Search billions of records on Ancestry.com
   
This website designed by Clovis LaFleur
37 Marker Genetic Results
Persons to Contact

Administrator: Sheila Schmutz

<sheila.schmutz@usask.ca>

Co-administrator: Clovis LaFleur 

<clafleur1@austin.rr.com>

Webmaster: Clovis LaFleur <clafleur1@austin.rr.com> Click HERE to see Disclaimer Last Update: November 23, 2014

General Information About The Charts

The values in the table below have been grouped according to the guidelines set forth by FamilyTree DNA in the following documents concerning "Interpreting Genetic Distance" in the 12-marker, 25-marker, and 37-marker tests (please take a few minutes to read these three documents).

The Cells with this background color within a group indicate a value difference from the most common value within the marker column for that group. Subgroups within a Group having this background color are based on the same criteria --- a value difference from the most common value within that group for that marker column. 

You can click on any kit number in the left-most column to see corresponding genealogical information and contact email addresses available on the various "Member Web Pages." There are three Member Web Pages: Group 1: Members and Their Genealogy; Group 2: Members and Their Genealogy; and Other Members and Their Genealogy.

Members with there Haplogroup reported in RED have been predicted by FTDNA but not confirmed. Members with their Haplogroup in GREEN have been confirmed by additional SNP testing. Shorthand Haplogroup notations have been used for many members as follows: R-M269 is (R1b1a2); R-L21 is (R1b1a2a1a1b4); R-U106 is (R1b1a2a1a1a*); R-L260 is (R1a1a1g2). If the Allele value in the Marker 37 column is presented with a Red colored font, this member has genetic results beyond 37 markers. These results are  presented on the 67 Marker Y-DNA Test Results Web page.

Group 1: Descendants of Aaron Stark [1608-1685] of New London County, Connecticut

 

Aaron Stark arrived in New England between 1630 and 1637   most likely from Scotland or England. He was born about 1608 and died in 1685 in New London County, Connecticut. His service in the Pequot War under Captain John Mason in May of 1637, is the first record we have of him in Connecticut. He eventually settled in New London County, Connecticut in a region that later became Groton Township. Many of the early Stark family researchers had claimed the Aaron Stark family was related to later arrivals to America named Dr. Richard Starke, James Stark of Stafford County, Virginia, and Archibald Stark of New Hampshire. Y-DNA comparisons of members of Group 1 to members of Group 2 descendants of the later arrivals have revealed Aaron Stark was not related to these three later arrivals to America. When the Group 1 Modal Haplotype is compared to the Group 2 Modal Haplotype, there is a genetic distance of 17. The odds greatly favor Members of Group 1a & 1b and members of Group 2a, 2b, & 2c; could not have shared a common male ancestor within thousands of years.

Genealogical research suggests all the members of Group 1a & 1b are descendants of Aaron Stark [1608-1685]. Aaron Stark had two sons named Aaron Stark (Junior) and William Stark (Senior), each son a progenitor of two descendant branches from Aaron Stark (Senior).  Members of Group 1a are descendants of William Stark (Senior) and Members of Group 1b are descendants of Aaron Stark (Junior). If you are interested in a more in-depth analysis of Group 1 go to the web pages entitled Group 1: Y-DNA Analysis of the Descendants of Aaron Stark [1608-1685].

 Other Group 1 Subgroups

Group 1c: Genetic Matches to Group 1a & 1b / Surname Stark / Genealogy Incomplete

Group 1d: Genealogy Suggests Aaron [1608-1695] was Ancestor; are not genetic matches to 1A or 1B

 

[Top of Page]

Group 2: Stark/Starke Families; Descendants of Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland {Killermont Stark Families}

Group 2 Results Posted G2 Analysis

 

About 75 to 100 years after the arrival of Aaron Stark [1608-1685] in Connecticut, three men with the surnames Stark and Starke arrived in New Hampshire and Virginia. Their names were Dr. Richard Starke of Virginia, James Stark of Stafford County, Virginia, and Archibald Stark of New Hampshire (father of General John Stark of Revolutionary War fame). Earlier genealogical research has not been able to determine if these three men were related. However, independent research of each of these men has suggested the ancestral home of each could have been in or near Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland. Many of the early Stark family researchers had claimed the Aaron Stark family and these three men were somehow related. Y-DNA comparisons of the Modal Haplotype of Group 1a & 1b Members descendants of Aaron Stark to the Modal Haplotype of Group 2a, 2b, &2c Members; reveal they have a genetic distance of 17 over their respective Modal H37 Haplotypes. The odds greatly favor Members of Group 1 and members of Group 2 could not have shared a common male ancestor within thousands of years, thereby eliminating the possibility Aaron Stark was a near relative of these three later arrivals to America.

