, José de las Piedras, Commander of the garrison at
Nacogdoches, ordered all of the settlers in the area
to surrender their arms. This was just a few months after the Lewis
family had located in Texas from Ouachita Parish,
Louisiana. As one would expect, this order clearly threatened the
security of the settlers. The order was rejected and
the settlers in the region organized a militia to prevent Piedras from
enforcing it. Word was sent out in all directions from
Nacogdoches to the other American colonies that this order must be
resisted by force of arms.[11]
________
|
9) |
H.
W. Brands; Pages 163 thru 167. |
| 10) |
Ibid;
Source: Davis, William C., “Three Roads to the Alamo The
Lives and Fortunes of David Crockett, James Bowie, and William
Barret Travis.” New York, Harper-Collins, 1998. |
| 11) |
Ibid;
Pages 179 & 180. |
|
|
Page
97
Samuel Lewis and his sons, Martin Baty Lewis, and John
Taylor Lewis, answered the call to arms and joined with the insurgents
against Piedras. John W. Bullock was elected Commander of the force
which assembled near Nacogdoches on the
31st of July. The men were divided into companies and made preparations
to attack the garrison. However, Piedras was
considered to be a gallant man and a gentleman who was generally liked
by the residents. A committee was formed consisting
of Isaac W. Burton, Philip A. Sublett and Henry W. Augustin who visited
Piedras and make known to him the views
and intentions of their constituents, and ask his co-operation in
sustaining Santa Anna and a free Republican government,
with an intimation, unmistakable in tone, that, if he did not, be must
evacuate his position and retire to the interior
of Mexico. To the requests of the committee, Piedras delivered a
gentlemanly but emphatic "No." The answer left
but one of two courses to the armed citizens.[12]
In 1898, John Henry Brown wrote this account of the battle of
Nacogdoches[12]
“On the
night of August 1st, these earnest men, about three hundred in number,
camped a little east of Nacogdoches. During the night, in anticipation
of bloody work on the morrow, the families evacuated the town. On the
next the forces entered the suburbs, challenging attack; but, none
being made, moved into the center of the town, whereupon they were
charged by about a hundred Mexican cavalry, who were repulsed with
some loss. Don Encarnacion Chirino, Alcalde, fell by the fire of his
own countrymen. The Texians took position in houses and behind fences,
and a random fire was kept up till night, in which time they lost
three killed and five wounded, while the Mexican loss was stated at
forty-one killed and about as many wounded. During the night Piedras
retreated on the road to San Antonio. Colonel James Bowie, who seems
to have arrived during the night, headed a party to out travel and got
in front of Piedras, while the main body pursued in the rear. By
taking the lower road Bowie succeeded and appeared in Piedras' front a
little west of the Angelina, in crossing which the Mexican sergeant,
Marcos, was killed by Bowie's men. Seeing his inevitable defeat, and
resolved not to abandon the cause of his chief, Piedras surrendered
the command to the next in rank, Don Francisco Medina, who at once
declared for Santa Anna and the Republican constitution, and submitted
himself to the colonists ¾ nominally yielding himself and command as
prisoners. By agreement, Bowie escorted the Mexicans to San Antonio.
Asa M. Edwards conducted Piedras to Velasco, whence he returned to
Mexico. Among the volunteers at Nacogdoches, besides Bullock and
Bowie, were Asa M. Edwards, Haden H. Edwards, Alexander Horton,
Almanzon Huston, Isaac W. Burton, Philip A. Sublett, Henry W. Augustin,
M. B. Lewis, Theophilus Thomas, Isaac D. Thomas, Thomas
S. McFarland, Asa Jarman, and William Y. Lacy."
It is ironic, as later events will reveal, that the
officer surrendering Piedras’ troops to James Bowie declared for Santa
Anna and the Republican
Constitution. In the summer of 1832, Santa Anna was a hero of the
Mexican Revolution and the
hopeful salvation of the Texans and the interest of Stephen F. Austin.
The government was controlled by centralist who
were manipulating the elections to give them the results they desired.
Santa Anna, as a hedge against this fraud, enlisted
the aid of some of his old comrades in arms and seized the Port of
Veracruz, the single largest source of Mexico’s
public revenue. On hearing the port had been captured, other southern
states in Mexico, along with the Texans, called
for Santa Anna to lead the country back to federalism. Stephen F. Austin
wrote; “I would not be a lover of the fundamental
principles of the constitutional liberty of my adopted country if I
failed to respect the Chief whose arms have
always been used to protect and sustain them.”[13]
After a series of small battles, Santa Anna’s forces
had gained control of the country by October of 1832. In January of 1833, a parade was held in Santa
Anna’s honor in Mexico City and Santa Anna called for pass grievances
to be forgotten with these
words to a grateful nation; “…indulgence with mistakes of
opinion, an end to hatreds, and the erasure from memory
of the word vengeance. Thus, you will attain the object of your desires
and sacrifices, long and happy days for the
republic, durable happiness for all.” With the nation at peace,
Santa Anna retired to his hacienda but assured his supporters
he would not be far away with these words, “My whole ambition is
restricted to beating my sword into a plowshare.
