CHATHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA
LARGEST SLAVEHOLDERS FROM 1860 SLAVE CENSUS SCHEDULES
SURNAME MATCHES FOR AFRICAN AMERICANS ON 1870 CENSUS
Transcribed by Tom Blake, March 2001
PURPOSE. Published information giving names of slaveholders and numbers of slaves held in Chatham County, Georgia, in 1860, is either non-existent or not readily available. It is possible to locate a free person on the Chatham County, Georgia census for 1860 and not know whether that person was also listed as a slaveholder on the slave census, because published indexes almost always do not include the slave census.
Those who have found a free ancestor on the 1860 Chatham County, Georgia census can check this list to learn if their ancestor was one of the larger slaveholders in the County. If the ancestor is not on this list, the 1860 slave census microfilm can be viewed to find out whether the ancestor was a holder of a fewer number of slaves or not a slaveholder at all. Whether or not the ancestor is found to have been a slaveholder, a viewing of the slave census will provide an informed sense of the extent of slavery in the ancestral County, particularly for those who have never viewed a slave census. An ancestor not shown to hold slaves on the 1860 slave census could have held slaves on an earlier census, so those films can be checked also. In 1850, the slave census was also separate from the free census, but in earlier years it was a part of the free census.
African American descendants of persons who were enslaved in Chatham County, Georgia in 1860, if they have an idea of the surname of the slaveholder, can check this list for the surname. If the surname is found, they can then view the microfilm for the details listed regarding the sex, age and color of the slaves. If the surname is not on this list, the microfilm can be viewed to see if there were smaller slaveholders with that surname. To check a master surname list for other States and Counties, return to Home and Links Page.
The information on surname matches of 1870 African Americans and 1860 slaveholders is intended merely to provide data for consideration by those seeking to make connections between slaveholders and former slaves. Particularly in the case of these larger slaveholders, the data seems to show in general not many freed slaves in 1870 were using the surname of their 1860 slaveholder. However, the data should be checked for the particular surname to see the extent of the matching.
The last U.S. census slave schedules were enumerated by County in 1860 and included 393,975 named persons holding 3,950,546 unnamed slaves, or an average of about ten slaves per holder. The actual number of slaveholders may be slightly lower because some large holders held slaves in more than one County and they would have been counted as a separate slaveholder in each County. Excluding slaves, the 1860 U.S. population was 27,167,529, with about 1 in 70 being a slaveholder. It is estimated by this transcriber that in 1860, slaveholders of 200 or more slaves, while constituting less than 1 % of the total number of U.S. slaveholders, or 1 out of 7,000 free persons, held 20-30% of the total number of slaves in the U.S. The process of publication of slaveholder names beginning with larger slaveholders will enable naming of the holders of the most slaves with the least amount of transcription work.
SOURCES. The 1860 U.S. Census Slave Schedules for Chatham County, Georgia (NARA microfilm series M653, Roll 143) reportedly includes a total of 14,807 slaves, ranking it the highest County total in Georgia. This transcription includes 32 slaveholders who held 80 or more slaves in Chatham County, and also a few who held slightly less, accounting for 5,248 slaves, or 35% of the County total. The rest of the slaves in the County were held by a total of 1,173 slaveholders, and those slaveholders have not been included here. Due to variable film quality, handwriting interpretation questions and inconsistent counting and page numbering methods used by the census enumerators, interested researchers should view the source film personally to verify or modify the information in this transcription for their own purposes. Census data for 1860 was obtained from the Historical United States Census Data Browser, which is a very detailed, searchable and highly recommended database that can found at http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/census/ . Census data on African Americans in the 1870 census was obtained using Heritage Quest's CD "African-Americans in the 1870 U.S. Federal Census", available through Heritage Quest at http://www.heritagequest.com/ .
FORMAT. This transcription lists the names of those largest slaveholders in the County, the number of slaves they held in the District where the slaves were enumerated and the first census page of that District on which they were listed. The page numbers used are the rubber stamped numbers in the upper right corner of every set of two pages, with the previous stamped number and a "B" being used to designate the pages without a stamped number. Holder James Potter is listed with two pages because his total was placed in two separate locations, the enumerator explaining, "continued from another schedule it being impossible for me to hold all of his Negroes. Following the holder list is a separate list of the surnames of the holders and their "agents" (overseers?) with information on numbers of African Americans on the 1870 census who were enumerated with the same surname. The term "County" is used to describe the main subdivisions of the State by which the census was enumerated.
TERMINOLOGY. Though the census schedules speak in terms of "slave owners", the transcriber has chosen to use the term "slaveholder" rather than "slave owner", so that questions of justice and legality of claims of ownership need not be addressed in this transcription. Racially related terms such as African American, black, mulatto and colored are used as in the source or at the time of the source, with African American being used otherwise.
PLANTATION NAMES. Plantation names were not shown on the census. Using plantation names to locate ancestors can be difficult because the name of a plantation may have been changed through the years and because the sizeable number of large farms must have resulted in lots of duplication of plantation names. In Georgia in 1860 there were 482 farms of 1,000 acres or more, the largest size category enumerated in the census, and another 1,359 farms of 500-999 acres. Linking names of plantations in this County with the names of the large holders on this list should not be a difficult research task, but it is beyond the scope of this transcription.
FORMER SLAVES. The 1860 U.S. Census was the last U.S. census showing slaves and slaveholders. Slaves were enumerated in 1860 without giving their names, only their sex and age and indication of any handicaps, such as deaf or blind Slaves 100 years of age or older were supposed to be named on the 1860 slave schedule, but there were only 1,570 slaves of such age enumerated, out of a total of 3,950,546 slaves, and the transcriber did not find any such information on the enumeration of the transcribed slaveholders. Freed slaves, if listed in the next census, in 1870, would have been reported with their full name, including surname. Some of these former slaves may have been using the surname of their 1860 slaveholder at the time of the 1870 census and they may have still been living in the same State or County. Before presuming an African American was a slave on the 1860 census, the free census for 1860 should be checked, as almost 11% of African Americans were enumerated as free in 1860, with about half of those living in the southern States. Estimates of the number of former slaves who used the surname of a former owner in 1870, vary widely and from region to region. If an African American ancestor with one of these surnames is found on the 1870 census, then making the link to finding that ancestor as a slave requires advanced research techniques involving all obtainable records of the holder.
MIGRATION OF FORMER SLAVES: According to U.S. Census data, the 1860 Chatham County population included 15,511 whites, 725 "free colored" and 14,807 slaves. By the 1870 census, the white population had increased 8% to 16,760, while the "colored" population increased almost 58% to 24,515. (As a side note, by 1960, 100 years later, the County was listed as having 124,116 whites, as eight fold increase, but the 1960 total of 63,930 "Negroes"was only about four times what the colored population had been 100 years before.) Chatham County saw an increase in colored population of almost two thirds between 1860 and 1870, so obviously many freed slaves stayed there. Other Georgia Counties showing significant increases include Fulton, Houston and Richmond. Between 1860 and 1870, the Georgia colored population increased by 80,000, to 545,000, a 17% increase. Where did freed Georgia slaves go if they did not stay in Georgia? States that saw significant increases in colored population during that time, and were therefore more likely possible places of relocation for colored persons from Chatham County, included the following: Texas, up 70,000 (38%); Alabama, up 37,000 (8%); North Carolina, up 31,000 (8%); Florida, up 27,000 (41%); Ohio, up 26,000 (70%); Indiana, up 25,000 (127%); and Kansas up from 265 to 17,000 (6,400%).
ANDERSON, Geo. W., Robt. TUTTLE? Agent, 130 slaves, Ogeecha 7th, page 431B
ANDERSON, John W., Simon ZITROWER agent, 93 slaves, Ogeecha 7th, page 434
BARCLEY, Ann, 90 slaves, Cherokee Hill 8th, page 424
CHENEY, F. W., 103 slaves, No district, page 405B
CHIVERS & HUGER, Edward SELLERS agent, 149 slaves, Ogeecha 7th, page 430
CHIVERS?, Dr. J. R., John G. MORREL agent, 234 slaves, Ogeecha 7th, page 427
ELLIOTT, R. E., John D. FOX agent, 205 slaves, Ogeecha 7th, page 431
GIBBONS, William H., 320 slaves, Cherokee Hill 8th, page 410
HABERSHAM, L.? E., Wm. C.? HAMMERSTEIN? Agent, 160 slaves, Ogeecha 7th, page 437
HABERSHAM,, Robt., 213 slaves, White Bluffs 6th, page 443
HARPER, Perry, 97 slaves, Bloom Town Valley, page 397
HARRISON, George P., 102 slaves, Cherokee Hill 8th, page 416
HAYWOOD, A., Wyley W. WILLIAMS agent, 372 slaves, Ogeecha 7th, page 438
HOLIDAY, Andrew, 97 slaves, Ogeecha 7th, page 439
HOUSTON, Jno. W., 148 slaves, Ogeecha 7th, page 429
JONES, Augustus L., 97 slaves, Savannah 4th, page 499B
JONES, W. H. & Co., 112 slaves, No district, page 393
KING, Hon. M., A. J. SWEAT agent, 200 slaves, Cherokee Hill 8th, page 420
MANIGAULT, Chas., Wm. C. CALAIS? agent, 116 slaves, Cherokee Hill 8th, page 413
MCALFRIN, A. & Bro., 121 slaves, Cherokee Hill 8th, page 416B
MCDOWELL & CALIHAN, Railroad Contractors, 100 slaves, Cherokee Hill 8th, page 423
MCDUFFY, Archibald, 291 slaves, White Bluffs 6th, page 447
MCLEOD, Robt., Edwrad BAUGUIN? Agent, 160 slaves, Ogeecha 7th, page 437
MILLER, W. H., James L.ILLER agent, 87 slaves, Cherokee Hill 8th, page 417
POTTER, James, Ex for Estate of J. F. Potter, 440 slaves, Cherokee Hill 8th, page 418 and continued on page 424B
SCRIVEN, Est. of James B., 157 slaves, Savannah 4th, page 494B
SCRIVEN, George B., 200 slaves, Savannah 4th, page 493B
SCRIVEN, Thomas P., 148 slaves, Savannah 4th, page 492B
SINGLETON & DRAIN, Messrs., George W. LANGSTON agent, 107 slaves, Cherokee Hill 8th, page 414B
TUCKER, John F., 220 slaves, Cherokee Hill 8th, page 422
WARING, J. F., 82 slaves, White Bluffs 6th, page 441
WINKLER, Zachriah N., 97 slaves, Cherokee Hill 8th, page 412
SURNAME MATCHES AMONG AFRICAN AMERICANS ON 1870 CENSUS:
(exact surname spellings only are reported, no spelling variations or soundex)
(SURNAME, # in US, in State, in County, born in State, born and living in State, born in State and living in County)
ANDERSON, 8173, 722, 72, 807, 591, 63
BARCLEY, 10, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0
BAUGUIN, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
CALAIS, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
CALIHAN, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
CHENEY, 86, 56, 0, 48, 47, 0
CHIVERS?, 34, 18, 0, 20, 14, 0
DRAIN, 41, 4, 0, 5, 4, 0
ELLIOTT, 807, 48, 5, 43, 38, 3
FOX, 820, 42, 4, 44, 34, 4
GIBBONS, 164, 27, 15, 27, 21, 12
HABERSHAM, 60, 50, 28, 47, 46, 28
HAMMERSTEIN?, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
HARPER, 1363, 234, 5, 281, 206, 4
HARRISON, 3639, 275, 11, 330, 208, 8
HAYWOOD, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
HOLIDAY, 88, 9, 0, 9, 8, 0
HOLMES, 2804, 327, 40, 309, 246, 35
HOUSTON, 976, 200, 177, 98
HUGER, 37, 5, 3, 2, 2, 0
JONES, 27193, 2842, 206, 3155, 2331, 184
KING, 4979, 623, 42, 662, 509, 36
LANGSTON, 152, 152, 2, 28, 26, 2
MANIGAULT, 123, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
MCALFRIN, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
MCDOWELL, 415, 40, 5, 49, 36, 5
MCDUFFY, 38, 4, 0, 4, 2, 0
MCLEOD, 260, 62, 0, 59, 55, 0
MILLER, 6577, 557, 76, 602, 446, 66
MORREL, 49, 21, 11, 2, 2, 1
POTTER, 425, 229, 14, 28, 23, 4
SCRIVEN, 60, 26, 13, 23, 21, 11
SELLERS, 225, 21, 2, 26, 16, 2
SINGLETON, 1321, 143, 29, 118, 105, 17
SWEAT, 67, 6, 1, 10, 8, 1
TUCKER, 2023, 164, 1, 187, 129, 1
TUTTLE?, 55, 1, 0, 3, 1, 0
WARING, 90, 8, 6, 6, 5, 3
WILLIAMS, 28865, 3136, 396, 3439, 2520, 348
WINKLER, 15, 3, 2, 3, 3, 2
ZITROWER, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
You are the visitor to this page.
Census Records | Vital Records | Family Trees & Communities | Immigration Records | Military Records Directories & Member Lists | Family & Local Histories | Newspapers & Periodicals | Court, Land & Probate | Finding Aids