Analysis of the Y-DNA of Descendants of Archibald, James, and Richard has proven their descendants most likely genetically share a unknown common ancestor within genealogical time. It now remains for further genealogical research to determine the identity of their common ancestor. Members of Group 2 have been variously tested over the H12, H25, and H37 haplotypes. If you are interested in a more in-depth analysis of Group 2 go to the web page entitled: Group 2 Y-DNA Analysis.

  

[Top of Page]

Group 3: Descendants of Zerubabel Starks [1760-1800] of Robertson County,  Tennessee

Group Contact: Richard W. Starks; starks336@aol.com

Zerubabel Starks was born ca. 1760 and died in 1800. He lived in Virginia and died in Robertson County, Tennessee. His descendants had always thought they were not related to the other Stark families and the Y-DNA results of his descendants clearly confirm this to be a fact. Reuben Starks, reported to be a son of Zerubabel, is a common ancestor, according to the genealogical research, of #82072, #80570, and #270111. Jesse Starks has also been reported to have been a son of Zerubabel. Genealogical research suggests #137905 is a descendant of Jesse Starks; a different son of Zerubabel.  #137905 is a perfect match to #82072, #80570, and #27011 over the H25 haplotype, suggesting all four are related to each other and most likely share Zerubabel Starks as a common ancestor. Their results place them in Haplogroup R1b1b2 (shorthand notation is R-M269), thought to have originated in Western Europe.

All of the persons reported in Group 3a have been a perfect match to each other at all of the Markers compared. #82072, #80570, and #270111 were a perfect match to each other over the H37 haplotype. The resultant probability in their comparisons would be 99.99% they share a common ancestor who lived within the last 20 generations (or within Genealogical time). The genealogy of all three  indicates their most recent common ancestor was Reuben Starks [1791-????]. According to their genealogy, Reuben Starks would have lived 5 generations earlier. There is a 93.29% probability they share a common ancestor within the last 6 generations. They share Zerubabel as a common ancestor 6 generations back. The probability they share Zerubabel as a common ancestor within the last 7 Generations is 95.73%. However, #82072 and #270111 share William Marshall Starks [1809-1892] as a common ancestor who lived 4 generations earlier. William was a son of Reuben Starks [1791-????]. The probability they share William Marshall Starks [1809-1892] as a common ancestor within the last 5 Generations is 89.48%.   

#137905 was only tested over the H25 haplotype and is a perfect match with compared to #80570, #82072, and #270111. There is a 80.9% probability he shares a common ancestor with all three who lived within the last 7 generations. If #137905 had been tested over the H37 haplotype and was a perfect match, the probability would be 95.73%.

There is no Genealogical data at this time for #A624253. However, his perfect match to all of the other Group 3a members over those Markers that can be compared; suggests he is related  and probably shares Zerubabel as a common ancestor. 

G3a: Descendants of Zerubabel Starks [1760-1800] of Robertson County,  Tennessee

G3b: Maternal Descendants of Zerubabel Starks [1760-1800] of Robertson County,  Tennessee

 

Panels Panel 1 (1-12)

Panel 2 (13-25)

[See Marker 464e,f note after chart.]

Panel 3 (26-37)
Marker # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 - - 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

K
I
T
#

*
H
a
p
l
o

3
9
3

3
9
0

1
9

3
9
1

3
8
5
a

___

3
8
5
b

4
2
6

3
8
8

4
3
9

3
8
9
-
1

3
9
2

3
8
9
-
2

4
5
8

4
5
9
a

4
5
9
b

4
5
5

4
5
4

4
4
7

4
3
7

4
4
8

4
4
9

4
6
4
a

4
6
4
b

4
6
4
c

4
6
4
d

4
6
4
e

4
6
4
f

4
6
0

G
A
T
A
H
4

Y
C
A
I
I
a

Y
C
A
I
I
b

4
5
6

6
0
7

5
7
6

5
7
0

C
D
Y
a

C
D
Y
b

4
4
2

4
3
8

  G3 Modal 13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 13 30 16 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17 18     11 12 19 23 15 15 18 18 37 38 12 12