If any hand should again disturb the public peace and constitutional
order, do not forget me. I shall return at your
call, and we shall again show the world that the Mexican Republic will
not tolerate tyrants and oppressors of the people.”[14]
The Lewis family settled on Indian Creek in the region
which later became Jasper County. Samuel Lewis and John Taylor
Lewis probably encouraged others in Ouachita Parish to move to Texas
where there was an abundance of land for the
taking and it is believed William Hawley Stark followed his sister,
Sarah Mariah Stark and her husband, to Texas, purchasing
a league of land in 1835 at about the same time his brother-in-law and
neighbor, William Herrin, by then married
to Prudence Jane Stark, purchased land in November of 1835. By 1835,
John Taylor Lewis and Sarah Mariah Stark
had a son, William McFarland Lewis, born in Texas in 1833, and a
daughter, Nancy Jane Lewis, born in Louisiana in
1831.[15]
________
|
12) |
Brown,
John Henry, “History of Texas, The Confrontation at
Nacogdoches, August 1832”; Published 1898. |
| 13) |
Brands,
H. W., Page 182. Source: “The Austin Papers,” Edited
by Eugene C. Baker. 3 Volumes. Volumes 1 &2; Washington
Government Printing Office, 1924-1928 (Volumes 1-2); Austin
University of Texas Pres, 1927 (Volume 3). Vol. 2, page 811. |
| 14) |
Ibid;
page 183. Source Callcott, Randolph B. “Santa Anna The
Story of an Enigma Who Once Was Mexico.” Norman University
of Oklahoma Press, 1936, page 96. |
| 15) |
The
1835 Mexican Census of Texas; Bevil District or Municipalty. |
|
|
Page
98
Mary Holly was a cousin of Stephen F. Austin who was a
writer by inclination. Her husband had died and Mary knew her
brother, Henry, and cousin Stephen, were in Texas. Being an enterprising
woman, she decided to make a journey to Texas,
keeping an diary of her travels, which she intended to publish as a
book. Because Stephen Austin was becoming well
known in the United States as a successful empresario in Mexico, she
reasoned her readers would find her stories interesting
and her travel guide helpful to those planning a move to Texas. She
found a publisher, and in the fall of 1831, left
New Orleans with a boatload of passengers bound for Texas. From her
account, life in Texas, as seen from a woman’s
point of view, can be appreciated and understood. Although she visited
communities like Brazoria and San Felipe
on the Brazos River, we can get some understanding of what life was like
for the women who arrived and lived in these
early Texas communities. One would suppose the circumstances and
experiences in other communities would be similar.[16]
Mary wrote this first impression of the community
of
Brazoria, “One street stretches along the bank of the Brazos, and one parallel with it further back,
while other streets, with the trees still standing, are laid out to
intersect these at right angles,
to be cleared at some future day as the wants of the citizens may
require. Its arrangement, as well as its wealth and
greatness, are all prospective.”[17]
Of the fifty or so families who lived in the town, she
wrote, “Some families, recently arrived, are obliged to camp out, from the impracticability of
getting other accommodation. The place, therefore, has a busy and
prosperous air, which it is
always agreeable to notice, but has not yet advanced beyond the wants of
first necessity. There is neither cabinetmaker, tailor,
hatter, shoe-maker, nor any other mechanic, except carpenters."
Of the one boardinghouse, she said, “The proprietors
of it are from New York and know how things should be, and have
intelligence and good sense enough to make
the best of circumstances they cannot control.”[17]
Mary counseled those expecting to move to arrive in the
fall. “The best month to arrive is in October. The first impression at that time is
delightful, as well as just, and there is less inconvenience and trouble
at that time than at any other
season. It is also the most favorable season on account of health. Those
persons who come from the northern states or
from Europe, in the spring and summer, experience too sudden a change
and are always more or less affected by it.” She
then gave the following advice for women who would be making the
transition to Texas with there families:
“House-keepers
should bring with them all indispensable articles for household use,
together with as much common clothing (other clothing is not wanted)
for themselves and their children, as they conveniently can. Ladies in
particular should remember that in a new country they cannot get
things made at any moment, as in an old one, and that they will be
sufficiently busy the first two years, in arranging such things as
they have, without occupying themselves in obtaining more. It should
also be done as a matter of economy…
Those
who must have a feather-bed had better bring it, for it would take too
long to make one; and though the air swarms with live geese, a
feather-bed could not be got for love or money. Everybody should bring
pillows and bed linen. Mattresses, such as are used universally in
Louisiana ¾ and they are very comfortable ¾ are made of the moss
which hangs on almost every tree. They cost nothing but the case and
the trouble of preparing the moss. The case should be brought.
Domestic checks are best, being cheap and light, and sufficiently
strong. The moss is prepared by burying it in the earth until it is
partially rotted. It is then washed very clean, dried and picked, when
it is fit for use. These mattresses should be made very thick, and
those who like a warmer bed in winter can put some layers of wool,
well car ded, upon the moss, taking care to keep this side up.
Every
emigrant should bring mosquito bars…. They are indispensable in the
summer season, and are made of a thin species of muslin, manufactured
for the purpose. Furniture, such as chairs and bureaus, can be brought
in separate pieces and put together, cheaper and better, after
arrival, than they can be purchased here, if purchased at all. But it
must be recollected that very few articles of this sort are required,
where houses are small and building expensive…. Tables are made by
the house carpenter, which answer the purpose very well, where nobody
has better and the chief concern is to get something to put upon them.
The maxim here is, nothing for show but all for use. “[17]
And for those who Texas might not be the place for them,
Mary gave this sobering advice, “Those persons… Who are established in comfort and
competency, with an ordinary portion of domestic happiness; who have
never been far from home,
and are excessively attached to personal ease; who shrink from hardship
and danger, and those who, being accustomed
to a regular routine of prescribed employment in a city, know not how to
act on emergencies or adapt themselves
to all sorts of circumstances, had better stay where they are.”[17]
________
|
16) |
Brands,
H. W., Page 213. |
| 17) |
Ibid,
page 215; Source: Holly, Mary Austin. “Texas Observations
Historical, Geographic, and Descriptive.” 1833, New York
Arno Press, 1973. Also the 1836 edition, subtitled “Original
Narratives of Texas History and Adventure,” reprinted Austin
Steck Company, 1935. |
|
|
Page
99
From October 1, to October 6 of 1832, the American
Settlements in Texas held a convention to ask the Mexican Government
to address the issues which had been the cause of the insurgencies in
Nacogdoches and Anahuac. Attending were
fifty-six delegates from sixteen districts. Austin was elected President
of the Convention and among those attending were
William McFarland, representing Ayish Bayou District and Samuel Lewis,
named to the Subcommittee of Safety, Vigilance,
and Correspondence for the Snow River District (later became Bevil
District).[18],[19],[20]
The convention adopted a series of resolutions such as;
requesting an extension of the tariff exemption in Texas for three
years; modification of the Law of April 6, 1830 which would permit more
general immigration from the United States;
the appointment of a commissioner to issue land titles in East Texas;
donation of government lands for the maintenance
of primary schools to be conducted in Spanish and English; and a request
from the ayuntamiento (Town Council)
of Nacogdoches to prevent white encroachment on lands guaranteed to
Indians in East Texas. The convention also
established a plan for organizing a militia and committees of vigilance,
safety, and correspondence, which could disseminate
news quickly in case of an emergency. In its most controversial
decision, the convention adopted a motion to request
separate statehood from Coahuila which, after some debate, was
adopted.[20]
For several reasons, the resolutions were never
presented, the primary reason being the refusal of San Antonio to cooperate with the convention
which made it appear that only the colonists who had come from the
United States were dissatisfied.
Therefore, the political chief of the province, Ramón Músquiz, ruled
that the meeting was unauthorized and therefore
illegal and Stephen Austin, believing the petition for statehood was
premature, decided Santa Anna would soon take
over the centralist government from Anastasio Bustamante and be more
favorable to the petition. As already presented,
Santa Anna did take over soon after the convention adjourned.[20]
Sam Houston had met James Prentiss, a speculator who
controlled tens of thousands of acres in the Leftwich grant, or at least he controlled them on paper.
