Search billions of records on Ancestry.com
   

MADISON PARISH, LOUISIANA

LARGEST SLAVEHOLDERS FROM 1860 SLAVE CENSUS SCHEDULES

and

SURNAME MATCHES FOR AFRICAN AMERICANS ON 1870 CENSUS

Transcribed by Tom Blake, May 2001

PURPOSE. Published information giving names of slaveholders and numbers of slaves held in Madison Parish, Louisiana, in 1860, is either non-existent or not readily available. It is possible to locate a free person on the Madison Parish, Louisiana census for 1860 and not know whether that person was also listed as a slaveholder on the slave census, because published indexes almost always do not include the slave census.

Those who have found a free ancestor on the 1860 Madison Parish, Louisiana census can check this list to learn if their ancestor was one of the larger slaveholders in the Parish. If the ancestor is not on this list, the 1860 slave census microfilm can be viewed to find out whether the ancestor was a holder of a fewer number of slaves or not a slaveholder at all. Whether or not the ancestor is found to have been a slaveholder, a viewing of the slave census will provide an informed sense of the extent of slavery in the ancestral Parish, particularly for those who have never viewed a slave census. An ancestor not shown to hold slaves on the 1860 slave census could have held slaves on an earlier census, so those films can be checked also. In 1850, the slave census was also separate from the free census, but in earlier years it was a part of the free census.

African American descendants of persons who were enslaved in Madison Parish, Louisiana in 1860, if they have an idea of the surname of the slaveholder, can check this list for the surname. If the surname is found, they can then view the microfilm for the details listed regarding the sex, age and color of the slaves. If the surname is not on this list, the microfilm can be viewed to see if there were smaller slaveholders with that surname. To check a master surname list for other States and Counties, return to Home and Links Page.

The information on surname matches of 1870 African Americans and 1860 slaveholders is intended merely to provide data for consideration by those seeking to make connections between slaveholders and former slaves. Particularly in the case of these larger slaveholders, the data seems to show in general not many freed slaves in 1870 were using the surname of their 1860 slaveholder. However, the data should be checked for the particular surname to see the extent of the matching.

The last U.S. census slave schedules were enumerated by County in 1860 and included 393,975 named persons holding 3,950,546 unnamed slaves, or an average of about ten slaves per holder. The actual number of slaveholders may be slightly lower because some large holders held slaves in more than one County and they would have been counted as a separate slaveholder in each County. Excluding slaves, the 1860 U.S. population was 27,167,529, with about 1 in 70 being a slaveholder. It is estimated by this transcriber that in 1860, slaveholders of 200 or more slaves, while constituting less than 1 % of the total number of U.S. slaveholders, or 1 out of 7,000 free persons, held 20-30% of the total number of slaves in the U.S. The process of publication of slaveholder names beginning with larger slaveholders will enable naming of the holders of the most slaves with the least amount of transcription work.

SOURCES. The 1860 U.S. Census Slave Schedules for Madison Parish, Louisiana (NARA microfilm series M653, Roll 429) reportedly includes a total of 12,477 slaves, ranking it the sixth highest Parish total in Louisiana. This transcription includes 88 slaveholders who held 50 or more slaves in Madison Parish, accounting for 8,587 slaves, or 68 % of the Parish total. The rest of the slaves in the Parish were held by a total of 241 slaveholders, and those slaveholders have not been included here. Due to variable film quality, handwriting interpretation questions and inconsistent counting and page numbering methods used by the census enumerators, interested researchers should view the source film personally to verify or modify the information in this transcription for their own purposes. Census data for 1860 was obtained from the Historical United States Census Data Browser, which is a very detailed, searchable and highly recommended database that can found at http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/census/ . Census data on African Americans in the 1870 census was obtained using Heritage Quest's CD "African-Americans in the 1870 U.S. Federal Census", available through Heritage Quest at http://www.heritagequest.com/ . In comparing census data for different years, the transcriber was not aware of any relevant changes to Parish boundaries, though there may have been some reduction in the size of Madison Parish in 1861 (it is presumed any such change would have affected the comparison groups equally, but for more precise comparison the affect of any boundary change should be fully calculated.

FORMAT. This transcription lists the names of those largest slaveholders in the Parish, the number of slaves they held in the Parish and the first census page on which they were listed. Following the holder list is a separate list of the surnames of the holders with information on numbers of African Americans on the 1870 census who were enumerated with the same surname. The term "Parish" is used to describe the main subdivisions of the State by which the census was enumerated.

TERMINOLOGY. Though the census schedules speak in terms of "slave owners", the transcriber has chosen to use the term "slaveholder" rather than "slave owner", so that questions of justice and legality of claims of ownership need not be addressed in this transcription. Racially related terms such as African American, black, mulatto and colored are used as in the source or at the time of the source, with African American being used otherwise. The term "Parish" is used to describe the main subdivisions of the State by which the census was enumerated.

PLANTATION NAMES. Plantation names were not shown on the census. Using plantation names to locate ancestors can be difficult because the name of a plantation may have been changed through the years and because the sizeable number of large farms must have resulted in lots of duplication of plantation names. In Louisiana in 1860 there were 371 farms of 1,000 acres or more, the largest size category enumerated in the census, and another 1,161 farms of 500-999 acres. Linking names of plantations in this Parish with the names of the large holders on this list should not be a difficult research task, but it is beyond the scope of this transcription.

FORMER SLAVES. The 1860 U.S. Census was the last U.S. census showing slaves and slaveholders. Slaves were enumerated in 1860 without giving their names, only their sex and age and indication of any handicaps, such as deaf or blind Slaves 100 years of age or older were supposed to be named on the 1860 slave schedule, but there were only 1,570 slaves of such age enumerated, out of a total of 3,950,546 slaves, and the transcriber did not find any such information on the enumeration of the transcribed slaveholders. Freed slaves, if listed in the next census, in 1870, would have been reported with their full name, including surname. Some of these former slaves may have been using the surname of their 1860 slaveholder at the time of the 1870 census and they may have still been living in the same State or Parish. Before presuming an African American was a slave on the 1860 census, the free census for 1860 should be checked, as almost 11% of African Americans were enumerated as free in 1860, with about half of those living in the southern States. Estimates of the number of former slaves who used the surname of a former owner in 1870, vary widely and from region to region. If an African American ancestor with one of these surnames is found on the 1870 census, then making the link to finding that ancestor as a slave requires advanced research techniques involving all obtainable records of the holder.

MIGRATION OF FORMER SLAVES: According to U.S. Census data, the 1860 Madison Parish population included 1,640 whites, 16 "free colored" and 12,477 slaves. By the 1870 census, the white population had decreased 43% to 936, and the "colored" population had decreased 38% to 7,663. (As a side note, by 1960, 100 years later, the Parish was listed as having 5,767 whites, about three and a half times as many as in1860, while the 1960 total of 10,650 "Negroes"was about 15% less than what the colored population had been 100 years before.) As for all those freed slaves who did not stay in the Parish, where did they go? Orleans Parish saw an increase in colored population of almost double between 1860 and 1870, growing to over 50,000, so likely that is where many went. No other Louisiana Parish showed such a significant increase. Between 1860 and 1870, the Louisiana colored population only increased by 4%, about 13,000. States that saw more significant increases in colored population during that time, and were therefore more likely possible places of relocation for colored persons from Madison Parish, included the following: Georgia, up 80,000 (17%); Texas, up 70,000 (38%); Alabama, up 37,000 (8%); North Carolina, up 31,000 (8%); Florida, up 27,000 (41%); Ohio, up 26,000 (70%); Indiana, up 25,000 (127%); and Kansas up from 265 to 17,000 (6,400%).

SLAVEHOLDER LIST:

AMIS, Mrs. H. and 3 others, 85 slaves, page 55B

AMIS, Mrs. H., Fortune's Fork Plantation, 198 slaves, page 119

ANDERSON, Saml., 79 slaves, page 113

ARMORER, Edwd., 51 slaves, page 89

BALFOUR, Jno. W., 52 slaves, page 50

BALLARD, R. C. and another, 155 slaves, page 54

BARNES, Nicholson, 53 slaves, page 114

BARNEY, R. W., 60 slaves, page 68

BARR, Mrs. E. J. and 5 others, 50 slaves, page 87B

BASS & HARDING, 173 slaves, page 65

BEDFORD, Thos. C., 74 slaves, page 68B

BENNETT, E. R., Natchez, M. Crain manager, 110 slaves, page 109

BOWMAN, J. H. D., 81 slaves, page 86B

BOZMAN, Joseph and brother, 60 slaves, page 81B

BRIDGES, Elias, 70 slaves, page 79

BRISCOE, Thomas W., Mrs. E. W. and C. C., 59 slaves, page 117

BROWN & JOHNSTON, 132 slaves, page 114

BUCKNER, B. H., Oakley and Sparta Plantations, 222 slaves, page 56B

BYRNE, Danl., 89 slaves, page 59

CASE, Mrs. Margaret and 2 others, 74 slaves, page 73B

COMPTON, Thomas A., 75 slaves, page 121B

CULBERTSON, L. P., 113 slaves, page 111B

DANCY & DEMOSS, & Co., 5 in number, 150 slaves, page 118

DAWSON, Henry S., 65 slaves, page 110

DONNAN, Mrs. E. R. and 5 others, 54 slaves, page 79B

DUNBAR, Est. R., J. F. Perkins manager, 109 slaves, page 103C

EDRINGTON?, Wm. H., 95 slaves, page 63B

FARRAR, E. D. 84 slaves, page 99

FISK, S. W., Araby Plantation, W. W. Williams agt., and Aligator Place, 229 slaves, page 104B

FOSTER, James, Wm. Brown manager, 71 slaves, page 103B

GIBBS, Mrs. M. A. and 6 others, California Plantation and Hella? Place, 216 slaves, page 52

GIBBS, Mrs. M., 68 slaves, page 121B

GOODRUM, W. J. and another, 56 slaves, page 83B

GRIFFING, D. C., 50 slaves, page 78B

GROVES, Est. M. 2 heirs, 117 slaves, page 106

HAMILTON, C. D. and Jesse, 50 slaves, page 94B

HARROLD, Wm. E., 78 slaves, page 82

HAYWARD, Richard owner, Doc Richardson manager, 57 slaves, page 75B

HESTER, C. J., 72 slaves, page 92

HOLMES, Capt. T. C., Haynie manager, 108 slaves, page 110B

HUMPHREYS, G. W., 85 slaves, page 49 and 50

HUMPHREYS, Jno. C., 70 slaves, page 49B

HUNTER, M., 64 slaves, page 96

JAMES, Joshua, 134 slaves, page 72B

JONES, Allen, 129 slaves, page 115

KILGORE, Benjm. And another, 80 slaves, page 112B

LANE, E. M. owner, J. S. Bryant manager, 118 slaves, page 48B

LANE, E. M. owner, Jno. Bartlett manager, 95 slaves, page 48

LOWRY, A. J., 89 slaves, page 61B

LUM, John L., 100 slaves, page 117B

MAHER, Philip, 81 slaves, page 59B

MARSHALL, Lorne R., Cabin Teele Plantation and Manor Place, 271 slaves, page 57B and 103C

MASON, T. W., 206 slaves, page 51

MCALPIN, J. R., 63 slaves, page 80B

MONETTE, Est. J. W. 5 heirs, 106 slaves, page 123

MONTAGNE, R. V., 74 slaves, page 101B

MONTGOMERY, Thomas, 67 slaves, page 107

MOORE, C. H., 56 slaves, page 98

MORANCY, H. P., 164 slaves, page 99B

MORRIS, Est. E. W. 16 heirs, 67 slaves, page 113B

MYERS, R. C., 121 slaves, page 102

NEELY, John G., 78 slaves, page 77B

NOLAND, Avery, 50 slaves, page 74B

NOLAND, Joseph, 73 slaves, page 62B

NUTT , C. R., 67 slaves, page 62B

PARHAM, Wm. S., 81 slaves, page 61

PARKER, James P., Glen Marie Plantation, 111 slaves, page 50B

PARKER, James P. owner, Wm. Fuqua manager, 71 slaves, page 55

PERKINS, John, Via Mede, Backland and Homestead Plantations, 340 slaves, page 71B

PILCHER & GOODRICH, 90 slaves, page 91B

PUGH, Est J. J. 5 heirs, 52 slaves, page 101B

RIGGS, Mrs. Mary and 6 minors, 67 slaves, page 64B

SARGEANT, George, 82 slaves, page 69B

SHARKEY, R. R., 84 slaves, page 95

SHOEWATTERS, J. D., 60 slaves, page 81B

SMITH, E. W., 73 slaves, page 107B

STANBROUGH, Jesse, 113 slaves, page 124

SURGETTE, Frank, Natchez, J. C. Maupin manager, 164 slaves, page 108

TAYLOR, Dr. J. Theus?, 115 slaves, page 74

THISTLE, L. H., 108 slaves, page 104

WADDELL, G. C. and another, 78 slaves, page 88

WALL, Mrs. L. A. and 5 others, 83 slaves, page 83

WHITE, Zachariah, 60 slaves, page 67

WILEY & LUCAS, 116 slaves, page 120B

WILLIAMS, John B., 77 slaves, page 75B

WILSON, James H., Tenn., W. A. Evans manager, 70 slaves, page 122B

WITHERS & GRAVES, 54 slaves, page 96B

YOUNG, Alfred M., 80 slaves, page 66

SURNAME MATCHES AMONG AFRICAN AMERICANS ON 1870 CENSUS:

(exact surname spellings only are reported, no spelling variations or soundex)

(SURNAME, # in US, in State, in Parish, born in State, born and living in State, born in State and living in Parish)

AMIS, 63, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0

ANDERSON, 8173, 653, 18, 359, 296, 3

ARMORER, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0

BALFOUR, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0

BALLARD, 633, 26, 0, 12, 9, 0

BARNES, 2155, 88, 8, 47, 33, 4

BARNEY, 190, 22, 0, 13, 11, 0

BARR, 190, 16, 1, 5, 5, 0

BASS, 764, 38, 1, 23, 18, 1

BEDFORD, 186, 17, 2, 6, 2, 0

BENNETT, 1319, 63, 3, 39, 36, 0

BOWMAN, 926, 107, 6, 54, 46, 0

BOZMAN, 9, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0

BRIDGES, 396, 13, 0, 5, 3, 0

BRISCOE, 286, 19, 1, 8, 7, 0

BROWN, 27013, 2409, 58, 1414, 1211, 22

BUCKNER, 794, 57, 4, 24, 19, 0

BYRNE, 29, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0

CASE, 83, 3, 0, 3, 3, 0

COMPTON, 136, 6, 0, 12. 4. 0

CULBERTSON, 37, 5, 0, 4, 4, 0

DANCY, 135, 5, 1, 5, 2, 1

DAWSON, 1079, 75, 0, 53, 45, 0

DEMOSS, 38, 1, 0, 2, 1, 0

DONNAN, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0

DUNBAR, 291, 31, 0, 20, 14, 0

EDRINGTON?, 14, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1

FARRAR, 173, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0

FISK, 13, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0

FOSTER, 2611, 210, 6, 135, 112, 3

GIBBS, 1191, 56, 0, 38, 29, 0

GOODRICH, 116, 12, 0, 4, 4, 0

GOODRUM, 32, 2, 0, 4, 2, 0

GRAVES, 1232, 45, 1, 34, 21, 0

GRIFFING, 10, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0

GROVES, 173, 7, 0, 5, 3, 0

HAMILTON, 2446, 254, 6, 157, 127, 1

HARDING, 286, 22, 0, 16, 12, 0

HARROLD, 27, 2, 0, 2, 2, 0

HAYWARD, 117, 6, 0, 1, 1, 0

HESTER, 359, 19, 0, 9, 8, 0

HOLMES, 2804, 219, 15, 115, 98, 4

HUMPHREYS, 134, 18, 1, 7, 7, 0

HUNTER, 2838, 207, 4, 100, 85, 1

JAMES, 3993, 426, 7, 246, 223, 2

JOHNSTON, 2186, 133, 0, 101, 75, 0

JONES, 27193, 2228, 82, 1298, 1105, 23

KILGORE, 113, 6, 0, 2, 2, 0

LANE, 1402, 66, 6, 34, 23, 1

LOWRY, 222, 4, 0, 2, 1, 0

LUCAS, 997, 36, 2, 21, 12, 0

LUM, 19, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0

MAHER, 8, 4, 3, 1, 1, 0

MARSHALL, 1756, 136, 2, 75, 58, 1

MASON, 2858, 198, 16, 98, 85, 7

MCALPIN, 40, 2, 0, 1, 1, 0

MONETTE, 12, 10, 0, 9, 9, 0

MONTAGNE, 3, 2, 0, 2, 2, 0

MONTGOMERY, 1303, 111, 5, 68, 51, 2

MOORE, 8698, 579, 27, 330, 275, 5

MORANCY, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0

MORRIS, 3112, 302, 2, 184, 160, 0

MYERS, 1335, 85, 0, 45, 36, 0

NEELY, 274, 11, 1, 7, 6, 0

NOLAND, 98, 4, 0, 3, 3, 0

NUTT, 60, 2, 0, 1, 1, 0

PARHAM, 424, 9, 0, 4, 3, 0

PARKER, 4448, 389, 9, 199, 172, 3

PERKINS, 1897, 182, 6, 125, 99, 2

PILCHER, 10, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0

PUGH, 343, 28, 3, 15, 13, 1

RIGGS, 179, 16, 0, 10, 9, 0

SARGEANT, 12, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0

SHARKEY, 22, 6, 6, 1, 1, 1

SHOEWATTERS, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0

SMITH, 29087, 2573, 74, 1500, 1274, 21

STANBROUGH, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0

SURGETTE, 0, 0, 0,0,0, 0

TAYLOR, 11696, 996, 38, 538, 463, 12

THISTLE, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0

WADDELL, 138, 12, 1, 5, 5, 0

WALL, 535, 38, 3, 21, 18, 1

WHITE, 9567, 803, 22, 488, 419, 5

WILEY, 580, 47, 1, 21, 19, 0

WILLIAMS, 28865. 3171, 95, 1987, 1686, 30

WILSON, 10819, 1016, 33, 609, 518, 7

WITHERS, 281, 4, 0, 2, 1, 0

YOUNG, 6185, 485, 18, 264, 218, 0

Return to Home and Links Page

Madison Parish, LA GenWeb (Great resources)

You are the visitor to this page.