82072

G3a

R-M269

13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 13 30 16 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17 18     11 12 19 23 15 15 18 18 37 38 12 12
270111
G3a
R-M269 13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 13 30 16 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17 18     11 12 19 23 15 15 18 18 37 38 12 12

80570

G3a

R-M269 13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 13 30 16 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17 18     11 12 19 23 15 15 18 18 37 38 12 12

137905

G3a

R-M269 13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 13 30 16 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17 18                            

A624253

G3a

R1b 13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 14 13 30 16 - - 11 11 25 - 19 29 15 15 17 18     11 12 19 23 - - - - - - - 12

Note 1:

Numbers Starting with A were tested by Ancestry.com. The "-" indicates these markers were not available for comparison to the FTDNA markers used in Panels 2 & 3. [Marker 27: Subtract 11 from Ancestry.com value to be equivalent to FTDNA value.] [Marker 36: Subtract 5 from Ancestry.com value to be equivalent to FTDNA value.]

1111445
G3b
R-M269 12 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 30 18 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 28 15 15 17 17     11 11 19 23 17 15 17 15 36 41 12 12

1)

#111445 is a 1st cousin of #137905 in Group 3a. While he has the surname Stark, his Mother is a sister of the Father of #137905. Therefore, #111445, while not a direct male descendant of his Grandfather Stark;  will not match those in Group 3a although he is a descendant of Zerubabel Stark through his mother. According to the FTDNA database, over 37 markers, #111445 has a genetic distance of 1 from a person with the surname Terrell and a genetic distance of 4 from a person with the surname Hutchens; the only other surname matches reported by FTDNA with 4 or less mismatches over 37 markers.

 

[Top of Page]

Group 4. Descendants of Col. John Starke b. 1715 VA - d. Nov 1799 Hanover Co., VA

Those in Group 4 are descendants of Colonel John Starke of Hanover County, Virginia. Their test results place them in Haplogroup G. Between 75 and 100 million males worldwide are in Haplogroup G. In Europe, Haplogroup G is found in 4.88% of the male population on average throughout the continent. In the British Isles, Scandinavia, northern France, northern Germany, the Netherlands and the Baltic countries it is less common, e.g. Britain and Norway at 2%. Around 4% of Welsh men are in Haplogroup G. [Click HERE for more information on Haplogroup G]

#78032 and #N47628 were a perfect match over the H12 haplotype; resulting in a 87.07% probability they share a common ancestor within the last 20 generations.  #89006 and #149455 were a perfect match over the H37 haplotype; resulting in a 99.99% probability they share a common ancestor who lived within 20 generations. The H37 haplotype comparison of #78032 and #149455 reveals they have three mismatches and a genetic distance of 3. There is a 96.97% probability they share a common ancestor who lived within 20 generations. This comparison confirms #89006 is related to #78032 and #N47628; and all members of Group 4 have a common ancestor who lived within 20 generations.

The genealogy of #149455 has been confirmed to John Wyatt Starke [1796-?1860?] but the genealogical connection to Col. John Starke had not been found. Click HERE to see an Article that connects John Wyatt Starke to Col. John Starke.

There is some evidence Col. John Starke is a descendent of Thomas Starke [b. 1689 in Queen & King Co., VA]  and Wilmouthe Williams. The Jorgenson and Harris publication reports some of his descendants moved to Hanover Co., VA and others moved to Fairfield Co., SC.  

 

Panels Panel 1 (1-12)

Panel 2 (13-25)

[See Marker 464e,f note after chart.]

Panel 3 (26-37)
Marker # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 - - 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