He offered to bring Houston in as a partner in exchange for payment of
cash and Houston’s
commitment to travel to Texas to make good on his claim. The April 6,
1830 law made it imperative that Houston
make the trip as soon as possible. Houston arrived in Nacogdoches in
January of 1833 and from there traveled to San
Felipe and then to San Antonio. His traveling companion from San Felipe
to San Antonio was James Bowie and it is probable
the two men exchanged information on the unrest and insurgency which had
occurred in Texas in the previous year.
Houston met with several Comanche Chiefs in San Antonio to provide
legitimacy to his presence in Texas on behalf
of President Jackson and then returned to Nacogdoches, which, by 1833,
had become the center of intrigue and agitation
in the dispute between the American Colonist and the Mexican Government,
and where many opportunist had established
their base of operations.
Another convention was held in San Felipe on April 1,
1833, the same day Antonio López de Santa Anna became President
of Mexico by popular demand. The convention included about fifty
participants including Austin, representing San
Felipe, Sam Houston, representing Nacogdoches, and most likely William
McFarland, representing Ayish Bayou District,
and although the list of names of the attendees has been lost, men like
Samuel Lewis probably attended representing
their regions. The resolutions adopted by this convention were much the
same as the Convention of 1832.
The convention petitioned again for repeal of the
anti-immigration section of the Law of April 6, 1830 and in addition asked for more adequate Indian
defense, judicial reform, and improvement in mail service. They sought
tariff exemption as before,
and passed resolutions prohibiting African slave traffic into Texas
which agreed with the Mexican Constitution
of 1824. The delegates proposed the Mexican Government split the Mexican
State of Coahuila allowing a new
Mexican State of Texas to be created. Assuming that the petition for
statehood would be granted, a committee, of which
Houston was chairman, prepared a constitution for submission to the
Mexican Congress. Stephen Austin was chosen
to present the petition to the Mexican government in Mexico City and the
Convention adjourned on April 13.[21]
________
|
18) |
"The
Handbook of Texas Online", MCFARLAND, WILLIAM
(1774-1840), by McXie Whitton Martin; BIBLIOGRAPHY George L.
Crocket, Two Centuries in East Texas (Dallas Southwest,
1932; facsimile reprod., 1962). Texas House of Representatives, Biographical
Directory of the Texan Conventions and Congresses, 1832-1845 (Austin
Book Exchange, 1941). |
| 19) |
Martin,
Mrs. Charles, “Early Settlers of Jasper County, The First
to Arrive,” Kirbyville Banner, Kirbyville, Texas 75956,
1971. |
| 20) |
"The
Handbook of Texas Online", Convention of 1832, by Ralph
W. Steen; BIBLIOGRAPHY Eugene C. Barker, The Life of Stephen
F. Austin (Nashville Cokesbury Press, 1925; rpt.,
Austin Texas State Historical Association, 1949; New York AMS
Press, 1970). Hans Peter Nielsen Gammel, comp., Laws of
Texas, 1822-1897 (10 vols., Austin Gammel, 1898). |
| 21) |
Ibid;
Convention of 1833, by Ralph W. Steen. BIBLIOGRAPHY Stephen F.
Austin, "Explanation to the Public Concerning the Affairs
of Texas, by Citizen Stephen F. Austin," Quarterly of
the Texas State Historical Association 8 (January 1905).
Eugene C. Barker, The Life of Stephen F. Austin (Nashville
Cokesbury Press, 1925; rpt., Austin Texas State Historical
Association, 1949; New York AMS Press, 1970). Eugene C. Barker,
ed., The Austin Papers (3 vols., Washington GPO,
1924-28). Holland Edwards Bell, The Texas Convention of 1832
(M.A. thesis, University of Texas, 1907). John Henry Brown, History
of Texas from 1685 to 1892 (2 vols., St. Louis Daniell,
1893). E. W. Winkler, "Membership of the 1833 Convention of
Texas," Southwestern Historical Quarterly 45
(January 1942). Henderson K. Yoakum, History of Texas from
Its First Settlement in 1685 to Its Annexation to the United
States in 1846 (2 vols., New York Redfield, 1855). |
|
|
Page
100
There was considerable debate on the issue of Mexican
Statehood which at times took a decidedly secessionist direction
with Sam Houston the leader of this group. At the convention, Houston
declared in a speech, “Can Mexico ever make
laws for Texas? No!!…Mexico is acting in bad faith and trifling with
the rights of people. Plans formed without the
assent of Texas are not binding upon Texas.” By preparing a
Constitution and requesting Statehood, the message was clear
that Texas was determined to govern itself. While many in the
delegation, led by Stephen Austin, would have been content
with self-government within the Mexican federation, there were others,
led by Sam Houston, who saw the separation
from Coahuila as a first step towards eventual separation from
Mexico.[22]
Austin left for Mexico City soon after the convention
and on arriving at the seat of Mexican government, he found Vice President
Valéntin Gómez Farias was sitting in for Santa Anna, who was ill and
had not arrived at the Capital to take control
of the government. Austin, in letters back to San Felipe, reported the
progress of his meetings with Vice President Farias and the Mexican
Cabinet members; “I explained at large and with some detail the
situation of Texas and
the necessity of erecting it into a state…..and had the right and duty
of every people to save themselves from anarchy and
ruin…On this last point I enlarged very much. I distinctly stated as
my opinion that self-preservation would compel the
people of Texas to organize a local government, with or without the
approbation of the General Government ¾ that this measure would not proceed
from any hostile views to the permanent union of Texas with Mexico, but
from absolute necessity, to
save themselves from anarchy and total ruin. How such a measure would
affect the union of Texas with Mexico,
or where it would end, were matters worthy of serious reflection.”
