1
Peter
Pat(t)erson was born after 1724. This birth date is deduced
from the fact that on 11 Dec 1777 Peter appealed a tour of military
duty based on hardship, rather than because he was over the age of
53--the age after which able-bodied men were not required to serve.
(Egles’ Notes and Queries, Third Series, Vol. 1, IX, p.
42) And, since his wife, Agnes McCormick, was born abt. 1733
(according to her headstone in Rehoboth Presbyterian cemetery in
Belle Vernon, Fayette Co., PA; see picture this chapter), we
might suppose Peter’s birth date to be close to that of his (first?)
wife. We know Peter died abt. 1821 (See Peter’s will in
this chapter; it was probated 1821) and we know that, according
to Ellis, (History of Fayette County, Pennsylvania, p.
617) Peter died “at more than 90 years of age”-- all of which
leads us to a more refined guess that Peter was probably
born between 1725 and 1730. (If he were born after
1730, he would not have been more than ninety years old at his
death, as Ellis asserts.)
At this time we do not know where
Peter was born; he may have been born in Co. Antrim. At
this time we also do not know the names of Peter’s parents, though
clues point to Peter being the son of a James and Mary
Patterson. (Since these last two statements contain
conjecture, they are further explored in a separate chapter; see
“Who was Peter’s Father?”-- Chapter VIII of this
paper.)
On April 1, 1755, in the
Paxtang (Paxton) Twp. meeting house, Lancaster Co. [later Dauphin
Co.], PA, Peter married Agnes McCormick. * (Register
of Marriages and Baptism Performed by Rev. John Cuthbertson
1751-1791 ed. by S. Helen Fields; originally published 1934 in
Washington D.C. and reprinted 2001 by Heritage Books, Bowie, MD.; p.
11)
Agnes McCormick was b. abt. 1733
and she died 1807 in Washington Twp., Fayettte Co., PA.**.
(Birth date calculated from headstone information at Rehoboth
Presbyterian Cemetery: “died 1807, age
74”.)
Peter “Paterson” is listed as father of the
following children (all as listed in baptism records of
Rev. John Cuthbertson; source previously
cited), which children agree with
those listed in his will (excepting dau. Agnes, who predeceased her
father):
1.
James Paterson, bapt. 2 Aug 1756 Pequea meeting house, Lancaster
Co., PA
2.
Thomas Paterson, bapt. 11 June 1758, Middle Octoraro, Lancaster Co.,
PA
3.
John Paterson, bapt. 8 June 1760, Paxtang meeting house, Lancaster
Co., PA
4.
Agnes Paterson, bapt. 5 Sept, 1762, Muddy Run meeting house,
Lancaster Co., PA
5.
Mary Paterson, bapt. 7 Apr 1765 in Paxtang meeting house, Lancaster
Co., PA
*The marriage recorded was of “Peter Peters” to “Agnes
McCormick”. Cuthbertson often used abbreviations, and his
spelling of the surname “Paterson” varied wildly. For example,
he recorded the marriage of “Han. Peterson” to James Mitchel on 14
Dec 1769. This “Han. Peterson” is undoubtedly the daughter of
Peter Patterson of Drumore Twp., Lancaster Co., PA; Peter Patterson
of Drumore’s will was proved 1786 and listed daughter “Hannah, wife
of James Mitchel”. (Lancaster Co. will abstracts on-line at
rootsweb.com)
** Vol. XIX, Baptisms 1701-1746, First Presbyterian
Church, Philadelphia, p. 299, shows “June 2, 1735 – Agnes, born 20
Aprl. past, daughter of John McCormick.” The dates don’t quite
work, but it’s worth a mention. Maybe this record is of the birth of
Peter’s wife—maybe not. It is also worth mentioning that in Verkus’
Compendium of American Genealogy, Vol. 6, p. 143 (or, rather,
a Patterson & Pattison Family publication transcription
of same), is listed a Peter Patterson who abt. 1756 m. “Agnes
McCormick (1723-1807).” See, in this chapter, the photo of Agnes’
grave in Rehoboth Presbyterian Cemetery where her headstone says
“died 1807, age 74.” This makes Agnes b. abt. 1733, not 1723
as (allegedly) in Verkus. Must be a typo—whether by Verkus or
by the submitter to the Patterson & Pattison publication, I
cannot say.