K
I
T
#

*
H
a
p
l
o

3
9
3

3
9
0

1
9

3
9
1

3
8
5
a

___

3
8
5
b

4
2
6

3
8
8

4
3
9

3
8
9
-
1

3
9
2

3
8
9
-
2

4
5
8

4
5
9
a

4
5
9
b

4
5
5

4
5
4

4
4
7

4
3
7

4
4
8

4
4
9

4
6
4
a

4
6
4
b

4
6
4
c

4
6
4
d

4
6
4
e

4
6
4
f

4
6
0

G
A
T
A
H
4

Y
C
A
I
I
a

Y
C
A
I
I
b

4
5
6

6
0
7

5
7
6

5
7
0

C
D
Y
a

C
D
Y
b

4
4
2

4
3
8

G4 Modal G-M201 14 22 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 30 19 9 9 11 11 23 16 20 30 13 13 13 14     11 12 20 21 15 13 17 18 33 39 11 10
78032 G-M201 14 22 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 30 19 9 9 11 11 23 16 20 30 13 13 13 13     11 12 20 21 15 13 17 18 33 38 11 10
214358 G-M201 14 22 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 30 19 9 9 11 11 23 16 20 30 12 13 13 14     11 12 20 21 15 13 17 18 33 39 11 10

N47628

G-M201

14 22 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 30 19 9 9 11 11 23 16 20 30 13 13 13 14     11 12 20 21 15 14 17 18 33 39 11 10
89006 G-M201 13 22 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 30 19 9 9 11 11 23 16 20 30 13 13 13 14     11 12 20 21 15 13 17 18 33 39 11 10
149455 G-M201 13 22 15 10 13 14 11 12 11 12 11 30 19 9 9 11 11 23 16 20 30 13 13 13 14     11 12 20 21 15 13 17 18 33 39 11 10

 

[Top of Page]

Group 6: Descendants of Old Georgia Stark/Starks/Starke Families
  

Genetic results for participants who report lineage from Georgia ancestors, will be placed in Group 6; unless their genetic results clearly compare favorably with other Groups in the Project. Subgroups 6a and 6b have member results for two families in Georgia who clearly are not related within Genealogical Time. [Defined as the time period after 1400 to the present.] When #74591 and #232326 are compared over 25 markers, there is a Genetic Distance of 11 and a 1.96% probability they share a common ancestor within 24 generations; clearly indicating these families are not related within genealogical nor to members in other Groups in the project. With only three participants tested at this time, it is clear the Stark families of Georgia have more complicated ancestry than previously thought. More participants from men with the surname Stark who descend from Georgia Stark families will need to be tested to have a clear understanding of their ancestry.

 

Group 6a: Georgia Descendants Thomas Starke, born 1724 in Virginia

#74591 and #89996  are first cousins, sharing Buell Stark as their grandfather. As expected, they were a perfect match over the H12 haplotype. They are descendants of Thomas Starke [1724-1794] whose place of birth in Virginia is not known with certainty. His entire family moved to Wilkes County, Georgia from Charlotte County, Virginia in about 1780; where most of his children were born. Before these results were available and members of Group 4 were tested, it was believed Members of Group 4 and Subgroup 6a would have a common ancestor who lived within genealogical time. [Defined as the time period after 1400 to the present.] However, the genetic results revealed they did not belong to the same Haplogroup. Members of Subgroup 6a are in Haplogroup R-M269. Members of Group 4 are in Haplogroup G. As expected, there was a zero percent probability members of Group 4 and Subgroup 6a could have shared a common ancestor within genealogical time. Because Members of Group 4 are in Haplogroup G and Members of Subgroup 6a are in Haplogroup R, their first common ancestor would have been the progenitor of Haplogroup F who lived about 45,000 years earlier. [Contact Rep: Diane Stark Sanfilippo]

 

Group 6b: Georgia Descendants of Benjamin Stark/Starks, born 1774 in Greenville, Augusta County, Virginia

#232326 is a representative of a previously unknown early American Stark Family in our project, believed to be descendants of one Benjamin Stark/Starks born in Greenville, Augusta County, Virginia in the year 1774. #232326 is clearly not a descendant of James Stark of Stafford County, VA, nor of Dr. Richard Starke of York County, VA, nor other Stark/Starks families originating in Virginia. Benjamin's son, Benton Stark/Starks was most likely born in about 1797 in either Wake County or Orange County, North Carolina ,and, after his marriage to Nancy Goodson in 1825, moved to Clarke County, Georgia and later to nearby Jackson County, Georgia.

 

Panels Panel 1 (1-12)

Panel 2 (13-25)

[See Marker 464e,f note after chart.]