If Austin spoke to the Vice President in this way and
tone, he had issued an ultimatum ---- Give us statehood or we will give it to ourselves. This enraged
Gómez Farias causing him to become suspicious of Austin‘s motives and
loyalty to the Mexican
government. Austin’s loyalty to the Mexico was further questioned by
Gómez Farias, still handling government affaires
for Santa Anna, when he obtained letters Austin sent in October of 1833
to the ayuntamiento (town council) of San
Antonio de Béxar. When Austin wrote these letters, he had seen little
progress towards statehood and he reported and recommended;
“And in my opinion nothing is going to be done…And so I hope that
you will not lose a single moment in directing
a communication to all the Ayuntamientos of Texas, urging them to unite
in a measure to organize a local government
independent of Coahuila, even though the general government should
withhold its consent.” To the Mexican officials,
these were the words of a rebel organizing his followers.[22]
Believing he could do no more, Austin left Mexico City
in December of 1833 and hurried to catch up with General Pedro Lemus, newly appointed commandant of the Northern District. He caught up
with the General at Saltillo and was immediately
placed under arrest on the order of the war ministry and was to be
returned to the capital to answer charges raised
by the state government of Coahuila y Texas. He arrived back in Mexico
City February 13, 1834 and was placed in
prison with no charges being formally filed. After three months in
prison, Austin had been allowed no visitors and hopes
for a hearing and freedom were placed in Santa Anna’s return to the
capital.
For one year, Santa Anna had skirted his duties as
President, feigning illness as his reason for not attending his own inauguration and then for the same
reason, letting his vice-president, Gómez Farias, run the country in
his absence. Some historians
believe Santa Anna’s “illness” was a political ploy to avoid being
responsible for liberal reforms the vice president
and a like wise liberal congress put into place. The most influential
persons in the country, the wealthy, were the
biggest losers if the reforms were enacted, which caused Santa Anna to
delay his return to the capital and wait for their
reaction and the reaction of the general population. If they proved to
be popular, Santa Anna could claim credit, but if
they failed, then he could place the blame on Gómez Farias and the
Congress.
Santa Anna, during his stay at his hacienda, was
approached by a conservative alliance of Bishops and Generals asking Santa Anna to assume emergency
powers which he declined to do at that time with these words, “I
swear to you that I oppose
all efforts aimed at the destruction of the constitution and that I
would die before accepting any other power than that
designated by it…..My firmest determination is to defend without the
slightest hesitation the constitution as our representatives
gave it to us in 1824.”[23] However, after several more months had
passed, the bishops, generals, and landed
gantry, again visited Santa Anna’s hacienda and again requested he
move against the liberal movement, arguing the
masses weren’t ready for republicanism and Mexico needed stronger
leadership. Santa Anna allowed himself to be persuaded
by these arguments and in a complete about face, determined he alone
would rule the country. Towards the end
of April 1834, he returned to the capital, sent the congress home,
forced Vice President Gómez Farias into exile in New
Orleans, and unilaterally repealed most of the reforms of his liberal
government.
With his now conservative base satisfied, Santa Anna
justified his actions to the Mexican citizens with these words, “I encountered stormy sessions of the
Congress. One faction was endeavoring to confiscate the property of the
church and to deny to the
clergy its rights and ancient privileges. The public was dismayed by
these actions and opposed violently any usurpation
of the clergy’s rights. Obeying the dictates of my conscience and
hoping to quell a revolution, I declined to approve
the necessary decree to put these edicts into law.”[24] With these
sweeping political actions, Santa Anna assumed
dictatorial powers over the government of Mexico in May of 1834.
________
|
22) |
Brands,
H. W., Pages 205, 220 - 223, 226. Source: Washington Daniel
Miller Papers, Austin Papers. |
| 23) |
Ibid;
Page 227. Source: Callcott, Randolph B. “Santa Anna The
Story of an Enigma Who Once Was Mexico.” Norman University
of Oklahoma Press, 1936, page 102. |
| 24) |
Santa
Anna, Antonio López de. “The Eagle: The Autobiography of
Santa Anna.” Edited by Ann Fears Crawford. Austin
Pemberton Press, 1967. |
|
|
Page
101
Meanwhile, Stephen F. Austin continued to languish in
his Mexico City prison cell, but was much encouraged by the return
of Santa Anna to the capital. Santa Anna eased the conditions of Austin’s
imprisonment after Gómez Farias departed,
having him transferred to better prison quarters in the suburbs.
Visitors were allowed and one businessman who
admired Austin, offered to help him escape. However, Austin declined the
offer, placing his faith in Santa Anna to set things right. This faith
in Santa Anna led Austin to write in August of 1834, “I have no
doubt that the political intentions
of the President General Santa Anna are sound and patriotic…President
Santa Anna is friendly to Texas and to me,
of this I have no doubt.”[25]
Santa Anna continued to expand his control over the
Mexican government by dismantling the federalist institutions, dissolving
state legislatures and militias, and even demoting the Mexican States to
departments of the national government.
After disposing of his vice-president, Gómez Farias, he held rigged
elections that provided him with a rubber
stamp congress. This was not done without some resistance. The State of
Zacatecas, northeast of Mexico City, refused
to disband it’s militia. Santa Anna personally led an Army which
soundly defeated the Zacatecas Militia and then,
as an example, brutally slaughtered the insurgents and hundreds of women
and children. His message was clear, those
who opposed his rule could expect no mercy if their opposition failed,
an ominous warning to Texans if they planned
to oppose Santa Anna’s ambitions.
To restore order to the northern frontier and Texas,
Santa Anna sent his brother-in-law north to Texas with several hundred
men, there mission, to prevail in Texas as Santa Anna had prevailed in
the State of Zacatecas. His orders were to
disarm the citizens of Texas and if this could not be accomplished
peacefully, then, the population could expect the same
harsh treatment experienced by the State of Zacatecas. Cos, on his
arrival, announced; “The plans of the revolutionist
of Texas are well known to this commandancy, and it is quite useless and
vain to cover them with a hypocritical
adherence to the federal constitution. The constitution by which all
Mexicans may be governed is the constitution
which the colonists of Texas must obey, no matter on what principles it
may be formed.”[26] With all of the players
in place, the revolution is about to begin.
In the spring of 1835, Santa Anna ordered new troops to
Anahuac to collect the customs duties, which angered the local merchants
and rebellion began anew in Anahuac, led once again by William Travis.
The merchant’s retaliated using sabotage
and evasion. One of Travis’ clients had a schooner which arrived
having passengers aboard without passports. The
schooner was seized, it’s cargo impounded and the passengers arrested
and taken to Veracruz. Word was quickly passed
among the colonist that similar actions by the British had triggered the
American Revolution. Travis raised a band
of volunteers who elected him Captain and advanced on Anahuac where he
demanded the garrison commander surrender
or have every member of his garrison killed. Not knowing the strength of
Travis’ band, the garrison commander, after
assurances his men would not be harmed, abandoned the garrison and rode
towards the Rio Grande. General Cos ordered
the arrest of Travis but the local authorities refused to carry out the
arrest order. A $1,000 dollar bounty reward was
offered for the capture of Travis, which further enhanced his reputation
among the Texas settlements.
