|
|
|
23rd April 1920 The chairman, addressing the prisoner, said that it was his painful duty to remand her in custody for a week. The charge was a most serious one. Inspector Wayman said he had been advised by Superintendent Honeybone not to accept bail in the case. Bail was accordingly not allowed. The prisoner appeared in Court with bruised and blacked features, while blood-stains were visible on her hair and clothes. The facts of the unfortunate happening will, of course, be detailed when the case is fully gone into. The injury was such that, though there was considerable loss of blood through the wound on the neck, neither of the main arteries were severed, and it was anticipated that he would recover. Burgham had been well known as a colliery blacksmith. He had been employed at the Lydney and Crump Meadow Colliery at the Bilson Yard during the past few weeks, but otherwise had, it is said, been out of work for some months. He had an idea he was suffering from a complaint, but the doctors said it was unfounded. This seems also to have worried the wife. On Sunday night the husband was sitting in his chair, reading a paper when it is alleged she went behind him and drew a razor across the back of his neck. A struggle ensued, in which blood flowed freely and the man eventually obtained possession of the razor and threw it into a tub. Several neighbours heard the noise and went to the house taking all possible steps suggesting themselves under the tragic circumstances of the moment. The clothes of the husband and wife were covered with blood marks and blood was also about the room and in the garden. The police were sent for and PC James was promptly in attendance, arriving at the house at about 10.30. The inspector was at the time off duty, but he hurried to the scene as soon as he could be acquainted of the occurrence, and took the action referred to in the evidence given above. We understand there are several children. On enquiry on Thursday morning we were informed that Thomas Burgham was progressing favourably and there was every hope of his recovery.
April 30th 1920
May 7th 1920 A naturally delicate woman, the prisoner seemed to be suffering much from nervousness. She was accompanied to Cinderford by two wardresses. Inspector Wayman asked that the prisoner be further remanded till Friday May 7th, when he said the case would be fully gone into. He added that Mr Thomas Burgham was considerably improved. In making the remand, Mr Hale said that Mr Thomas Burgham had approached him that morning, asking if he could go to work. He (Mr Hale) advised him not to do so, seeing that he was but convalescent. It would be hard for him to work after such suffering. The accused was accordingly taken to Littledean gaol. | ||
| Click here to continue with Article Seven | ||
| Send us an | ![]() | |