Panel 3 (26-37)
Marker # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 - - 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

K
I
T
#

*
H
a
p
l
o

3
9
3

3
9
0

1
9

3
9
1

3
8
5
a

___

3
8
5
b

4
2
6

3
8
8

4
3
9

3
8
9
-
1

3
9
2

3
8
9
-
2

4
5
8

4
5
9
a

4
5
9
b

4
5
5

4
5
4

4
4
7

4
3
7

4
4
8

4
4
9

4
6
4
a

4
6
4
b

4
6
4
c

4
6
4
d

4
6
4
e

4
6
4
f

4
6
0

G
A
T
A
H
4

Y
C
A
I
I
a

Y
C
A
I
I
b

4
5
6

6
0
7

5
7
6

5
7
0

C
D
Y
a

C
D
Y
b

4
4
2

4
3
8

74591

R-M269

13 24 14 10 12 15 13 12 12 13 13 29 17 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 16 18                            
89996

R-M269

13 24 14 10 12 15 13 12 12 13 13 29                                                      

1)

When the H25 Haplotype of #74591 is compared to the other Members belonging to the R-M269 Haplogroup, there is a genetic distance of 5 or greater. With a genetic distance of 5, there is a 26.93% probability they share a common ancestor who lived within the last 20 generations; and a 41.56% probability within the last 24 generations. The probability is low they share a common ancestor with any other Members of the Project within genealogical time. #74591 and #89996  are first cousins, sharing Buell Stark as their grandfather. As expected, they were a perfect match over the H12 haplotype.

 

Panels Panel 1 (1-12)

Panel 2 (13-25)

[See Marker 464e,f note after chart.]

Panel 3 (26-37)
Marker # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 - - 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

K
I
T
#

*
H
a
p
l
o

3
9
3

3
9
0

1
9

3
9
1

3
8
5
a

___

3
8
5
b

4
2
6

3
8
8

4
3
9

3
8
9
-
1

3
9
2

3
8
9
-
2

4
5
8

4
5
9
a

4
5
9
b

4
5
5

4
5
4

4
4
7

4
3
7

4
4
8

4
4
9

4
6
4
a

4
6
4
b

4
6
4
c

4
6
4
d

4
6
4
e

4
6
4
f

4
6
0

G
A
T
A
H
4

Y
C
A
I
I
a

Y
C
A
I
I
b

4
5
6

6
0
7

5
7
6

5
7
0

C
D
Y
a

C
D
Y
b

4
4
2

4
3
8

1232326 R-M269 13 23 14 11 11 15 12 10 12 14 13 31 18 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 29 15 15 17 17     11 11 19 23 16 15 16 17 37 37 12 12

1)

Over 37 markers, #232326 has a genetic distance of 13 or greater when compared to other members of the project. When compared to #82072, a descendant of Zerubabel Starks (Group 3), the genetic distance is 13 and there is a 10.26% probability they share a common ancestor within 20 generations. Therefore, they could not have shared a common ancestor within genealogical time (defined as after surnames were established in the 13th & 14th centuries in Western Europe), nor within thousands of years.

 

 

[Top of Page]

Group 8: Other Haplogroups / No Genetic Matches

Group 8 is comprised of members with the surname Stark who do not match members in other groups, nor match each other. They have been organized into the Primary Haplogroups. The project objectives for this group is to find genetic matches. Any combination of Comparisons of members in this group results in genetic distances suggesting their common ancestor lived many thousands of years earlier than the present. Differences in the Primary Haplogroups further suggests a common ancestor who lived greater than 10,000 years earlier.

FTDNA and Ancestry.com use the same H25 haplotype reported in Panel 1 and Panel 2. Some kits do not report Ancestry results in  Markers 14 & 15 in Panel 2. Five of the markers in Panel 3 tested by FTDNA are not tested by Ancestry.com. Will find this in Kits starting with "A" tested by Ancestry.com. The "-" indicates these markers were not available for comparison to the FTDNA markers used in Panels 2 & 3. [Marker 27: Subtract 11 from Ancestry.com value to be equivalent to FTDNA value.] [Marker 36: Subtract 5 from Ancestry.com value to be equivalent to FTDNA value.]

Those in this group reporting their earliest known ancestors lived in Germany or the Germanic States, have a more in-depth analysis at the web page entitled Group 8: Y-DNA Analysis Stark Descendants of German Heritage

 

Group 8 Subgroups

Group 8e: Haplogroup E / Group 8f: Haplogroup F / Group 8g: Haplogroup G / Group 8i: Haplogroup I / Group 8r: Haplogroup R

 

For more detail on individual participants in these SubGroups of Group 8, click on their Kit Number.