James Bowie was arrested by General Cos who was after
some other officials and happened to catch Bowie in his net. After
several weeks, Bowie escaped to the American settlements, sounding the
alarm that General Cos and his troops were
coming. He eventually reached Nacogdoches where militia units were being
raised and was elected to be a Colonel.
Austin was finally released in August of 1835 and
traveled by boat from Veracruz to New Orleans. He found there were
thousands of immigrants pouring into Texas each month, most entering
without the permission of the Mexican government
or the local empresarios. Texas was becoming Americanized with the
population now about thirty thousand from
the United States compared to about three thousand Mexican nationals.
During his time in New Orleans, Austin learned
of the latest Anahuac uprising and of General Cos’ approach. Although
Austin still had a glimmer of hope Santa Anna
had the best interest of Texas at heart, his trust in this man as a
savior of the settlers was faltering as he wrote, “General
Santa Anna told me he should visit Texas next month as a friend. His
visit is uncertain, his friendship much more
so. We must rely on ourselves, and prepare for the worst.”[27]
Upon his return,
there was a tremendous celebration and at the conclusion, Austin was ask
to speak.[27]
" My
efforts to serve Texas involved me in the labyrinth of Mexican
politics. I was arrested, and have suffered a long persecution and
imprisonment. I fully hoped to have found
Texas at peace and in tranquility, but regret to find if in commotion,
all disorganized, all in anarchy, and
threatened with immediate hostilities. This state of things is deeply
to be lamented; it is a great misfortune, but it is one which has not
been produced by any acts of the
people of this country. On the contrary it is the natural and
inevitable consequence of the revolution that has spread all
over Mexico, and of the imprudent and impolitic measures of both the
general and state governments with respect to Texas. They are farmers,
cultivators of the soil, and are pacific from interest, from
occupation, and from inclination. They have uniformly endeavored to
sustain the constitution and the
public peace by pacific means, and have never deviated from their duty
as Mexican citizens. The federal constitution of 1824
is about to be destroyed, the system of government changed, and a
central or consolidated one established. Let all personalities, or
divisions, or excitements, or passion, or
violence, be banished from among us. Let a general consultation of
people of Texas be convened as speedily
as possible, to be composed of the best, and most calm, and
intelligent, and firm men in the country, and let them decide what
representations ought to be made to the
general government and what ought to be done in the future."
________
|
25) |
Austin
Papers, Volume 2, page 1077. |
| 26) |
Brands,
H. W., Page 237. Source: Wooten, Dudley G., “A
comprehensive History of Texas, 1685 to 1897.” Volumes 1,
page 173. Dallas William G. Scarff, 1898. Reprinted edition
Austin Texas State Historical Association, 1986. |
| 27) |
Ibid.
Pages 247, 248, 250. Source: Austin Papers, Volume 3, pages 102,
103, 116-119. |
|
|
Page
102
General Cos loaded five hundred troops on ships and two
weeks after Austin’s homecoming, landed troops on the Texas coast.
Austin had hoped for more time to get organized, but this new
development and the populations fear of meeting the
same fate as the State of Zacatecas, moved the settlers to act more
quickly than they would have liked. Committees of
Safety were organized with Austin heading San Felipe’s. Austin
circulated a letter to the other communities giving the latest
information on the movements of General Cos and plans for countering
those movements. He wrote; [28]
“Things
have come on us much sooner than I expected. The substance of this
information is that General Cos was expected at Béxar on the 16th of this month with more troops, that
there was a plan to try and foment divisions and discord among the
people, so as to use one part against the other,
and prevent preparation ¾ and that the real object is to destroy and
break up the foreign settlements in Texas. All kind of conciliatory measures with General Cos and the
military at Béxar are hopeless….Nothing but ruin to Texas can be
expected from any such measures. They have
already and very properly been resorted to, without effect. War is
upon us. There is no remedy. The people must unconditionally summit to whatever the government chooses to do
for them; he (General Cos) lays down the principle that General
Government have the right to force us
to summit to any reform or amendments or alterations that congress may
make in the constitution, &c, for we shall be, under Cos‘
doctrine, without any rights or
guarantees of any kind. War is inevitable. There must now be no
halfway measures --- war in full. The sword is drawn and
the scabbard must be put on one side until the military are all driven
out of Texas.”
In early October of 1835, there was an altercation at
Gonzales on the Guadalupe River. The empresario, Green Dewitt had
been given a cannon by the Mexican authorities several years earlier to
protect the settlement from Indians. When General
Cos ordered the Texans to disarm, Colonel Ugartechea sent a small
detachment of troops from San Antonio to Gonzales
to retrieve the cannon. The colony refused to turn over the cannon after
many Texan volunteers arrived in Gonzales.
While the Texan Commander, John Moore, chosen in an election of the men
who had assembled, parleyed with
the Mexican commander, a banner was unfurled by the cannon with the
words, “Come And Take
It.” Moore returned
to the Texan side of the Guadalupe River and the cannon was fired,
discharging metal scraps toward the Mexicans.
Musket fire was exchanged and the Mexican officer retreated to San
Antonio. Casualties were light on both sides,
but hostilities were escalating beyond insurgency and now becoming open
rebellion which would rapidly lead to revolution.
The Texans had still not had a general consultation as
suggested by Austin in early September of 1835. The skirmish in
Gonzales left no doubt the Texans needed to meet and get organized soon,
which would not happen until November. Because
of the events in Gonzales, the communities of Gonzales, San Felipe, and
Nacogdoches raised companies of volunteers
naming as their commanders, John Moore, Stephen Austin, and Sam Houston,
respectively. Once the commanders
were named, they chose Austin as the Commander of the Texan Army.
Now that the Texan Army was organized, Austin ordered a
march towards San Antonio de Béxar to attempt to engage General
Cos. James Bowie was in Nacogdoches when news of the Gonzales battle
arrived and with some friends from Louisiana,
caught up with Austin’s army near Cibolo Creek, about 25 miles east
and north of San Antonio. Austin assigned
Bowie to his staff and gave him, along with James Fannin, the
responsibility of reconnoitering San Antonio to learn
more about the Mexican defenses. Intelligence reports from the town
prompted Bowie and Fannin to report “A large
number of the citizens of Béxar and of this place are now laying out,
to prevent being forced to perform the most servile
duties….Great consternation was manifested there when our approach to
this point (Espada Mission, 9 miles from
San Antonio) was made known….They have 8 pieces (4 lb) (Cannon)
mounted, and one of larger size preparing for us.
