Search billions of records on Ancestry.com
   


Miscellaneous
Email Address
Queries
Site Ratings
Monthly Mailing List
Friends of the CCFGPW
General Index

Site Ratings

Feel free to Rate this site. Your survey will be included in the results below.


How to Read the Results:

The results of this survey are shown below. The overall rating by each respondent is noted on the left with a bar graph that shows the rating against a percentage axis. A good rating will show a gold bar that extends toward the right; a poor rating will show a gold bar nearer to the 0 mark. All n/a (not applicable) responses have been given a 10% credit (which may distort the overall rating).

To understand the individual components of the survey, a second bar graph has been added. Each question has been graded according to the responses provided, where green represents approval and red represents disapproval. The questions that were used to measure this site include:

  1. This website was easy to find.
  2. The website was easy to navigate - I found things easily.
  3. The website had interesting content.
  4. I would recommend this site to other researchers.
  5. I liked the graphics and pictures used in this website.
  6. The website has useful data that can be easily retrieved.
  7. The website was well-researched and has reference material.
  8. I learned a lot about the Cullinans and Cullinanes.
  9. I learned something about my ancestors at this website.
  10. The website surpassed my expectations.
Finally, each respondent was given the ability to add comments.

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:
This is a test only.

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:
confused! never knew if my posting was received od went to never never land.

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:
The feedback is poor. I e-mailed you a long time ago, and did not get a response.

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:
I enjoyed the site alot learned abit about where I come from and appreciate the effort you have put into the site

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:
Thank you for so much work. However; navigation is very, very difficult if you are not familiar with the overall organization that I still don't quite understand. Perhaps an explanation of the organization on the start page might be helpful. The genealogical plates give sources only rather that any trees that may have been submitted. There is a wealth of information and sources, but one really has to work at it to sort it out. I would like to add comments or corrections to specific pages rather than to a central location. Many pages have beautiful and artistic backgrounds and overall the artistic quality is unique.

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:
Thanks, Great web-site! Charles Justin Cullinane USA, son of Charles Cullinane USA, son of Michael Cullinane (County Cork).

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:
Thank you for all the hard word put into this site. It has given me an insight into the family I had no idea about. It is only recently that I found out I was a Cullinane, my surname is Caldon, a variant on Cullinane written by a Polish priest in the 1800s. Once again, thanks for a great site. Cathy Duhig nee Caldon

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:
Your site is very nice, compliment! from http://www.visasupport.org

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:
The site's good features are too numerous to list, but here are some constructive criticisms: The "Mini-census" was missing although the page indicated it was below. Although you have an index for names, (and topic links on the main page,) and although the search features are quite useful, there seems to be no easily understandable site index, so the hierarchy of organization of the site can be understood, and clearly visualized. It's therefore difficult to determine if I've followed all the links. The comments section has many duplications; probably from people hitting a button numerous times while not waiting for the comment to upload. You might include a direction to only hit the button once. The comment section also sometimes seems to not always upload the text properly. Larger comments that look like links only bring you to some type of "mail-merge" form. It seems to happen infrequently, and may be an error in the design of the code that runs this section. Blank comment postings are probably the result of the help button being too close to the "submit" button. The section should also be pruned of the blanks, and the duplicates. The Genealogy Plates in some instances, indicate they show the ancestry of the named person. Some only contain the name of the person, and references to source notes - but not the actual source note text - the text of the source would be quite useful in order to attempt to assess it's likely accuracy. If there was a way to add user input and additions to these plates, you might get a better picture of the families, and how family members are related. For example, Rootsweb - World Connect has family trees where the user can put a "post-em" note providing additional information to the tree owner. See an example for Patrick Cullinan here: http://wc.rootsweb.com/cgi- bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=new_england&id=I35391 Thanks again for your fine project, Joseph L. McCann

--------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:
I just got on this site today (8/13/2007) and was overwhelmed by all the information and the preciseness of it. I am still muddling through and just fascinated. Ratings I'm sure will be much higher once I've finished the entire site. Thanks so much for your dedication to the site. Ronnie Lorentz, daughter-in-law of Rita Ellen Cullinan, who was granddaughter of Lot Cullinan, born in Ireland.

. --------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:
I just got on this site today (8/13/2007) and was overwhelmed by all the information and the preciseness of it. I am still muddling through and just fascinated. Ratings I'm sure will be much higher once I've finished the entire site. Thanks so much for your dedication to the site. Ronnie Lorentz, daughter-in-law of Rita Ellen Cullinan, who was granddaughter of Lot Cullinan, born in Ireland.

. --------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:

. --------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Comments:

.