 

Group 8e: Haplogroup E / No Genetic Matches

Panels Panel 1 (1-12)

Panel 2 (13-25)

[See Marker 464e,f note after chart.]

Panel 3 (26-37)
Marker # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 - - 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

K
I
T
#

*
H
a
p
l
o

3
9
3

3
9
0

1
9

3
9
1

3
8
5
a

___

3
8
5
b

4
2
6

3
8
8

4
3
9

3
8
9
-
1

3
9
2

3
8
9
-
2

4
5
8

4
5
9
a

4
5
9
b

4
5
5

4
5
4

4
4
7

4
3
7

4
4
8

4
4
9

4
6
4
a

4
6
4
b

4
6
4
c

4
6
4
d

4
6
4
e

4
6
4
f

4
6
0

G
A
T
A
H
4

Y
C
A
I
I
a

Y
C
A
I
I
b

4
5
6

6
0
7

5
7
6

5
7
0

C
D
Y
a

C
D
Y
b

4
4
2

4
3
8

173094

E-L117 13 24 13 10 16 18 11 12 11 13 11 30 15 9 9 11 11 26 14 19 32 14 16 17 17     9 11 19 21 15 12 16 18 31 33 11 10
284968 E-L542 13 24 13 10 17 18 11 12 12 13 11 31 15 9 9 11 11 26 14 20 34 13 16 16 17     9 10 19 21 17 12 17 19 31 35 10 10

A159571

E1b1b 13 24 13 10 16 18 11 12 11 13 11 30 16 - - 11 11 26 - 19 33 14 15 17 17     9 11 19 21 - - - - - - - 10

Group 8f: Haplogroup F / No Genetic Matches

Panels Panel 1 (1-12)

Panel 2 (13-25)

[See Marker 464e,f note after chart.]

Panel 3 (26-37)
Marker # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 - - 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

K
I
T
#

*
H
a
p
l
o

3
9
3

3
9
0

1
9

3
9
1

3
8
5
a

___

3
8
5
b

4
2
6

3
8
8

4
3
9

3
8
9
-
1

3
9
2

3
8
9
-
2

4
5
8

4
5
9
a

4
5
9
b

4
5
5

4
5
4

4
4
7

4
3
7

4
4
8

4
4
9

4
6
4
a

4
6
4
b

4
6
4
c

4
6
4
d

4
6
4
e

4
6
4
f

4
6
0

G
A
T
A
H
4

Y
C
A
I
I
a

Y
C
A
I
I
b

4
5
6

6
0
7

5
7
6

5
7
0

C
D
Y
a

C
D
Y
b

4
4
2

4
3
8

149294

F-M89 14 22 16 11 12 13 11 12 12 13 11 32 17 8 10 11 11 23 14 20 31 11 11 12 14 15 15 10 10 17 17 15 13 18 16 34 35 12 11

Group 8g: Haplogroup G / No Genetic Matches

Panels Panel 1 (1-12)

Panel 2 (13-25)

[See Marker 464e,f note after chart.]

Panel 3 (26-37)
Marker # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 - - 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

K
I
T
#

*
H
a
p
l
o

3
9
3

3
9
0

1
9

3
9
1

3
8
5
a

___

3
8
5
b

4
2
6

3
8
8

4
3
9

3
8
9
-
1

3
9
2

3
8
9
-
2

4
5
8

4
5
9
a

4
5
9
b

4
5
5

4
5
4

4
4
7

4
3
7

4
4
8

4
4
9

4
6
4
a

4
6
4
b

4
6
4
c

4
6
4
d

4
6
4
e

4
6
4
f

4
6
0

G
A
T
A
H
4

Y
C
A
I
I
a

Y
C
A
I
I
b

4
5
6

6
0
7

5
7
6

5
7
0

C
D
Y
a

C
D
Y
b

4
4
2

4
3
8

173510

G-P15

14 22 15 10 12 14 11 12 12 12 11 29 20 9 9 11 11 22 16 20 27 12 14 14 14     10 10 19 20 15 13 17 17 36 41 10 10

Group 8i: Haplogroup I / No Genetic Matches

 Within Europe, several populations are distinguished by having a significantly lower frequency of Haplogroup I than the surrounding populations: these depressions in the frequency of Haplogroup I distinguish the populations of Italy and Switzerland from Germany and Sardinia, Iberia from southern France and Normandy, Greece, Albania and the Slavic peoples, and the Baltic Latvians from the Finnic Estonians. In all these areas, Haplogroup I populations are small relative to the dominant Haplogroups in Europe (R1b in Western Europe, R1a1 in Eastern Europe, and N in Northeastern Europe).  [Click HERE for more information on Haplogroup I]

*At this time, no members of Haplogroup I share a common ancestor; the exception being #A775689 and #148040; Father and Son who are a perfect match over the Markers that can be compared.