They have none on the Church, but have removed all their ammunition to
it, and enclosed it by a wall, made of wood, six
feet apart and six feet high, filled in with dirt, extending from the
corners to the ditch, say sixty yards in length.”[29] They
further reported provisions in the town were running low and General Cos
and his men could be starved out in five days.
On this intelligence, Austin cautiously advanced towards
San Antonio on October 27, 1836 sending Bowie and Fannin ahead
with ninety men with orders to reconnoiter and return. However, in
defiance of that order, Bowie and Fannin established
a position in a bend of the San Antonio River, which protected them from
flanking or rear attacks but having the
disadvantage of providing no avenue of retreat. General Cos became aware
of the presence of Bowie and Fannin and the
position they had taken and sent a contingent of troops to exploit the
rebels tenuous position. With the battle about to be
engaged before Austin was prepared, he hastened forward to reinforce
Bowie and Fannin, who were about to become embroiled
in a fight with General Cos' troops.
________
|
28) |
Austin
Papers, Volume 3, page 128. |
| 29) |
Ibid.
Volume 3, page 202. |
|
|
Page
103
During the night of October 27, a heavy fog settled on
the river and continued to hang in the air on the next morning. Although
shots were exchanged by both sides, it was ineffective. As the fog
lifted, the ninety rebels found themselves surrounded.
Noah Smithwick wrote of the encounter; [30]
“When
the fog lifted, we found ourselves pretty well surrounded, though the
bluff and heavy timber on the west side of the river secured us against attack in the rear. In front was
a field piece flanked by several companies of infantry; and across the
river, to cut off retreat, were two companies
of cavalry. But we lay low and their grape and canister crashed
through the pecan trees overhead, raining a shower of ripe nuts down on us, and I saw men picking them up
and eating them with as little apparent concern as if they were being
shaken down by a norther. Bowie
was a born leader, never needlessly spending a bullet or imperiling a
life. He repeatedly admonished us, ’Keep under cover, boys, and reserve your fire; we haven’t a man to
spare.’ Our long rifles ¾ and
I thought I never heard rifles crack so keen, after the dull roar of
the cannons ¾ mowed down the Mexicans at a rate
that might well have made braver hearts than those encased in their
shriveled little bodies recoil.
Three
times they charged, but there was a platoon ready to receive them.
Three times we picked off their gunners; the last one with a lighted match in his hand; then a panic seized
them and they broke. They jumped on the mules attached to the caisson,
two or three on a mule, without even
taking time to cut them loose, and struck out for the fort, leaving
the loaded gun on the field. With a ringing cheer we mounted the bank and gave chase. We turned their cannon on
them, giving wings to their flight. They dropped their muskets, and,
splashing through the shallow water
of the river, fled helter skelter as if pursued by all the furies.”
In a stunning victory which became known as the
Battle of Concepción, Bowie and Fannin had routed four times their number, inflicting sixty
casualties on the Mexican troops while having one of their owned killed.
Austin arrived shortly after
the battle concluded and wrote, “The overwhelming superiority of
force, and the brilliancy of the victory gained over
them, speaks for themselves in terms too expressive to require from me
any further eulogy.”[31]
In early November of 1835, Martin Baty Lewis raised a
company of East Texas Volunteers who joined the Texas Army
after the Battle of Concepcion. Among the volunteers was his brother,
John Taylor Lewis.[32] The Consultation convened
at about the same time in San Felipe with 55 delegates attending. Among
the many decisions made, Sam Houston
was appointed commander of the army, replacing the ailing Stephen F.
Austin, and a provisional Government of Texas
was created as a state of Mexico with Henry Smith elected as Governor.
Houston was now commander of a army that
didn’t really exist for the fighting thus far involved irregulars who
came to fight when the mood struck them. The army
lacked discipline, command and control, equipment and supplies, and the
necessary training needed to act as a cohesive
unit. The irregulars at San Antonio had defied Stephen F. Austin
attempts to organize an assault before he relinquished
his command and most decisions were actually being made by committee,
many times at the lowest level units
and this democratic army had decided to starve General Cos and his men
into submission by laying siege to San Antonio.
Houston was against this strategy, believing it would
be better to pull back to the east until the army could be trained. Houston wrote to James Fannin
suggesting, not ordering, the army fall back to La Bahia and Gonzales
along the Guadalupe River,
leaving a force of sufficient strength to protect the frontier. The
other fighting men would be allowed to
go home until the Army could be supplied with ammunition and artillery
to make a proper attack on San Antonio.
However, retreat was not acceptable to this
democratic army and the siege of San Antonio continued in defiance of Houston‘s suggestion. After
weeks on siege duty, the men became bored and on hearing a Mexican
column, rumored to have a
large quantity of silver, was approaching from the Rio Grande, decided
it was time to attack to break the boredom and
collect the booty. Bowie was placed in command of forty men to intercept
the soldiers who had approached to within
one mile of Béxar. Out numbered three or four to one, the Texans boldly
galloped into the middle of the Mexican train,
forcing them into a arroyo where they took refuge. Hearing the sound of
gunfire, Cos sent troops out to reinforce the train
and these additional Mexican troops then forced the Texans to seek cover
in another close by arroyo. The battle raged
back and forth, until Texan reinforcements made up of volunteers who
wanted to share in the booty, arrived, driving the
Mexicans into the town and forcing them to leave their baggage behind.
The Texans fell upon their prize only to find out
the train was nothing more than a contingent of troops sent out to
gather grass to feed their horses and mules. This battle
became known as the “Grass Fight” for obvious reasons.
________
|
30) |
Brands,
H. W., Pages 275-277. Source: Compiled by Nanna Smithwick
Donaldson. Austin Gammel Book Company, 1900, page 114-115. |
| 31) |
Ibid;
page 277. Source Austin Papers, Vol. 3, page 217. |
| 32) |
Audited
Military Claims, Republic of Texas (Miscellaneous Archives,
Texas State Library) |
|
|
Page
104
All of this was happening with Edward Burleson
commanding, who had been elected by the volunteers participating in the siege when Austin stepped
aside. He was by now having difficulty keeping the bored men from going
home and promised an
assault was to begin on San Antonio on the morning of December 2.
However, the lack of a chain of command
stopped the planned attack for the company captains polled their men and
reported to Burleson they wouldn’t attack.
Discouraged by this turn of events, many of the men elected to return to
their homes if the Army wasn’t going to fight.
Burleson tried to rally the men, but the exodus continued, weakening the
siege. He then decided to make preparations
to retreat to the east side of the Guadalupe as “suggested” by
Houston.