2
No birth or baptism record for a son named
Peter has been found. It does seem odd that Peter did not have a
son named after himself. According to “Scotch-Irish”
naming patterns observed pretty rigously at that time, the first son
was named after the father’s father; the second son after the
mother’s father; and the third son after the father. According
to the above baptism records, Peter’s third son was named John,
rather than Peter, as one might expect. Was there possibly a
son named Peter, born abt. 1759, between Thomas and John? If
so, did this son Peter die before he was baptized? Could this
explain why there is no baptism record for a son named Peter and
also why our Peter does not name a son Peter in his will?
I must mention one other possibility. If Peter
were born in 1724 (the earliest year of our estimated range of
years), then he could have married a woman prior to
marrying Agnes—say abt. 1745 (when he was about 21 years of age))
and he could have had three children between 1746 and1751,
at which point his theoretical 1st wife could have died.
In this hypothetical scenario, the third child of Peter and his
(theoretical) 1st wife could have been a son named Peter. It is true
that Rev. Cuthbertson did not come to America until 1751, and until
that time the “Covenanters” in America had no minister to attend to
them, so there may not have been any baptism records of any
Covenanter children prior to 1751. Should future researchers
find record of a Peter Patterson born between about 1746 and 1751
and cannot determine who the father of this Peter was, they should
keep “our” Peter in mind.
I must also briefly mention the possibility
that, if Peter had a wife before he married Agnes McCormick, then
the name of this (theoretical) 1st wife is not known to me;
therefore Peter could have married Ann Montgomery, as was
stated by Ms. Espy in the D.A.R. magazine piece quoted
above. However, Ms. Espy does not seem to me to be a
credible source of information about Paxtang Pattersons. She had the
wrong names for the spouses of all but one of Peter’s siblings; she
did not name Peter’s sister Mary; and she erroneously claimed that
there was a Peter “Sr.” living in Paxtang Twp. who was old enough to
have had four sons who were Revolutionary War soliders (William,
James, Peter and Robert). At any rate, Ms. Espy’s incorrect
information regarding Pattersons of Paxtang seems to be the source
upon which incorrect D.A.R. lineages are based—lineages which claim
that the father of the Mary Patterson who married George Espy was a
Peter “Jr.” who was son of a Peter “Sr. and Eleanor (Lytle)
Patterson of Paxtang. We must reiterate: the Mary Patterson
who married Revolutionary War soldier George Espy, was daughter of
Peter and Agnes (McCormick) Patterson. This will be definitively
proven below.
Another piece of information that just won’t
“go away” is the fact that at in December 1777 Peter appealed his
upcoming tour of military duty, claiming hardship, and he stated
that he had “two sons already in the service at Camp in the seventh
class.” This information, combined with the information that a
Peter Patterson was listed in the “seventh class” on the “Class Roll
of Capt. McCoy’s Co., made out by Liet. Beaty [sic], the Capt. being
Dead for the Years 1781 and 1782” (PA Archives, Series 3, Vol.
XXIII, p. 797)…well, it gives one pause. This Peter on
Capt. McCoy’s muster roll was not “our” Peter. Could this
soldier be “our” Peter’s son? Future researchers might investigate
where Capt. McCoy’s company was mustered, and find other Pattersons
in the “seventh class” on other muster rolls, and find out where
these companies were formed.
It’s worth a mention here that the “Peter
Patterson Jr.” who witnessed Peter’s will, written in 1818, was not
a son but a grandson. This “Peter Patterson Jr.” was son of
Peter’s
3
son James; Peter so states this
relationship in his will. (See transcription of Peter’s will at
end of this chapter)
Before proceeding to the other facts of our
Peter’s life, we should note here that the baptism dates given above
for Peter’s children may well be several years later than the
children’s actual birth dates. Rev. Cuthbertson covered a wide area.
S. Helen Fields, in the introduction to her book cited above, says
that Cuthbertson traveled over 70,000 miles during his
pastorate. He wasn’t necessarily available to baptize a child
within a few months or even within a few years of a child’s
birth. Also, Indian incursion into the Paxtang area in the
1750’s and 1760’s caused people to flee to safer territory for long
periods, during which they perhaps temporarily lost contact with
their Covenanter minister.

