Search billions of records on Ancestry.com
   
This line should be corrected according to the following email:

From:  Deborah Sweet
To:  Bonnie Bunce
Subject:   De Courtenay Line
Date:  Mon, 15 Sep 2003

While perusing the tree you have on the royal ancestry of the Loomis family, done by David Martin, I noticed an error which you might want to correct.

Renaud De Courtenay [185], b. ca. 1125, father of Reginald De Courtenay by an unknown first wife is not the son of Ermengarde de Nevers & Milo de Courtenay of France, according to Frederick Lewis Weis, Ancestral Roots of Certain/Sixty American Colonists... (1992) Weis has this to say about this mistaken connection on p. 121, line 138, #23 for Ermengarde De Nevers: m. Milo (or Miles) De Courtenay.  [They did have a son Renaud, but apparently this is not the same Renaud as the one in England.]  Weis says:

(See line 107-24 for their son Renaud de Courtenay, who in Ezra Cleveland's A Genealogical History of the Noble and Illustrious Family of Courtenay, (1735), pp. 114-115, is identified as Reginald de Courtenay."  (Weis's ref. #24, line 138, [our Reginald whom I mentioned above].  Weis continues— "The story is told that the great pos­sessions in France of Renaud de Courtenay (a man of high social rank and described in personal terms as in effect a glorified bandit) were seized about 1150 by King Louis VII who granted them to his own younger brother, Pierre [de Courtenay] (ances­tor of the French Courtenays), with Renaud's daughter Elizabeth, in marriage, and that Renaud then appeared in England as a minor functionary to the English Court with a small manor and another family.  LINE BREAKS HERE.  Although Old-CP III 102 states that the alleged connection between the English and French families has not been established, CP IV 317 INEXPLICABLY revived the connection.  Herbert F. Seversmith, The Ances­try of Roger Ludlow pp. 2419-2424, in addition to demonstrating the LACK of contemporary EVI­DENCE, points out the chronological, personal char­acter, and social status difficulties with this identification."

This line was actually corrected in Weis by David Faris.  Renaud De Courtenay is my 28th Great Grand, for your refer­ence.  Just thought you'd like to know.  Thanks for taking the time to check this out.