A group of volunteers raised in New Orleans called
the “Greys” because of their uniforms arrived at about this time, spoiling for a fight, only to find
out the army was going to retreat from San Antonio rather than attack.
They were among a group who
strongly objected to the retreat and the most notable objector to the
retreat was Ben Milam. When he found out
Burleson was going to withdraw, he declared he would attack San Antonio
on his own. Heated discussion could be heard
after Milam and another volunteer, Frank Johnson, entered Burleson’s
tent to argue their case. After several minutes,
Milam stepped out of the tent and drew a line on the ground with the
stock of his rifle and cried out in a loud voice;
“Boys! Who will go with Ben Milam into Béxar?” Many of those
close by answered “I Will” and Milam said, “Well,
if you are going with me, get on this side.” About three hundred
answered the call causing Burleson to reverse his decision
and plan an attack to start on the morning of December 5. He persuaded
those opposed to attacking to stay as a reserve
force with these words; “Remain like men, and, win or lose, you
will share the glory with your comrades. Abandon
us, and you will merit the contempt of posterity.”[33]
Herman Ehrenberg, a member of the New Orleans Grays,
wrote this account of the ensuing battle from his vantage point.[34]
“The
hollow roar of our cannon was followed by the brisk rattling of drums
and the shrill blasts of bugles. Summons, cries, the sudden trampling
of feet, the metallic click of weapons mingled in the distance with
the noisy blare of the alarm and the heavy rumblings of the artillery.
Our friends had done the trick. [Note:
James C. Neill, the artillery commander, sent several salvos in the
direction of the Alamo to divert
attention away from other forces moving into the town of San Antonio.]
Their cannonading had put the Mexicans on the alert, and many of them would probably rush to the
defense of the fortress. The success of this first part of our scheme
encouraged us, for we thought that in
the midst of the din and confusion we should have a better chance of
slipping into the city unnoticed.
[Note:
Jesus Cuellar, a native of Bexar, led the New Orleans Greys into the
city.] Not a word passed his (Jesus Cuellar} lips, and his
eyes were constantly turned
toward the Alamo, as if the dense shadows about the fortress held the
secret fate of our adventure. {Note at some point after
the cannon fired on the Alamo, rockets flared up from the fort, calling
for the men in town to come to the defense of the fort.} It meant, he said (Cuellar comment on seeing the
flares), that the road was free and that we were safe. The further into
the city we ran, the more stone houses
we should be able to occupy. Sometimes our way led across small Mexican
gardens, which afforded us a good deal of shelter; sometimes
over bare, exposed patches of ground close to the edge of the stream.
It
was quite early yet. Most of the objects around us were still wrapped in
the receding shadows of departing night, but in spite of this
semidarkness, we easily detected the
enemy’s position. The lurid glow of the explosions lit up the central
quadrangle of the city, from which the Mexican
artillery poured forth continuous volleys of shot. A dozen or more six-pounders
seemed to have chosen our small fortress [Note:
Place of
shelter taken by Ehrenburg and several other men which was a stone
building that had served as a guardhouse.] as a special
objective, and one of them,
which stood within eight feet of us, gave us a good deal of anxiety….Cannon
balls and bullets whizzed and crashed above our heads,
leaving us frightened and bewildered.
On
our right and somewhat farther back than we were, little clouds of smoke
were raising at intervals from several stone buildings. Judging from
the intermittent shooting that these were held by a small number of our
adversaries, we promptly made up our minds to seize the houses and
use them as part of our quarters. Just as our plans were completed,
several discharges from these same houses informed us that they were in the hands of our friends, who likewise
had mistaken us for enemies. While they were firing upon us, one of
their bullets had hit a tall Mississippian
named Moore, but fortunately it had glanced off a two-dollar piece which
he had in his coat pocket. The second bullet struck another
very tall fellow, also from Mississippi, tore off his forehead, and
dashed its fragments on the flagstone and on those of us who stood around him. [Note:
A third man, a German, was badly wounded in this exchange of friendly
fire.] Scores of lead and copper bullets greeted the appearance of volunteers bold enough to run
the gauntlet of this well- sustained fusillade. (On silencing the cannon
which harassed them) Several of our
best sharpshooters stationed themselves close to the loop-holes in our
walls and mercilessly struck down every bluecoat who came
near the artillery piece, which was very soon reduced to silence because
the Mexican soldiers were unable to reach it.
[Note:
The fighting was causing the men to become thirsty and the rebels
attempted to run to the river for water but were discouraged by sniping by the Mexicans. By this time,
Ehrenberg and his group had taken refuge in a house with a Mexican woman
in attendance. She made them
breakfast and then realized the men needed water. She volunteered to
make the trip to the River, at which the men protested.] But
she (The Mexican women)
laughed at our objections, saying that we did not begin to realize the
fondness of the Mexicans for the fair sex. She added
that since there was no danger it would be foolish to stop her, and was
off before we had time to hold her back. She {after reaching the river
without incidence} had filled the buckets and was preparing to go back
when the enemy opened fire on her. Four bullets went through her body
and she fell lifeless on the green grass. Our men, horror-stricken,
gazed over the walls, and after a few moments several of them rushed outside and dragged in the well meaning but
unfortunate woman." [Note:
While both sides paused in the battle after this horrifying event,
several of
the Greys were able to make it to the river and bring back the badly
needed water.]
________
|
33) |
Brands,
H. W.; page 297. Source: Taylor, Creed, “Tall Men with Long
Rifles,”; pages 62-63. As told to James T. DeShields. San
Antonio Naylor Company, 1935, 1971. Note Creed Taylor was a
volunteer present at the Siege of Bexar. |
| 34) |
Ibid;
page 297-301. Source: Ehrenberg, Herman. “With Milam and
Fannin Adventures of a German Boy in Texas‘ Revolution”;
Originally published in German in 1843. Translated by Charlotte
Churchill. Dallas Tardy Publishing Co., 1935, pages 71-81 |
|
|
Page
105
At the conclusion of the first day of battle, the
Texans had one killed and several wounded while the Mexican side had several killed and several more
wounded. However, the Mexicans still held the plaza and the Alamo. Creed
Taylor recalled the action
at the plaza on the close of the first day of fighting; “These
walls were manned by Mexicans troops who
kept up a brisk fire upon us during the day, and if they had been
trained marksmen, armed with any other gun than the
’escopeta.’ few of us would have escaped death. I saw volley after
volley fired from an ’ararea’ in our front and not a man’s
head to be seen. Crouching behind the roof-walls, these Mexican soldiers
would load, thrust their guns over the crest
of the low wall, and send a constant shower of balls in our direction,
with harmless effect. It was a matter of self preservation, since
no sooner did a head appear above the walls than it served as a target
for a dozen hunting rifles, and there
was always another dead Mexican.”[35]
Frank Johnson’s after-action report to Burleson on
the second day of fighting gave this brief account; “At daylight on
the 6th the enemy were observed to
have occupied the tops of houses in our front, where, under the cover of
breastworks, they opened
through loop-holes a very brisk fire of small arms on our whole line,
followed by a steady cannonading from the
town, in front, and the Alamo on the left flank, with few interruptions
during the day.”