Peter lived in the area of
Paxtang (Paxton) Twp., Lancaster [later Dauphin] Co. at least
between the years 1755 and July 1778. (Peter’s
marriage in Paxtang recorded in Cuthbertson’s journal 1755; and
Paxtang Twp. tax list 1770 as seen in First & Second Series
Egle’s Notes and Queries, Vol. 1, XXVI, p. 179; and “Paxton”
tax list 1771 as seen in PA Archives, Series 3, Vol. SVII, p.
75; and “Paxton” tax list 1772 as seen in PA Archives,
Series 3, Vol. XVII, p. 317; and “Paxton” tax list 1773 as seen in
PA Archives, Series 3, Vol. XVII, p. 380; and Peter’ military
appeal in Paxtang 1777 as seen in Egle’s Notes and Queries,
Third Series, Vol. I, IX, p. 42; and Peter’s military appeal in
Paxtang 21 July 1778 as seen in Egle’s Notes and Queries,
Third Series, Vol. 1, XI, p. 61)
There was another Peter Patterson
living in Lancaster Co. at the same time as our Peter. This Peter
lived in Drumore Twp. On the 1771 Lancaster “14th
Eighteen-Penny Tax” list are seen: Peter Patterson of Dromore
[Drumore] Twp. as well as Peter Patterson of Paxton [Paxtang] Twp.
(our Peter). Because this 1771 tax list establishes that two
different Peter Pattersons were living in Lancaster Co., I then
cannot say with certainty that any Peter Patterson listed on certain
earlier records was “our” Peter. For example, a Peter
Patterson warranted 80 acres of land in Lancaster Co. on 18 Dec
1748. (PA Archives, Series 3, Vol. XXIV, p.
501) Also, a Peter Patterson is on a list of “Early Land
Applications for 1765 in Lancaster Co.” (transcription of
microfilm #0984245 by Catherine and Carl Paystrup posted on rootsweb
Aug 2001) Also, a Peter Patterson is listed on the 1757
Martic Twp., Lancaster Co. Provincial tax list (History of
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania by Ellis & Evans,
Chapter LXVI, p. 967) Are any of the Peters Pattersons of
these earlier records “our” Peter of Paxtang, or do any of these
records pertain to Peter of Drumore? I cannot
say.
In 1776, Peter enlisted in
Captain James Cowden’s Co. of Col. James Burd’s 4th Batt. of the PA
Militia, as did his brothers William and James. (PA
Archives, Series 5, Vol. VII, p. 337) This company was formed
from Paxtang area men*, and there is no record of any Patterson men,
other than “our” Peter and his brothers, living in Paxtang at this
time. Captain Cowden was himself a “Paxtang” man. A bio
in Commemorative Biographical Records of Washington County,
Pennnsylvania (on-line at http://maley.net/transcription) says: “He [Cowden] was one of
the leading spirits in the meeting at Middletown [in Paxtang Twp.],
June 9, 1774, of which Col. James Burd was chairman, and whose
action, in conjunction with those of Hanover [township, Lancaster
Co.], nerved the people of Lancaster in their patriotic resolves.
Suiting the action to the word, Mr. Cowden and the young men of
*I have examined the nearly 120 names of the men in
Capt. Cowden’s Co. and have found over half of them on tax rolls
(1770’s) in either Paxtang or Hanover townships
4
his neighborhood* took measures toward raising a
battalion of associators, of which Col. James Burd was in command,
and a company of which was intrusted [sic] to Captain Cowden. His
company, although not belonging to the Pennsylvania Line, was,
nevertheless, in several campaigns, and did faithful service at Fort
Washington, in the Jerseys, at Brandywine [11 Sept 1777], and
Germantown [4 Oct 1777], and in the war on the northern and western
frontiers, defending them from the attack of the savage Indian and
treacherous Tory.” Egle, in his Notes and Queries,
Vol. 1, XXXVII, p. 259, writes: “During the campaign of the
year 1776, they [Cowden’s Co.] were in active service—quite a number
were captured at Fort Washington**, and several lost their lives.