Panels Panel 1 (1-12)

Panel 2 (13-25)

[See Marker 464e,f note after chart.]

Panel 3 (26-37)
Marker # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 - - 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

K
I
T
#

*
H
a
p
l
o

3
9
3

3
9
0

1
9

3
9
1

3
8
5
a

___

3
8
5
b

4
2
6

3
8
8

4
3
9

3
8
9
-
1

3
9
2

3
8
9
-
2

4
5
8

4
5
9
a

4
5
9
b

4
5
5

4
5
4

4
4
7

4
3
7

4
4
8

4
4
9

4
6
4
a

4
6
4
b

4
6
4
c

4
6
4
d

4
6
4
e

4
6
4
f

4
6
0

G
A
T
A
H
4

Y
C
A
I
I
a

Y
C
A
I
I
b

4
5
6

6
0
7

5
7
6

5
7
0

C
D
Y
a

C
D
Y
b

4
4
2

4
3
8

*148040 I-M253 13 23 15 10 13 14 11 14 12 12 11 28 14 8 9 8 11 24 16 20 30 12 15 16 16     10 10 19 21 14 14 15 18 35 35 12 10
*A775689 I1 13 23 15 10 13 14 11 14 12 12 11 28 14 8 9 8 11 24 16 20 30 12 15 16 16     10 10 19 21 14 - - - - - 12 10

153149

I-M253 13 22 14 10 13 15 11 14 11 12 11 28 16 8 9 8 11 21 16 20 26 12 14 15 15     11 9 19 21 15 15 16 19 35 39 13 10

A159521

I1a 13 23 14 10 13 14 11 14 12 12 11 28 15 8 9 8 11 23 16 20 28 12 13 15 16     10 10 19 21 14 - - - - - 12 10

A319430

I1b 13 23 16 11 14 15 11 13 13 12 11 29 18 9 9 11 11 25 15 21 28 11 16 16 16     9 10 19 21 15 - - - - - 12 10

N24725

I-P37

13 24 16 10 14 14 11 13 13 13 11 32 17 8 10 10 11 25 15 20 33 12 14 15 15                            

202943

I-CTS616 14 23 16 11 15 15 11 13 11 13 12 28 16 8 10 11 11 27 15 21 28 11 13 14 15     11 9 19 19 17 16 18 19 33 34 13 10

Group 8r: Haplogroup R / No Genetic Matches

Panels Panel 1 (1-12)

Panel 2 (13-25)

[See Marker 464e,f note after chart.]

Panel 3 (26-37)
Marker # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 - - 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

K
I
T
#

*
H
a
p
l
o

3
9
3

3
9
0

1
9

3
9
1

3
8
5
a

___

3
8
5
b

4
2
6

3
8
8

4
3
9

3
8
9
-
1

3
9
2

3
8
9
-
2

4
5
8

4
5
9
a

4
5
9
b

4
5
5

4
5
4

4
4
7

4
3
7

4
4
8

4
4
9

4
6
4
a

4
6
4
b

4
6
4
c

4
6
4
d

4
6
4
e

4
6
4
f

4
6
0

G
A
T
A
H
4

Y
C
A
I
I
a

Y
C
A
I
I
b

4
5
6

6
0
7

5
7
6

5
7
0

C
D
Y
a

C
D
Y
b

4
4
2

4
3
8

140291

R-M512 13 26 16 10 11 14 12 12 11 13 11 29 16 9 10 11 11 23 14 20 30 12 12 15 15 15 16 11 11 19 23 17 16 18 19 35 40 12 11

228697

R-Z280 13 25 16 10 11 15 12 12 10 13 11 29 15 9 10 11 11 24 14 20 31 13 14 15 15     11 12 19 23 16 15 18 17 34 39 12 11
N92648 R-M512 13 24 16 10 11 15 12 12 10 13 11 29                                                      

180764

R-M269 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 13 12 12 13 29 17 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 16 16 17     10 11 20 23 16 15 17 19 35 37 12 12
258637 R-M269 13 24 14 10 11 15 12 12 11 13 13 29 16 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 31 15 15 15 17     11 11 19 23 16 15 16 17 36 38 12  12
283416 R-P312 13 23 14 11 11 14 12 12 11 12 13 28 16 9 10 11 11 26 15 20 30 15 15 16 17     10 11 19 23 15 15 19 19 32 36 12 12
284860 R-M269 13 24 14 10 10 14 12 12 11 13 13 29 18 9 9 11 11 25 15 19 28 15 15 16 17     11 11 19 23 15 15 18 18 36 37 12 12
N91230 R-M269 13 25 15 11 11 11 12 12 13 13 13 29                                                      
175273 R-M269 13 24 14 11 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 17 9 10 11 11 24 14 18 27 14 15 16 16     10 10 19 23 15 15 19 18 35 36 12 12

76345

R-M269

13 24 14 10 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 18 9 10 9 11 25 15 19 32 15 15 15 17                            

171830

R-P312 13 25 14 10 11 14 12 12 12 13 13 29 16 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 30 13 15 17 17     11 10 19 23 16 15 18 18 38 38 12 12
249627 R-P312 13 24 14 11 10 14 12 12 13 14 13 30 18 9 10 11 11 25 15 19 30 15 16 17 17     11 11 19 23 17 16 17 17 38 38 12 12
334877 R-M269 13 23 14 10 8 14 12 12 11 13 13 28 17 9 10 11 11 26 15 19 29 15 15 16 16     11 11 19 23 16 15 20 16 36 42 12 12

 

[Top of Page]

Notes from Family Tree DNA:

1)

Haplogroups in red have been predicted by Family Tree DNA based on unambiguous results in the individuals' personal page. Please note that for any predicted results we see no reason for ordering a SNP test to confirm the Haplogroup. If a blank space is in the HAPLO field then we feel that the comparative results are not clear and unambiguous and if the kit holder wants to know their SNP with 100% confidence they may consider ordering a SNP confirmation test.

2)

DYS 19 is also known as DYS 394.

3)

DYS 464 multi-copy Markers. The genetic distance for DYS464 copies a, b, c, & d (Markers 22, 23, 24, 25) will always be 1 in comparisons when there is an allele value difference at one or more of these markers. In the example comparison that follows, the allele values did not determine the genetic distance. The genetic distance of one was determined because all of the 464 copies were not a perfect match. 

464e Marker Note: FTDNA reports the following: "Markers 464a-d are copies found at different locations on the Y chromosome. In about 1.5% of the test subjects, more than 4 copies will be present, representing Markers 464e, 464f, 464g. If those additional Markers are found, they are considered a one step mutation."

4)

It is obvious from our observation of 1000's of samples that some markers change or mutate at a faster rate than others. While that actual 'faster rate' has not yet been definitively calculated, not all markers should be treated the same for evaluation purposes.

5)

The markers in red have shown a faster mutation rate then the average, and therefore these markers are very helpful at splitting lineages into sub sets, or branches, within your family tree.

6)

Explained another way, if you match exactly on all of the markers except for one or a few of the markers we have determined mutate more quickly, then despite the mutation this mismatch only slightly decreases the probability of two people in your surname group who match 11/12 or even 23/25 of not sharing a recent common ancestor.

7)

Click HERE for Family Tree DNA information on DYS Markers 389-1 and 389-2. When a comparison yields a difference at both of these markers, they can represent a mutation of 1 rather than 2 if the mutation is plus 1 at both markers or - 1 at both markers. Otherwise, it is a mutation of 2 markers.

 

[Top of Page]

Disclaimer

The project administrator and webmaster is yours truly, Clovis LaFleur.  I am a volunteer and receive no financial remuneration of any kind from Family Tree DNA, nor am I one of their "web affiliates" (i.e., I don't profit from "click throughs").  I'm retired and genealogy is my hobby and is not my business. As a Project Administrator and webmaster I am not responsible for the genealogy material provided by members nor am I responsible for the Test Results publicly reported by FTDNA. The analysis of results prepared and presented by me on this web site are based on my interpretation of the Y-DNA results published and the genealogy provided by the project members. Discussion of my analysis with members and others will always be welcome.