On the third day, Creed Taylor’s company found
themselves pinned down in an adobe house which came under fire from
Mexican cannon. Each time the cannon roared, another part of the house
was destroyed and it would only be a matter
of time before there protection was gone and they were exposed to the
cannon. Across the street was another stone house
occupied by Mexican soldiers, but which offered better protection.
Taylor wrote this account of the heroics of Henry
Karnes. “Boys (Karnes speaking), load your guns and be ready. I am
going to break open that door….I want you to pour
a steady hot fire into those fellows on the roof and hold their
attention till I reach the door, and when I break it in I want
you boys to make a clean dash for that house.” Taylor and the
other men appraised Karnes of all of the guns in the windows
of the building and the danger of what he was suggesting to which he
answered: “Damn the Mexicans and their escopetas,
(Mexican Gun) It’s that house or retreat. You men do as I tell you.”
Taylor continued his account; “And with rifle
in one hand and crowbar in the other, he flew across the street, and
after a few well-directed blows, the door gave way,
by which time our whole company was at his heels.” The company
forced the Mexicans from the house and took up their
new safer position.[35] Around noon, the rebels captured the Veramendi
house[36], and this was where Ben Milam established
a headquarters. While scanning the battlefield with a telescope from the
house courtyard, he was killed by a Mexican
sniper.
During the night of December 7th, a cold rain fell,
wetting the gun powder preventing and slowing the firing of weapons.
The rebels took advantage of the lull to improve their defensive
positions while General Cos attempted to change
the outcome of the battle by attacking the headquarters’ of Burleson.
According to one witness of the attack, “It appeared
we were to be swept off by a general charge by the cavalry, Infantry,
and lancers, playing more music than I ever
heard.”[37] With the assistance of his artillery, Burleson and his
men held their ground, inflicting heavy casualties on
the Mexican troops which forced them to break-off the charge and
withdraw
A rumor started making the rounds in the Mexican camp
that a relief column was approaching and Cos sent two hundred
men out to meet them. These men, on finding no troops approaching the
city, promptly deserted. Mexican General
Vicente Filisola wrote these words related to Mexican moral when the
deserters didn’t return. “There was a feeling
that General Cos was dead. The fact that many of the women and children
of the town had sought refuge in the Alamo
depressed the troops which yet remained. They became obsessed with the
idea that their cause was already lost, and
increasing rumors of more desertions persisted.”[38]
On the afternoon of the fourth day of battle, five
hundred men under the command of Colonel Ugartecha arrived from the
Rio Grande and entered the town where the defenders still held the
rebels at bay. Juan Sanchez - Navarro, a Lieutenant
Colonel of Engineers gave this account of their arrival in San Antonio.
“We entered the town by the trail to Cadet
Flores’ house and from there to the plaza, where we were greeted with
rifle fire, acclamations and ringing of bells by
300 valiant souls who for 55 days had been preparing breastworks day and
night without regard for distinction of rank.”
However, the relief troops had been marching for forty-eight hours and
were fatigued to the extent, they could offer little
support. Sanchez wrote, “I slept so soundly that nearby cannon and
rifle fire did not wake me.” Sanchez was awakened
by one of his captains declaring, “We are lost!”
General Cos ordered Sanchez to approach the rebels to
obtain the best terms of surrender possible. His instructions from
Cos were “….approach the enemy and obtain the best terms
possible. Save the dignity of our Government, the honor
of its arms, and honor, life, and property of chiefs, officials, and
troops that still remain with me, even though I myself
perish.” Sanchez wrote of his encounter with the rebels “We
were surrounded with crude bumpkins, proud and overbearing.
Whoever knows the character of North America may appreciate the position
in which we found ourselves.”[39]
His negotiations with the rebels resulted in better terms of surrender
than expected. The cease-fire document
stated the Mexicans could “retire with their arms and private
property into the interior of the republic under parole
of honor….not in any way oppose the reestablishment of the federal
constitution of 1824.” In addition to the above,
the rebels agreed to supply the Mexicans with provisions for their
journey from the battlefield. So ended the Siege
of Béxar.[40]
Apparently, after the Siege of Béxar, the Lewis men
returned to their families. After Santa Anna recaptured San Antonio
and the Alamo and the fate of the men defending spread through the
communities, large numbers of settlers left their
homes behind and began to move towards the Sabine River and the United
States. The Retreating Texas Army burned
crops, buildings, and anything that would aid the enemy soldiers as they
advanced towards the United States border,
hoping to deprive them of the ability of living off the land. The exodus
from Texas by the refugees became known as
the “Runaway Scrape” and most likely, the Lewis Family, along with
the Stark and Herrin families, removed to their previous
homes in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana until the war ended. No further
records have been found indicating the participation
of members of these families in the Texas Revolution after the siege at
Béxar further supporting the probability
the families and their men became refugees after Santa Anna captured the
Alamo.
At the conclusion of hostilities after Houston was
victorious at the Battle of San Jacinto, Samuel S. Lewis became a prominent member of the Jasper
County community and served in the Texas Republic as a representative
from Jasper County until
his death February 10, 1838, at his plantation in the Bevil district.
________
|
35) |
Brands,
H. W., page 301-303. Source: Taylor,
Creed, “Tall Men with Long Rifles,”; page 67, 69-71 |
| 36) |
Home
of Juan Martin Veramedi, the father-in-law of James Bowie. |
| 37) |
Brands,
H. W.; page 304. Source “Papers of Lamar“, Vol. 5,
page 97 |
| 38) |
Ibid;
page 305. Source Huson, Hobart. “Captain Phillip Dimmit’
s Commander of Goliad, 1835-1836 An Episode of the Mexican
Federalists War in Texas, Usually Referred to as the
Texian Revolution.” Austin Von Beckman - Jones Co., 1974,
page 190-194. |
| 39) |
Benthall,
Lillian Light, “Colonel Samuel S. Lewis, Early Texan
Founder of Orleans, Indiana“, June 13, 1966. |
| 40) |
“Papers
of the Texas Revolution“; Volume 3. |
|
|