Many of the younger portion subsequently enlisted in the
Pennsylvania Line, remaining in the patriot army until its close.”
The length of Peter’s service in Captain Cowden’s company
has not been determined, but we know that by 11 Dec 1777 Peter was
back in Paxtang. On this date he appeared at Garber’s Mill,
Paxtang Twp., to appeal a tour of military duty. (Egles’
Notes and Queries, Third Series, Vol. I, IX, p.
42) Quoting from this record: “Personally app’d Peter
Patterson and complains he’s unfit to do his own business, but has
to hire a man 7/6 p. day to fatten his Cattle and has 2 sons already
in the service at Camp in the seventh class. He’s exempted
this Tour.” Also, on the same day, on 11 Dec 1777 Peter’s
brother William appeared: “Personally appeared Wm. Patterson and
complains of Inability of Body and says he is overage, tho’ he
cannot prove it. Thought capable of performing garrison duty.” I am
assuming that William did not lie to get out of his tour of duty;
therefore I believe William to be Peter’s older brother. (More of
this in William’s chapter.)
In 1778 Peter took an Oath of Allegiance
in Paxtang. His name appears of a “list of Person’s
Names who took the Oath of Allegiance before Joshua Elder, one of
the justices for Lancaster County, from the 28th of January, 1778 to
the 7th of January, 1779.” Peter’s name is found in the
section of the list said by Elder to have been “sworn and subscribed
since the first day of June, 1778.” (Egles’ Notes and
Queries, First & Second Series, Vol. 1, XXXII, p.
228) It is surprising that Peter signed his name on this
list. Covenanters were loathe to swear allegiance to any
person or entity other than their God. Another comment about
this list of people who signed the oath of allegiance: this list is
not alphabetized, so the
*One reason I believe that Florence Mercy Espy might
have assumed the existence of a Peter “Sr.” of Paxtang—father of
“our” Peter-- is that Peter and his brothers, William and James,
were definitely not “young men” when they enlisted in Captain
Cowden’s company. In 1776, Peter’s older brother, William, was
most probably over fifty years old; Peter was probably between the
ages of 46 and 51; and Peter’s brother James was about 49.
Researchers not aware of all the facts, seeing a Peter Patterson
listed on a tax list in the early 1770’s, might wrongly assume that
this Peter on the tax list was the father of the Peter who enlisted
in Cowden’s Co.
*A
Peter Patterson was captured by the British and imprisoned on the
prison ship “Jersey.” (List of prisoner compiled in 1888 from
papers of the British War Department by the “Society of Old
Brooklyites”) Other Pattersons listed as prisoners on the
“Jersey” were: Edward, Hance [sic], John, John, “W.,” and
William. It is of course possible that this Peter Patterson on
the “Jersey” was our Peter, but as the “Jersey” was first brought to
shore in April of 1778, and since by 21 July 1778 our Peter was back
in Paxtang where he appeared at a military appeal, it seems
unlikely. As to the identity of the William Patterson on this
list, in D.A.R. Lineage Book Vol. 73, p. 44, Mrs. Mary E. Patterson
Elliott (member #72120), a descendant of Peter’s brother William,
does claim that “our” Peter’s brother, William, who enlisted in 1776
in Capt. Cowden’s Co., was “afterwards on the prison ship ‘Jersey.’”
Mrs. Elliott was a great-grandaughter of Peter’s brother William,
and was still living in Fayette Co.,
PA at the time she applied for D.A.R. membership. She may have
been privy to familiy stories about her grandfather’s imprisonment
on the ‘Jersey’—or, she, too, may have read the 1888 list of
prisoners published by the “Society of Old Brooklynites” and then
simply decided that this William was her ancestor. Who
knows.
5
names surrounding Peter’s might well be those
of his neighbors and friends. The 4th name after Peter’s is
“Elijah Stewart.” Elijah was originally from Paxtang, and was
also in Capt. Cowden’s Co. Elijah Stewart married Peter’s sister,
Mary; and Elijah’s sister, Mary Stewart, married Peter’s brother
Robert. (More of this in Robert’s chapter and in Mary’s
chapter.)
Peter was still in Paxtang as of
21 July 1778. On this date Peter again appeared at
Garber’s Mill, Paxtang Twp., to appeal a tour of duty. (Egle’s
Notes and Queries, Third Series, Vol. 1, XI, p. 62)
Quoting the record: “Personally appeared Peter Patterson and says
he is ab’t to remove to Westmoreland [County, PA]
immediately [emphasis mine], and his sons are there
already. Is excus’d in case he removes in less than two months; if
not is liable to his Tour or Substitution.” Before leaving the
subject of Peter’s military service, it should be stated that
“our” Peter Patterson did not ever apply for a pension for
Revolutionary. The Peter Patterson who in 1834 in
Fayette Co. began the pension application process was NOT “our”
Peter; this was a Peter Patterson from New Jersey who had moved to
Fayette County sometime after “our” Peter had arrived there.*
Consistent with Peter’s intentions as
stated in the 21 July 1778 military appeal, Peter Patterson
was indeed in Westmoreland Co. , PA (part of which became Fayette
Co. in 1783) by 3 Aug 1779. A Deed from Annis &
Samuel Perry and Mary, his wife, of Westmoreland, to Charles Hurrah
of the same place, refers to a tract of land “lying in the forks of
Youghiogania and Monongahala rivers, bounded by the lands of William
Moore, Peter Patterson, Isaac Green, and ‘others’…”
(Recorded 20 Apr 1781, Westmoreland Co. Deed Book A, Part 1, p.
231)
In the autumn of 1779,
Rev. Cuthbertson made his one and only trip across the mountains, to
the area known as the “Forks of the Yough.” His journal entry for 7
Oct 1779 reads: “rode 14 miles, 6 to Sam Wilson’s; preached
51:1—preached Hebrews 13:14 and baptized Elizabeth to S. Wilson John
and Margaret to Sa. Scot, then rode 8 miles to Peter
Paterson’s, Red Sto. [emphasis
mine].”
*I believe that researchers (in particular, Florence
Espy), who were seeking facts about “our” Peter Patterson, confused
him with the Peter Patterson from NJ who applied for a pension 10
Sept 1834 in Fayette Co., PA. I received from the D.A.R.
library the entire contents of this other Peter’s pension
application file (#R8008). This other Peter had enlisted in Monmouth
Co., NJ and was age 80 in 1834, so was b. abt. 1754. At the time of
his application his deposition shows that he was living in the
“poorehouse” in Uniontown, Fayette Co. Fayette Co.
census records show that in 1800 “our” Peter was the only Peter
Patterson in Fayette Co., but that in 1810 another Peter Patterson
appears, in Union Twp. This other Peter is also in Union Twp. in
1820. This other Peter “disappears” in 1830, but perhaps this
is because by 1830 he was living in the poorhouse and wasn’t
“counted.” At any rate, I wonder if this other Peter died in 1840
and if previous researchers (Ms. Espy) grafted this other Peter’s
death date onto “our” Peter. The D.A.R. membership of Mrs.
Genevieve Morrison Smith (member #37550) is based on “our” Peter’s
service, as well as on the service of “our” Peter’s son-in-law,
George Espy. However, Mrs. Smith gives Peter’s birth
date as 1739 and death date as 1740, both of which are most
assuredly incorrect. (D.A.R. Lineage Book Vol. 38, p. 198) She
claims Peter lived “to a phenomenal age.” She also incorrectly
claims that George Espy’s wife, Mary Patterson, was the daughter of
Peter and _____ Montgomery. Where could Mrs. Smith have
gathered all this incorrect information? Turning the D.A.R.
Lineage Book Vol. 38 to the previous page, to the details of member
#37549, is enlightening. Member #37549 is Florence Mercy Espy
who, like Mrs. Smith, lived in Fort Madison, IA. Florence
Mercy Espy is the author of the piece in the D.A.R. magazine which
was transcribed in full at the beginning of this paper and which
seems to contains a myriad of errors (as does Mrs. Smith’s D.A.R.
lineage). What is very, very interesting (getting back to the
pension application of this other Peter, who had enlisted in New
Jersey) is the fact that included in this other Peter’s pension file
(the complete contents of which I have a copy) is a letter from
Florence Espy, written 4 Mar 1900, addressed to the Commissioner of
Pensions in Washington, D.C.: